-
1.
Comparison of early clinical outcomes between dual antiplatelet therapy and triple antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
Park, J, Jung, JH, Choi, EK, Lee, SW, Kwon, S, Lee, SR, Kang, J, Han, KD, Park, KW, Oh, S, et al
PloS one. 2022;(2):e0264538
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Most Asian patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) receive only dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) without oral anticoagulants (vitamin K antagonists [VKA] or non-VKA oral anticoagulants [NOAC]). However, it has not been fully investigated whether the DAPT results in better clinical outcomes in the early period after PCI than the standard triple therapy with VKA or NOAC. METHODS We analyzed the claims records of 11,039 Korean AF population who had PCI between 2013 and 2018. Patients were categorized according to the post-PCI antithrombotic therapy as VKA-based triple therapy (VKA-TT), NOAC-based triple therapy (NOAC-TT), and DAPT groups. After baseline adjustment using inverse probability weighting, we compared the risks of ischemic endpoints (ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, and all-cause mortality) and major bleeding at 3 months post-PCI. RESULTS Ischemic stroke, MI, and all-cause mortality occurred in 105, 423, and 379 patients, respectively, and 138 patients experienced major bleeding. The DAPT group was associated with a lower risk of ischemic stroke and major bleeding (hazard ratio [HR] 0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37-0.84) compared to the VKA-TT group, despite no significant differences in the risks of MI and all-cause mortality. In contrast, the DAPT group demonstrated no significant difference in the risks for ischemic endpoints compared to the NOAC-TT group. Additionally, the DAPT group had a numerically lower risk of major bleeding than the NOAC-TT group but this was not statistically significant (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.45-1.07). CONCLUSIONS An outcome benefit of DAPT was observed in the early period after PCI compared to the VKA-TT, but not against NOAC-TT users among the Asian AF population. Given the potential long-term benefits of NOACs, greater efforts should be made to increase compliance in clinical practice with proper combination therapy with NOAC after PCI.
-
2.
Aspirin versus anticoagulation in cervical artery dissection (TREAT-CAD): an open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial.
Engelter, ST, Traenka, C, Gensicke, H, Schaedelin, SA, Luft, AR, Simonetti, BG, Fischer, U, Michel, P, Sirimarco, G, Kägi, G, et al
The Lancet. Neurology. 2021;(5):341-350
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cervical artery dissection is a major cause of stroke in young people (aged <50 years). Historically, clinicians have preferred using oral anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists for patients with cervical artery dissection, although some current guidelines-based on available evidence from mostly observational studies-suggest using aspirin. If proven to be non-inferior to vitamin K antagonists, aspirin might be preferable, due to its ease of use and lower cost. We aimed to test the non-inferiority of aspirin to vitamin K antagonists in patients with cervical artery dissection. METHODS We did a multicentre, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial in ten stroke centres across Switzerland, Germany, and Denmark. We randomly assigned (1:1) patients aged older than 18 years who had symptomatic, MRI-verified, cervical artery dissection within 2 weeks before enrolment, to receive either aspirin 300 mg once daily or a vitamin K antagonist (phenprocoumon, acenocoumarol, or warfarin; target international normalised ratio [INR] 2·0-3·0) for 90 days. Randomisation was computer-generated using an interactive web response system, with stratification according to participating site. Independent imaging core laboratory adjudicators were masked to treatment allocation, but investigators, patients, and clinical event adjudicators were aware of treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was a composite of clinical outcomes (stroke, major haemorrhage, or death) and MRI outcomes (new ischaemic or haemorrhagic brain lesions) in the per-protocol population, assessed at 14 days (clinical and MRI outcomes) and 90 days (clinical outcomes only) after commencing treatment. Non-inferiority of aspirin would be shown if the upper limit of the two-sided 95% CI of the absolute risk difference between groups was less than 12% (non-inferiority margin). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02046460. FINDINGS Between Sept 11, 2013, and Dec 21, 2018, we enrolled 194 patients; 100 (52%) were assigned to the aspirin group and 94 (48%) were assigned to the vitamin K antagonist group. The per-protocol population included 173 patients; 91 (53%) in the aspirin group and 82 (47%) in the vitamin K antagonist group. The primary endpoint occurred in 21 (23%) of 91 patients in the aspirin group and in 12 (15%) of 82 patients in the vitamin K antagonist group (absolute difference 8% [95% CI -4 to 21], non-inferiority p=0·55). Thus, non-inferiority of aspirin was not shown. Seven patients (8%) in the aspirin group and none in the vitamin K antagonist group had ischaemic strokes. One patient (1%) in the vitamin K antagonist group and none in the aspirin group had major extracranial haemorrhage. There were no deaths. Subclinical MRI outcomes were recorded in 14 patients (15%) in the aspirin group and in 11 patients (13%) in the vitamin K antagonist group. There were 19 adverse events in the aspirin group, and 26 in the vitamin K antagonist group. INTERPRETATION Our findings did not show that aspirin was non-inferior to vitamin K antagonists in the treatment of cervical artery dissection. FUNDING Swiss National Science Foundation, Swiss Heart Foundation, Stroke Funds Basel, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Academic Society Basel.
-
3.
Comparison of Ticagrelor Versus Clopidogrel on Cerebrovascular Microembolic Events and Platelet Inhibition during Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.
Vavuranakis, MA, Kalantzis, C, Voudris, V, Kosmas, E, Kalogeras, K, Katsianos, E, Oikonomou, E, Siasos, G, Aznaouridis, K, Toutouzas, K, et al
The American journal of cardiology. 2021;:78-85
Abstract
The impact of the antiplatelet regimen and the extent of associated platelet inhibition on cerebrovascular microembolic events during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are unknown. Our aim was to evaluate the effects of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel and of platelet inhibition on the number of cerebrovascular microembolic events in patients undergoing TAVI. Patients scheduled for TAVI were randomized previous to the procedure to either aspirin and ticagrelor or to aspirin and clopidogrel. Platelet inhibition was expressed in P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) and percentage of inhibition. High intensity transient signals (HITS) were assessed with transcranial Doppler (TCD). Safety outcomes were recorded according to the VARC-2 definitions. Among 90 patients randomized, 6 had an inadequate TCD signal. The total number of procedural HITS was lower in the ticagrelor group (416.5 [324.8, 484.2]) (42 patients) than in the clopidogrel group (723.5 [471.5, 875.0]) (42 patients), p <0.001. After adjusting for the duration of the procedure, diabetes, extra-cardiac arteriopathy, BMI, hypertension, aortic valve calcium content, procedural ACT, and pre-implantation balloon valvuloplasty, patients on ticagrelor had on average 256.8 (95% CI: [-335.7, -176.5]) fewer total procedural HITS than patients on clopidogrel. Platelet inhibition was greater with ticagrelor 26 [10, 74.5] PRU than with clopidogrel 207.5 (120 to 236.2) PRU, p <0.001, and correlated significantly with procedural HITS (r = 0.5, p <0.05). In conclusion, ticagrelor resulted in fewer procedural HITS, compared with clopidogrel, in patients undergoing TAVI, while achieving greater platelet inhibition.
-
4.
De-Escalation of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes.
Shoji, S, Kuno, T, Fujisaki, T, Takagi, H, Briasoulis, A, Deharo, P, Cuisset, T, Latib, A, Kohsaka, S
Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2021;(8):763-777
Abstract
BACKGROUND Balancing the effects of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in the era of potent P2Y12 inhibitors has become a cornerstone of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) management. Recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have investigated DAPT de-escalation to decrease the risk of bleeding outcomes. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety outcomes of various DAPT strategies in patients with ACS, including de-escalation from a potent P2Y12 inhibitor to clopidogrel or low-dose prasugrel. METHODS MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched through January 2021 for RCTs investigating the efficacy and safety of DAPT in patients with ACS, and a network meta-analysis was conducted. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke. The primary bleeding outcome was trial-defined major or minor bleeding. RESULTS Our search identified 15 eligible RCTs, including 55,798 patients with ACS. De-escalation therapy was associated with reduced risk of primary bleeding outcomes (HR: 0.48 [95% CI: 0.30-0.77] vs clopidogrel; HR: 0.32 [95% CI: 0.20-0.52] vs ticagrelor; HR: 0.36 [95% CI: 0.24-0.55] vs standard-dose prasugrel; and HR: 0.40 [95% CI: 0.22-0.75] vs low-dose prasugrel) without negatively affecting primary efficacy outcomes. There were no significant differences in ischemic or bleeding outcomes between de-escalation to clopidogrel or low-dose prasugrel. CONCLUSIONS Compared with other established uses of DAPT, de-escalation was the most effective strategy for ACS treatment, resulting in fewer bleeding events without increasing ischemic events.
-
5.
Comparison of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Medical Therapy in Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients With 3-Vessel Disease.
Jia, S, Zhang, C, Jiang, L, Xu, L, Tian, J, Zhao, X, Feng, X, Wang, D, Zhang, Y, Sun, K, et al
Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society. 2020;(10):1718-1727
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study is to compare the long-term prognosis of non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) patients with 3-vessel disease (3VD) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or medical therapy (MT).Methods and Results:Overall, 3,928 NSTE-ACS patients with 3VD were consecutively enrolled from April 2004 to February 2011 at Fu Wai Hospital. Patients were followed up for a median of 7.5 years, and were divided into PCI, CABG or MT groups according to their treatment. Compared with patients undergoing PCI, CABG patients had lower rates of myocardial infarction (MI), unplanned revascularization, major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and a higher rate of stroke (all P<0.05). Compared with MT, PCI and CABG had lower incidences of all adverse outcomes (all P<0.05), except for a similar rate of stroke between PCI and MT. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed similar results. After adjusting for confounders, CABG was independently associated with a lower risk of cardiac death, revascularization and MACCE compared with PCI (all P<0.05). Compared with MT, PCI reduced long-term risk of death, whereas CABG reduced long-term risk of death, revascularization and MACCE events (all P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS In NSTE-ACS patients with 3VD, CABG is independently associated with a lower risk of long-term cardiac death, revascularization and MACCE compared with PCI. Patients who received MT alone had the highest risk of long-term MACCE.
-
6.
One-year clinical outcomes of patients with versus without acute coronary syndrome with 3-month duration of dual antiplatelet therapy after everolimus-eluting stent implantation.
Natsuaki, M, Morimoto, T, Yamamoto, E, Watanabe, H, Furukawa, Y, Abe, M, Nakao, K, Ishikawa, T, Kawai, K, Yunoki, K, et al
PloS one. 2020;(3):e0227612
Abstract
There has been no previous prospective study evaluating 3-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stent (CoCr-EES) implantation in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The STOPDAPT trial is a prospective multi-center single-arm study evaluating 3-month DAPT duration in all-comer population after CoCr-EES implantation. Among 1525 study patients enrolled from 58 Japanese centers, the present study compared the 1-year clinical outcomes between ACS patients (N = 487) and stable coronary artery disease (CAD) patients (N = 1038). In the ACS group, 228 patients (47%) had unstable angina and 259 patients (53%) had myocardial infarction. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, definite stent thrombosis (ST) and TIMI major/minor bleeding. Thienopyridine was discontinued within 4-month in 455 patients (94.0%) in the ACS group and 977 patients (94.3%) in the stable CAD group. Cumulative 1-year incidence of and the adjusted risk for the primary endpoint were not significantly different between the ACS and stable CAD groups (2.3% vs. 3.0%, P = 0.42, and HR 0.94, 95%CI 0.44-1.87, P = 0.87). In the 3-month landmark analysis, cumulative incidence of the primary endpoint was also not significantly different between the ACS and stable CAD groups (1.3% vs. 2.4%, P = 0.16). There was no definite/probable ST through 1-year in both groups. In the propensity matched analysis, the cumulative 1-year incidence of the primary endpoint were similar between the ACS and stable CAD groups (2.3% versus 2.1%, P = 0.82). In conclusion, stopping DAPT at 3 months after CoCr-EES implantation in patients with ACS including 47% of unstable angina was as safe as that in patients with stable CAD.
-
7.
Platelet Apoptotic Response May Be Associated With the Capacity of Aspirin to Inhibit Platelets.
Zamorano-León, JJ, Gascón, M, Martínez, CH, Freixer, G, Guerra, R, Zekri-Nechar, K, Bernardo, E, Serna-Soto, M, Segura, A, Giner, M, et al
Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology. 2020;(5):584-591
Abstract
An inadequate platelet response to aspirin (ASA) has been identified in some patients under chronic ASA treatment. The aim of this study was to analyze if ASA-sensitive and ASA-resistant platelets have differences in their apoptotic capability. Clinically stable ischemic coronary patients who had been taking ASA (100 mg/d) for at least 9 months before inclusion were divided into ASA-resistant (n = 11) and ASA-sensitive (n = 13) groups as defined by the PFA-100 test. Platelets from ASA-sensitive patients showed higher expression of the proapoptotic proteins Bak and Bax than those from ASA-resistant patients, although only Bak protein remained different when the results were adjusted by age. In resting platelets, neither caspase-3 activity nor cytosolic cytochrome C levels were different between both experimental groups. Stimulation of platelets with calcium ionophore (10 nmol/L, A23187) increased caspase-3 activity (1.91-fold higher; P < 0.05) and cytosolic cytochrome C levels (1.84-fold higher; P < 0.05) to a higher degree in ASA-sensitive than in ASA-resistant platelets. In conclusion, ASA-sensitive platelets seem to be better prepared to undergo apoptosis during robust platelet activation.
-
8.
Effects of six types of aspirin combination medications for treatment of acute cerebral infarction in China: A network meta-analysis.
Jin, L, Zhou, J, Shi, W, Xu, L, Sheng, J, Fan, J, Yuan, Y, Yuan, H
Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics. 2019;(1):91-101
Abstract
WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE Previous studies have shown that various aspirin combinations might be beneficial for the treatment of acute cerebral infarction (ACI). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of six aspirin combinations in the treatment of ACI using network meta-analysis (NMA). The performance of these combinations is then ranked according to results of this analysis. METHODS Multiple databases were consulted to find randomized controlled trials (RCT) of six different aspirin combinations for the treatment of ACI. NMA was conducted on the data using stata (13.0) software. The odds ratio (OR) was calculated. The studies included in this paper were divided into a control group (aspirin alone) and an observation group (one of six aspirin combinations). RESULTS A total of 103 eligible RCTs were identified. A total of 13 317 cases were included in the study, and the results showed that the six types of aspirin combinations (aspirin with atorvastatin, ozagrel sodium, low molecular weight heparin [LMWH], clopidogrel, cilostazol and ginkgo damo) were all significantly superior (P < 0.05) to aspirin alone. The combination of aspirin with LMWH had the highest probability of being the most clinically efficacious intervention, with a surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) curve of 79.1. The combination of aspirin with ozagrel sodium was the worst, with a SUCRA value of 29.7. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION A combination of aspirin with LMWH is the best option among the six aspirin combinations considered for the treatment of ACI. The combination of aspirin with ozagrel sodium was ranked the last.
-
9.
Oral Anticoagulants With Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Versus Clopidogrel in Patients After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis.
Palla, M, Briasoulis, A, Kondur, A
American journal of therapeutics. 2019;(1):e143-e150
Abstract
BACKGROUND In patients on oral anticoagulation (OAC), dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is often indicated after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). AREAS OF UNCERTAINTY We sought to investigate the effects of triple antithrombotic therapy (TT) versus dual therapy (DT) with OAC and clopidogrel on all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, major bleeding, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and stent thrombosis. DATA SOURCES We systematically searched on MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL for randomized controlled or cohort studies, which investigated the comparative effects of TT versus DT. We performed a meta-analysis of 6 studies (1 randomized control study and 5 cohort studies). RESULTS The included studies enrolled 7259 patients; 4630 (63.8%) were on TT and 2629 (36.2%) were on DT. The average follow-up time was 1.4 years. No significant differences were found between TT and DT in all-cause mortality (P = 0.70; I = 64%), stent thrombosis (P = 0.41), myocardial infarction (P = 0.43; I = 0%), stroke (P = 0.36; I = 0%), and major bleeding (P = 0.43; I = 0%). CONCLUSIONS In patients who are on OAC with vitamin K antagonist and underwent percutaneous coronary intervention, no significant differences were found in mortality, ischemic, and hemorrhagic complications between the patients treated with TT and DT. Thus, tailored treatment based on individual thromboembolic and bleeding risk might be the most reasonable approach in these patients.
-
10.
The Incidence of Myocardial Injury after Loading Doses of Clopidogrel versus Prasugrel in the Candidates for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Rahmani, R, Jiriaee, L, Jiriaee, Z, Shafiee, A, Zand Parsa, AF
Critical pathways in cardiology. 2018;(2):69-72
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Prevention of myocardial injury is an essential issue in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We compared the incidence of myocardial injury after loading doses of clopidogrel versus prasugrel in the candidates for PCI. METHODS In this randomized-controlled clinical trial, we enrolled 88 stable angina patients, candidate for PCI. Patients received either prasugrel (60 mg orally) (n = 42) or clopidogrel (600 mg orally) (n = 46). Serum levels of creatine phosphokinase muscle-brain type, cardiac troponin I, and high sensitive C-reactive protein were measured at baseline and 6 and 12 hours postprocedural. Primary endpoint was periprocedural myocardial infarction (MI), defined as elevation of cTn values (>5 times) in patients with normal baseline values or a rise of cTn values >20% if the baseline values are elevated. RESULTS Based on the levels of cTnI 6 hours after PCI, 1 patient (2.4%) had MI in the prasugrel group, whereas 4 patients (8.7%) had MI in the clopidogrel group. After 12 hours, 4 patients (9.5%) had MI in the prasugrel group versus 5 patients (10.9%) in the clopidogrel arm. There was no significant difference between the groups regarding the changes in cardiac specific enzyme levels. However, serum levels of cTnI were significantly lower in patients with myocardial injury in the prasugrel arm (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Prasugrel is an effective antiplatelet drug in preventing periprocedural MI.