1.
Growth-arrest-specific 6 (GAS6) protein in ARDS patients: determination of plasma levels and influence of PEEP setting.
Diehl, JL, Coolen, N, Faisy, C, Osman, D, Prat, G, Sebbane, M, Nieszkowska, A, Gervais, C, Richard, JC, Richecoeur, J, et al
Respiratory care. 2013;(11):1886-91
Abstract
BACKGROUND Growth-arrest-specific protein 6 (GAS6) is a vitamin K-dependent protein expressed by endothelial cells and leukocytes participating in cell survival, migration and proliferation and involved in many pathological situations. The aim of our study was to assess its implication in ARDS and its variation according to PEEP setting, considering that different cyclic stresses could alter GAS6 plasma levels. METHODS Our subjects were enrolled in the ExPress study comparing a minimal alveolar distention (low-PEEP) ventilatory strategy to a maximal alveolar recruitment (high-PEEP) strategy in ARDS. Plasma GAS6, interleukin-8 (IL-8), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels were measured at day 0 and day 3 by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in blood samples prospectively collected during the study for a subset of 52 subjects included in 8 centers during year 2005. RESULTS We found that GAS6 plasma level was elevated in the whole population at day 0: median 106 ng/mL IQR 77-139 ng/mL, with significant correlations with IL-8, the Simplified Acute Physiology Score II and the Organ Dysfunction and Infection scores. Statistically significant decreases in GAS6 and IL-8 plasma levels were observed between day 0 and day 3 in the high-PEEP group (P = .02); while there were no differences between day 0 and day 3 in the low-PEEP group. CONCLUSIONS GAS6 plasma level is elevated in ARDS patients. The high-PEEP strategy is associated with a decrease in GAS6 and IL-8 plasma levels at day 3, without significant differences in day 28 mortality between the 2 groups. (Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00188058).
2.
Acute effects of tidal volume strategy on hemodynamics, fluid balance, and sedation in acute lung injury.
Cheng, IW, Eisner, MD, Thompson, BT, Ware, LB, Matthay, MA, ,
Critical care medicine. 2005;(1):63-70; discussion 239-40
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the effects of mechanical ventilation with a tidal volume of 6 mL/kg compared with 12 mL/kg predicted body weight on hemodynamics, vasopressor use, fluid balance, diuretics, sedation, and neuromuscular blockade within 48 hrs in patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome. DESIGN Retrospective analysis of a previously conducted randomized, clinical trial. SETTING Two adult intensive care units at a tertiary university medical center and a large county hospital. PATIENTS One hundred eleven patients who were enrolled in the National Institutes of Health ARDS Network trial at the University of California, San Francisco. INTERVENTIONS None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Compared with 12 mL/kg predicted body weight, treatment with a tidal volume of 6 mL/kg predicted body weight had no adverse effects on hemodynamics. There were also no differences in the need for supportive therapies, including vasopressors, intravenous fluids, or diuretics. In addition, there were no differences in body weight, urine output, and fluid balance. Finally, there was no difference in the need for sedation or neuromuscular blockade between the two tidal volume protocols. CONCLUSIONS When compared with ventilation with 12 mL/kg predicted body weight, patients treated with the lung-protective 6 mL/kg predicted body weight tidal volume protocol had no difference in their supportive care requirements. Therefore, concerns regarding potential adverse effects of this protocol should not preclude its use in patients with acute lung injury or the acute respiratory distress syndrome.
3.
A randomized controlled trial of sodium bicarbonate in neonatal resuscitation-effect on immediate outcome.
Lokesh, L, Kumar, P, Murki, S, Narang, A
Resuscitation. 2004;(2):219-23
Abstract
UNLABELLED Very little evidence is available that supports or disproves the use of medications in neonatal resuscitation. In this randomized controlled trial, we evaluated the effect of sodium bicarbonate given during neonatal resuscitation, on survival and neurological outcome at discharge. SUBJECTS AND METHODS Consecutively born asphyxiated neonates continuing to need positive pressure ventilation at 5min of life received either sodium bicarbonate or 5% dextrose. The study group was given intravenous sodium bicarbonate solution 4ml/kg (1.8meq./kg) over 3-5min. This solution was prepared by diluting 7.5% sodium bicarbonate (0.9meq./ml) with distilled water in a 1:1 ratio. The placebo group received 4ml/kg of undiluted 5% dextrose at a similar rate. The surviving neonates were evaluated for their neurological status at discharge. Primary outcome variable: Death or abnormal neurological examination at discharge. Secondary outcome variables: Encephalopathy, multi-organ dysfunction, intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH) and arterial pH at 6h. RESULTS Twenty-seven babies were randomized to receive sodium bicarbonate (bicarb group) and 28 to receive 5% dextrose. Eighteen of the 27 (66.7%) babies in the bicarb group and 19 of the 28 babies (68%) in the dextrose group survived to discharge ( P=0.84 ). Twenty-eight percent of the survivors in the bicarb group and 32% of the survivors in the dextrose group were neurologically abnormal at discharge ( P=0.10 ). The composite primary outcome of death or abnormal neurological examination at discharge was similar in both groups (52% versus 54%, P=0.88 ). The incidence of encephalopathy (74% versus 63%), cerebral oedema (52% versus 30%), need for inotropic support (44% versus 29%), intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH) and the mean arterial pH at 6hrs were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION Administration of sodium bicarbonate during neonatal resuscitation did not help to improve survival or immediate neurological outcome.