-
1.
A prospective randomized trial of a potassium competitive acid blocker vs proton pump inhibitors on the effect of ulcer healing after endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric neoplasia.
Komori, H, Ueyama, H, Nagahara, A, Akazawa, Y, Takeda, T, Matsumoto, K, Matsumoto, K, Asaoka, D, Hojo, M, Yao, T, et al
The Journal of international medical research. 2019;(4):1441-1452
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Vonoprazan is a new a potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB) that was recently developed in Japan. However, vonoprazan's efficacy in healing gastric ulcers after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of P-CABs and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in healing post-ESD ulcers. MATERIALS AND METHODS This prospective randomized controlled trial (UMIN000017386) enrolled 40 patients with gastric neoplasia, who underwent ESD at our hospital from April 2015 to January 2016. Before ESD, patients were randomly divided into the following two groups: group V, vonoprazan 20 mg/day; or group R, rabeprazole 10 mg/day. Medications were taken 1 day before to 4 weeks after ESD. The ESD-induced artificial ulcer size was measured just after ESD and 4 weeks after ESD to calculate the reduction rate as follows: (ulcer area 4 weeks after ESD)/(ulcer area just after ESD) × 100. RESULTS Eighteen patients in group V and 15 patients in group R were analyzed. The mean reduction rate was significantly different in groups V and R (93.3% vs 96.6%, respectively). Post-ESD bleeding was observed in two patients in group R and drug-induced hepatic injury in one patient in group R. CONCLUSION Rabeprazole facilitated the healing process post-ESD.
-
2.
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Effects of Vonoprazan Plus Rebamipide and Esomeprazole Plus Rebamipide on Gastric Ulcer Healing Induced by Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection.
Ichida, T, Ueyama, S, Eto, T, Kusano, F, Sakai, Y
Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan). 2019;(2):159-166
Abstract
Objective Gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is currently a standard procedure, and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are most commonly used to treat post-ESD ulcers. Vonoprazan, a potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB), reportedly inhibits gastric acid secretions more effectively than PPIs. Combination therapy of a PPI plus rebamipide is effective for treating larger ulcers. Our goal was to evaluate the effects of vonoprazan plus rebamipide compared to esomeprazole plus rebamipide for the treatment of post-ESD ulcers. Methods First, vonoprazan plus rebamipide (V group) or esomeprazole plus rebamipide (E group) was orally administered to subjects for eight weeks. We then evaluated the ulcer healing process at four and eight weeks after the procedure using a gastric ulcer stage system and by measuring the ulcer size. Patients A total of 84 patients who underwent ESD for gastric neoplasms between September 2015 and December 2017 in Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital were included in this randomized controlled trial. Results The ulcer scar rates at week 4 in the V group (n=43) and E groups (n=39) were 20.9% and 15.4%, while those at week 8 were 90.7% and 92.3%, respectively. The ulcer reduction rates at week 4 in the V and E groups were 94.6% and 93.8%, and those at week 8 were 99.7% and 99.3%, respectively. The ulcer scar rates and reduction rates were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion Combination therapy consisting of vonoprazan plus rebamipide was not superior to that of esomeprazole plus rebamipide for post-ESD ulcer healing (UMIN000019516).
-
3.
Vonoprazan, a Novel Potassium-Competitive Acid Blocker, Should Be Used for the Helicobacter pylori Eradication Therapy as First Choice: A Large Sample Study of Vonoprazan in Real World Compared with Our Randomized Control Trial Using Second-Generation Proton Pump Inhibitors for Helicobacter pylori Eradication Therapy.
Ozaki, H, Harada, S, Takeuchi, T, Kawaguchi, S, Takahashi, Y, Kojima, Y, Ota, K, Hongo, Y, Ashida, K, Sakaguchi, M, et al
Digestion. 2018;(3):212-218
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Phase III study demonstrated that vonoprazan-based Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy achieved higher eradication rate compared with lansoprazole. However, there is no study that evaluated the efficacy of vonoprazan in a large sample in real world. We investigated the eradication rate and safety of vonoprazan-based eradication therapy compared with our randomized control trial using second-generation proton pump inhibitor (PPIs). METHODS (First study) A total of 147 patients who have H. pylori infection were randomly assigned to receive either, esomeprazole (EPZ) group and rabeprazole (RPZ) group. (Second study) 1,688 patients who have H. pylori infection underwent primary eradication with triple therapy involving vonoprazan. In both studies, triple therapy with amoxicillin, clarithromycin, and PPI or vonoprazan was performed, and eradication effect was assessed by an urea breath test. RESULTS (First study) Eradication rate was 77.5% in the EPZ group and 68.4% in the RPZ group; no significant difference was observed between the 2 groups. (Second study) The successful primary eradication rate was 90.8%. There was no severe adverse effect. CONCLUSIONS The eradication rate of vonoprazan-based triple therapy was remarkably higher compared with second-generation PPIs-based triple therapy in real world. Vonoprazan is very likely to become the first option for future eradication therapy.
-
4.
Comparison of the Effects of Vonoprazan and Lansoprazole for Treating Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection-Induced Artificial Ulcers.
Hirai, A, Takeuchi, T, Takahashi, Y, Kawaguchi, S, Ota, K, Harada, S, Kojima, Y, Tominaga, K, Tokioka, S, Higuchi, K
Digestive diseases and sciences. 2018;(4):974-981
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vonoprazan exhibits a more potent, rapid, and longer-lasting inhibitory effect on gastric acid secretion than proton pump inhibitors; however, whether it is more effective than PPI for treating endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)-induced artificial ulcers remains controversial. AIM: This study aimed to assess and compare the effects of vonoprazan and lansoprazole for treating ESD-induced artificial ulcers. METHODS This prospective, randomized controlled trial enrolled 149 patients who underwent ESD for the treatment of early gastric neoplasms from April 2015 to May 2017. They were randomly treated with either 20 mg/day vonoprazan (V group) or 30 mg/day lansoprazole (L group) orally. The primary end points were the area and shrinkage ratio of the ulcers at 4 and 8 weeks post-ESD. RESULTS Data from 127 patients were analyzed, which showed that the 4- and 8-week healing ratios were not significantly different between the V and L groups (4 weeks, 16.3 vs. 25.8%; 8 weeks, 86.9 vs. 90.9%, respectively). Similarly, the shrinkage ratio, categorized as less than 90%, 90% or more but less than 100%, or 100% at 4 weeks and as less than 100% or 100% at 8 weeks were not statistically different between the V and L groups (4 weeks: 12, 41, 8 vs. 13, 41, 12, p = 0.7246; 8 weeks: 9, 52 vs. 9, 57, p = 0.8568). Delayed bleeding was also not significantly different between both the groups (5.4 vs. 5.3%; p = 0.9844). CONCLUSIONS Vonoprazan is as effective as lansoprazole in treating ESD-induced ulcers.
-
5.
Vonoprazan-Based Regimen Is More Useful than PPI-Based One as a First-Line Helicobacter pylori Eradication: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Maruyama, M, Tanaka, N, Kubota, D, Miyajima, M, Kimura, T, Tokutake, K, Imai, R, Fujisawa, T, Mori, H, Matsuda, Y, et al
Canadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology. 2017;:4385161
Abstract
Background. A new agent, potassium-competitive acid blocker vonoprazan (VPZ) has potent acid-inhibitory effects and may offer advantages over conventional H. pylori eradication therapies. We aimed to compare the eradication rate between VPZ-based treatment and PPI-based one. Methods. This randomized controlled trial was designed to assign 141 patients with H. pylori-positive gastritis to VPZ group (VPZ 20 mg, amoxicillin 750 mg, and clarithromycin 200 or 400 mg twice daily for 7 days) or PPI group (rabeprazole 20 mg or lansoprazole 30 mg, amoxicillin 750 mg, and clarithromycin 200 or 400 mg twice daily for 7 days). Primary endpoints were eradication rates and adverse events. Results. Seventy of 72 patients in VPZ group and 63 of 69 patients in PPI group completed the treatment after 7 days. The eradication rate was significantly higher in VPZ group than PPI group by intention-to-treat analysis (95.8% versus 69.6%, P = 0.00003, 95% confidence interval [CI] 88.3-99.1% versus 57.3-80.1%) and per-protocol analysis (95.7% versus 71.4%, P = 0.0002, 95% CI 88.0-99.1% versus 58.7-82.1%). The incidence of adverse events was not different between the groups (26.3% in VPZ group versus 37.7% in PPI group, P = 0.15). Conclusion. VPZ-based regimen is more useful than that PPI-based regimen as a first-line H. pylori eradication therapy.
-
6.
Randomised clinical trial: vonoprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, vs. lansoprazole for the healing of erosive oesophagitis.
Ashida, K, Sakurai, Y, Hori, T, Kudou, K, Nishimura, A, Hiramatsu, N, Umegaki, E, Iwakiri, K
Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics. 2016;(2):240-51
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vonoprazan is a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker which may provide clinical benefit in acid-related disorders. AIM: To verify the non-inferiority of vonoprazan vs. lansoprazole in patients with erosive oesophagitis (EE), and to establish its long-term safety and efficacy as maintenance therapy. METHODS In this multicentre, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group comparison study, patients with endoscopically confirmed EE (LA Classification Grades A-D) were randomly allocated to receive vonoprazan 20 mg or lansoprazole 30 mg once daily after breakfast. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with healed EE confirmed by endoscopy up to week 8. In addition, subjects who achieved healed EE in the comparison study were re-randomised into a long-term study to investigate the safety and efficacy of vonoprazan 10 or 20 mg as maintenance therapy for 52 weeks. RESULTS Of the 409 eligible subjects randomised, 401 completed the comparison study, and 305 entered the long-term maintenance study. The proportion of patients with healed EE up to week 8 was 99.0% for vonoprazan (203/205) and 95.5% for lansoprazole (190/199), thus verifying the non-inferiority of vonoprazan (P < 0.0001). Vonoprazan was also effective in patients with more severe EE (LA Classification Grades C/D) and CYP2C19 extensive metabolisers. In the long-term maintenance study, there were few recurrences (<10%) of EE in patients treated with vonoprazan 10 or 20 mg. Overall, vonoprazan was well-tolerated. CONCLUSIONS The non-inferiority of vonoprazan to lansoprazole in EE was verified in the comparison study, and vonoprazan was well-tolerated and effective during the long-term maintenance study.
-
7.
Calcifediol improves lipid profile in osteopenicatorvastatin-treated postmenopausal women.
Catalano, A, Morabito, N, Basile, G, Cucinotta, D, Lasco, A
European journal of clinical investigation. 2015;(2):144-9
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low vitamin D serum levels have been associated with unfavourable lipid profile and poorer response to atorvastatin. Aims of this study were to test the effects of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (calcifediol) compared to parental vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) supplementation on modifications of plasma 25(OH)D levels and lipid profile. MATERIALS AND METHODS Fifty-seven postmenopausal women (aged 59.03 ± 6.73 years) who were at low risk of fracture and with basal plasma 25(OH)D < 30 ng/mL were included if they were on atorvastatin treatment prescribed as appropriate. Recruited women were randomized to receive oral calcifediol or cholecalciferol, both at a dose of 140 μg according to a weekly regimen. RESULTS At baseline, 25(OH)D was negatively associated with BMI (r = -0.37; P = 0.004), total cholesterol (r = -0.31; P = 0.01) and LDL-C (r = -0.32; P = 0.02). After 24 weeks, 25(OH)D increased significantly in both groups (P < 0.001), although higher levels were obtained with calcifediol as compared with cholecalciferol (P < 0.001). Only in the calcifediol group, a significant reduction of LDL-C (P = 0.01) and an increase of HDL-C (P = 0.02) were obtained, even after adjustment for age, and baseline BMI, 25(OH)D and lipid levels (P < 0.05). The percentage changes in 25(OH)D levels were associated with the variations of LDL-C (r = -0.44; P = 0.01) and HDL-C levels (r = 0.30; P = 0.10). CONCLUSION Calcifediol administration in osteopenic and dyslipidemic postmenopausal women with low 25(OH)D improves lipid profile when added to an ongoing atorvastatin treatment.
-
8.
Differences between rosuvastatin and atorvastatin in lipid-lowering action and effect on glucose metabolism in Japanese hypercholesterolemic patients with concurrent diabetes. Lipid-lowering with highly potent statins in hyperlipidemia with type 2 diabetes patients (LISTEN) study –.
Ogawa, H, Matsui, K, Saito, Y, Sugiyama, S, Jinnouchi, H, Sugawara, M, Masuda, I, Mori, H, Waki, M, Yoshiyama, M, et al
Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society. 2014;(10):2512-5
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about the differences between standard-dose statins effects on glucose level and lipids in Japanese patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). METHODS AND RESULTS The 1,049 patients were randomly assigned to either the rosuvastatin group or atorvastatin group. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in the effect on non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) and HbA1c at 12 months. However, physicians tended to switch to more intensive therapy for DM in the atorvastatin group. CONCLUSIONS Rosuvastatin 5 mg and atorvastatin 10 mg have a similar lowering effect on non-HDL-C, but might be different in terms of adverse effect on glucose levels.
-
9.
Randomized phase III trial of temsirolimus versus sorafenib as second-line therapy after sunitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
Hutson, TE, Escudier, B, Esteban, E, Bjarnason, GA, Lim, HY, Pittman, KB, Senico, P, Niethammer, A, Lu, DR, Hariharan, S, et al
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2014;(8):760-7
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
PURPOSE This international phase III trial (Investigating Torisel As Second-Line Therapy [INTORSECT]) compared the efficacy of temsirolimus (mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor) and sorafenib (vascular endothelial growth factor receptor [VEGFR] tyrosine kinase inhibitor) as second-line therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) after disease progression on sunitinib. PATIENTS AND METHODS In total, 512 patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive intravenous temsirolimus 25 mg once weekly (n = 259) or oral sorafenib 400 mg twice per day (n = 253), with stratification according to duration of prior sunitinib therapy (≤ or > 180 days), prognostic risk, histology (clear cell or non-clear cell), and nephrectomy status. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) by independent review committee assessment. Safety, objective response rate (ORR), and overall survival (OS) were secondary end points. RESULTS Primary analysis revealed no significant difference between treatment arms for PFS (stratified hazard ratio [HR], 0.87; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.07; two-sided P = .19) or ORR. Median PFS in the temsirolimus and sorafenib arms were 4.3 and 3.9 months, respectively. There was a significant OS difference in favor of sorafenib (stratified HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.63; two-sided P = .01). Median OS in the temsirolimus and sorafenib arms was 12.3 and 16.6 months, respectively. Safety profiles of both agents were consistent with previous studies. CONCLUSION In patients with mRCC and progression on sunitinib, second-line temsirolimus did not demonstrate a PFS advantage compared with sorafenib. The longer OS observed with sorafenib suggests sequenced VEGFR inhibition may benefit patients with mRCC.
-
10.
Comparison of the efficacy of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin in preventing contrast induced nephropathy in patient with chronic kidney disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
Liu, Y, Liu, YH, Tan, N, Chen, JY, Zhou, YL, Li, LW, Duan, CY, Chen, PY, Luo, JF, Li, HL, et al
PloS one. 2014;(10):e111124
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We prospectively compared the preventive effects of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin on contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS We enrolled 1078 consecutive patients with CKD undergoing elective PCI. Patients in Group 1 (n = 273) received rosuvastatin (10 mg), and those in group 2 (n = 805) received atorvastatin (20 mg). The primary end-point was the development of CIN, defined as an absolute increase in serum creatinine ≥0.5 mg/dL, or an increase ≥25% from baseline within 48-72 h after contrast medium exposure. RESULTS CIN was observed in 58 (5.4%) patients. The incidence of CIN was similar in patients pretreated with either rosuvastatin or atorvastatin (5.9% vs. 5.2%, p = 0.684). The same results were also observed when using other definitions of CIN. Clinical and procedural characteristics did not show significant differences between the two groups (p>0.05). Additionally, there were no significant inter-group differences with respect to in-hospital mortality rates (0.4% vs. 1.5%, p = 0.141), or other in-hospital complications. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that rosuvastatin and atorvastatin demonstrated similar efficacies for preventing CIN, after adjusting for potential confounding risk factors (odds ratio = 1.17, 95% confidence interval, 0.62-2.20, p = 0.623). A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that patients taking either rosuvastatin or atorvastatin had similar incidences of all-cause mortality (9.4% vs. 7.1%, respectively; p = 0.290) and major adverse cardiovascular events (29.32% vs. 23.14%, respectively; p = 0.135) during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Rosuvastatin and atorvastatin have similar efficacies for preventing CIN in patients with CKD undergoing PCI.