-
1.
Accelerated Versus Standard Corneal Cross-Linking for Progressive Keratoconus: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Kobashi, H, Tsubota, K
Cornea. 2020;(2):172-180
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the clinical results of accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking (ACXL) to standard corneal collagen cross-linking (SCXL) in progressive keratoconus by summarizing randomized controlled trials using a meta-analysis. METHODS Trials meeting the selection criteria were quality appraised, and data were extracted by 2 independent authors. A comprehensive search was performed using the Cochrane methodology to evaluate the clinical outcomes of ACXL and SCXL for treating progressive keratoconus. Estimates were evaluated by weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for absolute changes of the outcomes during 12-month observation periods. Postoperative demarcation line depth was also compared. RESULTS We identified 6 randomized controlled trials that met the eligibility criteria for this meta-analysis. SCXL resulted in a significantly better outcome in postoperative changes in best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (WMD = -0.02; 95% CI, -0.03 to -0.01; P < 0.0001); however, the small differences may not be clinically significant. ACXL provided a significantly better improvement of cylindrical refraction after the 1-year follow-up (WMD = 0.15; 95% CI, 0.05-0.26; P = 0.005). Demarcation line depth at 1 month after SCXL was deeper than that after ACXL (WMD = -102.25; 95% CI, -157.16 to -47.35; P = 0.0003). No differences in the changes in maximum keratometry, central corneal thickness, uncorrected visual acuity, spherical equivalent refraction, corneal biomechanical properties, and corneal endothelial cell density were found among both groups. CONCLUSIONS An ACXL shows a comparable efficacy and safety profile at the 1-year follow-up, but it has less impact on improving best spectacle-corrected visual acuity when compared with the Dresden protocol. Overall, both methods similarly stop the disease progression.
-
2.
Standard and accelerated corneal cross-linking long-term results: A randomized clinical trial.
Hashemi, H, Mohebbi, M, Asgari, S
European journal of ophthalmology. 2020;(4):650-657
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare long-term results between accelerated and standard corneal cross-linking protocols in the treatment of progressive keratoconus and compare their effectiveness between central (cone in the central 3 mm) and peripheral (cone beyond 3 mm) cases. METHODS In this randomized clinical trial, we compared 31 eyes treated with accelerated corneal cross-linking (18 mW/cm2, 5 min) and 31 eyes treated with standard corneal cross-linking (3 mW/cm2, 30 min), 16 central and 11 peripheral keratoconus in each group. In this report, 4-year changes in vision, refraction, topography, corneal biomechanics, and corneal cell count were evaluated. RESULTS Uncorrected distance visual acuity improvement was better with standard corneal cross-linking (0.19 ± 0.30 logMAR) than accelerated corneal cross-linking (0.08 ± 0.35 logMAR), but the intergroup difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.283). Cylinder and spherical equivalent significantly increased similarly in both groups. Among topographic indices, anterior Kmax-3 mm showed more reduction in standard corneal cross-linking than accelerated corneal cross-linking (1.35 ± 1.39 vs 0.36 ± 1.10 D, p = 0.011). Anterior Kmax-8 mm reduced by 1.50 ± 1.82 and 0.37 ± 1.58 D in the standard corneal cross-linking and accelerated corneal cross-linking groups, respectively (p = 0.029). Compared to 18-month results, none of the indices at 4 years showed any significant intergroup difference (all p > 0.05). In cases with peripheral keratoconus, changes in anterior Kmax-3 mm (+0.03 ± 0.66 vs -1.17 ± 1.15 D, p = 0.012) and anterior Kmax-8 mm (+0.43 ± 1.09 vs -1.57 ± 1.40 D, p = 0.003) were greater with standard corneal cross-linking. In central cases, no significant intergroup difference was observed. CONCLUSION At 4 years after the procedure, standard corneal cross-linking offered better anterior corneal flattening in the center and periphery. These differences concerned cases of peripheral keratoconus, and the two protocols were similarly effective in central cases. Beyond the 18th month, the two protocols appeared to be similarly effective.
-
3.
Noninvasive real-time assessment of riboflavin consumption in standard and accelerated corneal crosslinking.
Lombardo, M, Lombardo, G
Journal of cataract and refractive surgery. 2019;(1):80-86
Abstract
PURPOSE To estimate the noninvasive riboflavin concentration in the corneal stroma using a new ultraviolet-A (UVA) theranostic device for corneal crosslinking (CXL). SETTING Vision Engineering Italy srl, Rome, Italy. DESIGN Experimental study. METHODS Fourteen human donor corneas were treated according to conventional (UVA irradiance of 3 mW/cm2 for 30 minutes) and rapid (10 mW/cm2 for 9 minutes) riboflavin-UVA CXL protocols using a theranostic UVA device. Five additional samples were treated by 0.5 mW/cm2 for 9 minutes and used as positive controls to determine riboflavin photodegradation under near ambient lighting conditions. A 20% dextran-enriched 0.1% riboflavin solution was used in all cases. The device consisted of a UVA light source; a red-green-blue camera, which acquires the fluorescence images of the cornea during treatment; and a single-board computer for managing the overall operations and the raw data processing. RESULTS Preirradiation stromal soaking for 30 minutes achieved highly consistent intrastromal riboflavin concentration in all tissues (mean 0.015% ± 0.003% [SD]). There were no differences in the kinetics curves of riboflavin consumption between the 2 UVA irradiation protocols; the intrastromal riboflavin concentration decreased exponentially, with a mean constant energy rate of 2.8 ± 0.2 J/cm2. In the control group, the intrastromal riboflavin concentration decreased quasilinearly. CONCLUSIONS The theranostic device provided estimates of the intrastromal concentration of riboflavin noninvasively during treatment. In the 3 to 10 mW/cm2 range of power densities, the consumption of riboflavin in the stroma by UVA irradiation was only energy dependent in accordance with the Bunsen-Roscoe law.
-
4.
Prospective Randomized Trial of Corneal Cross-linking Riboflavin Dosing Frequencies for Treatment of Keratoconus and Corneal Ectasia.
Price, MO, Fairchild, K, Feng, MT, Price, FW
Ophthalmology. 2018;(4):505-511
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate whether the riboflavin dosing frequency affects corneal cross-linking efficacy or safety, given that isotonic riboflavin solution is viscous and each installation coats the corneal surface with a film that absorbs some of the incident ultraviolet A light. DESIGN Prospective, randomized, single-center equivalence trial. PARTICIPANTS Patients with progressive keratoconus or ectasia after refractive surgery (n = 510). METHODS One eye per patient was prospectively randomized to 2-minute or 5-minute riboflavin dosing intervals with standard corneal cross-linking (epithelial removal and 30-minute irradiation with 3 mW/cm2 ultraviolet A light). Block randomization resulted in comparable representation of keratoconus and ectasia after refractive surgery in the 2 treatment arms. Treatment equivalence was assessed using the 2 one-sided test. Fellow eyes (n = 207) were treated with 5-minute dosing and considered in the safety analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary hypothesis was equivalent change in the topography-derived maximum keratometry value from baseline to 6 months with 2-minute vs. 5-minute dosing. A ±0.75-diopter margin of equivalence for the treatment difference between dosing regimens was considered clinically relevant. Adverse events and changes from baseline to 6 months in corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), uncorrected distance visual acuity, and minimum corneal thickness were assessed. RESULTS The mean reduction in maximum keratometry from baseline was equivalent with 2-minute and 5-minute riboflavin dosing intervals at 6 months (0.97 and 0.76 diopters, respectively; 90% confidence interval for treatment difference, -0.23 to 0.66; per-protocol population). With both dosing intervals, the mean improvement in CDVA was 0.07 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution or 3.5 letters at 6 months. Of the 635 study and fellow eyes examined at 6 months, 134 (21%) gained and 32 (5%) lost 2 or more lines of CDVA. Three eyes (0.4%) developed sterile infiltrates, 1 (0.1%) had delayed epithelial healing with dendrites, and 3 (0.4%) had recurrent epithelial defects. Three eyes (0.4%) were re-treated. CONCLUSIONS The 2 riboflavin dosing regimens produced equivalent reduction in the maximum keratometry value, with a favorable safety profile.
-
5.
Low light visual function after accelerated corneal Cross-Linking Protocols: 18 mW/cm2 vs. 9 mW/cm2.
Asgari, S, Hashemi, H, Jafarzadehpur, E, Mohamadi, A, Mehravaran, S, Fotouhi, A
Romanian journal of ophthalmology. 2018;(4):270-276
Abstract
Objective. To compare one-year results of vision, corneal aberrometry and contrast sensitivity (CS) in low light conditions between 5- and 10-minute accelerated cross-linking (CXL) protocols. Methods. Thirty eyes were evaluated in each studied group. Uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuity by the SC-2000 Snellen chart, corneal higher order aberrations using the OPD Scan III and CS using MonCv3System was tested under mesopic (20 lux) and scotopic (0.5 lux) light conditions at pre-CXL and 6 and 12 months post-CXL. Results. At 12 months, a mean improvement of 0.06±0.22 (22.2%) and 0.02±0.25 logMAR (7.9%) in mesopic UDVA and 0.01±0.13 (14.3%) and 0.07±0.13 logMAR (87.9%) in mesopic CDVA was observed in the 5- and 10-minute groups, respectively. Mean decline in scotopic UDVA was 0.01±0.16 (1.0%) and 0.03±0.17 logMAR (11.9%) and mean improvement in scotopic CDVA was 0.03±0.10 (35.5%) and 0.02±0.07 logMAR (22.2%), respectively. Inter-group differences in the decrease of corneal aberrations were not statistically significant. Among CS variables, only inter-group changes in corrected CS 0.5 to 2.2 was significantly different (all P<0.050). The linear regression analysis showed that these differences were related to baseline values not CXL protocols; corrected CS 0.5 (Pgroup=0.261 and Pbaseline value<0.001), CS 1.1 (Pgroup=0.250 and Pbaseline value<0.001), and CS 2.2 (Pgroup=0.101 and Pbaseline value=0.054). Conclusions. Changing the intensity of UV in cross-linking from 18mW/ cm2 to 9mW/ cm2 does not affect the visual function under low-light conditions.
-
6.
Accelerated versus conventional corneal collagen cross-linking in patients with keratoconus: an intrapatient comparative study.
Sadoughi, MM, Einollahi, B, Baradaran-Rafii, A, Roshandel, D, Hasani, H, Nazeri, M
International ophthalmology. 2018;(1):67-74
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the outcomes of the conventional and accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) in patients with bilateral progressive keratoconus (KC). METHODS Fifteen consecutive patients with bilateral progressive KC were enrolled. In each patient, the fellow eyes were randomly assigned to the conventional CXL (3 mW/cm2 for 30 min) or accelerated CXL (ACXL) (9 mW/cm2 for 10 min) groups. Manifest refraction; uncorrected and corrected distant visual acuity; maximum and mean keratometry; corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor; endothelial cell density and morphology; central corneal thickness; and wavefront aberrations were measured before and 12 months after the CXL. RESULTS Manifest refraction spherical equivalent and refractive cylinder improved significantly only in conventional group. Uncorrected and corrected distant visual acuity did not change significantly in either group. Also there was no significant change in the maximum and mean keratometry after 12 months. There was significant decrease in central corneal thickness in both groups which was more prominent in conventional group. Endothelial cell density reduced only in the conventional group which was not statistically significant (P = 0.147). CH, CRF, and wavefront aberrations did not change significantly in either group. We did not observe any significant difference in the changes of the variables between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS Accelerated CXL with 9 mW/cm2 irradiation for 10 min had similar refractive, visual, keratometric, and aberrometric results and less adverse effects on the corneal thickness and endothelial cells as compared with the conventional method after 12 months follow-up. However, randomized clinical trials with longer follow-ups and larger sample sizes are needed.
-
7.
Epithelium-off versus transepithelial corneal collagen crosslinking for progressive corneal ectasia: a randomised and controlled trial.
Rush, SW, Rush, RB
The British journal of ophthalmology. 2017;(4):503-508
Abstract
AIM: To compare the outcomes of corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) for the treatment of progressive corneal ectasia using a standard epithelium-off technique versus a transepithelial technique with enhanced riboflavin solution. METHODS One hundred and forty-four eyes with progressive corneal ectasia were prospectively randomised into a transepithelial CXL study arm or an epithelium-off CXL control arm. Follow-up examinations were set at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. The primary outcome measure was change in the maximum simulated keratometry value (Ksteep) after 24 months of follow-up. The secondary outcome measure was change in the best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) after 24 months follow-up. RESULTS One hundred and thirty-one eyes completed the 24-month follow-up interval. Change in Ksteep was -1.52±0.66 dioptres (D) for the control group versus -0.54±0.58 D for the study group at 24 months of follow-up (p=0.0320). Change in BSCVA was -0.18±0.09 logMAR for the control group versus -0.14±0.08 logMAR for the study group at 24 months of follow-up (p=0.4978). Two eyes in the control group had minor postoperative complications that did not affect the final visual acuity, and one eye in the control group underwent keratoplasty during the study interval. CONCLUSIONS At 24 months of follow-up, subjects in the epithelium-off CXL group demonstrated a greater improvement in Ksteep compared with subjects in the transepithelial CXL group, but no statistically significant difference in BSCVA was found between groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT01708538; pre-results.
-
8.
Transepithelial Versus Epithelium-Off Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking for Progressive Keratoconus: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.
Al Fayez, MF, Alfayez, S, Alfayez, Y
Cornea. 2015;:S53-6
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the safety and efficacy of transepithelial with epithelium-off corneal cross-linking for progressive keratoconus. METHODS In a prospective clinical trial, 70 patients with progressive keratoconus were randomized to undergo corneal cross-linking with intact epithelium (n = 34) or after deepithelialization (n = 36). The main outcome measure was a change in the maximum K reading (K(max)). RESULTS With 3-year follow-up, K(max) decreased in the epithelium-off group with a mean of 2.4 D and no patient showed evidence of progression. In the transepithelial group, K(max) increased by a mean of 1.1 D, and 20 patients (55%) showed progression of keratoconus. CONCLUSIONS In this study, epithelium-off was significantly more effective than transepithelial corneal cross-linking in halting the progression of keratoconus (P < 0.0001).
-
9.
Comparison of accelerated and conventional corneal collagen cross-linking for progressive keratoconus.
Cınar, Y, Cingü, AK, Türkcü, FM, Çınar, T, Yüksel, H, Özkurt, ZG, Çaça, I
Cutaneous and ocular toxicology. 2014;(3):218-22
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare outcomes of accelerated and conventional corneal cross-linking (CXL) for progressive keratoconus (KC). MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients were divided into two groups as the accelerated CXL group and the conventional CXL group. The uncorrected distant visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distant visual acuity (CDVA), refraction and keratometric values were measured preoperatively and postoperatively. The data of the two groups were compared statistically. RESULTS The mean UDVA and CDVA were better at the six month postoperative when compared with preoperative values in two groups. While change in UDVA and CDVA was statistically significant in the accelerated CXL group (p = 0.035 and p = 0.047, respectively), it did not reach statistical significance in the conventional CXL group (p = 0.184 and p = 0.113, respectively). The decrease in the mean corneal power (Km) and maximum keratometric value (Kmax) were statistically significant in both groups (p = 0.012 and 0.046, respectively in the accelerated CXL group, p = 0.012 and 0.041, respectively, in the conventional CXL group). There was no statistically significant difference in visual and refractive results between the two groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Refractive and visual results of the accelerated CXL method and the conventional CXL method for the treatment of KC in short time period were similar. The accelerated CXL method faster and provide high throughput of the patients.
-
10.
Corneal cross-linking: intrastromal riboflavin concentration in iontophoresis-assisted imbibition versus traditional and transepithelial techniques.
Mastropasqua, L, Nubile, M, Calienno, R, Mattei, PA, Pedrotti, E, Salgari, N, Mastropasqua, R, Lanzini, M
American journal of ophthalmology. 2014;(3):623-30.e1
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine differences in riboflavin concentration in the anterior, intermediate, and posterior stroma after 3 corneal cross-linking imbibition techniques (standard epithelial [epi]-off, epi-on, and iontophoresis-assisted administration) of 0.1% riboflavin. DESIGN Experimental laboratory investigation of human cadaver corneas not suitable for transplantation. METHODS Ten corneas underwent imbibition with epi-on (n = 3), epi-off (n = 3), iontophoresis (n = 3), and saline exposure (control; n = 1). Femtosecond laser was used to produce 3 8-mm discs of the superficial (0-150 μm), intermediate (150-300 μm), and deep stroma (>300 μm). Riboflavin concentration was measured with high-performance liquid chromatography. The main outcome measure was riboflavin concentration at the 3 evaluated depths. RESULTS The overall stromal concentration of riboflavin was 34.1 ± 7.1 μg/g in epi-off, 7.2 ± 3.7 μg/g in epi-on, and 15.0 ± 5.1 μg/g in iontophoresis. The mean riboflavin content in the superficial slice in the epi-off group was about 2-fold greater than that of the iontophoresis group (50.5 ± 5.3 μg/g and 23.6 ± 2.5 μg/g, respectively) and 4-fold greater than that of the epi-on group (11.7 ± 3.3 μg/g). Similar differences among the 3 groups were observed for the intermediate and posterior stromal slices, presenting an evident reduction of riboflavin concentration with increasing depth in all groups. Slice depth-dependent decrease in riboflavin concentration was statistically significant (general linear model (GLM); F1,6 = 62.265, P < .001), as was the group-dependent variation (GLM; F2,6 = 20.268, P = .002) and the slice depth group interaction (GLM; F2,6 = 18.004, P = .002). CONCLUSIONS Corneal cross-linking transepithelial iontophoresis imbibition yielded greater and deeper riboflavin saturation with respect to conventional epi-on, while maintaining the advantages of avoiding epithelial removal and shorter procedure time, but did not reach concentrations obtained with standard epi-off.