0
selected
-
1.
Comparative pharmacokinetic study on three formulations of Astragali Radix by an LC-MS/MS method for determination of formononetin in human plasma.
Rao, T, Gong, YF, Peng, JB, Wang, YC, He, K, Zhou, HH, Tan, ZR, Lv, LZ
Biomedical chromatography : BMC. 2019;(9):e4563
Abstract
Astragali Radix (AR) is a widely used traditional Chinese medicine for healing the cardiovascular, liver and immune systems. Recently, superfine pulverizing technology has been applied to developing novel formulations to improve bioavailability of the active constituents in herbs, such as ultrafine granular powder of AR. In this study, a universal and sensitive quantitative method based on LC-MS/MS was employed for determining formononetin, the main flavonoid in AR, in human plasma for comparative pharmacokinetics of three oral formulations of AR. Formononetin and IS (quercetin) were extracted by ethyl acetate from human plasma and were separated on a C18 column with a mobile phase consisting of acetonitrile and 0.1% formic acid. Positive-ion electrospray-ionization mode was applied in mass spectrometric detection. The quantitative method was validated with regards to selectivity, linearity, accuracy and precision, matrix effect, extraction recovery and stability, and was applied to comparing the pharmacokinetics of ultrafine granular powder (UGP), ultrafine powder (UP) and traditional decoction pieces (TDP) of AR after oral administration. The peak concentration and areas under the concentration-time curve of formononetin in UGP and UP were significantly higher than those of TDP. UGP and UP could significantly improve the bioavailability of AR in human compared with TDP after oral administration.
-
2.
Comparison of Targeted Mass Spectrometry Techniques with an Immunoassay: A Case Study for HSP90α.
Güzel, C, Govorukhina, NI, Stingl, C, Dekker, LJM, Boichenko, A, van der Zee, AGJ, Bischoff, RPH, Luider, TM
Proteomics. Clinical applications. 2018;(1)
Abstract
PURPOSE The objective of this study is to better understand factors governing the variability and sensitivity in SRM and PRM, compared to immunoassay. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN A 2D-LC-MS/MS-based SRM and PRM assay is developed for quantitative measurements of HSP90α in serum. Forty-three control sera are compared by SRM, PRM, and ELISA following the manufacturer's instructions. Serum samples are trypsin-digested and fractionated by strong cation exchange chromatography prior to SRM and PRM measurements. Analytical parameters such as linearity, LOD, LOQ, repeatability, and reproducibility of the SRM, PRM, and ELISA are determined. RESULTS PRM data obtained by high-resolution MS correlate better with ELISA measurements than SRM data measured on a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer. While all three methods (SRM, PRM, and ELISA) are able to quantify HSP90α in serum at the ng mL-1 level, the use of PRM on a high-resolution mass spectrometer reduces variation and shows comparable sensitivity to immunoassay. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Using fractionation, it is possible to measure ng mL-1 levels of HSP90α in a reproducible, selective, and sensitive way using PRM in serum. This opens up the possibility to use PRM in a multiplexed way as an attractive alternative for immunoassays without the use of antibodies or comparable binders.
-
3.
Relative bioavailability of diclofenac potassium from softgel capsule versus powder for oral solution and immediate-release tablet formulation.
Bende, G, Biswal, S, Bhad, P, Chen, Y, Salunke, A, Winter, S, Wagner, R, Sunkara, G
Clinical pharmacology in drug development. 2016;(1):76-82
Abstract
The oral bioavailability of diclofenac potassium 50 mg administered as a soft gelatin capsule (softgel capsule), powder for oral solution (oral solution), and tablet was evaluated in a randomized, open-label, 3-period, 6-sequence crossover study in healthy adults. Plasma diclofenac concentrations were measured using a validated liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry method, and pharmacokinetic analysis was performed by noncompartmental methods. The median time to achieve peak plasma concentrations of diclofenac was 0.5, 0.25, and 0.75 hours with the softgel capsule, oral solution, and tablet formulations, respectively. The geometric mean ratio and associated 90%CI for AUCinf, and Cmax of the softgel capsule formulation relative to the oral solution formulation were 0.97 (0.95-1.00) and 0.85 (0.76-0.95), respectively. The geometric mean ratio and associated 90%CI for AUCinf and Cmax of the softgel capsule formulation relative to the tablet formulation were 1.04 (1.00-1.08) and 1.67 (1.43-1.96), respectively. In conclusion, the exposure (AUC) of diclofenac with the new diclofenac potassium softgel capsule formulation was comparable to that of the existing oral solution and tablet formulations. The peak plasma concentration of diclofenac from the new softgel capsule was 67% higher than the existing tablet formulation, whereas it was 15% lower in comparison with the oral solution formulation.
-
4.
Budesonide quantification by HPLC coupled to atmospheric pressure photoionization (APPI) tandem mass spectrometry. Application to a comparative systemic bioavailability of two budesonide formulations in healthy volunteers.
Borges, NC, Astigarraga, RB, Sverdloff, CE, Borges, BC, Paiva, TR, Galvinas, PR, Moreno, RA
Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences. 2011;(3-4):236-42
Abstract
In the present study, a novel, fast, sensitive and robust method to quantify budesonide in human plasma using 3-keto-desogestrel as the internal standard (IS) is described. The analyte and the IS were extracted from human plasma by liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) using ether. Extracted samples were analyzed by high performance liquid chromatography coupled to Atmospheric pressure photoionization tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-APPI-MS/MS). Chromatography was performed isocratically on a C18, 5 μm analytical column. The temperature of the autosampler was kept at 6 °C and the run time was 4.00 min. A linear calibration curve over the range 7.5-1000 pg ml⁻¹ was obtained and the lowest concentration quantified was 7.5 pg ml⁻¹, demonstrating acceptable accuracy and precision. This analytical method was applied in a relative bioavailability study in order to compare a test budesonide 64 μg/dose nasal spray formulation vs. a reference 64 μg/dose nasal spray formulation (Budecort Aqua) in 48 volunteers of both sexes. The study was conducted in an open randomized two-period crossover design and with a one-week washout period. Plasma samples were obtained over a 14 h interval. Since the 90% CI for both C(max), AUC(last) and AUC(0-inf) were within the 80-125% interval proposed by the Food and Drug Administration and ANVISA, it was concluded that budesonide 64 μg/dose nasal spray was bioequivalent to Budecort Acqua® 64 μg/dose nasal spray, according to both the rate and extent of absorption.