-
1.
Intermittent chemotherapy in patients with metastatic androgen-independent prostate cancer: results from ASCENT, a double-blinded, randomized comparison of high-dose calcitriol plus docetaxel with placebo plus docetaxel.
Beer, TM, Ryan, CW, Venner, PM, Petrylak, DP, Chatta, GS, Ruether, JD, Chi, KN, Young, J, Henner, WD, ,
Cancer. 2008;(2):326-30
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Survival in patients with metastatic, chemotherapy-naive, androgen-independent prostate cancer (AIPC) is improved with 10 to 12 cycles of docetaxel-containing chemotherapy but further management is undefined. In the current study, the authors examined retreatment with the same regimen after a treatment holiday. METHODS Patients treated with docetaxel at a dose of 36 mg/m(2) plus either high-dose calcitriol (DN-101; 45 mug) or placebo administered weekly for 3 of every 4 weeks could suspend treatment if their serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level was reduced >or=50% and reached a level or=50% and was >or=2 ng/mL or when there was other evidence of disease progression. The study was not powered to compare treatment holiday outcomes between the 2 arms. RESULTS A total of 250 patients were randomized 1:1. Overall, 18% of patients (20% in the high-dose calcitriol group and 16% in the placebo group) entered the intermittent chemotherapy arm. The median duration of the first chemotherapy holiday was 18 weeks (range, 4%70 weeks). On resumption of treatment after the first holiday, 45.5% of evaluable patients responded with a >or=50% reduction in serum PSA from their postholiday baseline, 45.5% met the criteria for stable PSA for at least 12 weeks, and 9.1% of patients developed disease progression. CONCLUSIONS To the authors' knowledge, the current study is the first report of intermittent chemotherapy in patients with AIPC who were prospectively tested in a large multi-institutional trial. This strategy results in a clinically significant duration of chemotherapy holidays and can be offered to a minority of patients. At the time of retreatment, the majority of patients again respond to treatment or their PSA levels stabilized. Additional studies of intermittent chemotherapy are needed to better characterize the optimal patient population and the optimal approach.
-
2.
Weekly paclitaxel in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer.
Sparano, JA, Wang, M, Martino, S, Jones, V, Perez, EA, Saphner, T, Wolff, AC, Sledge, GW, Wood, WC, Davidson, NE
The New England journal of medicine. 2008;(16):1663-71
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND We compared the efficacy of two different taxanes, docetaxel and paclitaxel, given either weekly or every 3 weeks, in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. METHODS We enrolled 4950 women with axillary lymph node-positive or high-risk, lymph node-negative breast cancer. After randomization, all patients first received 4 cycles of intravenous doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide at 3-week intervals and were then assigned to intravenous paclitaxel or docetaxel given at 3-week intervals for 4 cycles or at 1-week intervals for 12 cycles. The primary end point was disease-free survival. RESULTS As compared with patients receiving standard therapy (paclitaxel every 3 weeks), the odds ratio for disease-free survival was 1.27 among those receiving weekly paclitaxel (P=0.006), 1.23 among those receiving docetaxel every 3 weeks (P=0.02), and 1.09 among those receiving weekly docetaxel (P=0.29) (with an odds ratio >1 favoring the groups receiving experimental therapy). As compared with standard therapy, weekly paclitaxel was also associated with improved survival (odds ratio, 1.32; P=0.01). An exploratory analysis of a subgroup of patients whose tumors expressed no human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 protein found similar improvements in disease-free and overall survival with weekly paclitaxel treatment, regardless of hormone-receptor expression. Grade 2, 3, or 4 neuropathy was more frequent with weekly paclitaxel than with paclitaxel every 3 weeks (27% vs. 20%). CONCLUSIONS Weekly paclitaxel after standard adjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide improves disease-free and overall survival in women with breast cancer. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00004125 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).
-
3.
Gemcitabine and vinorelbine followed by weekly docetaxel in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II trial of sequential chemotherapy.
Cobo Dols, M, Villar Chamorro, E, Alés Díaz, I, Gil Calle, S, Alcalde García, J, Gutiérrez Calderón, V, Carabantes Ocón, F, Montesa Pino, A, Bretón García, JJ, Benavides Orgaz, M
Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico. 2006;(10):742-9
Abstract
UNLABELLED Objective. We conducted this phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of the sequential nonplatinum combination chemotherapy consisting of gemcitabine (GEM) and vinorelbine (VNR) followed by weekly docetaxel (DOC) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and methods. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA stage IV NSCLC, Performance status =/< 2, adequate renal, hepatic and bone marrow function. Treatment consisted on: VNR 25 mg/m(2) plus gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2), on days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle, followed by docetaxel 36 mg/m(2) weekly until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Results. 21 stage IV patients were enrolled. All patients are evaluable for treatment response and toxicity profile. The mean age of the patients was 63 years (range: 51 to 72) with 18 (86%) males and 3 (14%) females. Histology types were: adenocarcinoma in 8 patients (38%), large cell carcinoma in 1 patients (5%) and squamous cell carcinoma in 12 patients (57%). The majority of the patients had and ECOG PS of 1. Eight patients (38%) did not complete six cycles of gemcitabine-navelbine. The median number of cycles of gemcitabine-navelbine was 4 (range 2-6) Of the 13 patients (61%) who completed six cycles of gemcitabine-navelbine, all of them went on to receive weekly docetaxel and received at least 3 cycles, with a median number of 8 cycles (range 3- 16). The overall response rate was 33%. Respect survival, the minimum follow-up was 6 months (range, 6-25 months). The median survival time (MST) was 7.9 months, and the 1-year survival was 30%, and the median progression-free survival was 4.7 months. Toxicity was mild, well tolerated and mostly hematologic. In the GEM/VNR cycle, grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 14%, two patients with febrile neutropenia. Grade 3 anaemia in 1 patients (5%) and grade 3 thrombocytopenia in 1 patient (5%). Nonhematologic toxicity was also mild: 1 patient with Grade 3 skin toxicity with docetaxel, 1 patient with grade 3 infection, 2 patients with grade 3 astenia and 1 patient with a mild allergic reaction postchemotherapy treatment with docetaxel. Conclusion. The sequential triplet nonplatinum chemotherapy consisted of GEM/VNR followed by weekly DOC is active and can be administered safely in advanced NSCLC. Our results are similar with other sequential regimens and did not represent a significant improvement in the treatment of this disease.
-
4.
Elderly patients benefit from second-line cytotoxic chemotherapy: a subset analysis of a randomized phase III trial of pemetrexed compared with docetaxel in patients with previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
Weiss, GJ, Langer, C, Rosell, R, Hanna, N, Shepherd, F, Einhorn, LH, Nguyen, B, Paul, S, McAndrews, P, Bunn, PA, et al
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2006;(27):4405-11
Abstract
PURPOSE Numerous prospective and retrospective studies have concluded that elderly patients (> or = 70 years old) achieve a similar survival benefit, with acceptable toxicity, from first-line cytotoxic chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) compared with their younger counterparts. However, few published data exist on the efficacy and tolerability of second-line cytotoxic therapy in this population. PATIENTS AND METHODS Retrospective analysis of a large second-line trial was performed. Data from 571 patients randomly assigned to docetaxel 75 mg/m2 or pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 every 3 weeks were analyzed for efficacy and toxicity comparisons between age groups and treatment arms. RESULTS Eighty-six of 571 patients (15%) were > or = 70 years old, similar to rates of elderly observed in the first-line setting. Elderly patients receiving pemetrexed (n = 47) or docetaxel (n = 39) had a median survival of 9.5 and 7.7 months compared with 7.8 and 8.0 months for younger patients receiving pemetrexed (n = 236) or docetaxel (n = 249), respectively. Elderly patients treated with pemetrexed had a longer time to progression and a longer survival than their counterpart patients treated with docetaxel (not statistically significant). Febrile neutropenia was less frequent in elderly patients treated with pemetrexed (2.5%) compared with docetaxel (19%; P = .025), with only one death as a result of toxicity (docetaxel arm). CONCLUSION Elderly patient participation was similar to rates observed in the first-line setting. There was no significant difference in outcome or toxicity between elderly and younger patients. For elderly patients with advanced NSCLC and good performance status, second-line cytotoxic therapy is appropriate. In this subset, pemetrexed produced a more favorable toxicity profile.
-
5.
[Start of a new Working Group on Urological Oncology (AUO) study of prostate cancer].
Rexer, H
Der Urologe. Ausg. A. 2005;(8):924
-
6.
Randomized phase III study of docetaxel compared with paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer.
Jones, SE, Erban, J, Overmoyer, B, Budd, GT, Hutchins, L, Lower, E, Laufman, L, Sundaram, S, Urba, WJ, Pritchard, KI, et al
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2005;(24):5542-51
Abstract
PURPOSE This randomized, controlled, multicenter, open-label, phase III study compared docetaxel versus paclitaxel in patients with advanced breast cancer that had progressed after an anthracycline-containing chemotherapy regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients (n = 449) were randomly assigned to receive either docetaxel 100 mg/m2 (n = 225) or paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 (n = 224) on day 1, every 21 days until tumor progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. RESULTS In the intent-to-treat population, both the median overall survival (OS, 15.4 v 12.7 months; hazard ratio [HR], 1.41; 95% CI, 1.15 to 1.73; P = .03) and the median time to progression (TTP, 5.7 months v 3.6 months; HR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.33 to 2.02; P < .0001) for docetaxel were significantly longer than for paclitaxel, and the overall response rate (ORR, 32% v 25%; P = .10) was higher for docetaxel. These results were confirmed by multivariate analyses. The incidence of treatment-related hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities was greater for docetaxel than for paclitaxel; however, quality-of-life scores were not statistically different between treatment groups over time. CONCLUSION Docetaxel was superior to paclitaxel in terms of OS and TTP. ORR was higher for docetaxel. Hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities occurred more frequently in the docetaxel group. The global quality-of-life scores were similar for both agents over time.
-
7.
Multimodality treatment including postoperative radiation and concurrent chemotherapy with weekly docetaxel is feasible and effective in patients with oral and oropharyngeal cancer.
Kovács, AF, Mose, S, Böttcher, HD, Bitter, K
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]. 2005;(1):26-34
Abstract
BACKGROUND To examine the feasibility and efficacy of weekly docetaxel with concurrent radiation as postoperative treatment in a multimodality approach to oral and oropharyngeal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS 94 patients (Table 1) with primary resectable squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity and oropharynx (UICC stage I 14%, II 15%, III 18%, IV 53%; Table 2) were treated with a multimodality therapy program consisting of neoadjuvant intra-arterial high-dose chemotherapy (cisplatin 150 mg/m(2) with parallel systemic sodium thiosulfate 9 g/m(2) for neutralization), followed by surgery of the primary and neck, and postoperative concurrent radiation and chemotherapy with weekly docetaxel (20-30 mg/m(2); Table 3). Chronic toxicities were followed over a period of 5 years. RESULTS At a median follow-up of 4 years, the 5-year survival rate for all 94 patients was 80%, and disease-free survival was 73% (Figures 1 and 2). Among patients with advanced disease (stage III and IV), survival was 83 and 59%, respectively (Figure 4). Grade 3 and 4 mucositis was the main acute toxicity necessitating supportive care. Long-term toxicity appears to be moderate (Table 4). The maximum tolerated dose of weekly docetaxel was 25 mg/m(2). CONCLUSIONS Concurrent radiation and chemotherapy with weekly docetaxel is a feasible postoperative treatment in a multimodality approach to oral and oropharyngeal cancer, resulting in high overall and disease-free survival. This approach warrants further evaluation in prospective randomized trials.
-
8.
[Hormone-refractory metastatic prostate carcinoma -- combination improves survival].
Aktuelle Urologie. 2005;(5):385-7
-
9.
Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0521: a phase III randomized trial of androgen suppression and radiation therapy versus androgen suppression and radiation therapy followed by chemotherapy with docetaxel/prednisone for localized, high-risk prostate cancer.
Patel, AR, Sandler, HM, Pienta, KJ
Clinical genitourinary cancer. 2005;(3):212-4
-
10.
Contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging underestimates residual disease following neoadjuvant docetaxel based chemotherapy for breast cancer.
Denis, F, Desbiez-Bourcier, AV, Chapiron, C, Arbion, F, Body, G, Brunereau, L
European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology. 2004;(10):1069-76
Abstract
AIMS: We prospectively compared the ability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to measure residual breast cancer in patients treated with different neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen. METHODS Forty patients with locally advanced breast carcinoma underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Twelve patients received 5-fluoro-uracyl-epirubicin-cyclophosphamide (FEC-group, six cycles), 28 (DXL-group) received docetaxel-based chemotherapy (six cycles DXL-epirubicin: 13 patients, eight cycles DXL alone: 15 patients). All patients had baseline and preoperative MRI. The spread of pathologic residual disease (PRd) was compared to preoperative MRI measures according to chemotherapy regimen. RESULTS MRI over/underestimation of the spread of residual tumour was never superior to 15mm in FEC group, whereas it appeared in 11/28 (39%, 30-48%-95% CI) patients in DXL group (p=0.017). Tumour shrinkage led to single nodular residual lesions in FEC group, whereas vast numerous microscopic nests were observed in docetaxel group in pathology. CONCLUSION Among tumours treated with a taxane-containing regimen, residual disease was frequently underestimated by MRI because of PRd features.