1.
Effect of Supplemental Parenteral Nutrition Versus Enteral Nutrition Alone on Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Adult Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Alsharif, DJ, Alsharif, FJ, Aljuraiban, GS, Abulmeaty, MMA
Nutrients. 2020;12(10)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
For individuals who are critically ill and cannot eat, the use of a tube through the mouth is the preferred way to ensure nutrition needs are met. However, complications such as diarrhoea and vomiting often means that these individuals still do not achieve optimal nutrition. In these instances, giving individuals nutrients directly into a vein alongside the feeding tube is an option to ensure they do not become nutrient deficient. This is known as a combination of enteral and parenteral nutrition. However, studies on the use of this combination are limited. This systematic review and meta-analysis of 5 studies aimed to determine the effects of a combination of enteral and parenteral feeding on clinical outcomes compared to a feeding tube alone. The results showed that compared to enteral feeding alone the combination decreased infections and intensive care unit (ICU) mortality. There was a very small effect on duration of ventilation and no effects were seen on length of hospital stay nor length of ICU stay. It was concluded that enteral feeding alone is insufficient to meet the nutritional needs of critically ill patients. Supplementing in parenteral nutrition may be of benefit to these individuals and help decrease infections and improve ICU mortality. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand that the health of patients who are being fed through a tube may be compromised through malnutrition and that supplemental ways of getting more nutrients into these individuals is of importance.
Abstract
Enteral nutrition (EN) is considered the first feeding route for critically ill patients. However, adverse effects such as gastrointestinal complications limit its optimal provision, leading to inadequate energy and protein intake. We compared the clinical outcomes of supplemental parenteral nutrition added to EN (SPN + EN) and EN alone in critically ill adults. Electronic databases restricted to full-text randomized controlled trials available in the English language and published from January 1990 to January 2019 were searched. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Jadad scale, and the meta-analysis was conducted using the MedCalc software. A total of five studies were eligible for inclusion in the systematic review and meta-analysis. Compared to EN alone, SPN + EN decreased the risk of nosocomial infections (relative risk (RR) = 0.733, p = 0.032) and intensive care unit (ICU) mortality (RR = 0.569, p = 0.030). No significant differences were observed between SPN + EN and EN in the length of hospital stay, hospital mortality, length of ICU stay, and duration of mechanical ventilation. In conclusion, when enteral feeding fails to fulfill the energy requirements in critically ill adult patients, SPN may be beneficial as it helps in decreasing nosocomial infections and ICU mortality, in addition to increasing energy and protein intakes with no negative effects on other clinical outcomes.
2.
Micronutrient Gaps in Three Commercial Weight-Loss Diet Plans.
G Engel, M, J Kern, H, Brenna, JT, H Mitmesser, S
Nutrients. 2018;10(1)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Globally, around 39% of adults are overweight and 13% obese, and more than one third of American adults are obese. Being overweight or obese is associated with many chronic conditions, such as heart disease, high blood pressure and type 2 diabetes. Weight loss, even at moderate level, can reduce the risk of these obesity-related chronic conditions. Commercial weight-loss diet plans can vary greatly, not only in energy content but also in macronutrient and micronutrient composition. Most plans restrict calories or certain macronutrients, particularly carbohydrate or fat, and in doing so, often overlook micronutrient, i.e. vitamin and mineral, content. Previous studies have shown that many weight-loss plans do not provide adequate amounts of all micronutrients, and in order to reach the reference daily intakes for various vitamins and minerals, dieters would need to increase their calorie intake significantly and often unrealistically. The authors of this paper analysed seven single-day menus of three select commercial diet plans to determine their micronutrient sufficiency. The diet plans included were Eat to Live-Vegan, Aggressive Weight Loss (ETL-VAWL), Fast Metabolism Diet (FMD), and Eat, Drink and Be Healthy (EDH). ETL-VAWL diet provided less than 90% of recommended amounts for B12, B3, D, E, calcium, selenium and zinc. The FMD diet was low in B1, D, E, calcium, magnesium and potassium, while EDH diet didn’t meet the recommended amounts for vitamin D, calcium and potassium. Even after adjusting all the plans to an intake of 2000 kcal/day, several micronutrients were found to remain inadequate (vitamin B12 in ETL-VAWL, calcium in FMD and EDH and vitamin D in all diets). The authors conclude that, in order to reduce the risk of micronutrient deficiencies, more attention needs to be paid to micronutrient rich foods when designing commercial diet plans. Alternatively, these nutrient gaps should be filled in other ways, e.g. using appropriate dietary supplements.
Abstract
Weight-loss diets restrict intakes of energy and macronutrients but overlook micronutrient profiles. Commercial diet plans may provide insufficient micronutrients. We analyzed nutrient profiles of three plans and compared their micronutrient sufficiency to Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs) for male U.S. adults. Hypocaloric vegan (Eat to Live-Vegan, Aggressive Weight Loss; ETL-VAWL), high-animal-protein low-carbohydrate (Fast Metabolism Diet; FMD) and weight maintenance (Eat, Drink and Be Healthy; EDH) diets were evaluated. Seven single-day menus were sampled per diet (n = 21 menus, 7 menus/diet) and analyzed for 20 micronutrients with the online nutrient tracker CRON-O-Meter. Without adjustment for energy intake, the ETL-VAWL diet failed to provide 90% of recommended amounts for B12, B₃, D, E, calcium, selenium and zinc. The FMD diet was low (<90% DRI) in B₁, D, E, calcium, magnesium and potassium. The EDH diet met >90% DRIs for all but vitamin D, calcium and potassium. Several micronutrients remained inadequate after adjustment to 2000 kcal/day: vitamin B12 in ETL-VAWL, calcium in FMD and EDH and vitamin D in all diets. Consistent with previous work, micronutrient deficits are prevalent in weight-loss diet plans. Special attention to micronutrient rich foods is required to reduce risk of micronutrient deficiency in design of commercial diets.