1.
2019 EACTS Expert Consensus on long-term mechanical circulatory support.
Potapov, EV, Antonides, C, Crespo-Leiro, MG, Combes, A, Färber, G, Hannan, MM, Kukucka, M, de Jonge, N, Loforte, A, Lund, LH, et al
European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery. 2019;(2):230-270
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Long-term mechanical circulatory support (LT-MCS) is an important treatment modality for patients with severe heart failure. Different devices are available, and many-sometimes contradictory-observations regarding patient selection, surgical techniques, perioperative management and follow-up have been published. With the growing expertise in this field, the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) recognized a need for a structured multidisciplinary consensus about the approach to patients with LT-MCS. However, the evidence published so far is insufficient to allow for generation of meaningful guidelines complying with EACTS requirements. Instead, the EACTS presents an expert opinion in the LT-MCS field. This expert opinion addresses patient evaluation and preoperative optimization as well as management of cardiac and non-cardiac comorbidities. Further, extensive operative implantation techniques are summarized and evaluated by leading experts, depending on both patient characteristics and device selection. The faculty recognized that postoperative management is multidisciplinary and includes aspects of intensive care unit stay, rehabilitation, ambulatory care, myocardial recovery and end-of-life care and mirrored this fact in this paper. Additionally, the opinions of experts on diagnosis and management of adverse events including bleeding, cerebrovascular accidents and device malfunction are presented. In this expert consensus, the evidence for the complete management from patient selection to end-of-life care is carefully reviewed with the aim of guiding clinicians in optimizing management of patients considered for or supported by an LT-MCS device.
2.
[Clinical nutrition in surgery. Guidelines of the German Society for Nutritional Medicine].
Weimann, A, Breitenstein, S, Breuer, JP, Gabor, SE, Holland-Cunz, S, Kemen, M, Längle, F, Rayes, N, Reith, B, Rittler, P, et al
Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen. 2014;(4):320-6
Abstract
BACKGROUND While enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs are the standard for perioperative management, special nutritional care has to be administered to malnourished patients and those at metabolic risk with special regard to patients with postoperative complications. METHODS Existing guidelines of the German and European societies of nutritional medicine (DGEM and ESPEN) on enteral and parenteral nutrition in surgery were merged and in accordance with the principles of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften (AWMF, German Association of the Scientific Medical Societies) and Ärztliches Zentrum für Qualität in der Medizin (AeZQ, German Agency for Quality in Medicine) revised and extended. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The working group developed 41 consensus-based recommendations for perioperative nutrition. The recommendation strength is: 9x A (recommendation based on significant good quality literature containing at least one randomized controlled trial), 12x B (recommendation based on well-designed trial without randomization), 13x C (recommendation based on expert opinions and/or clinical experience of respected authorities) and 7x CCP (clinical consensus point). CONCLUSION Even in patients without obvious malnutrition perioperative nutritional support is indicated when oral food intake is not feasible or inadequate for a longer period of time.
3.
French clinical guidelines on perioperative nutrition. Update of the 1994 consensus conference on perioperative artificial nutrition for elective surgery in adults.
Chambrier, C, Sztark, F, , , ,
Journal of visceral surgery. 2012;(5):e325-36
Abstract
Surgical patient is a stressed patient. Aggression is more intense and prolonged as surgery is important. Surgery induces secretion of stress hormones, inflammatory mediators and metabolic changes resulting in significant catabolic phenomena. The presence of malnutrition is an independent risk factor for postoperative complications. Malnutrition increases morbidity (infections, delayed healing), mortality, length of stay and costs and impacts human quality of life for patients. It has been shown that the management of perioperative malnutrition reduces the additional risk generated by it. Perioperative nutritional support should not be systematically provided. Since 1994, recommendations on perioperative nutrition, the care of patients and the available resources have changed dramatically. An update of these recommendations was needed. In 2010, an expert panel of the French society of Anesthesiology (SFAR) and the French-speaking society of Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (SFNEP) has made recommendations for good clinical practice of perioperative nutrition. They are presented. Thus, the perioperative nutritional management must be integrated in a process to reduce the operative risk: risk reduction due to preoperative malnutrition, reduced risk of postoperative malnutrition which may compromise the following treatments, reduction of postoperative metabolic complications, reducing the postoperative morbidity, especially infectious, through the use of pharmaconutrients either preoperatively or postoperatively in some patients.