1.
Iodine-125 brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer and urinary morbidity: a prospective comparison of two seed implant methods-preplanning and intraoperative planning.
Matzkin, H, Kaver, I, Stenger, A, Agai, R, Esna, N, Chen, J
Urology. 2003;(3):497-502
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare morbidity between two currently used iodine-125 seed implantation techniques for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. METHODS Iodine-125 brachytherapy was used in 300 consecutive men with localized prostate cancer. Two seed implant techniques were used: preplanning, using preloaded needles, and intraoperative planning, using a Mick applicator. A comparison was made between the groups for urinary morbidity. The International Prostate Symptom Score was assessed prospectively among all patients. Computed tomography-based implant quality parameters were correlated with lower urinary system morbidity. RESULTS The median follow-up was 30 months. In both treatment groups, the International Prostate Symptom Score increased significantly for about 9 to 12 months and returned to baseline thereafter. The International Prostate Symptom Scores reached a higher level and remained at a higher level for a longer period in the intraoperative group. Although the differences were statistically significant, they were of mild clinical importance. Overall, the incidence of acute retention and the need for surgery was very low in both groups (2% and 1%, respectively). No differences were noted between the two groups. Significantly better computed tomography-based implant dosimetry parameters were noted with the intraoperative method. A positive correlation (P < 0.001) was found between the dosimetry parameters and symptom severity. CONCLUSIONS This prospective study reports the first large-scale comparison of urologic outcomes after two different seed implant techniques. Both were associated with very low urinary retention rates or other grade 3 or greater urologic morbidity. Almost all men had worse urinary symptoms for the first 6 to 9 months, regardless of the seed implant technique used. Patients treated with the intraoperative method demonstrated toxicity for a longer duration. Because of the much better gland isodose coverage and greater doses delivered in the intraoperative seed implantation, we favor this method.
2.
Oral tegafur-uracil plus folinic acid versus intravenous 5-fluorouracil plus folinic acid as adjuvant chemotherapy of colon cancer.
Kim, DJ, Kim, TI, Suh, JH, Cho, YS, Shin, SK, Kang, JK, Kim, NK, Kim, WH
Yonsei medical journal. 2003;(4):665-75
Abstract
To compare, in terms of compliance, toxicity, quality of life (QOL) and efficacy, intravenous 5-fluorouracil plus folinic acid with oral tegafur-uracil plus folinic acid as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy after curative resection in patients with Dukes' stage B2 and C2 colon cancer. Among all patients with adenocarcinoma of the colon operated on between July 1997 and June 1999, 122 with Dukes' stage B2 or C2 colon cancer were enrolled in this study. Fifty-three patients were treated with intravenous 5-fluorouracil plus folinic acid (5-FU group) and 69 with oral tegafur-uracil plus folinic acid (UFT group). Compliance, toxicity, QOL and efficacy were evaluated. Compared with the 5-FU group, patients in the UFT group experienced a lower incidence of grade 1 toxicity. The incidences of grade 2-4 toxicity were similar in the two treatment groups. However, severe toxicity (grade 3 or 4) was rare in both groups. A steady and significant increase of the QOL score, both during and after therapy, was evident in both groups suggesting that chemotherapy is quite tolerable and does not deteriorate the patients' QOL. At the median follow-up duration of 28 months, the survival rate and disease free survival rate for the UFT and 5-FU groups were 94.9% vs. 92.5% and 87.5% vs. 84.1%, respectively (p > 0.05). These data suggest that oral tegafur-uracil modulated with oral folinic acid as an adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with Dukes' stage B2 and C2 colon cancer may be a good alternative to infusional 5- fluorouracil.