1.
Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis: Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 for Treating Acute Gastroenteritis in Children. An Update.
Patro-Gołąb, B, Szajewska, H
Nutrients. 2019;11(11)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Acute gastroenteritis (AGE) is a common health problem in children and, globally, diarrhoea is one of the leading causes of death in children younger than the age of 5 years. Probiotics have been extensively studied as a supportive treatment regimen in children with AGE and shown to be effective in reducing both diarrhoea duration and severity, and potentially reducing the duration of hospitalization. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis of four randomised controlled trials including 347 children was to provide an update on the research into a particular strain of Lactobacillus reuteri for the treatment of AGE. The meta-analysis showed a significantly reduced duration of illness and hospitalisation, as well as increased cure rate on day 1 and 2, but not 3, 4 or 5. Based on two of the four trials there was no difference in number of watery stools on day 1, 2, 3 or 4. The authors note that the clinical relevance of the findings was limited due to the small effect size and methodological limitations of the included studies.
Abstract
The effectiveness of Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 (L. reuteri) for the management of acute gastroenteritis (AGE) has been recently questioned. We performed a systematic review to update evidence on L. reuteri for treating AGE in children. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library databases, and additional data sources from January 2016 (end of search for our 2016 systematic review) to August 2019. The primary outcomes were stool volume and duration of diarrhea. Four RCTs were included. None of them evaluated stool volume. Compared with placebo or no treatment, L. reuteri reduced diarrhea duration (four RCTs, n = 347, mean difference, MD -0.87 days, 95% CI [-1.43, -0.31]). L. reuteri use was also associated with a reduced duration of hospitalization (three RCTs, n = 284, MD -0.54 days, 95% CI [-1.09, 0.0]). The small effect sizes of limited clinical relevance and methodological limitations of the included trials should be noted when interpreting these findings.
2.
Probiotic monotherapy and Helicobacter pylori eradication: A systematic review with pooled-data analysis.
Losurdo, G, Cubisino, R, Barone, M, Principi, M, Leandro, G, Ierardi, E, Di Leo, A
World journal of gastroenterology. 2018;24(1):139-149
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Helicobacter pylori (H-pylori) is a parasite that resides in the human stomach and is associated with the development of stomach ulcers, amongst other conditions. Conventional treatment relies on a combination of antibiotics and stomach acid suppressants, however failure rates for standard treatments have been rising and alternatives are required. Probiotics (live bacteria that provide health benefits to their host) have been used alongside antibiotic treatment for H-pylori in some cases to reduce medication side effects. This systematic review of 11 studies including 517 H-pylori infected patients, aimed to assess the effects of probiotic therapy alone on H-pylori status. The study found that the eradication rate of H-pylori with a variety of probiotic strains was 12-16%, compared to a 0% success rate in the placebo groups. Clinically, this rate is low, however the authors conclude that probiotics may have a role to play in a multi-therapy approach for the eradication of H-pylori.
Abstract
AIM: To define probiotic monotherapy effect on Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) status by performing a systematic review. METHODS Methods of analysis and inclusion criteria were based on PRISMA recommendations. Relevant publications were identified by searching PubMed, MEDLINE, Science Direct, and EMBASE. The end-point was to estimate eradication rate and urea breath test delta value before and after probiotic monotherapy across all studies and, overall, with a pooled data analysis. Adverse events of probiotic therapy were evaluated. The data were expressed as proportions/percentages, and 95%CIs were calculated. For continuous variables, we evaluated the weighted mean difference. Odd ratios (ORs) were calculated according to the Peto method for the comparison of eradication rates between probiotics and placebo. RESULTS Eleven studies were selected. Probiotics eradicated H. pylori in 50 out of 403 cases. The mean weighted eradication rate was 14% (95%CI: 2%-25%, P = 0.02). Lactobacilli eradicated the bacterium in 30 out of 235 patients, with a mean weighted rate of 16% (95%CI: 1%-31%). Saccharomyces boulardii achieved eradication in 6 out of 63 patients, with a pooled eradication rate of 12% (95%CI: 0%-29%). Multistrain combinations were effective in 14 out of 105 patients, with a pooled eradication rate of 14% (95%CI: 0%-43%). In the comparison of probiotics vs placebo, we found an OR of 7.91 in favor of probiotics (95%CI: 2.97-21.05, P < 0.001). Probiotics induced a mean reduction in delta values higher than placebo (8.61% with a 95%CI: 5.88-11.34, vs 0.19% for placebo, P < 0.001). Finally, no significant difference in adverse events was found between probiotics and placebo (OR = 1, 95%CI: 0.06-18.08). CONCLUSION Probiotics alone show a minimal effect on H. pylori clearance, thus suggesting a likely direct role.