-
1.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of cognitive and behavioral interventions to improve sleep health in adults without sleep disorders.
Murawski, B, Wade, L, Plotnikoff, RC, Lubans, DR, Duncan, MJ
Sleep medicine reviews. 2018;40:160-169
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Sleep is important for good health but more than a quarter of the adult population reports poor quality sleep. This review and meta-analysis looked at cognitive and behavioural interventions in adults who report poor sleep but are not diagnosed with a clinical sleep disorder. The most commonly used interventions were stress management/relaxation, meditation, controlled breathing and stimulus control. A meta-analysis showed a medium improvement of overall sleep quality and a small but significant improvement of subjective sleep quality and duration with cognitive and behavioural interventions. The effects were bigger when sleep at baseline was worse. Effects of mode of delivery, study duration and the inclusion of a relaxation component were not assessed, due to insufficient numbers. The authors conclude that there is room for improvements of cognitive and behavioural interventions and call for more investigations into this.
Abstract
Many adults without a diagnosed sleep disorder report poor sleep health, which is defined by dissatisfactory levels of sleep duration, sleep quality, or the timing of sleep. No previous review has summarized and described interventions targeting poor sleep health in this population. This meta-analysis aimed to quantify the efficacy of behavioral and cognitive sleep interventions in adults with poor sleep health, who do not have a sleep disorder. Electronic databases (Medline, Embase, PsycInfo, Cinahl) were searched with restrictions for age (18-64 y) and English language full-text, resulting in 18,009 records being screened and 592 full-texts being assessed. Eleven studies met inclusion criteria, seven of which reported a measure of overall sleep health (Pittsburgh sleep quality index [PSQI]). Following appraisal for risk of bias, extracted data were meta-analyzed using random-effects models. Meta-analyses showed interventions had a medium effect on sleep quality (Hedge's g = -0.54, [95% confidence interval (CI)] -0.90 to -0.19, p < 0.01). Baseline sleep health was the only significant effect moderator (p = 0.01). The most frequently used intervention components were stress management and relaxation practice, stimulus control, sleep hygiene, and exercise. Interventions targeting cognitive and behavioral self-regulation improve sleep quality in adults without clinical sleep disorder.
-
2.
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy for Health Anxiety: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Cooper, K, Gregory, JD, Walker, I, Lambe, S, Salkovskis, PM
Behavioural and cognitive psychotherapy. 2017;45(2):110-123
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Hypochondriasis is characterised by preoccupation with the belief that one has, or could acquire, a serious illness, emanating from “anxiety about the meaning, significance or cause” of their symptoms. The main aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) for clinical and subclinical health anxiety (HA) relative to control conditions, focusing on measures of HA, depression and anxiety pre and post intervention, and assessing the quality of the randomized control trials. This study is a systemic review and meta-analysis which included 14 studies in the final analysis with a total of 1544 participants. Results provide evidence supporting CBT treatment of HA, in people with and without medical problems, and in people with subclinical as well as clinical levels of HA. Authors conclude that further investigation is required in order to delineate the active treatment elements.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health anxiety (HA), or hypochondriasis, is a psychological problem characterized by a preoccupation with the belief that one is physically unwell. A 2007 Cochrane review (Thomson and Page, 2007) found cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) to be an effective intervention for individuals with HA. Similar findings were reported in a recent meta-analysis (Olatunji et al., 2014), which did not employ a systematic search strategy. The current review aimed to investigate the efficacy of CBT for HA, and to update the existing reviews. METHOD A systematic search was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidance, including randomized controlled trials that compared CBT with a control condition for people with HA. Five hundred and sixty-seven studies were found in the original search, of which 14 were included in the meta-analysis. RESULTS Meta-analysis was conducted on 21 comparisons and a large effect size for CBT compared with a control condition was found at post therapy d = 1.01 (95% confidence interval 0.77-1.25), as well as at 6- and 12-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS This systematic review and meta-analysis provides support for the hypothesis that CBT is an effective intervention for HA when compared with a variety of control conditions, e.g. treatment-as-usual, waiting list, medication, and other psychological therapies.
-
3.
Non-pharmacological self-management for people living with migraine or tension-type headache: a systematic review including analysis of intervention components.
Probyn, K, Bowers, H, Mistry, D, Caldwell, F, Underwood, M, Patel, S, Sandhu, HK, Matharu, M, Pincus, T
BMJ open. 2017;7(8):e016670
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Non-pharmacological self-management interventions have been promoted as a promising approach for helping people with intractable chronic conditions. For migraine and tension type headaches self-management can be used either alongside pharmacological interventions or as a stand-alone therapy. The aims of this study were to provide an overall effect size of non-pharmacological self-management interventions against usual care, and to explore different components and delivery methods within those interventions. This study is a systematic review of 16 peer reviewed RCTs with one or more relevant self-management interventions compared with usual care. Findings indicate that non-pharmacological self-management appears to be slightly more effective in improving pain intensity, headache-related disability, quality of life and medication consumption. Furthermore, it is moderately more effective than usual care in improving mood. Assessed self-management interventions did not improve measures on headache frequency. Authors conclude that their findings provide some preliminarily evidence to guide research-based decisions about intervention content and delivery details of self-management interventions that aim to improve patients’ capacity to manage their headaches.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the effect of non-pharmacological self-management interventions against usual care, and to explore different components and delivery methods within those interventions PARTICIPANTS People living with migraine and/or tension-type headache INTERVENTIONS Non-pharmacological educational or psychological self-management interventions; excluding biofeedback and physical therapy.We assessed the overall effectiveness against usual care on headache frequency, pain intensity, mood, headache-related disability, quality of life and medication consumption in meta-analysis.We also provide preliminary evidence on the effectiveness of intervention components and delivery methods. RESULTS We found a small overall effect for the superiority of self-management interventions over usual care, with a standardised mean difference (SMD) of -0.36 (-0.45 to -0.26) for pain intensity; -0.32 (-0.42 to -0.22) for headache-related disability, 0.32 (0.20 to 0.45) for quality of life and a moderate effect on mood (SMD=0.53 (-0.66 to -0.40)). We did not find an effect on headache frequency (SMD=-0.07 (-0.22 to 0.08)).Assessment of components and characteristics suggests a larger effect on pain intensity in interventions that included explicit educational components (-0.51 (-0.68 to -0.34) vs -0.28 (-0.40 to -0.16)); mindfulness components (-0.50 (-0.82 to -0.18) vs 0.34 (-0.44 to -0.24)) and in interventions delivered in groups vs one-to-one delivery (0.56 (-0.72 to -0.40) vs -0.39 (-0.52 to -0.27)) and larger effects on mood in interventions including a cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) component with an SMD of -0.72 (-0.93 to -0.51) compared with those without CBT -0.41 (-0.58 to -0.24). CONCLUSION Overall we found that self-management interventions for migraine and tension-type headache are more effective than usual care in reducing pain intensity, mood and headache-related disability, but have no effect on headache frequency. Preliminary findings also suggest that including CBT, mindfulness and educational components in interventions, and delivery in groups may increase effectiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER PROSPERO 2016:CRD42016041291.
-
4.
Therapist-supported Internet cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in adults.
Olthuis, JV, Watt, MC, Bailey, K, Hayden, JA, Stewart, SH
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2016;3:CD011565
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Previous research has supported the use of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) in the treatment of anxiety disorders, which is aimed at changing negative or unhealthy thinking patterns. Many individuals with anxiety find it challenging to get to CBT appointments and so an internet-based programme, with telephone and email support, has been developed. This systematic review of 38 randomised controlled trial studies aimed to assess the effects of internet CBT (ICBT) on anxiety symptoms and severity. The results showed that there was a clinically important improvement in anxiety alongside reductions in symptom severity and an increase in the patient’s quality of life (QoL) when following ICBT compared to no treatment or online support group discussions. When comparing supported ICBT and self-guided CBT there were no differences between anxiety symptom severity and QoL. When comparing ICBT and face to face therapist-supported CBT, no differences were reported in anxiety symptoms and QoL. It was concluded that ICBT is more beneficial than no treatment or online discussion groups and may be just as useful as face-to-face CBT. The number of studies that compared ICBT to self-guided CBT was limited and so specific conclusions were difficult to ascertain. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand that people suffering from anxiety may not be receiving the treatment they need for fears of new situations or leaving the house. In this instance ICBT is an alternative treatment that is just as beneficial as face-to-face therapy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is an evidence-based treatment for anxiety disorders. Many people have difficulty accessing treatment, due to a variety of obstacles. Researchers have therefore explored the possibility of using the Internet to deliver CBT; it is important to ensure the decision to promote such treatment is grounded in high quality evidence. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of therapist-supported Internet CBT (ICBT) on remission of anxiety disorder diagnosis and reduction of anxiety symptoms in adults as compared to waiting list control, unguided CBT, or face-to-face CBT. Effects of treatment on quality of life and patient satisfaction with the intervention were also assessed. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Depression, Anxiety and Neurosis Review Group Specialised Register (CCDANCTR) to 16 March 2015. The CCDANCTR includes relevant randomised controlled trials from MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CENTRAL. We also searched online clinical trial registries and reference lists of included studies. We contacted authors to locate additional trials. SELECTION CRITERIA Each identified study was independently assessed for inclusion by two authors. To be included, studies had to be randomised controlled trials of therapist-supported ICBT compared to a waiting list, attention, information, or online discussion group; unguided CBT (that is, self-help); or face-to-face CBT. We included studies that treated adults with an anxiety disorder (panic disorder, agoraphobia, social phobia, post-traumatic stress disorder, acute stress disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder, and specific phobia) defined according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders III, III-R, IV, IV-TR or the International Classification of Disesases 9 or 10. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors independently assessed the risk of bias of included studies and judged overall study quality. We used data from intention-to-treat analyses wherever possible. We assessed treatment effect for the dichotomous outcome of clinically important improvement in anxiety using a risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). For disorder-specific and general anxiety symptom measures and quality of life we assessed continuous scores using standardized mean differences (SMD). We examined statistical heterogeneity using the I(2) statistic. MAIN RESULTS We screened 1736 citations and selected 38 studies (3214 participants) for inclusion. The studies examined social phobia (11 trials), panic disorder with or without agoraphobia (8 trials), generalized anxiety disorder (5 trials), post-traumatic stress disorder (2 trials), obsessive compulsive disorder (2 trials), and specific phobia (2 trials). Eight remaining studies included a range of anxiety disorder diagnoses. Studies were conducted in Sweden (18 trials), Australia (14 trials), Switzerland (3 trials), the Netherlands (2 trials), and the USA (1 trial) and investigated a variety of ICBT protocols. Three primary comparisons were identified, therapist-supported ICBT versus waiting list control, therapist-supported versus unguided ICBT, and therapist-supported ICBT versus face-to-face CBT.Low quality evidence from 11 studies (866 participants) contributed to a pooled risk ratio (RR) of 3.75 (95% CI 2.51 to 5.60; I(2) = 50%) for clinically important improvement in anxiety at post-treatment, favouring therapist-supported ICBT over a waiting list, attention, information, or online discussion group only. The SMD for disorder-specific symptoms at post-treatment (28 studies, 2147 participants; SMD -1.06, 95% CI -1.29 to -0.82; I(2) = 83%) and general anxiety symptoms at post-treatment (19 studies, 1496 participants; SMD -0.75, 95% CI -0.98 to -0.52; I(2) = 78%) favoured therapist-supported ICBT; the quality of the evidence for both outcomes was low.One study compared unguided CBT to therapist-supported ICBT for clinically important improvement in anxiety at post-treatment, showing no difference in outcome between treatments (54 participants; very low quality evidence). At post-treatment there were no clear differences between unguided CBT and therapist-supported ICBT for disorder-specific anxiety symptoms (5 studies, 312 participants; SMD -0.22, 95% CI -0.56 to 0.13; I(2) = 58%; very low quality evidence) or general anxiety symptoms (2 studies, 138 participants; SMD 0.28, 95% CI -2.21 to 2.78; I(2) = 0%; very low quality evidence).Compared to face-to-face CBT, therapist-supported ICBT showed no significant differences in clinically important improvement in anxiety at post-treatment (4 studies, 365 participants; RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.34; I(2) = 0%; low quality evidence). There were also no clear differences between face-to-face and therapist supported ICBT for disorder-specific anxiety symptoms at post-treatment (7 studies, 450 participants; SMD 0.06, 95% CI -0.25 to 0.37; I(2) = 60%; low quality evidence) or general anxiety symptoms at post-treatment (5 studies, 317 participants; SMD 0.17, 95% CI -0.35 to 0.69; I(2) = 78%; low quality evidence).Overall, risk of bias in included studies was low or unclear for most domains. However, due to the nature of psychosocial intervention trials, blinding of participants and personnel, and outcome assessment tended to have a high risk of bias. Heterogeneity across a number of the meta-analyses was substantial, some was explained by type of anxiety disorder or may be meta-analytic measurement artefact due to combining many assessment measures. Adverse events were rarely reported. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Therapist-supported ICBT appears to be an efficacious treatment for anxiety in adults. The evidence comparing therapist-supported ICBT to waiting list, attention, information, or online discussion group only control was low to moderate quality, the evidence comparing therapist-supported ICBT to unguided ICBT was very low quality, and comparisons of therapist-supported ICBT to face-to-face CBT were low quality. Further research is needed to better define and measure any potential harms resulting from treatment. These findings suggest that therapist-supported ICBT is more efficacious than a waiting list, attention, information, or online discussion group only control, and that there may not be a significant difference in outcome between unguided CBT and therapist-supported ICBT; however, this latter finding must be interpreted with caution due to imprecision. The evidence suggests that therapist-supported ICBT may not be significantly different from face-to-face CBT in reducing anxiety. Future research should explore heterogeneity among studies which is reducing the quality of the evidence body, involve equivalence trials comparing ICBT and face-to-face CBT, examine the importance of the role of the therapist in ICBT, and include effectiveness trials of ICBT in real-world settings. A timely update to this review is needed given the fast pace of this area of research.
-
5.
Does forming implementation intentions help people with mental health problems to achieve goals? A meta-analysis of experimental studies with clinical and analogue samples.
Toli, A, Webb, TL, Hardy, GE
The British journal of clinical psychology. 2016;55(1):69-90
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
There is often a gap between goal setting and goal attainment, and this is likely worsened by mental health problems. While forming implementation intentions (if-then planning) has been shown to be a useful technique for bridging this gap, the extent to which planning can help people with mental health problems has not yet been systematically examined. Implementation intentions (if-then planning) are designed to present good opportunities to act ('if') together with the cognitive or behavioural responses to these ('then'). For example, a person with anxiety may form an implementation intention that 'if' they begin to feel anxious or under-pressure, they will 'then' use deep breathing for 5 minutes to relax. The aim of this meta-analysis was to investigate the effect of implementation intentions (if-then planning) on goal attainment among people with clinically diagnosed mental health disorders. A total of 29 experimental studies were included in the analysis. Based on the current literature, this study found forming implementation intentions had a beneficial impact on goal attainment across a range of various mental health disorders. Based on these results, the authors conclude that forming implementation intentions can be an effective strategy to integrate into treatment approaches for patients with mental health diagnoses.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE People struggle to act on the goals that they set themselves, and this gap between intention and action is likely to be exacerbated by mental health problems. Evidence suggests that forming specific if-then plans (or 'implementation intentions') can promote goal attainment and a number of studies have applied such techniques in clinical contexts. However, to date, the extent to which planning can help people with mental health problems has not been systematically examined. METHOD The present review used meta-analysis to investigate the effect of if-then planning on goal attainment among people with a DSM-IV/ICD-10 diagnosis (i.e., clinical samples) or scores above a relevant cut-off on clinical measures (i.e., analogue samples). In total, 29 experimental studies, from 18 records, met the inclusion criteria. RESULTS Excluding one outlying (very large) effect, forming implementation intentions had a large-sized effect on goal attainment (d+ = 0.99, k = 28, N = 1,636). Implementation intentions proved effective across different mental health problems and goals, and in studies with different methodological approaches. CONCLUSIONS Taken together, the findings suggest that forming implementation intentions can be a useful strategy for helping people with mental health problems to achieve various goals and might be usefully integrated into existing treatment approaches. However, further studies are needed addressing a wider range of mental health problems.
-
6.
Hunger and binge eating: a meta-analysis of studies using ecological momentary assessment.
Haedt-Matt, AA, Keel, PK
The International journal of eating disorders. 2011;44(7):573-8
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Binge eating is a key feature of both bulimia nervosa (BN) and binge-eating disorder (BED). Impaired appetite regulation (i.e. excessive hunger) has been implicated in binge eating. This study is a meta-analysis of ten studies (180 participants) that explored hunger as an antecedent for binge eating. It focused on studies using Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA), where a participant reports symptoms, affect, behaviours and cognitions close to binge-eating and in their natural environment. It found that hunger was rated significantly lower before a binge compared to before a regular meal. This suggests that excessive hunger may not be an antecedent to binge eating and support the anecdotal reports that BED eaters binge when they are not physically hungry. The authors suggest that binge eating may be a result of cognitive factors (e.g. eating in response to dietary rules) and/or negative feelings rather than physical hunger. The authors also suggest that the effectiveness of establishing a regular eating pattern and using selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) medications may therefore be effective in BN and BED for another reason other than reducing hunger.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Binge eating has been associated with increased hunger, suggesting a role for impaired appetite regulation. Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) is ideally suited to examine whether hunger is a precipitant of binge eating but results from such studies have not been systematically reviewed. This study provides a meta-analysis of EMA studies that have examined hunger as an antecedent of binge eating. METHOD Electronic database and manual searches produced seven EMA studies with N = 180 participants. Meta-analyses were conducted to compare: (1) pre-binge eating hunger to average ratings of hunger, and (2) pre-binge eating hunger to hunger before regular eating. RESULTS Across studies, hunger was significantly greater before binge eating compared with average hunger ratings, but was significantly lower before binge eating compared with before other eating episodes. DISCUSSION Excessive hunger does not appear to be a precipitant of binge eating because higher levels of hunger are observed before regular eating episodes. However, lower hunger before food consumption may contribute to the experience of a particular eating episode as a binge.
-
7.
Do implementation intentions help to eat a healthy diet? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the empirical evidence.
Adriaanse, MA, Vinkers, CD, De Ridder, DT, Hox, JJ, De Wit, JB
Appetite. 2011;56(1):183-93
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Eating a healthy diet reduces the likelihood of becoming overweight or chronically ill. Many people are aware of the health benefits of eating a healthy diet, and are hence motivated to eat healthily. This study is a review and meta-analysis with the aim to evaluate the effectiveness of setting implementation intentions (the where, when and how planning in goal setting) in promoting healthy eating behaviour. Results indicate that implementation intentions can be effective in increasing healthy eating behaviours with 12 studies showing an overall medium size effect on increasing fruit and vegetable consumption. Authors conclude that implementation intentions to promote healthy eating have more promising effects that those aiming to diminish unhealthy eating patterns.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This systematic review and meta-analysis examined whether implementation intentions are an effective tool to help people put their intentions to eat a healthy diet into practice. Additionally, it was investigated whether the quality of the outcome measures and the quality of the control conditions that are used in these studies influence implementation intentions' effectiveness. METHODS Twenty three empirical studies investigating the effect of implementation intentions on eating behavior were included. In assessing the empirical evidence, a distinction was made between studies that aim to increase healthy eating (i.e., eating more fruits) and studies that aim to diminish unhealthy eating (i.e., eating fewer unhealthy snacks). RESULTS Implementation intentions are an effective tool for promoting the inclusion of healthy food items in one's diet (Cohen's d=.51), but results for diminishing unhealthy eating patterns are less strong (Cohen's d=.29). For studies aiming to increase healthy eating, it was found that higher quality outcome measures and lower quality control conditions tended to yield stronger effects. CONCLUSION Implementation intentions are somewhat more effective in promoting healthy eating than in diminishing unhealthy eating, although for some studies promoting healthy eating effect sizes may have been inflated due to less than optimal control conditions.