1.
Does adding exercise or physical activity to pharmacological osteoporosis therapy in patients with increased fracture risk improve bone mineral density and lower fracture risk? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Schumm, AK, Craige, EA, Arora, NK, Owen, PJ, Mundell, NL, Buehring, B, Maus, U, Belavy, DL
Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA. 2023;34(11):1867-1880
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Osteoporosis, a progressive systematic skeletal disease is caused by diminished bone density and strength, which may increase the risk of fragility fractures in the spine, pelvis, femur etc. Women are at greater risk of developing osteoporosis. Osteopenia is an intermediary stage of reduced bone mineral density before progressing into the osteoporosis disease state. Exercise and pharmacological therapies are considered two effective strategies commonly used in the treatment of osteoporosis. Exercise may help to improve bone mineral density, strength and muscle mass and reduce the risk of fractures. This systematic review and meta-analysis of five parallel-arm randomised controlled trials investigated the combined effect of exercise and pharmacological therapy on bone mineral density, bone turnover markers, fractures and fracture healing in patients with osteopenia and osteoporosis. This systematic review and meta-analysis showed a non-significant improvement in bone mineral density in patients with osteopenia and osteoporosis followed by combined pharmacological treatment with exercise. Pharmacological therapy alone showed improvement and maintenance of bone mineral density. There was no evidence for the improvement in fragility fracture healing. Due to the low evidence and high heterogeneity of included studies, further robust studies are required to evaluate the combined effect of exercise and pharmacological therapy in people with systematic skeletal disease. Healthcare professionals can use this study to understand the benefits of pharmacological therapy in improving osteoporosis and osteopenia and the potential of adding exercise as a therapeutic strategy in clinical practice.
Abstract
This prospectively registered systematic review and meta-analysis examines whether exercise (EX) training has an additive effect to osteoanabolic and/or antiresorptive pharmacological therapy (PT) in people with osteoporosis on bone mineral density (BMD), bone turnover markers (BTMs), fracture healing, and fractures. Four databases (inception to 6 May 2022), 5 trial registries, and reference lists were searched. Included were randomized controlled trials comparing the effect of EX + PT vs. PT with regard to BMD, BTM, fracture healing, and fractures. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB2 and certainty of evidence by the GRADE approach. Random-effects meta-analysis with Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman adjustment was used to estimate standardized mean differences and 95% confidence intervals. Out of 2593 records, five RCTs with 530 participants were included. Meta-analysis showed with very low certainty evidence and wide confidence intervals that EX + PT compared to PT had larger effect sizes for BMD at 12 months at the hip (SMD [95%CI]: 0.18 [- 1.71; 2.06], n = 3 studies), tibia (0.25 [- 4.85; 5.34], n = 2), lumbar spine (0.20 [- 1.15; 1.55], n = 4), and forearm (0.05 [- 0.35; 0.46], n = 3), but not femoral neck (- 0.03 [- 1.80; 1.75], n = 3). Furthermore, no improvement was revealed for BTM such as bone ALP (- 0.68 [- 5.88; 4.53], n = 3), PINP (- 0.74 [- 10.42; 8.93], n = 2), and CTX-I (- 0.69 [- 9.61; 8.23], n = 2), but with very wide confidence intervals. Three potentially relevant ongoing trials were identified via registries. No data were found for fracture healing or fracture outcomes. It remains unclear whether EX has an additive impact to PT in people with osteoporosis. High-quality, adequately powered, targetted RCTs are required. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42022336132.
2.
Association of Coffee and Tea Intake with Bone Mineral Density and Hip Fracture: A Meta-Analysis.
Chen, CC, Shen, YM, Li, SB, Huang, SW, Kuo, YJ, Chen, YP
Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania). 2023;59(6)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Osteoporosis is associated with severe complications, such as osteoporotic fracture and fracture-related functional disability. Risk factors for osteoporosis must be identified and validated at the earliest. The aim of this study was to investigate the association of coffee and tea intake with bone mass density (BMD) and hip fracture risk. This study was a systematic review and meta-analysis of 106 studies. In total, 416,847 individuals (BMD related studies, 99,750 individuals; hip fracture–related studies, 408,562 individuals) were included in the final analysis. Results showed that the daily intake of caffeinated beverages, such as coffee and tea, is not associated with BMD or hip fracture risk, particularly in postmenopausal women. Authors concluded that their findings help reduce the inconsistency in the current literature. Furthermore, it may serve as a reference for future studies aimed at identifying the risk factor for osteoporosis.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Osteoporosis is characterized by low bone mass and high bone fragility. Findings regarding the association of coffee and tea intake with osteoporosis have been inconsistent. We conducted this meta-analysis to investigate whether coffee and tea intake is associated with low bone mineral density (BMD) and high hip fracture risk. Materials and Methods: PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase were searched for relevant studies published before 2022. Studies on the effects of coffee/tea intake on hip fracture/BMD were included in our meta-analysis, whereas those focusing on specific disease groups and those with no relevant coffee/tea intake data were excluded. We assessed mean difference (MD; for BMD) and pooled hazard ratio (HR; for hip fracture) values with 95% confidence interval (CI) values. The cohort was divided into high- and low-intake groups considering the thresholds of 1 and 2 cups/day for tea and coffee, respectively. Results: Our meta-analysis included 20 studies comprising 508,312 individuals. The pooled MD was 0.020 for coffee (95% CI, -0.003 to 0.044) and 0.039 for tea (95% CI, -0.012 to 0.09), whereas the pooled HR was 1.008 for coffee (95% CI, 0.760 to 1.337) and 0.93 for tea (95% CI, 0.84 to 1.03). Conclusions: Our meta-analysis results suggest that daily coffee or tea consumption is not associated with BMD or hip fracture risk.
3.
Meta-Analysis of Effects of Nutritional Intervention Combined with Calcium Carbonate D3 Tablets on Bone Mineral Density, Bone Metabolism, and Curative Effect in Patients with Osteoporosis.
Ni, H, Zhang, S, Niu, X, Dai, S
Contrast media & molecular imaging. 2022;2022:3670007
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Osteoporosis is characterised by reduced bone mineral density and changes in bone metabolism, which may increase the risk of bone fractures. Elderly people are more at risk of developing osteoporosis. A calcium carbonate D3 tablet combined with nutritional intervention is commonly recommended by health professionals for the treatment of osteoporosis in the elderly. In this meta-analysis, 10 Chinese literature, 7 high-quality literature and 3 low-quality research were examined to determine the effect of nutritional intervention with calcium carbonate D3 tablets on changes in bone mineral density and bone metabolism in osteoporosis patients. Nutritional intervention in combination with calcium carbonate tablet supplementation showed significant efficacy compared to the use of a single drug. In the combined intervention group, osteocalcin levels, serum alkaline phosphatase levels, serum calcium levels, blood phosphorus levels, and bone mineral density were significantly higher than those in the monotherapy group. This study provides healthcare professionals with an opportunity to gain a better understanding of the efficacy of nutritional intervention coupled with calcium carbonate D3 supplementation on osteocalcin levels, serum alkaline phosphatase levels, serum calcium levels, blood phosphorus levels, and bone mineral density in osteoporosis patients. The validity of the data and the clinical utility of different combinations of therapeutic strategies require further robust research.
Abstract
To investigate the changes in bone mineral density, bone metabolism, and efficacy of nutritional intervention combined with calcium carbonate D3 tablets in patients with osteoporosis, a RevMan 5.2 software meta-analysis was conducted in this study. According to the therapeutic direction of nutritional intervention combined with calcium carbonate D3 tablets for osteoporosis patients, relevant literature were searched in Wanfang Medical, CNKI, VIP, and PubMed literature databases at home and abroad. Keywords included bone mineral density, bone metabolism, blood calcium (Ca), blood phosphorus (P), osteocalcin (OC), bone mineral density (BMD), serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP), efficacy, osteoporosis, and nutritional intervention. Literature that met the criteria were deleted, and meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.2 software. The results indicate that a total of 10 Chinese literature were included. Compared with the monotherapy group, the clinical efficacy, osteocalcin, BMD, alkaline phosphatase, calcium, and phosphorus were significantly higher in the combination group (P < 0.05). Based on calcium carbonate D3, treatment combined with nutritional intervention can enhance the clinical efficacy, bone metabolism, and bone mineral density of patients with osteoporosis, and nutritional intervention combined with calcium carbonate D3 tablets is a feasible program to promote the recovery of patients with osteoporosis.
4.
Probiotic supplements and bone health in postmenopausal women: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Yu, J, Cao, G, Yuan, S, Luo, C, Yu, J, Cai, M
BMJ open. 2021;11(3):e041393
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Osteoporosis is a disease where bone density is decreased and is often seen in postmenopausal women. Current prescribed treatments are costly and can often have serious side effects and as a result natural treatments are often requested. Probiotics have been shown in previous studies to be of benefit to bones, however no large review of all the available studies has been performed. This systematic review and meta-analysis of current randomised control trials (RCT’s) aimed to summarise the effect of probiotics on bone density in postmenopausal women. The results showed that only five RCT’s were available on the effect of probiotics on bone density of which there were 497 postmenopausal women. Bone density at the base of the spine was increased in women taking probiotics, however there was no difference seen in bone density of the hip. Bone markers for bone degradation were decreased, however other markers associated with bone density changes were unaffected. It was concluded that probiotics may increase bone density at the base of the spine, however more high-quality studies are needed. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand how probiotics may be of benefit to postmenopausal women, however definitive recommendations based on this study may need to be made with caution.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Osteoporosis is a common disease in postmenopausal women. Several studies have analysed the associations between dietary supplementation with probiotics and bone health in postmenopausal women, but the results are still controversial. We conducted this meta-analysis to assess the effects of probiotics supplement on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers for postmenopausal women. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library from their inception to November 2020 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing probiotic supplements and osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Study-specific risk estimates were combined using random-effect models. RESULTS Five RCTs (n=497) were included. Probiotic supplements were associated with a significantly higher BMD in the lumbar spine (standardised mean difference, SMD=0.27, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.44) than in control. There was no difference between probiotic supplements and BMD in hips (SMD=0.22, 95% CI -0.07 to 0.52). Collagen type 1 cross-linked C-telopeptide levels in the treatment groups were significantly lower than those of the placebo group (SMD=-0.34, 95% CI -0.60 to -0.09). In subgroup meta-analysis, levels of bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, osteoprotegerin, osteocalcin and tumour necrosis factor did not differ between the probiotic and placebo groups. CONCLUSIONS We conclude cautiously that supplementation with probiotics could increase lumbar BMD. More RCTs are recommended to validate or update these results.