0
selected
-
1.
Paracetamol versus ibuprofen for the treatment of patent ductus arteriosus in preterm neonates: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Huang, X, Wang, F, Wang, K
The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians. 2018;(16):2216-2222
Abstract
BACKGROUND Paracetamol has been suggested as an effective treatment for patent ductus arteriosus (PDA). However, the comparative efficacy and safety between paracetamol and ibuprofen were not determined. METHODS A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed. Relevant studies were identified via database searching. A fixed or random effect model was applied depending on the extent of heterogeneity. RESULTS Five RCTs with 677 neonates were included. The efficacies for the primary (risk ratio [RR]: 1.03, p = .56) and overall PDA closure were comparable between the two medications (RR: 1.02, p = .62). Neonates of the two groups were comparable for the incidence of PDA complications, including necrotizing enterocolitis (RR: 0.86, p = .70), intraventricular hemorrhage (RR: 0.84, p = .55), bronchopulmonary dysplasia (RR: 0.69, p = .16), and retinopathy of prematurity (RR: 0.58, p = .15), and the risks of sepsis (RR = 0.88, p = .48) and death (RR: 1.45, p = .45) within hospitalization. However, treatment with paracetamol was associated with a trend of reduced risk of renal failure (RR: 0.20, p = .07), and a significantly reduced risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (RR: 0.28, p = .009). CONCLUSIONS Paracetamol may confer comparable treatment efficacy for the closure of PDA as ibuprofen, although paracetamol is associated with lower risk of adverse events.
-
2.
Oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy for lung disease in cystic fibrosis.
Lands, LC, Stanojevic, S
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2016;:CD001505
Abstract
BACKGROUND Progressive lung damage causes most deaths in cystic fibrosis. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (such as ibuprofen) may prevent progressive pulmonary deterioration and morbidity in cystic fibrosis. OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness of treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in cystic fibrosis. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Register comprising references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches, hand searches of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings. We contacted manufacturers of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.Latest search of the Group's Trials Register: 04 February 2016. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomized controlled trials comparing oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, at any dose for at least two months, to placebo in people with cystic fibrosis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors independently assessed trials for inclusion the review and their potential risk of bias. MAIN RESULTS The searches identified 10 trials; four are included (287 participants aged five to 39 years; maximum follow up of four years) and one is currently awaiting classification pending publication of the full trial report. Three trials compared ibuprofen to placebo (two from the same centre with some of the same participants); one trial assessed piroxicam versus placebo.The three ibuprofen trials were deemed to have good or adequate methodological quality, but used various outcomes and summary measures. Reviewers considered measures of lung function, nutritional status, radiological assessment of pulmonary involvement, intravenous antibiotic usage, hospital admissions, survival and adverse effects. Combined data from the two largest ibuprofen trials showed a significantly lower annual rate of decline for lung function, percent predicted forced expiratory volume in one second mean difference 1.32 (95% confidence interval 0.21 to 2.42); forced vital capacity mean difference 1.27 (95% confidence interval 0.26 to 2.28); forced expiratory flow (25-75%) mean difference 1.80 (95% confidence interval 0.15 to 3.45). The post-hoc analysis of data from two trials split by age showed a statistically significant slower rate of annual decline of percent predicted forced expiratory volume in one second and forced vital capacity in the ibuprofen group in younger children, mean difference 1.41% (95% confidence interval 0.03 to 2.80) and mean difference 1.32% (95% confidence interval 0.04 to 2.60) respectively. In one trial, long-term use of high-dose ibuprofen was associated with reduced intravenous antibiotic usage, improved nutritional and radiological pulmonary status. No major adverse effects were reported, but the power of the trials to identify clinically important differences in the incidence of adverse effects was low.We did not have any concerns with regards to risk of bias for the trial comparing piroxicam to placebo. However, the trial did not report many data in a form that we could analyse in this review. No data were available for the review's primary outcome of lung function; available data for hospital admissions showed no difference between the groups. No analysable data were available for any other review outcome. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS High-dose ibuprofen can slow the progression of lung disease in people with cystic fibrosis, especially in children, which suggests that strategies to modulate lung inflammation can be beneficial for people with cystic fibrosis.
-
3.
Pharmacological management of pain during orthodontic treatment: a meta-analysis.
Angelopoulou, MV, Vlachou, V, Halazonetis, DJ
Orthodontics & craniofacial research. 2012;(2):71-83
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effectiveness of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in managing pain arising from orthodontic interventions, such as archwire or separators placement. DATA SOURCES Medline and Cochrane databases searched in February 2010 and updated in July 2010 using orthodontics and pain as the search terms. Additional studies located from Google Scholar, Clinical Trials and the reference lists of retrieved articles. STUDY SELECTION Randomized controlled trials comparing NSAID to placebo using visual analogue scale (VAS) scores. DATA SYNTHESIS Of the 1127 studies identified through database searches, seven were included for meta-analysis. Treatment effects (Hedges' g using random effects model) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of the pain VAS scores were evaluated at 2, 6 and 24 h after intervention, during chewing and biting activities. Pain level at 2 h differed between the ibuprofen and placebo groups during biting (95% CI: -0.178 to -0.046), but not during chewing (95% CI: -0.551 to 0.148). At 6 h, the ibuprofen group exhibited lower pain levels during both activities (chewing 95% CI: -0.640 to -0.123, biting 95% CI: -0.857 to -0.172). At 24 h, no statistically significant difference could be detected between ibuprofen and placebo (chewing 95% CI: -0.642 to 0.112, biting 95% CI: -0.836 to 0.048). No statistically significant difference was found between ibuprofen and acetaminophen at any time point. CONCLUSION Ibuprofen appears to lower orthodontic pain compared to placebo at 2 and 6 h after separators or archwire placement, but not at 24 h, when pain peaks.
-
4.
Use of ibuprofen and risk of Parkinson disease.
Gao, X, Chen, H, Schwarzschild, MA, Ascherio, A
Neurology. 2011;(10):863-9
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neuroinflammation may contribute to the pathogenesis of Parkinson disease (PD). Use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) in general, and possibly ibuprofen in particular, has been shown to be related to lower PD risk in previous epidemiologic studies. METHODS We prospectively examined whether use of ibuprofen or other NSAIDs is associated with lower PD risk among 136,197 participants in the Nurses' Health Study (NHS) and the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (HPFS) free of PD at baseline (1998 for NHS and 2000 for HPFS). NSAIDs use was assessed via questionnaire. Results were combined in a meta-analysis with those of published prospective investigations. RESULTS We identified 291 incident PD cases during 6 years of follow-up. Users of ibuprofen had a significantly lower PD risk than nonusers (relative risk [RR], adjusted for age, smoking, caffeine, and other covariates = 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42-0.93; p = 0.02). There was a dose-response relationship between tablets of ibuprofen taken per week and PD risk (p trend = 0.01). In contrast, PD risk was not significantly related to use of aspirin (RR = 0.99; 95% CI 0.78-1.26), other NSAIDs (RR = 1.26; 95% CI 0.86-1.84), or acetaminophen (RR = 0.86; 95% CI 0.62-1.18). Similar results were obtained in the meta-analyses: the pooled RR was 0.73 (95% CI 0.63-0.85; p < 0.0001) for ibuprofen use, whereas use of other types of analgesics was not associated with lower PD risk. CONCLUSIONS The association between use of ibuprofen and lower PD risks, not shared by other NSAIDs or acetaminophen, suggests ibuprofen should be further investigated as a potential neuroprotective agent against PD.
-
5.
A meta-analysis of ibuprofen versus indomethacin for closure of patent ductus arteriosus.
Thomas, RL, Parker, GC, Van Overmeire, B, Aranda, JV
European journal of pediatrics. 2005;(3):135-40
Abstract
UNLABELLED Ibuprofen (IBU) has previously been shown to be as effective as indomethacin (INDO) in closing the patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) of preterm infants, without severely affecting renal hemodynamics or basal cerebral blood flow. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized trials to compare the efficacy and safety of IBU and INDO for treatment of PDA. Data from the nine relevant trials ( n =566), showed no significant difference in the efficacy of IBU and INDO in PDA closure ( P =0.70). However, five trials ( n =443) provided serum creatinine concentration data that revealed a significantly lower increase favoring IBU ( P < 0.001), and urine output data that showed a significantly lower decrease favoring IBU ( P < 0.001). In two trials ( n =188) the proportion of infants who required postnatal oxygen therapy at 28 days (defined as chronic lung disease) was significantly higher with IBU (52/94; 55.3%) than with INDO (38/94; 40.4%, P < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were found in mortality, intraventricular hemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis, surgical ligation, sepsis, retinopathy of prematurity, periventricular leukomalacia, length of hospital stay, gastrointestinal bleeding, re-opening of PDA, back-up treatment, surfactant therapy, or days on a ventilator. CONCLUSION ibuprofen and indomethacin have similar efficacy in patent ductus arteriosus closure, but preterm infants treated with ibuprofen experience lower serum creatinine values, higher urine output, and less undesirable decreased organ blood flow and vasoconstrictive adverse effects.
-
6.
The onset of action and the analgesic efficacy of Saridon (a propyphenazone/paracetamol/ caffeine combination) in comparison with paracetamol, ibuprofen, aspirin and placebo (pooled statistical analysis).
Kiersch, TA, Minić, MR
Current medical research and opinion. 2002;(1):18-25
Abstract
The objective was to evaluate the onset of action, analgesic efficacy and tolerability of Saridon*, a propyphenazone 150 mg/paracetamol 250 mg/caffeine 50 mg combination, in comparison with paracetamol 500 mg, aspirin 500 mg, ibuprofen 200 mg and placebo, by a pooled statistical analysis of eight studies. Out of 500 generally healthy patients (55.2% men, 44.8% women), average age 43.5 years, 329 (65.8%) had moderate and 171 (34.2%) severe acute dentoalveolar pain. More Saridon-treated patients reported 'pain gone/partly gone' and less 'pain unchanged or worse' compared with paracetamol, aspirin and placebo 30min (p = 0.009, p < 0.001, p = 0.001, respectively) and 60 min after dosing (p < 0.0001 for all). The difference with ibuprofen was observed 60 min after dosing (p < 0.01). Pain intensity differences 30 min and 60 min after dosing infer that Saridon has a faster onset of action than all of the other medications that it was compared with (ibuprofen at only 60 min after dosing). Total pain relief scores four hours after dosing were higher in the Saridon group compared with the paracetamol, ibuprofen, placebo (p < 0.0001 for all) and aspirin groups (p < 0.01). At the end of the study, patients assessed Saridon as more efficacious than the other study medications (p < 0.0001 for all). No serious adverse events were observed with any of the drugs studied. All medications were well tolerated. Twenty patients (4.0%) reported adverse events with no significant differences between groups. The most common adverse events were gastrointestinal disorders, followed by nervous system, skin, subcutaneous tissue, respiratory, cardiac and general disorders. Saridon is an effective analgesic that combines the advantage of fast onset and effective analgesia as compared with paracetamol alone, ibuprofen, aspirin or placebo. The results of this pooled analysis of eight studies should be confirmed in a double-blind study, since seven of the studies included in this analysis were single blind.