-
1.
The effectiveness of coenzyme Q10, vitamin E, inositols, and vitamin D in improving the endocrine and metabolic profiles in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a network Meta-analysis.
Zhang, J, Xing, C, Zhao, H, He, B
Gynecological endocrinology : the official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Endocrinology. 2021;(12):1063-1071
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This research evaluated the efficacy of oral nutritional agents including CoQ10, vitamin E, inositols and vitamin D on androgen-associated hormones, glycolipid metabolism and body weight in women with PCOS. METHOD A multi-database search was performed from inception to December 2020. Using multi-variate random effects method, a NMA was conducted by synthesizing data pooled from RCTs. It was registered with PROSPERO (registration number CRD42021230292). RESULTS Twenty-three RCTs and 1291 participants were included. Based on NMA, CoQ10, vitamin E, CoQ10 combined with vitamin E, and inositols were successful in decreasing TT as compared with PA; vitamin E was superior to other agents. Vitamin E and inositols were successful in increasing SHBG levels; inositols were stronger than vitamin E. CoQ10 alone or combined with vitamin E, and inositols were successful in decreasing HOMA-IR. Inositols had the best results among included nutraceuticals to ameliorate HOMA-IR, FBG, FINS, TG, TC, and LDL-C and correlated to improvements in BMI. There was no significant difference between the CoQ10 or vitamin E group and the PA group in ameliorating lipid metabolism, and vitamin D had no positive effects in ameliorating hyperandrogenism, BMI, glycolipid metabolism profiles compared with PA. CONCLUSION For women with PCOS, inositols supplementation have some certain advantages in increasing SHBG and improving glycolipid metabolism when compared with nutraceuticals like CoQ10, vitamin E, vitamin D. Besides, vitamin E may be a better option in reducing TT and increasing SHBG. CoQ10 alone or combined with vitamin E can be helpful in decreasing HOMA-IR as well.
-
2.
The effects of myo-inositol vs. metformin on the ovarian function in the polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Azizi Kutenaei, M, Hosseini Teshnizi, S, Ghaemmaghami, P, Eini, F, Roozbeh, N
European review for medical and pharmacological sciences. 2021;(7):3105-3115
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Recent studies have revealed that myo-inositol could be more influential in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). This study was aimed to determine and compare the effects of myo-inositol and metformin on hormonal and metabolic profiles and fertility outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS A comprehensive search was carried out among the English-language databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and Web of Science, and the articles published from April 2010 to February 2019 were tracked down. The fixed and random-effects meta-analysis was used to estimate the pooled effect size. The meta-analysis was performed in Stata Version 14.0. RESULTS Nine studies with 331 patients treated with metformin and 307 patients treated with myo-inositol groups were included in the analysis. The research groups did not diverge significantly in terms of the basic characteristics, such as age and Body Mass Index (BMI). In the myo-inositol group, the levels of Luteinizing Hormone (LH) [12.55% (95% I: 11.41-13.68%)], S. testosterone [44.38% (95% CI: 38.09-50.67%)] and prolactin [7.97% (95% CI: 6.58- 9.37%)] were significantly higher than those recorded, i.e., LH [7.97% (95% CI: 6.58- 9.37%)], S. testosterone [8.48% (95% CI: 3.14-13.83%)] and prolactin [7.14% (95% CI: 1.50-14.79%)] for the metformin group (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Due to the dearth of related research and the high heterogeneity of the Randomized Clinical Trials (RCTs) included in other studies, the present systematic review could not establish any differences between metformin and myo-inositol concerning the hormonal profile and the ovarian function. However, the findings indicated that myo-inositol could improve fertility outcomes by modulating hyperandrogenism. Randomized trials are required to understand the mechanistic actions of myo-inositol in comparison with those of metformin regarding oocyte and embryo quality, fertilization, pregnancy, and live birth rates.
-
3.
The effect of myo-inositol/di-chiro-inositol on markers of ovarian reserve in women with PCOS undergoing IVF/ICSI: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Bhide, P, Pundir, J, Gudi, A, Shah, A, Homburg, R, Acharya, G
Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. 2019;(10):1235-1244
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
INTRODUCTION High levels of anti-Mullerian hormone and a high antral follicle count in women with polycystic ovary syndrome, reflecting increased ovarian antral follicles, predisposes them to have a high number of retrieved oocytes with in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and an increased risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Inositols, which act as insulin sensitizers, have the potential to alter folliculogenesis and the functional ovarian reserve, with subsequent benefits to reproductive outcomes following IVF/ICSI treatment. Published literature is, however, unable to provide definitive evidence of its efficacy. The objective of our review was to evaluate the effect of inositols on anti-Mullerian hormone, antral follicle count and reproductive outcomes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome undergoing IVF/ICSI. MATERIAL AND METHODS We performed a literature search using standard methodology recommended by Cochrane. Randomized controlled trials and non-randomized studies comparing inositols with no treatment, placebo or other treatment were included in the review. Using standard methodology recommended by Cochrane we pooled results using the random effects model; our findings were reported as relative risk or mean differences. PROSPERO registration: CRD42017082275. RESULTS We included 18 trials. The primary outcome was a change in anti-Mullerian hormone and antral follicle count before and after treatment, for which data were unsuitable for meta-analysis. A narrative review showed no consistent direction or size of effect. A meta-analysis for the secondary outcomes showed no evidence of a significant difference between inositol and control groups for any outcome: number of oocytes (mean difference -0.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.11 to 0.33), number of metaphase II oocytes (mean difference 0.29, 95% CI -0.83 to 1.40), number of top grade embryos (risk ratio [RR] 1.02, 95% CI 0.93-1.12), clinical pregnancy rate (RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.87-1.53), and risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.39-1.37). The quality of evidence was assessed as very low. CONCLUSIONS There is insufficient evidence for an effect of inositols on ovarian reserve markers and to support their use as pretreatment before IVF/ICSI in women with polycystic ovary syndrome.
-
4.
Short-term effects of metformin and myo-inositol in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS): a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
Facchinetti, F, Orrù, B, Grandi, G, Unfer, V
Gynecological endocrinology : the official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Endocrinology. 2019;(3):198-206
Abstract
Metformin (MET), the most commonly used insulin sensitizer, is the reference off-label drug for the treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), worldwide. However, its use may be limited mainly by gastrointestinal adverse effects. Myo-inositol (MI), a well-recognized food supplement, also represents an evidence-based treatment for PCOS women, popular in many countries. Our aim is to provide a systematic review of the literature and a meta-analysis which compares these two treatments, for their short-term efficacy and safety in PCOS patients. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs). RCTs were identified from 1994 through 2017 using MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, PubMed, and ResearchGate. Included studies were limited to those one directly comparing MET to MI on several hormones changes. Standardized mean difference (SMD) or risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs were calculated. Changes in fasting insulin was the main outcome of measure. Six trials with a total of 355 patients were included. At the end of treatment, no difference between MET and MI was found on fasting insulin (SMD=0.08 µU/ml, 95% CI: -0.31-0.46, p=.697), HOMA index (SMD =0.17, 95% CI: -0.53-0.88, p=.635), testosterone (SMD= -0.01, 95% CI: -0.24-0.21, p=.922), SHBG levels (SMD= -0.50 nmol/l, 95% CI: -1.39-0.38, p=.263) and body mass index (BMI) (SMD= -0.22, 95% CI: -0.60-0.16, p=.265). There was strong evidence of an increased risk of adverse events among women receiving MET compared to those receiving MI (RR =5.17, 95% CI: 2.91-9.17, p<.001). No differences were found in the effect of MET and MI on short-term hormone changes. The better tolerability of MI makes it more acceptable for the recovery of androgenic and metabolic profile in PCOS women.
-
5.
Inositol for subfertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome.
Showell, MG, Mackenzie-Proctor, R, Jordan, V, Hodgson, R, Farquhar, C
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2018;(12):CD012378
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Subfertile women are highly motivated to try different adjunctive therapies to have a baby, and the widespread perception is that dietary supplements such as myo-inositol (MI) and D-chiro-insoitol (DCI) are associated with only benefit, and not with harm. Many fertility clinicians currently prescribe MI for subfertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) as pre-treatment to in vitro fertilisation (IVF) or for ovulation induction; however no high-quality evidence is available to support this practice. This review assessed the evidence for the effectiveness of inositol in subfertile women with a diagnosis of PCOS. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of oral supplementation of inositol for reproductive outcomes among subfertile women with PCOS who are trying to conceive. SEARCH METHODS We searched the following databases (to July 2018): Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group (CGFG) Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and AMED. We also checked reference lists and searched the clinical trials registries. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared any type, dose, or combination of oral inositol versus placebo, no treatment/standard treatment, or treatment with another antioxidant, or with a fertility agent, or with another type of inositol, among subfertile women with PCOS. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently selected eligible studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. The primary outcomes were live birth and adverse effects; secondary outcomes included clinical pregnancy rates and ovulation rates. We pooled studies using a fixed-effect model, and we calculated odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We assessed the overall quality of the evidence by applying GRADE criteria. MAIN RESULTS We included 13 trials involving 1472 subfertile women with PCOS who were receiving myo-inositol as pre-treatment to IVF (11 trials), or during ovulation induction (two trials). These studies compared MI versus placebo, no treatment/standard, melatonin, metformin, clomiphene citrate, or DCI. The evidence was of 'low' to 'very low' quality. The main limitations were serious risk of bias due to poor reporting of methods, inconsistency, and lack of reporting of clinically relevant outcomes such as live birth and adverse events.We are uncertain whether MI improves live birth rates when compared to standard treatment among women undergoing IVF (OR 2.42, 95% CI 0.75 to 7.83; P = 0.14; 2 RCTs; 84 women; I² = 0%). Very low-quality evidence suggests that for subfertile women with PCOS undergoing pre-treatment to IVF who have an expected live birth rate of 12%, the rate among women using MI would be between 9% and 51%.We are uncertain whether MI may be associated with a decrease in miscarriage rate when compared to standard treatment (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.86; P = 0.02; 4 RCTs; 535 women; I² = 66%; very low-quality evidence). This suggests that among subfertile women with PCOS with an expected miscarriage rate of 9% who are undergoing pre-treatment to IVF, the rate among women using MI would be between 2% and 8%; however this meta-analysis is based primarily on one study, which reported an unusually high miscarriage rate in the control group, and this has resulted in very high heterogeneity. When we removed this trial from the sensitivity analysis, we no longer saw the effect, and we noted no conclusive differences between MI and standard treatment.Low-quality evidence suggests that MI may be associated with little or no difference in multiple pregnancy rates when compared with standard treatment (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.71; P = 0.89; 2 RCTs; 425 women). This suggests that among subfertile women with PCOS who are undergoing pre-treatment to IVF, with an expected multiple pregnancy rate of 18%, the rate among women using inositol would be between 12% and 27%.We are uncertain whether MI may be associated with an increased clinical pregnancy rate when compared to standard treatment (OR 1.27, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.85; P = 0.22; 4 RCTs; 535 women; I² = 0%; very low-quality evidence). This suggests that among subfertile women with PCOS who are undergoing pre-treatment to IVF, with an expected clinical pregnancy rate of 26%, the rate among women using MI would be between 24% and 40%. Ovulation rates were not reported for this comparison.Other comparisons included only one trial in each, so for the comparisons MI versus antioxidant, MI versus an insulin-sensitising agent, MI versus an ovulation induction agent, and MI versus another DCI, meta-analysis was not possible.No pooled evidence was available for women with PCOS undergoing ovulation induction, as only single trials performed comparison of the insulin-sensitising agent and the ovulation induction agent. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS In light of available evidence of very low quality, we are uncertain whether MI improves live birth rate or clinical pregnancy rate in subfertile women with PCOS undergoing IVF pre-treatment taking MI compared to standard treatment. We are also uncertain whether MI decreases miscarriage rates or multiple pregnancy rates for these same women taking MI compared to standard treatment. No pooled evidence is available for use of MI versus placebo, another antioxidant, insulin-sensitising agents, ovulation induction agents, or another type of inositol for women with PCOS undergoing pre-treatment to IVF. No pooled evidence is available for use of MI in women undergoing ovulation induction.
-
6.
Myo-inositol lowers the risk of developing gestational diabetic mellitus in pregnancies: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with trial sequential analysis.
Guo, X, Guo, S, Miao, Z, Li, Z, Zhang, H
Journal of diabetes and its complications. 2018;(3):342-348
Abstract
AIMS: to explore the potential benefit of myo-inositol on pregnant women with high risk of developing gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). METHODS Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane library were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing myo-inositol with placebo for pregnant women with risk factors of GDM. Primary outcome were the incidence of GDM and birth weight. Secondary outcomes included fasting, 1h, and 2h oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), and complications. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was performed on primary outcomes to confirm the pooled results. Number needed to treat (NNT) was calculated to show the efficacy of myo-inositol supplement. RESULTS Four RCTs with 586 patients were included. Compared with placebo, patients with myo-inositol supplement had significantly lower the risk of developing GDM (RR=0.44, 95% CI [0.32, 0.62], P<0.0001) without heterogeneity (I2=0%, P=0.99), which was confirmed by TSA. NNT was 6.2 and rounded to 7. Myo-inositol did not significantly decrease birth weight (60.60g, 95% CI [-177.21, 56.02], P=0.31) with significant heterogeneity (I2=52%, P=0.12), but was not confirmed by TSA. Myo-inositol supplement was related to significantly lower fasting, 1h, and 2h OGTT value and the incidence of pre-term delivery. Difference was not significant between myo-inositol and placebo regarding incidence of other complications. CONCLUSION Myo-inositol is related to lower incidence of GDM, as well as fasting, 1h, and 2h OGTT value, in pregnant women with high risk of this condition. Myo-inositol might not be related to a lower birth weight, which needs further confirmation.
-
7.
The effects of inositol supplementation on lipid profiles among patients with metabolic diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Tabrizi, R, Ostadmohammadi, V, Lankarani, KB, Peymani, P, Akbari, M, Kolahdooz, F, Asemi, Z
Lipids in health and disease. 2018;(1):123
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several studies have evaluated the effect of inositol supplementation on lipid profiles among population with metabolic diseases; however, the findings are controversial. This review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed to summarize the evidence of the effects of inositol supplementation on lipid profiles among population with metabolic diseases. METHODS Relevant RCTs studies were searched in Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Web of Science until October 2017. Two researchers assessed study eligibility, extracted data, and evaluated risk of bias of included primary studies, independently. To check for the heterogeneity among included studies Q-test and I2 statistics were used. Data were pooled by using the random-effect model and standardized mean difference (SMD) was considered as summary of the effect size. RESULTS Overall, 14 RCTs were included into meta-analysis. Pooled results showed that inositol supplementation among patients with metabolic diseases significantly decreased triglycerides (SMD - 1.24; 95% CI, - 1.84, - 0.64; P < 0.001), total- (SMD - 1.09; 95% CI, - 1.83, - 0.55; P < 0.001), and LDL-cholesterol levels (SMD - 1.31; 95% CI, - 2.23, - 0.39; P = 0.005). There was no effect of inositol supplementation on HDL-cholesterol levels (SMD 0.20; 95% CI, - 0.27, 0.67; P = 0.40). CONCLUSIONS Inositol supplementation may result in reduction in triglycerides, total- and LDL-cholesterol levels, but did not affect HDL-cholesterol levels among patients with metabolic diseases. Additional prospective studies regarding the effect of inositol supplementation on lipid profiles in patients with metabolic diseases are necessary.
-
8.
Effectiveness of myoinositol for polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zeng, L, Yang, K
Endocrine. 2018;(1):30-38
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the effectiveness and safety of myoinositol for patients with PCOS. METHODS In this meta-analysis, data from randomized controlled trials are obtained to assess the effects of myoinositol vs. placebo or western medicine in women with PCOS. The study's registration number is CRD42017064563. The primary outcomes included total testosterone, estradiol (E2) and the homeostatic model assessment (HOMA) of insulin resistance. RESULT Ten trials involving 573 patients were included. The meta-analysis results show that: compared with the control group, myoinositol may improve HOMA index (WMD -0.65; 95% CI -1.02, -0.28; P = 0. 0005) and increase the E2 level (WMD 16.16; 95% CI 2.01, 30.31; P = 0. 03); while there is no enough strong evidence that the myoinositol has an effect on the total testosterone level (WMD -16.11; 95% CI -46.08, 13.86; P = 0. 29). CONCLUSION Based on current evidence, myoinositol may be recommended for the treatment of PCOS with insulin resistance, as well as for improving symptoms caused by decreased estrogen in PCOS.
-
9.
Inositol treatment of anovulation in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a meta-analysis of randomised trials.
Pundir, J, Psaroudakis, D, Savnur, P, Bhide, P, Sabatini, L, Teede, H, Coomarasamy, A, Thangaratinam, S
BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 2018;(3):299-308
Abstract
UNLABELLED Polycystic ovary syndrome is a common cause of anovulation and infertility, and a risk factor for development of metabolic syndrome and endometrial cancer. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCT) that evaluated the effects of inositol as an ovulation induction agent. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane and ISI conference proceedings, Register and Meta-register for RCT and WHO trials' search portal. We included studies that compared inositol with placebo or other ovulation induction agents. Quality of studies was assessed for risk of bias. Results were pooled using random effects meta-analysis and findings were reported as relative risk or standardised mean differences. We included ten randomised trials. A total of 362 women were on inositol (257 on myo-inositol; 105 on di-chiro-inositol), 179 were on placebo and 60 were on metformin. Inositol was associated with significantly improved ovulation rate (RR 2.3; 95% CI 1.1-4.7; I2 = 75%) and increased frequency of menstrual cycles (RR 6.8; 95% CI 2.8-16.6; I2 = 0%) compared with placebo. One study reported on clinical pregnancy rate with inositol compared with placebo (RR 3.3; 95% CI 0.4-27.1), and one study compared with metformin (RR 1.5; 95% CI 0.7-3.1). No studies evaluated live birth and miscarriage rates. Inositol appears to regulate menstrual cycles, improve ovulation and induce metabolic changes in polycystic ovary syndrome; however, evidence is lacking for pregnancy, miscarriage or live birth. A further, well-designed multicentre trial to address this issue to provide robust evidence of benefit is warranted. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT Inositols improve menstrual cycles, ovulation and metabolic changes in polycystic ovary syndrome.
-
10.
Myo-inositol supplementation reduces the amount of gonadotropins and length of ovarian stimulation in women undergoing IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Laganà, AS, Vitagliano, A, Noventa, M, Ambrosini, G, D'Anna, R
Archives of gynecology and obstetrics. 2018;(4):675-684
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate whether oral myo-inositol supplementation (MI) is able to reduce the amount of gonadotropins (GA) and the length of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (SL) in both Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS) and non-PCOS women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF). METHODS We performed a systematic review (PROSPERO ID CRD42017069439) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We searched articles published in English between January 1985 to August 2017, using the combination of the Medical Subject Headings "Inositol" with "Ovulation Induction", "follicle-stimulating hormone, human, with HCG C-terminal peptide", "Reproductive Techniques, Assisted", and "Fertilization in Vitro". We collected data about GA and SL comparing MI to no treatment or D-Chiro-Inositol (DCI) supplementation (controls). A subgroup analysis was performed to evaluate selected outcomes in PCOS and non-PCOS women. RESULTS We included 8 studies embedding 812 participants. We found a reduction in GA (p < 0.00001) and SL (p = 0.0007) in patients receiving MI with respect to controls. MI was effective in both PCOS (p < 0.00001) and non-PCOS women (p = 0.02) in reducing GA; conversely, MI supplementation decreased the SL only in PCOS women (p < 0.00001). CONCLUSION During IVF, MI is effective in both PCOS and non-PCOS women in saving gonadotropins, but reduces efficiently SL only in PCOS women.