-
1.
Effects of intensive lipid-lowering therapy on mortality after coronary bypass surgery: A meta-analysis of 7 randomised trials.
Alkhalil, M
Atherosclerosis. 2020;:75-78
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The recent reported analysis from the ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial showed that patients with previous coronary bypass graft surgery (CABG) had enhanced clinical benefits in response to intensive low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-c). Nonetheless, the impact on cardiovascular and all-cause mortality was difficult to ascertain given the relatively small number. METHODS We conducted a meta-analysis investigating the role of more versus less intensive lipid-lowering treatment, taking into consideration the difference in studies duration when reporting treatment effect. RESULTS A significant 14% reduction in deaths from any cause [RR 0.86 (95% CI, 0.74 to 0.99)] and 25% reduction in cardiovascular mortality [RR 0.75, (95% CI, 0.65 to 0.86)] were associated with intensive LDL-c reduction in patients post CABG. Importantly, this reduction was apparent in patients who were stable or developed an acute coronary syndrome following CABG. CONCLUSIONS Patients with previous CABG incurred reduction in all-cause mortality and particularly cardiovascular mortality in response to intensive LDL-c reduction. Patient's clinical presentation following CABG did not modulate the associated benefits with intensive LDL-c reduction. Characterising atherosclerotic disease may help identify other high-risk groups who may benefit maximally from additional lipid-lowering therapies.
-
2.
The effect of diets delivered into the gastrointestinal tract on gut motility after colorectal surgery-a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Hogan, S, Steffens, D, Rangan, A, Solomon, M, Carey, S
European journal of clinical nutrition. 2019;(10):1331-1342
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES Despite best practice guidelines, feeding methods after colorectal surgery vary due to the difficulties translating evidence into practice. The aim was to determine the effectiveness of diets delivered into the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) on gut motility following colorectal surgery. SUBJECTS/METHODS EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science and PubMed were systematically searched. Randomised controlled trials investigating effectiveness of a diet on gut motility after colorectal surgeries were included. Outcomes included postoperative ileus, length of stay, mortality, nausea and vomiting. RESULTS A total of 756 potential studies were identified; of these, 10 trials reporting on 1237 unique patients were included. There is evidence that early feeding reduces time (days) to first flatus (mean difference (MD):-0.64; 95% CI:-0.84 to -0.44) and bowel movements (MD:-0.64; 95% CI:-1.01 to -0.26), when compared to traditional postoperative fasting. Introducing solids versus the progression of fluids to solids had no effect on time (days) to first flatus (MD:0.13; 95% CI:-1.99 to 1.74) or bowel movement (MD:0.20; 95% CI:-0.50 to 0.98). Complete nutrition compared to hypocaloric nutrition had no effect on time to first flatus (MD:-0.60; 95% CI:-1.66 to 0.46) or bowel movement (MD:-0.20; 95% CI:-1.59 to 1.19), whereas coffee and diet compared to water and diet significantly decreased time (days) to first bowel movement (MD:-0.60; 95% CI:-0.97 to -0.19) but had no effect on time to first flatus (MD:-0.20; 95% CI:-0.57 to 0.09). CONCLUSIONS Any form of early postoperative diet provided into the GIT early after colorectal surgery is likely to stimulate gut motility, resulting in earlier return of bowel function and shorter length of stay.
-
3.
External suction versus simple water-seal on chest drainage following pulmonary surgery: an updated meta-analysis.
Zhou, J, Chen, N, Hai, Y, Lyu, M, Wang, Z, Gao, Y, Pang, L, Liao, H, Liu, L
Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery. 2019;(1):29-36
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The decision to apply simple water-seal drainage or the addition of an external suction to the simple water-seal drainage following pulmonary surgery is made based on the surgeon's experience or preference and has remained controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the effects of the addition of suction to simple water-seal on the postoperative outcomes. METHODS PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science were searched from their inception to 30 August 2017. The risk ratio and the weight mean difference were calculated for dichotomous and continuous outcomes, respectively, each with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The heterogeneity and risk of bias were also assessed. RESULTS A total of 10 randomized controlled trials enrolling 1601 patients were included. Overall, compared with simple water-seal, the addition of external suction reduced the occurrence of postoperative pneumothorax (risk ratio 0.35, 95% CI 0.13-0.93; P = 0.04) and other cardiopulmonary complications (risk ratio 0.65, 95% CI 0.48-0.89; P = 0.008), and increased the duration of chest tube drainage (weight mean difference 0.92 days, 95% CI 0.04-1.81, P = 0.04). However, the effect difference between the 2 groups was not significant regarding air leak duration, length of hospital stay and the occurrence of prolonged air leak. The stability of these studies was strong. No evidence of publication bias was detected. CONCLUSIONS The addition of suction to simple water-seal made no difference to air leak duration, hospital stay or the occurrence of prolonged air leak following pulmonary surgery. In patients where there is concern about a residual or increasing pneumothorax, the addition of suction may be applied selectively.
-
4.
Short-term evaluation of immune levels and nutritional values of EN versus PN in gastric cancer: a systematic review and a meta-analysis.
Xin, F, Mzee, SAS, Botwe, G, He, H, Zhiyu, S, Gong, C, Said, ST, Jixing, C
World journal of surgical oncology. 2019;(1):114
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postsurgical patients' oral feeding begins with clear fluids 1-3 days after surgery. This might not be sufficiently nutritious to boost the host immune system and provide sufficient energy in gastric neoplastic patients to achieve the goal of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS). Our objective was to analyze the significance of early postoperative feeding tubes in boosting patients' immunity and decreasing incidence of overall complications and hospital stay in gastric cancer patients' post-gastrectomy. METHODS From January 2005 to May 24, 2019, PubMed and Cochrane databases were searched for studies involving enteral nutrition (EN) feeding tubes in comparison to parenteral nutrition (PN) in gastric cancer patients undergoing gastrectomy for gastric malignancies. Relative risk (RR), mean difference (MD), or standard mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to estimate the effect sizes, and heterogeneity was assessed by using Q and χ2 statistic with their corresponding P values. All the analyses were performed with Review Manager 5.3 and SPSS version 22. RESULTS Nine randomized trials (n = 1437) and 5 retrospective studies (n = 421) comparing EN feeding tubes and PN were deemed eligible for the pooled analyses, with a categorized time frame of PODs ≥ 7 and PODs < 7. Ratio of CD4+/CD8+ in EN feeding tubes was the only outcome of PODs < 7, which showed significance (MD 0.22, 95% CI 0.18-0.25, P < 0.00001). Regarding other immune indicators, significant outcomes in favor of EN feeding tubes were measured on POD ≥ 7: CD3+ (SMD 1.71; 95% CI 0.70, 2.72; P = 0.0009), CD4+ (MD 5.84; 95% CI 4.19, 7.50; P < 0.00001), CD4+/CD8+ (MD 0.28; 95% CI 0.20; 0.36, P < 0.00001), NK cells (SMD 0.94; 95% CI 0.54, 1.30; P < 0.00001), nutrition values, albumin (SMD 0.63; 95% CI 0.34, 0.91; P < 0.001), prealbumin (SMD 1.00; 95% CI 0.52, 1.48; P < 0.00001), and overall complications (risk ratio 0.73 M-H; fixed; 95% CI 0.58, 0.92; P = 0.006). CONCLUSION EN feeding tube support is an essential intervention to elevate patients' immunity, depress levels of inflammation, and reduce the risk of complications after gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Enteral nutrition improves the innate immune system and nutrition levels but has no marked significance on certain clinical outcomes. Also, EN reduces the duration of hospital stay and cost, significantly.
-
5.
Does Postoperative Rehabilitation for Radical Cystectomy Call for Enhanced Recovery after Surgery? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Xiao, J, Wang, M, He, W, Wang, J, Yang, F, Ma, XY, Zang, Y, Yang, CG, Yu, G, Wang, ZH, et al
Current medical science. 2019;(1):99-110
Abstract
The aim of this review was to systematically compare the outcomes of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) with standard care (SC) after radical cystectomy. We performed a systematic search of PubMed, Ovid, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library to identify studies published until September 2017 which involved a comparison of ERAS and SC. A meta-analysis was performed to assess the outcomes of ERAS versus SC. Sixteen studies including 8 prospective and 8 retrospective trials met the eligibility criteria. A total of 2100 participants were assigned to ERAS (1258 cases) or SC (842 cases). The time to first flatus passage {WMD=-0.95 days, 95% CI (-1.50,-0.41), P=0.0006}, time until return to a regular diet {WMD=-2.15 days, 95% CI (-2.86,-1.45), P<0.00001} and the length of hospital stay {WMD=-3.75 days, 95% CI (-5.13,-2.36), P<0.00001} were significantly shorter, and the incidence of postoperative complications {OR=0.60, 95% CI (0.44, 0.83), P=0.002}, especially postoperative paralytic ileus {OR=0.43, 95% CI (0.30, 0.62), P<0.00001} and cardiovascular complications {OR=0.28, 95% CI (0.09, 0.90), P=0.03} was significantly lower in the ERAS group than those in the SC group. This meta-analysis demonstrated that ERAS was associated with a shorter time to first flatus passage, return of bowel function, and the length of hospital stay than SC in patients undergoing radical cystectomy, as well as a lower rate of postoperative complications, especially paralytic ileus and cardiovascular complications.
-
6.
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs for esophagectomy protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Liu, F, Wang, W, Wang, C, Peng, X
Medicine. 2018;(8):e0016
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Esophageal cancer is one of the worst malignant digestive neoplasms with poor treatment outcomes. Esophagectomy plays an important role and offers a potential curable chance to these patients. However, esophagectomy with radical lymphadenectomy is known as one of the most invasive digestive surgeries which are associated with high morbidity and mortality. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol is a patient-centered, surgeon-led system combining anesthesia, nursing, nutrition, and psychology, which is designed for reducing complications, promoting recovery, and improving treatment outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis is aiming at how beneficial, and to what extent ERAS really will be. METHODS A systematic literature search will be performed through January 2018 using MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar for relevant articles published in any language. Randomized controlled trials, prospective cohort studies, and propensity-matched comparative studies will be included. All meta-analyses will be performed using Review Manager software. The quality of the studies will be evaluated using the guidelines listed in the Cochrane Handbook. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statements will be followed until the findings of the systematic review and meta-analysis are reported. RESULTS The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. CONCLUSION Our study will draw an objective conclusion of the comparisons between ERAS and conventional care in aspects of perioperative outcomes and provide level I evidences for clinical decision makings.
-
7.
Effect of Early vs Late Start of Oral Intake on Anastomotic Leakage Following Elective Lower Intestinal Surgery: A Systematic Review.
Smeets, BJJ, Peters, EG, Horsten, ECJ, Weijs, TJ, Rutten, HJT, Buurman, WA, de Jonge, WJ, Luyer, MDP
Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. 2018;(6):803-812
Abstract
BACKGROUND Experimental and clinical studies have demonstrated a beneficial effect of early enteral nutrition (EN) on anastomotic leakage following colorectal surgery. Early oral intake is a common form of early EN with various clinical benefits, but the effect on anastomotic leakage is unclear. This systematic review investigates the effect of early vs late start of oral intake on anastomotic leakage following lower intestinal surgery. METHODS A systematic literature search was performed using the PubMed, Embase, Medline, and Cochrane databases. Randomized controlled trials were included that compared early (within 24 hours) vs late start of oral intake following elective surgery of the small bowel, colon, or rectum. Meta-analysis was performed for anastomotic leakage, overall complications, length of stay, and mortality. Sensitivity analysis was performed in which studies of inferior methodological quality were excluded. RESULTS Nine studies including 879 patients met eligibility criteria. Early start of oral intake significantly reduced overall complications (odds ratio [OR], 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.46-0.93; P = .02), length of stay (mean difference, -0.89; 95% CI, -1.22 to -0.57; P < .001), and anastomotic leakage (OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.17-0.95; P = .04) compared with late start of oral intake. However, in the sensitivity analysis only the overall reduction of length of stay remained significant. CONCLUSION The effect of early oral intake on anastomotic leakage is unclear as existing studies are heterogeneous and at risk of bias. High-quality studies are needed to study the potential benefit of EN on anastomotic healing.
-
8.
[Early versus traditional postoperative oral feeding in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of safety and efficacy].
Zhang, K, Cheng, S, Zhu, Q, Han, Z
Zhonghua wei chang wai ke za zhi = Chinese journal of gastrointestinal surgery. 2017;(9):1060-1066
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the outcomes of early oral feeding (EOF) and the traditional oral feeding (TOF) in postoperative patients with colorectal cancer using Meta-analysis. METHODS The databases of PubMed, SCI, Ovid, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, CBM, VIP and Wanfang Data were searched to collect randomized controlled trial (RCT) about EOF versus TOF in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. The retrieval time span was from inception to June 1, 2016. The studies were screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The data were extracted and the quality was evaluated by 2 reviewers independently. The Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.2 software. RESULTS A total of 14 studies with 1 807 patients (906 cases in EOF group and 901 cases in TOF group) were included. The time to first passage of flatus (MD=-16.11 h, 95%CI:-18.27 to -13.94 h, P=0.00), postoperative hospital stay (MD=-1.92 d, 95%CI:-2.83 to -1.01 d, P=0.00), hospitalization cost (ten thousand yuan) (MD=-0.58, 95%CI:-0.71 to -0.46, P=0.00) were less in EOF group compared to TOF group. EOF patients had lower total complication rate (OR=0.68, 95%CI:0.48 to 0.95, P=0.03), in which the pulmonary infection (OR=0.27, 95%CI:0.13 to 0.53, P=0.00), pharyngolaryngitis (OR=0.06, 95%CI:0.04 to 0.11, P=0.00) were lower than those in TOF group, while the tube reinsertion (OR=2.34, 95%CI:1.08 to 5.07, P=0.03) was higher. The incidence of anastomotic leakage, nausea, vomiting, abdominal distension, diarrhea, and wound infection between two groups was not significantly different(all P>0.05). There was no significant difference between two groups in IgM (P>0.05), while the IgA (MD=0.3, 95%CI:0.12 to 0.48, P=0.00), IgG (MD=2.13 ,95%CI:0.82 to 3.44, P=0.001), CD4+ (MD=3.80, 95%CI:2.55 to 5.04, P=0.00), CD4+/CD8+ (MD=0.22, 95%CI:0.04 to 0.41, P=0.02) in EOF group were higher than those in TOF group. Postoperative CRP decreased rapidly in EOF group (MD=-30.10, 95%CI:-48.07 to -12.13, P=0.00), and IL-6 was not significantly different (P>0.05). EOF patients had higher serum albumin level 5 days after operation (MD=3.27, 95%CI: 2.48 to 4.07, P=0.00). CONCLUSIONS EOF can promote gas passage and defecation, reduce postoperative hospital stay and treatment costs. Also, it can decrease the incidence of complications and postoperative inflammation, and maintain immune function.
-
9.
Role of honey after tonsillectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Lal, A, Chohan, K, Chohan, A, Chakravarti, A
Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery. 2017;(3):651-660
Abstract
BACKGROUND Honey reduced post-tonsillectomy pain, but its effects on awakening at night, inflammation and healing of the tonsillar fossa were controversial. OBJECTIVES This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluated the effect of oral honey on pain, consumption of painkillers, awakening at night, healing of tonsillar fossa and adverse effects in children after tonsillectomy. METHODS A search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL and Cochrane Collaboration Library databases was performed without any restriction of publication year. The end date of search was 30 June 2016. The search was supplemented by search from Google, hand search of cross-references of selected articles and reviews, and contacting the authors of different studies. The inclusion criteria were RCTs comparing the effect of honey with control on different outcomes, in children after tonsillectomy. RESULTS Our search generated 64 studies, and eight RCTs met our inclusion criteria. The methodological quality of RCTs was poor. Compared to control, honey significantly decreased postoperative pain from day 1 to day 7 (P = 0.05 to <0.0001); consumption of painkillers from days 1 to 5 (P = 0.03 to 0.003) and on day 10 (P = 0.002); and number of awakening at night due to pain on days 2 and 4 after tonsillectomy (P = 0.0001, 0.004). The healing of tonsillar fossa was significantly greater with honey compared to control on days 3-4 (P = 0.02) and days ≥9 (P = 0.01) after tonsillectomy. The adverse effects were not significantly different between honey and control groups. The Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) of the evidence for different outcomes varied from 'low' to 'very low'. CONCLUSIONS Honey improved pain, requirement of painkillers and awakening at night due to pain in children after tonsillectomy. There was little improvement in healing of tonsillar fossa. The GRADE of the evidence varied from 'low' to 'very low'. A good-quality, placebo-controlled RCT of different doses and durations of administration of honey is required to evaluate its clear efficacy and safety in children after tonsillectomy.
-
10.
The efficacy of local infiltration analgesia in the early postoperative period after total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Seangleulur, A, Vanasbodeekul, P, Prapaitrakool, S, Worathongchai, S, Anothaisintawee, T, McEvoy, M, Vendittoli, PA, Attia, J, Thakkinstian, A
European journal of anaesthesiology. 2016;(11):816-831
Abstract
BACKGROUND Local infiltration analgesia (LIA) has emerged as an alternative treatment for postoperative pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Its efficacy remains inconclusive with inconsistent results from previous studies and meta-analyses. There is no agreement on which local anaesthetic agent and infiltration technique is most effective and well tolerated. OBJECTIVE The objective was to compare LIA after primary TKA with placebo or no infiltration in terms of early postoperative pain relief, mobilisation, length of hospital stay (LOS) and complications when used as a primary treatment or as an adjunct to regional anaesthesia. The role of injection sites, postoperative injection or infusion and multimodal drug injection with ketorolac were also explored. DESIGN A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). DATA SOURCES A literature search was performed using PubMed and SCOPUS up to September 2015. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA RCTs comparing LIA with placebo or no infiltration after primary TKA in terms of pain score and opioid consumption at 24 and 48 h, mobilisation, LOS and complications were included. RESULTS In total 38 RCTs were included. LIA groups had lower pain scores, opioid consumption and postoperative nausea and vomiting, higher range of motion at 24 h and shorter LOS than no injection or placebo. After subgroup analysis, intraoperative peri-articular but not intra-articular injection had lower pain score at 24 h than no injection or placebo with the pooled mean difference of pain score at rest of -0.89 [95% CI (-1.40 to -0.38); I = 92.0%]. Continuing with postoperative injection or infusion reduced 24-h pain score with the pooled mean difference at rest of -1.50 [95% CI (-1.92 to -1.08); I = 60.5%]. There was no additional benefit in terms of pain relief during activity, opioid consumption, range of movement or LOS when LIA was used as an adjunct to regional anaesthesia. Four out of 735 patients receiving LIA reported deep knee infection, three of whom had had postoperative catheter placement. CONCLUSION LIA is effective for acute pain management after TKA. Intraoperative peri-articular but not intra-articular injection may be helpful in pain control up to 24 h. The use of postoperative intra-articular catheter placement is still inconclusive. The benefit of LIA as an adjunctive treatment to regional anaesthesia was not demonstrated.