1.
Comparison of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide with intravitreal bevacizumab for treatment of diabetic macular edema: a meta-analysis.
Zhang, Y, Ma, J, Meng, N, Li, H, Qu, Y
Current eye research. 2013;(5):578-87
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the effects of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) and intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) injections for the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME). METHODS A literature search was conducted using PUBMED, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science and the Chinese Biomedical Database. Pooled mean differences (MDs) for changes in visual acuity (VA) and central macular thickness (CMT) were calculated between groups receiving a single TA (4 mg) and bevacizumab (1.25 or 1.5 mg) from baseline to 4, 8, 12 and 24 weeks after treatment, respectively. Changes in intraocular pressure (IOP) were calculated between the two groups from baseline to 4, 8 and 12 weeks after treatment. RESULTS Eight trials (n = 434 eyes) comparing the efficacy of IVTA with IVB were included in the meta-analysis. Patients in the IVTA group demonstrated significant post-treatment improvement in VA compared with those in the IVB group at 4 (MD = -0.08; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.12 to -0.03; p = 0.0008), 8 (MD = -0.15; 95% CI: -0.20 to -0.11; p < 0.00001), 12 (MD = -0.11; 95% CI: -0.15 to -0.06; p < 0.0001) and 24 (MD = -0.05; 95% CI: -0.10 to -0.01; p = 0.02) weeks. After receiving IVTA, MDs in CMT decreased significantly at 4 weeks (MD = -40.05 μm; 95% CI: -75.29 to -4.81; p = 0.03). No significant differences in CMT were seen between the two groups at 8, 12 and 24 weeks post-treatment. Fluctuations of IOP were within normal range for both groups throughout the entire observation period. CONCLUSIONS Results of this meta-analysis suggest that IVTA is more effective for improving VA in DME. However, the CMT reduction with IVTA was unsustainable. Additional well-designed studies are needed to further investigate optimal interventions.
2.
Visual acuity after intravitreal triamcinolone for diabetic macular edema refractory to laser treatment: a meta-analysis.
Rudnisky, CJ, Lavergne, V, Katz, D
Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie. 2009;(5):587-93
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To quantify the effect on visual acuity of intravitreal triamcinolone for the treatment of laser-refractory diabetic macular edema (DME). STUDY DESIGN Meta-analysis of eligible studies identified by searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Google. PARTICIPANTS 7 randomized controlled trials and 3 cohort studies. METHODS A search of the literature between 1950 and September 2008 identified 540 articles. Studies that evaluated the efficacy of triamcinolone for the treatment of DME refractory to laser photocoagulation, reported visual acuity data, and compared the intervention with an appropriate control group were included. Exclusion criteria were studies of non-DME, triamcinolone used as an adjunct to another treatment, and triamcinolone delivery other than intravitreally. RESULTS Using a random-effects model, there was a statistically significant summary mean difference in visual acuity of -0.313 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) units (95% CI -0.551, -0.074) after 1 month of follow-up. This difference declined to -0.125 logMAR units (95% CI -0.181, -0.070) by 3 months and to -0.043 logMAR units (95% CI -0.090, 0.003) by 6 months. No evidence of publication bias was present. There was a high level of heterogeneity in this group of studies (meta-analysis of 1-month follow-up data: Q-statistic = 21.987, p< 0.001), attributable primarily to study design. CONCLUSIONS These meta-analyses demonstrate that intravitreal triamcinolone results in a temporary improvement of visual acuity in patients with laser-refractory DME, with a peak benefit of approximately 3 lines of visual acuity 1 month postinjection.