1.
Effectiveness of Therapeutic Patient Education Interventions in Obesity and Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Correia, JC, Waqas, A, Huat, TS, Gariani, K, Jornayvaz, FR, Golay, A, Pataky, Z
Nutrients. 2022;14(18)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Obesity and diabetes mellitus (DM) account for the highest burden of non-communicable diseases. Obesity is also highly comorbid with type 2 DM with a prevalence of 8.5% among adults around the globe. The aims of this study were to present (a) a critical synthesis of the theoretical basis and development of therapeutic patient education (TPE) interventions for obesity and diabetes, and (b) quantitative evidence for the efficacy of these interventions across a range of biomedical, psychosocial and psychological outcomes. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of fifty-four randomised controlled trials. Results show that: - TPE interventions bring about significant improvements in biomedical outcomes among patients with DM and obesity. - there weren’t significant differences in the quality of life of participants undergoing TPE interventions (inconclusive as only data from two studies were considered). - interventions delivered through different media and delivery formats may be equally effective. Authors conclude that the use of electronic media such as short messaging services, website-based educational programs and animation media can be used to deliver TPE effectively.
Abstract
Diabetes mellitus (DM) and obesity account for the highest burden of non-communicable diseases. There is increasing evidence showing therapeutic patient education (TPE) as a clinically and cost-effective solution to improve biomedical and psychosocial outcomes among people with DM and obesity. The present systematic review and meta-analysis present a critical synthesis of the development of TPE interventions for DM and obesity and the efficacy of these interventions across a range of biomedical, psychosocial and psychological outcomes. A total of 54 of these RCTs were identified among patients with obesity and diabetes and were thus qualitatively synthesized. Out of these, 47 were included in the quantitative synthesis. There was substantial heterogeneity in the reporting of these outcomes (I2 = 88.35%, Q = 317.64), with a significant improvement noted in serum HbA1c levels (standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.272, 95% CI: 0.118 to 0.525, n = 7360) and body weight (SMD = 0.526, 95% CI: 0.205 to 0.846, n = 1082) in the intervention group. The effect sizes were comparable across interventions delivered by different modes and delivery agents. These interventions can be delivered by allied health staff, doctors or electronically as self-help programs, with similar effectiveness (p < 0.001). These interventions should be implemented in healthcare and community settings to improve the health outcomes in patients suffering from obesity and DM.
2.
Effects of Attentional Focus on Muscular Endurance: A Meta-Analysis.
Grgic, J, Mikulic, P
International journal of environmental research and public health. 2021;19(1)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
For over 20 years, the effects of attentional focus on motor learning have been explored. Several muscular qualities are important when discussing resistance exercise, including muscular endurance. The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis examining the effects of external focus vs. internal focus vs. control on muscular endurance. This study is a meta-analysis of five studies. The pooled number of participants among the included studies was 141 (24 females and 117 males). Results indicate that adopting an external focus of attention enhances muscular endurance. These performance-enhancing effects of external focus were found when comparing both with an internal focus and control condition. However, there was no significant difference between the internal focus and control conditions. Authors conclude that individuals should use an external focus of attention for acute enhancement of muscular endurance.
Abstract
Several studies explored the effects of attentional focus on resistance exercise, but their analysed outcomes most commonly involved surface electromyography variables. Therefore, the effects of attentional focus on resistance exercise performance remain unclear. The aim of this review was to perform a meta-analysis examining the acute effects of external focus vs. internal focus vs. control on muscular endurance. Five databases were searched to find relevant studies. The data were pooled in a random-effects meta-analysis. In the analysis for external vs. internal focus of attention, there were seven comparisons with 14 study groups. In the analyses for external focus vs. control and internal focus vs. control, there were six comparisons with 12 study groups. An external focus of attention enhanced muscular endurance when compared with an internal focus (Cohen's d: 0.58; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.34 and 0.82) and control (Cohen's d: 0.42; 95% CI: 0.08 and 0.76). In the analysis for internal focus vs. control, there was no significant difference between the conditions (Cohen's d: -0.19; 95% CI: -0.45 and 0.07). Generally, these results remained consistent in the subgroup analyses for upper-body vs. lower-body exercises. From a practical perspective, the results presented in this review suggest that individuals should use an external focus of attention for acute enhancement of muscular endurance.
3.
Long-term clinical outcomes in survivors of severe acute respiratory syndrome and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus outbreaks after hospitalisation or ICU admission: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ahmed, H, Patel, K, Greenwood, DC, Halpin, S, Lewthwaite, P, Salawu, A, Eyre, L, Breen, A, O'Connor, R, Jones, A, et al
Journal of rehabilitation medicine. 2020;52(5):jrm00063
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Alongside acute challenges, the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) outbreaks resulted in significant long-term clinical problems for survivors, with implications for rehabilitation services and healthcare utilization. The aim of this study was to determine the long-term clinical complications for survivors of SARS and MERS after hospitalization and intensive care unit admission. This study is a systemic review and meta-analysis which included a total of 28 studies in the systematic review and 23 in the meta-analysis. Results indicate that health-related quality of life, measured using SF-36, was considerably reduced in survivors at 6 months post-infection, and showed only slight improvement beyond 6 months. Health-related quality of life of survivors remained below that of the normal population and of those with chronic conditions. Authors conclude that clinicians should monitor the survivors of COVID-19 for the range of physical and mental health impairments in order to manage these patients appropriately.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine long-term clinical outcomes in survivors of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) coronavirus infections after hospitalization or intensive care unit admission. DATA SOURCES Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL Plus, and PsycINFO were searched. STUDY SELECTION Original studies reporting clinical outcomes of adult SARS and MERS survivors 3 months after admission or 2 months after discharge were included. DATA EXTRACTION Studies were graded using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine 2009 Level of Evidence Tool. Meta-analysis was used to derive pooled estimates for prevalence/severity of outcomes up to 6 months after hospital discharge, and beyond 6 months after discharge. DATA SYNTHESIS Of 1,169 identified studies, 28 were included in the analysis. Pooled analysis revealed that common complications up to 6 months after discharge were: impaired diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (prevalence 27%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 15–45%); and reduced exercise capacity (mean 6-min walking distance 461 m, CI 450–473 m). The prevalences of post-traumatic stress disorder (39%, 95% CI 31–47%), depression (33%, 95% CI 20–50%) and anxiety (30%, 95% CI 10–61) beyond 6 months after discharge were considerable. Low scores on Short-Form 36 were identified beyond 6 months after discharge. CONCLUSION Lung function abnormalities, psychological impairment and reduced exercise capacity were common in SARS and MERS survivors. Clinicians should anticipate and investigate similar long-term outcomes in COVID-19 survivors.