1.
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Lifestyle Modification with Other Treatments on the Incidence of Type 2 Diabetes in People at High Risk: A Network Meta-Analysis.
Yamaoka, K, Nemoto, A, Tango, T
Nutrients. 2019;11(6)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The prevalence of diabetes has been increasing worldwide. The accompanying increase in the prevalence of diabetes-related complications and the occurrence of diabetes are likely to have a substantial impact on healthcare costs. The aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness of lifestyle modifications to other treatments for patients at high risk of type 2 diabetes. The study design is a systemic review of published literature and a network meta-analysis of data from each selected study. Forty-seven interventions were used for the analyses. The results of the meta-analysis highlight the efficacy of lifestyle modification in preventing the onset of type 2 diabetes in high-risk patients in comparison with standard treatment or placebo as well as other treatments. The proportion of patients with onset of type 2 diabetes in the intervention (lifestyle modification) group was approximately twice as low as compared to the control (standard intervention) group. Authors conclude that lifestyle modification is the superior treatment intervention among 12 treatments for the prevention of type 2 diabetes in high-risk individuals.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many clinical trials have been conducted to verify the effects of interventions for prevention of type 2 diabetes (T2D) using different treatments and outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of lifestyle modifications (LM) with other treatments in persons at high risk of T2D by a network meta-analysis (NMA). METHODS Searches were performed of PUBMED up to January 2018 to identify randomized controlled trials. The odds ratio (OR) with onset of T2D at 1 year in the intervention group (LM, dietary, exercise, or medication) versus a control group (standard treatments or placebo) were the effect sizes. Frequentist and Bayesian NMAs were conducted. RESULTS Forty-seven interventions and 12 treatments (20,113 participants) were used for the analyses. The OR in the LM was approximately 0.46 (95% CI: 0.33 to 0.61) times lower compared to the standard intervention by the Bayesian approach. The effects of LM compared to other treatments by indirect comparisons were not significant. CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis further strengthened the evidence that LM reduces the onset of T2D compared to standard and placebo interventions and appears to be at least as effective as nine other treatments in preventing T2D.
2.
Headache Associated with Coeliac Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Zis, P, Julian, T, Hadjivassiliou, M
Nutrients. 2018;10(10)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Coeliac disease (CD) is the best-recognised gluten-related disorder (GRD), and it is characterized by a small bowel enteropathy occurring in genetically susceptible individuals whilst exposed to the protein gliadin. The aim of this study was to systematically review the current literature in order to establish the relationship between headache and CD. This study is a systematic review of 40 articles, studying a total of 42,388 individuals with either headache or GRD. Results show that: - There is an increased prevalence of headache amongst patients with CD. - There is an increased prevalence of CD amongst patients with idiopathic headache. - Headaches associated with CD are mainly migraines. - Gluten-free diet is a very effective treatment for headaches associated with CD. Authors conclude that further studies on the prevalence of gluten sensitivity in patients with idiopathic headache are needed, including further research on the pathogenetic mechanisms.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this systematic review was to explore the relationship between coeliac disease (CD) and headache. The objectives were to establish the prevalence of each entity amongst the other, to explore the role of gluten free diet (GFD), and to describe the imaging findings in those affected by headaches associated with CD. METHODOLOGY A systematic computer-based literature search was conducted on the PubMed database. Information regarding study type, population size, the age group included, prevalence of CD amongst those with headache and vice versa, imaging results, the nature of headache, and response to GFD. RESULTS In total, 40 articles published between 1987 and 2017 qualified for inclusion in this review. The mean pooled prevalence of headache amongst those with CD was 26% (95% CI 19.5⁻33.9%) in adult populations and 18.3% (95% CI 10.4⁻30.2%) in paediatric populations. The headaches are most often migraine-like. In children with idiopathic headache, the prevalence of CD is 2.4% (95% CI 1.5⁻3.7%), whereas data for adult populations is presently unavailable. Brain imaging can be normal, although, cerebral calcifications on CT, white matter abnormalities on MRI and deranged regional cerebral blood flow on SPECT can be present. GFD appears to be an effective management for headache in the context of CD, leading to total resolution of headaches in up to 75% of patients. CONCLUSIONS There is an increased prevalence of CD amongst idiopathic headache and vice versa. Therefore, patients with headache of unknown origin should be screened for CD, as such patients may symptomatically benefit from a GFD.
3.
Nonnutritive sweeteners and cardiometabolic health: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies.
Azad, MB, Abou-Setta, AM, Chauhan, BF, Rabbani, R, Lys, J, Copstein, L, Mann, A, Jeyaraman, MM, Reid, AE, Fiander, M, et al
CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne. 2017;189(28):E929-E939
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Obesity is a major public health challenge that contributes to type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Evidence that sugar consumption is fuelling this epidemic has stimulated the increasing popularity of non-nutritive sweeteners including aspartame, sucralose and stevioside. The aim of this study was to synthesize evidence of whether routine consumption of non-nutritive sweeteners by adults and adolescents is associated with adverse long-term cardiometabolic effects. This study is a systemic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and prospective cohort studies. It includes 37 studies involving a total of 406910 individuals. The study shows that small RCTs with short follow-up (median 6 months) suggest that consumption of non-nutritive sweeteners is not consistently associated with decreases in body weight, BMI or waist circumference. However, in larger prospective cohort studies with longer follow-up periods (median 10 years), intake of non-nutritive sweeteners is significantly associated with modest long-term increases in each of these measures. Authors conclude that caution in the use of non-nutritive sweeteners is warranted until the long-term risks and benefits of these products are fully characterised.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nonnutritive sweeteners, such as aspartame, sucralose and stevioside, are widely consumed, yet their long-term health impact is uncertain. We synthesized evidence from prospective studies to determine whether routine consumption of non-nutritive sweeteners was associated with long-term adverse cardiometabolic effects. METHODS We searched MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library (inception to January 2016) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated interventions for nonnutritive sweeteners and prospective cohort studies that reported on consumption of non-nutritive sweeteners among adults and adolescents. The primary outcome was body mass index (BMI). Secondary outcomes included weight, obesity and other cardiometabolic end points. RESULTS From 11 774 citations, we included 7 trials (1003 participants; median follow-up 6 mo) and 30 cohort studies (405 907 participants; median follow-up 10 yr). In the included RCTs, nonnutritive sweeteners had no significant effect on BMI (mean difference -0.37 kg/m2; 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.10 to 0.36; I2 9%; 242 participants). In the included cohort studies, consumption of nonnutritive sweeteners was associated with a modest increase in BMI (mean correlation 0.05, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.06; I2 0%; 21 256 participants). Data from RCTs showed no consistent effects of nonnutritive sweeteners on other measures of body composition and reported no further secondary outcomes. In the cohort studies, consumption of nonnutritive sweeteners was associated with increases in weight and waist circumference, and higher incidence of obesity, hypertension, metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular events. Publication bias was indicated for studies with diabetes as an outcome. INTERPRETATION Evidence from RCTs does not clearly support the intended benefits of nonnutritive sweeteners for weight management, and observational data suggest that routine intake of nonnutritive sweeteners may be associated with increased BMI and cardiometabolic risk. Further research is needed to fully characterize the long-term risks and benefits of nonnutritive sweeteners. Protocol registration: PROSPERO-CRD42015019749.