-
1.
Vegetarian and vegan diets and the risk of cardiovascular disease, ischemic heart disease and stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.
Dybvik, JS, Svendsen, M, Aune, D
European journal of nutrition. 2023;62(1):51-69
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is mainly due to ischemic heart disease (IHD) and stroke. Plant-based diets are effective for improving CVD risk factors. This is further supported by the favourable cardiometabolic profile seen among vegetarians who predominantly exclude meat, fish and poultry from their diet, when compared to people consuming meat. The aim of this study was to analyse the association between vegetarian or vegan diets and risk of incidence and mortality from CVD, IHD and stroke, both overall and subtypes. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of thirteen prospective cohort studies. Results show a 15% and a 21% reduction in the relative risk of CVD and IHD, respectively, for vegetarians compared to nonvegetarians, but there wasn’t a clear association for total stroke or subtypes of stroke. Furthermore, an 18% reduction in the relative risk of IHD was observed among vegans when compared to nonvegetarians but the association lacked precision and no clear association was observed for CVD or stroke; however, there were few studies in the analyses of vegans. Authors conclude that their findings are consistent with existing guidelines recommending plant-based dietary patterns for CVD prevention. However, further studies are required to clarify the association between vegetarian diets and stroke risk, as well as the association between vegan diets and IHD.
Abstract
PURPOSE Vegetarian diets have been associated with reduced risk of ischemic heart disease (IHD). However, results regarding cardiovascular disease (CVD) overall and stroke are less clear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies on CVD, IHD and stroke risk among vegetarians or vegans versus nonvegetarians to clarify these associations. METHODS PubMed and Ovid Embase databases were searched through August 12, 2021. Prospective cohort studies reporting adjusted relative risk (RR) estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for incidence or mortality from CVD, IHD and stroke, comparing vegetarians and vegans to nonvegetarians were included. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using ROBINS-I and the strength of evidence was assessed using World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF) criteria. Summary RRs (95% CIs) were estimated using a random effects model. RESULTS Thirteen cohort studies (844,175 participants, 115,392 CVD, 30,377 IHD, and 14,419 stroke cases) were included. The summary RR for vegetarians vs. nonvegetarians was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.79-0.92, I2 = 68%, n = 8) for CVD, 0.79 (95% CI: 0.71-0.88, I2 = 67%, n = 8) for IHD, 0.90 (95% CI: 0.77-1.05, I2 = 61%, n = 12) for total stroke, and for vegans vs. nonvegetarians was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.68-1.00, I2 = 0%, n = 6) for IHD. RoB was moderate (n = 8) to serious (n = 5). The associations between vegetarian diets and CVD and IHD were considered probably causal using WCRF criteria. CONCLUSIONS Vegetarian diets are associated with reduced risk of CVD and IHD, but not stroke, but further studies are needed on stroke. These findings should be considered in dietary guidelines. REVIEW REGISTRATION No review protocol registered.
-
2.
Effect of supplementation with Chlorella vulgaris on lipid profile in adults: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Sherafati, N, Bideshki, MV, Behzadi, M, Mobarak, S, Asadi, M, Sadeghi, O
Complementary therapies in medicine. 2022;66:102822
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Dyslipidaemia is a chronic metabolic disorder that is characterized by increased levels of triglyceride (TG), total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and reduced levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). Patients with dyslipidaemia have an increased risk of coronary heart disease, stroke, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, diabetes and even mortality. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of Chlorella vulgaris supplementation on lipid profile in adults. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of ten randomised controlled trial studies. The studies included a total of 539 individuals (n= 264 in the Chlorella vulgaris group and n= 275 in the control group). Results show that Chlorella vulgaris supplementation resulted in a significant reduction in TC and LDL-C levels, while it had no significant effect on TG and HDL-C levels either in the overall analysis or in the subgroup analysis. Furthermore, the reducing effect of Chlorella vulgaris supplementation on LDL-C levels was significant between zero and 1500 mg/d and it was not significant at higher dosages. Authors conclude that future studies should examine the effect of Chlorella vulgaris supplementation on other biochemical parameters such as glycaemic measures and inflammatory biomarkers.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To summarize available findings on the effect of Chlorella vulgaris supplementation on lipid profile in adults. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). SETTING This study followed 2020 PRISMA guideline. We performed a systematic search in the online databases to identify relevant articles and then, extracted required data from each paper for the meta-analysis. Random-effects models were used to obtain overall mean difference (MD) comparing Chlorella vulgaris supplementation with a control group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Blood lipids including triglyceride (TG), total cholesterol (TC), LDL-C, and HDL-C. RESULTS In total, 10 RCTs with a total sample size of 539 adults (264 in the Chlorella vulgaris group and 275 in the control group) were included. Of the 10 RCTs, four had a low risk of bias for all aspects of the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Also, only two studies determined the chlorella content, purity, potency, and contamination of the supplements used in the intervention. Combining results from these studies showed a summary MD of -2.11 mg/dL (95% CI: -7.28 to 3.06) for TG, -7.47 mg/dL (95% CI: -12.98 to -1.96) for TC, -7.71 mg/dL (95% CI: -14.05 to -1.37) for LDL-C, and -0.45 mg/dL (95% CI: -0.67 to 1.57) for HDL-C, indicating a beneficial effect of Chlorella vulgaris supplementation on TC and LDL-C levels. Based on the dose-response analysis, the reducing effect of Chlorella vulgaris supplementation on LDL-C levels was seen at the dosages between zero and 1500 mg/d (P for non-linearity= 0.01), whereas in higher amounts, this effect was not significant. CONCLUSION We found that Chlorella vulgaris supplementation had a beneficial effect on TC and LDL-C levels with no significant effect on TG and HDL-C levels.
-
3.
The Dose-Response Associations of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Intake with the Risk of Stroke, Depression, Cancer, and Cause-Specific Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies.
Wang, Y, Zhao, R, Wang, B, Zhao, C, Zhu, B, Tian, X
Nutrients. 2022;14(4)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages is high in today's society, which may lead to weight gain, inflammation, and a number of obesity-associated diseases. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the associations and causal links between the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages and cancer, stroke, depression, and cause-specific mortality. Consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages significantly increased the risk of cancer, strokes, depression, and cause-specific mortality when compared with the consumption of low or no-sugar-sweetened beverages. As little as a 250ml increment of sugar-sweetened beverages was associated with an increase in risk. Consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages increases the risk of ischemic stroke by 10%, CVD-caused mortality by 13%, and cancer-caused mortality by 6.0% compared to those who consume less or no sugar-sweetened beverages. These findings can be used by healthcare professionals to understand the clinical significance of intervention strategies that reduce the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages. It is imperative to conduct additional robust studies as there is an insufficient amount of evidence at present to establish a causal connection between the consumption of sugary beverages and the risk of depression, stroke, cancer, and cause-specific mortality.
Abstract
The associations between sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) consumption and the risk of stroke, depression, cancer, and cause-specific mortality have not been determined, and the quantitative aspects of this link remain unclear. This meta-analysis therefore conducted a systematic review and dose-response analysis to determine their causal links. The database searches were conducted in PubMed, Cochrane library, Embase, Web of Science up to 10 November 2021. The intervention effects were evaluated by relative risk (RR) with 95% confidences (CI). Thirty-two articles met the inclusion criteria. Higher levels of SSB consumption significantly increased the risk of stroke (RR 1.12, 95% CI 1.03-1.23), depression (1.25, 1.11-1.41), cancer (1.10, 1.03-1.17), and all-cause mortality (1.08, 1.05-1.11) compared with none or lower SSB intake. The associations were dose-dependent, with per 250 mL increment of SSB intake daily increasing the risk of stroke, depression, cancer, and all-cause mortality by RR 1.09 (1.03-1.15), 1.08 (1.06-1.10), 1.17 (1.04-1.32), and 1.07 (1.03-1.11), respectively. The link was curved for depression and cancer risk (pnon-linear < 0.05). Subgroup analysis suggested that higher SSB intake increased ischemic stroke by 10%, CVD-caused mortality by 13%, and cancer-caused mortality by 6.0% than none or lower SSB consumption. It is suggested that SSB accounts for a leading risk factor of stroke, depression, cancer, and mortality, and that the risk rises in parallel with the increment of SSB intake (and is affected by participant characteristics).
-
4.
Effect of Omega-3 Dosage on Cardiovascular Outcomes: An Updated Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression of Interventional Trials.
Bernasconi, AA, Wiest, MM, Lavie, CJ, Milani, RV, Laukkanen, JA
Mayo Clinic proceedings. 2021;96(2):304-313
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
There is mixed evidence to support the use of omega-3 fatty acids for the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease. Animal studies have shown promising results, but randomised control trials are inconsistent, possibly due to differing doses used, or differences in the subject’s omega-3 levels at the start of the trial. This meta-analysis of 40 studies with over 135,000 subjects aimed to determine whether omega-3 supplementation reduces heart disease risk and whether dosage has a role. The results showed that omega-3 supplementation reduced the risk of heart attacks, death from heart attacks and deaths due to heart disease, and the higher the dose, the greater the protection. The majority of studies were on individuals who had already had a heart attack or who had suffered from a related condition. It was concluded that supplementation with omega-3 is effective in preventing heart disease and heart attacks and the protective effect increases with dosage. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to prevent further heart disease and heart attacks in individuals who have already suffered from one of these conditions.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To quantify the effect of eicosapentaenoic (EPA) and docosahexaenoic (DHA) acids on cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention and the effect of dosage. METHODS This study is designed as a random effects meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomized control trials with EPA/DHA supplementation. This is an update and expanded analysis of a previously published meta-analysis which covers all randomized control trials with EPA/DHA interventions and cardiovascular outcomes published before August 2019. The outcomes included are myocardial infarction (MI), coronary heart disease (CHD) events, CVD events (a composite of MI, angina, stroke, heart failure, peripheral arterial disease, sudden death, and non-scheduled cardiovascular surgical interventions), CHD mortality and fatal MI. The strength of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework. RESULTS A total of 40 studies with a combined 135,267 participants were included. Supplementation was associated with reduced risk of MI (relative risk [RR], 0.87; 95% CI, 0.80 to 0.96), high certainty number needed to treat (NNT) of 272; CHD events (RR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.84 to 0.97), high certainty NNT of 192; fatal MI (RR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.91]), moderate certainty NNT = 128; and CHD mortality (RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.85 to 0.98), low certainty NNT = 431, but not CVD events (RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.90 to 1.00). The effect is dose dependent for CVD events and MI. CONCLUSION Cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of death worldwide. Supplementation with EPA and DHA is an effective lifestyle strategy for CVD prevention, and the protective effect probably increases with dosage.
-
5.
Coenzyme Q10 for heart failure.
Al Saadi, T, Assaf, Y, Farwati, M, Turkmani, K, Al-Mouakeh, A, Shebli, B, Khoja, M, Essali, A, Madmani, ME
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2021;(2):CD008684
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
As per the definition given by the NHS, heart failure happens when the heart fails to pump blood around the body due to stiffness or weakness of the heart muscle. Coenzyme Q10 reduces oxidative stress and toxic effects in the body by acting as a fat-soluble antioxidant nutrient. Due to these beneficial effects, CoQ10 may effectively reduce damage to cardiac cells and disruption to cellular signalling. CoQ10 is also a cell membrane stabiliser, and previous studies have shown a correlation between the severity of heart failure and CoQ10 deficiency. In addition, dietary absorption of CoQ10 is relatively slow and ineffective; therefore, supplementation is effective and safe with no side effects. This review included eleven randomised controlled studies to compare the beneficial effects of Coenzyme Q10 for the treatment of people with heart disease. This review showed that Coenzyme Q10 might reduce all-cause mortality and hospitalisation due to heart failure. In addition, CoQ10 may stabilise myocardial calcium‐dependent ion channels and encourage adenosine‐5'‐triphosphate (ATP) synthesis. However, the effectiveness of CoQ10 in lowering the risk of myocardial infarction or stroke, left ventricular ejection fraction and exercise capacity is inconclusive. Healthcare professionals can use this study's results to understand the potential beneficial effects of CoQ10 supplementation on maintaining heart health. However, due to the high heterogeneity in the current research, further robust long-term studies are required to evaluate the therapeutic value of Coenzyme Q10 in managing heart disease.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Coenzyme Q10, or ubiquinone, is a non-prescription nutritional supplement. It is a fat-soluble molecule that acts as an electron carrier in mitochondria, and as a coenzyme for mitochondrial enzymes. Coenzyme Q10 deficiency may be associated with a multitude of diseases, including heart failure. The severity of heart failure correlates with the severity of coenzyme Q10 deficiency. Emerging data suggest that the harmful effects of reactive oxygen species are increased in people with heart failure, and coenzyme Q10 may help to reduce these toxic effects because of its antioxidant activity. Coenzyme Q10 may also have a role in stabilising myocardial calcium-dependent ion channels, and in preventing the consumption of metabolites essential for adenosine-5'-triphosphate (ATP) synthesis. Coenzyme Q10, although not a primary recommended treatment, could be beneficial to people with heart failure. Several randomised controlled trials have compared coenzyme Q10 to other therapeutic modalities, but no systematic review of existing randomised trials was conducted prior to the original version of this Cochrane Review, in 2014. OBJECTIVES To review the safety and efficacy of coenzyme Q10 in heart failure. SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL Plus, and AMED on 16 October 2020; ClinicalTrials.gov on 16 July 2020, and the ISRCTN Registry on 11 November 2019. We applied no language restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials of either parallel or cross-over design that assessed the beneficial and harmful effects of coenzyme Q10 in people with heart failure. When we identified cross-over studies, we considered data only from the first phase. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard Cochrane methods, assessed study risk of bias using the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool, and GRADE methods to assess the quality of the evidence. For dichotomous data, we calculated the risk ratio (RR); for continuous data, the mean difference (MD), both with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Where appropriate data were available, we conducted meta-analysis. When meta-analysis was not possible, we wrote a narrative synthesis. We provided a PRISMA flow chart to show the flow of study selection. MAIN RESULTS We included eleven studies, with 1573 participants, comparing coenzyme Q10 to placebo or conventional therapy (control). In the majority of the studies, sample size was relatively small. There were important differences among studies in daily coenzyme Q10 dose, follow-up period, and the measures of treatment effect. All studies had unclear, or high risk of bias, or both, in one or more bias domains. We were only able to conduct meta-analysis for some of the outcomes. None of the included trials considered quality of life, measured on a validated scale, exercise variables (exercise haemodynamics), or cost-effectiveness. Coenzyme Q10 probably reduces the risk of all-cause mortality more than control (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.95; 1 study, 420 participants; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 13.3; moderate-quality evidence). There was low-quality evidence of inconclusive results between the coenzyme Q10 and control groups for the risk of myocardial infarction (RR 1.62, 95% CI 0.27 to 9.59; 1 study, 420 participants), and stroke (RR 0.18, 95% CI 0.02 to 1.48; 1 study, 420 participants). Coenzyme Q10 probably reduces hospitalisation related to heart failure (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.78; 2 studies, 1061 participants; NNTB 9.7; moderate-quality evidence). Very low-quality evidence suggests that coenzyme Q10 may improve the left ventricular ejection fraction (MD 1.77, 95% CI 0.09 to 3.44; 7 studies, 650 participants), but the results are inconclusive for exercise capacity (MD 48.23, 95% CI -24.75 to 121.20; 3 studies, 91 participants); and the risk of developing adverse events (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.10; 2 studies, 568 participants). We downgraded the quality of the evidence mainly due to high risk of bias and imprecision. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The included studies provide moderate-quality evidence that coenzyme Q10 probably reduces all-cause mortality and hospitalisation for heart failure. There is low-quality evidence of inconclusive results as to whether coenzyme Q10 has an effect on the risk of myocardial infarction, or stroke. Because of very low-quality evidence, it is very uncertain whether coenzyme Q10 has an effect on either left ventricular ejection fraction or exercise capacity. There is low-quality evidence that coenzyme Q10 may increase the risk of adverse effects, or have little to no difference. There is currently no convincing evidence to support or refute the use of coenzyme Q10 for heart failure. Future trials are needed to confirm our findings.
-
6.
Effects of Vegetarian Diets on Blood Pressure Lowering: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis.
Lee, KW, Loh, HC, Ching, SM, Devaraj, NK, Hoo, FK
Nutrients. 2020;12(6)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
High blood pressure or hypertension is defined as systolic blood pressure of 140 mmHg or higher, and diastolic blood pressure of 90 mmHg or higher. It is an independent and major risk factor for cardiovascular disease and chronic kidney failure. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of a vegetarian diet on the reduction of blood pressure. This study is a systematic review together with trial sequential analysis. A total of 15 studies involving 856 individuals met the eligibility criteria and were included in the final analyses. Results show that a vegetarian dietary pattern significantly reduced systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Furthermore, dietary patterns based solely on plant sources are more effective in reducing blood pressure than other types of vegetarian diet which still include animal products or by-products, such as eggs and dairy products. Authors conclude that vegetarian diets, especially vegan diets, reduce blood pressure when compared with omnivorous diets. Thus, suggesting that they may be crucial in the primary prevention and overall management of hypertension.
Abstract
The beneficial effects of a vegetarian diet on blood pressure (BP) control have been reported in previous systematic reviews; however, so far, their relative effectiveness is not well established. Here, we performed a systematic review together with trial sequential analysis to determine the effect of a vegetarian diet on the reduction of blood pressure. We searched the randomized controlled trial (RCT) through Medline, PubMed and Cochrane Central Register. Fifteen eligible RCTs with 856 subjects were entered into the analysis. The pooled results demonstrated that vegetarian diet consumption significantly lowered the systolic blood pressure (weighted mean difference (WMD), -2.66 mmHg (95% confidence interval (CI) = -3.76, -1.55, p < 0.001) and diastolic BP was WMD, -1.69 95% CI = -2.97, -0.41, p < 0.001) as compared to an omnivorous diet. In subgroup analysis, a vegan diet demonstrated a greater reduction in systolic BP (WMD, -3.12 mm Hg; 95% CI = -4.54, -1.70, p < 0.001) as compared with a lacto-ovo-vegetarian diet (WMD, -1.75 mm Hg, 95% CI -5.38, 1.88, p = 0.05). The vegan diet has showed a similar trend in terms of diastolic blood pressure reduction (WMD, -1.92 mm Hg (95% CI = -3.18, -0.66, p < 0.001) but those with a lacto-ovo-vegetarian diet showed no changes in diastolic BP reduction (WMD, 0.00, 95% CI = 0.00, 0.00), p =0.432). In conclusion, vegetarian diets are associated with significant reductions in BP compared with omnivorous diets, suggesting that they may play a key role in the primary prevention and overall management of hypertension.
-
7.
Egg consumption and risk of cardiovascular disease: three large prospective US cohort studies, systematic review, and updated meta-analysis.
Drouin-Chartier, JP, Chen, S, Li, Y, Schwab, AL, Stampfer, MJ, Sacks, FM, Rosner, B, Willett, WC, Hu, FB, Bhupathiraju, SN
BMJ (Clinical research ed.). 2020;368:m513
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Eggs have a high cholesterol content and have therefore been associated with a risk for heart disease. However, studies to substantiate this have been conflicting, with some studies showing associations and others not. This systematic review and meta-analysis of over five million people and 763 studies aimed to evaluate the association between egg intake and the risk of heart disease. The results showed that higher egg intake was associated with a poor diet. Egg intake was not associated with heart disease and this was evident even in people who ate at least one egg per day. Even in people with other associated diseases, such as type 2 diabetes and high blood pressure, egg intake was not associated with heart disease. It was concluded that egg consumption does not increase an individual’s risk for heart disease. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to justify the recommendation that patients at risk of heart disease or those who have heart disease, can still eat up to one egg per day, without risk of exacerbating their condition.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the association between egg intake and cardiovascular disease risk among women and men in the United States, and to conduct a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. DESIGN Prospective cohort study, and a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. SETTING Nurses' Health Study (NHS, 1980-2012), NHS II (1991-2013), Health Professionals' Follow-Up Study (HPFS, 1986-2012). PARTICIPANTS Cohort analyses included 83 349 women from NHS, 90 214 women from NHS II, and 42 055 men from HPFS who were free of cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, and cancer at baseline. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Incident cardiovascular disease, which included non-fatal myocardial infarction, fatal coronary heart disease, and stroke. RESULTS Over up to 32 years of follow-up (>5.54 million person years), 14 806 participants with incident cardiovascular disease were identified in the three cohorts. Participants with a higher egg intake had a higher body mass index, were less likely to be treated with statins, and consumed more red meats. Most people consumed between one and less than five eggs per week. In the pooled multivariable analysis, consumption of at least one egg per day was not associated with incident cardiovascular disease risk after adjustment for updated lifestyle and dietary factors associated with egg intake (hazard ratio for at least one egg per day v less than one egg per month 0.93, 95% confidence interval 0.82 to 1.05). In the updated meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies (33 risk estimates, 1 720 108 participants, 139 195 cardiovascular disease events), an increase of one egg per day was not associated with cardiovascular disease risk (pooled relative risk 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.93 to 1.03, I2=62.3%). Results were similar for coronary heart disease (21 risk estimates, 1 411 261 participants, 59 713 coronary heart disease events; 0.96, 0.91 to 1.03, I2=38.2%), and stroke (22 risk estimates, 1 059 315 participants, 53 617 stroke events; 0.99, 0.91 to 1.07, I2=71.5%). In analyses stratified by geographical location (P for interaction=0.07), no association was found between egg consumption and cardiovascular disease risk among US cohorts (1.01, 0.96 to 1.06, I2=30.8%) or European cohorts (1.05, 0.92 to 1.19, I2=64.7%), but an inverse association was seen in Asian cohorts (0.92, 0.85 to 0.99, I2=44.8%). CONCLUSIONS Results from the three cohorts and from the updated meta-analysis show that moderate egg consumption (up to one egg per day) is not associated with cardiovascular disease risk overall, and is associated with potentially lower cardiovascular disease risk in Asian populations. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42019129650.
-
8.
Reduction in saturated fat intake for cardiovascular disease.
Hooper, L, Martin, N, Jimoh, OF, Kirk, C, Foster, E, Abdelhamid, AS
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2020;5:CD011737
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
UK public health dietary advice focuses on reducing saturated fat intakes and replacing it with polyunsaturated and monounsaturated fats to prevent heart disease. This systematic review of 15 randomised control trials with approximately 59,000 participants aimed to compare the effect of reducing saturated fats and replacing it with polyunsaturated fats, monounsaturated fats, carbohydrate or protein on death or death due to heart disease. The results showed that reducing saturated fat intake for two years did not reduce death or death from heart disease but may have caused a 21% reduction in people suffering a heart attack, stroke or narrowing of the arteries in the arms or legs. Replacing saturated fat with polyunsaturated fat or carbohydrates probably reduces the risk of heart attack, stroke or narrowing of the arteries in the arms and legs, however, there were no effects on death. There was no evidence of any benefits in replacing saturated fat with protein. There was limited evidence on replacement of saturated fats with monounsaturated fats. Overall greater reductions in fat resulted in greater protection from heart disease. It was concluded that the evidence supports replacing saturated fat in the diet to reduce the risk of heart attack, stroke or narrowing of the arteries in the arms and legs, but this may not prevent death. This paper could be used by health care professionals to recommend a low saturated fat diet to reduce heart attack, stroke or narrowing of the arteries in individuals who are at risk or who have already suffered one of these events.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reducing saturated fat reduces serum cholesterol, but effects on other intermediate outcomes may be less clear. Additionally, it is unclear whether the energy from saturated fats eliminated from the diet are more helpfully replaced by polyunsaturated fats, monounsaturated fats, carbohydrate or protein. OBJECTIVES To assess the effect of reducing saturated fat intake and replacing it with carbohydrate (CHO), polyunsaturated (PUFA), monounsaturated fat (MUFA) and/or protein on mortality and cardiovascular morbidity, using all available randomised clinical trials. SEARCH METHODS We updated our searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (Ovid) and Embase (Ovid) on 15 October 2019, and searched Clinicaltrials.gov and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) on 17 October 2019. SELECTION CRITERIA Included trials fulfilled the following criteria: 1) randomised; 2) intention to reduce saturated fat intake OR intention to alter dietary fats and achieving a reduction in saturated fat; 3) compared with higher saturated fat intake or usual diet; 4) not multifactorial; 5) in adult humans with or without cardiovascular disease (but not acutely ill, pregnant or breastfeeding); 6) intervention duration at least 24 months; 7) mortality or cardiovascular morbidity data available. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently assessed inclusion, extracted study data and assessed risk of bias. We performed random-effects meta-analyses, meta-regression, subgrouping, sensitivity analyses, funnel plots and GRADE assessment. MAIN RESULTS We included 15 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) (16 comparisons, ~59,000 participants), that used a variety of interventions from providing all food to advice on reducing saturated fat. The included long-term trials suggested that reducing dietary saturated fat reduced the risk of combined cardiovascular events by 21% (risk ratio (RR) 0.79; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66 to 0.93, 11 trials, 53,300 participants of whom 8% had a cardiovascular event, I² = 65%, GRADE moderate-quality evidence). Meta-regression suggested that greater reductions in saturated fat (reflected in greater reductions in serum cholesterol) resulted in greater reductions in risk of CVD events, explaining most heterogeneity between trials. The number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) was 56 in primary prevention trials, so 56 people need to reduce their saturated fat intake for ~four years for one person to avoid experiencing a CVD event. In secondary prevention trials, the NNTB was 32. Subgrouping did not suggest significant differences between replacement of saturated fat calories with polyunsaturated fat or carbohydrate, and data on replacement with monounsaturated fat and protein was very limited. We found little or no effect of reducing saturated fat on all-cause mortality (RR 0.96; 95% CI 0.90 to 1.03; 11 trials, 55,858 participants) or cardiovascular mortality (RR 0.95; 95% CI 0.80 to 1.12, 10 trials, 53,421 participants), both with GRADE moderate-quality evidence. There was little or no effect of reducing saturated fats on non-fatal myocardial infarction (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.07) or CHD mortality (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.16, both low-quality evidence), but effects on total (fatal or non-fatal) myocardial infarction, stroke and CHD events (fatal or non-fatal) were all unclear as the evidence was of very low quality. There was little or no effect on cancer mortality, cancer diagnoses, diabetes diagnosis, HDL cholesterol, serum triglycerides or blood pressure, and small reductions in weight, serum total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and BMI. There was no evidence of harmful effects of reducing saturated fat intakes. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The findings of this updated review suggest that reducing saturated fat intake for at least two years causes a potentially important reduction in combined cardiovascular events. Replacing the energy from saturated fat with polyunsaturated fat or carbohydrate appear to be useful strategies, while effects of replacement with monounsaturated fat are unclear. The reduction in combined cardiovascular events resulting from reducing saturated fat did not alter by study duration, sex or baseline level of cardiovascular risk, but greater reduction in saturated fat caused greater reductions in cardiovascular events.