1.
Change in physical activity level and clinical outcomes in older adults with knee pain: a secondary analysis from a randomised controlled trial.
Quicke, JG, Foster, NE, Croft, PR, Ogollah, RO, Holden, MA
BMC musculoskeletal disorders. 2018;19(1):59
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Exercise improves pain and function in adults with knee pain due to osteoarthritis. To date, no studies have investigated if changes in physical activity level can explain this improvement in pain and function. This longitudinal study aimed to investigate if change in physical activity during exercise interventions is associated with future pain and physical function in older adults with knee pain. Participants were adults over the age of 45, who were already taking part in a trial of exercise interventions on knee pain. Change in physical activity was measured using a self-reported scale from baseline to 3 months. Pain and physical function were measured at baseline, 3 months and 6 months. Change in physical activity level was not associated with pain or physical function at 3 or 6 months. The authors suggest that other factors may be responsible for clinical improvements following exercise interventions, and recommend further investigation into the responsiveness of commonly used physical activity measures.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Exercise interventions improve clinical outcomes of pain and function in adults with knee pain due to osteoarthritis and higher levels of physical activity are associated with lower severity of pain and higher levels of physical functioning in older adults with knee osteoarthritis in cross-sectional studies. However, to date no studies have investigated if change in physical activity level during exercise interventions can explain clinical outcomes of pain and function. This study aimed to investigate if change in physical activity during exercise interventions is associated with future pain and physical function in older adults with knee pain. METHODS Secondary longitudinal data analyses of a three armed exercise intervention randomised controlled trial. Participants were adults with knee pain attributed to osteoarthritis, over the age of 45 years old (n = 514) from Primary Care Services in the Midlands and Northwest regions of England. Crude and adjusted associations between absolute change in physical activity from baseline to 3 months (measured by the self-report Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE)) and i) pain ii) physical function (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) and iii) treatment response (OMERACT-OARSI responder criteria) at 3 and 6 months follow-up were investigated using linear and logistic regression. RESULTS Change in physical activity level was not associated with future pain, function or treatment response outcomes in crude or adjusted models at 3 or 6 months (P > 0.05). A 10 point increase in PASE was not associated with pain β = - 0.01 (- 0.05, 0.02), physical function β = - 0.09 (- 0.19, 0.02) or likelihood (odds ratio) of treatment response 1.02 (0.99, 1.04) at 3 months adjusting for sociodemographics, clinical covariates and the trial intervention arm. Findings were similar for 6 month outcome models. CONCLUSIONS Change in physical activity did not explain future clinical outcomes of pain and function in this study. Other factors may be responsible for clinical improvements following exercise interventions. However, the PASE may not be sufficiently responsive to measure change in physical activity level. We also recommend further investigation into the responsiveness of commonly used physical activity measures. TRIAL REGISTRATION ( ISRCTN93634563 ). Registered 29th September 2011.
2.
Effect of physical exercise on musculoskeletal pain in multiple body regions among healthcare workers: Secondary analysis of a cluster randomized controlled trial.
Jakobsen, MD, Sundstrup, E, Brandt, M, Andersen, LL
Musculoskeletal science & practice. 2018;34:89-96
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Musculoskeletal pain in the neck, shoulder and lower back is the most common and costly work-related health problem. While physical exercise has been shown to be beneficial for back and neck/shoulder pain, only a few studies have evaluated the effects on pain in multiple body regions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of workplace versus home-based physical exercise on the pressure pain threshold (PPT) and musculoskeletal pain intensity in multiple body regions. This study consisted of secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial. 200 female healthcare workers from three hospitals were randomised to 10 weeks of: 1) home-based physical exercise (HOME) performed alone during leisure time for 5 × 10 min per week or 2) workplace physical exercise (WORK) performed in groups during working hours for 5 × 10 min per week and up to 5 motivational coaching sessions. PPT (neck, lower back, lower leg) and perceived pain intensity in multiple body regions (feet, knee, hips, lower and upper back, elbow, hand, shoulder, neck, and head) were measured at baseline and 10-week follow-up. In some of the body regions, PPT and pain intensity improved more following WORK than HOME exercises. Significant better improvements were found for PPT in the lower back, and pain intensity in the lower back and feet. HOME did not improve more than WORK for any of the measurements. The authors concluded that physical exercise recommendations for healthcare workers should consider the setting, i.e. performing supervised group-based exercise at work and motivational coaching sessions is more effective than exercising alone at home.
Abstract
BACKGROUND While physical exercise is beneficial for back and neck-shoulder pain, only few intervention studies have evaluated effects on pain in multiple body regions. Furthermore, direct measurement of pain threshold can provide additional information to self-reported pain intensity. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effect of workplace versus home-based physical exercise on pressure pain threshold (PPT) and musculoskeletal pain intensity in multiple body regions. STUDY DESIGN Secondary analysis of an examiner-blinded, cluster randomized controlled trial with allocation concealment. METHOD Two-hundred female healthcare workers from 18 departments at three hospitals were cluster-randomized to 10 weeks of: 1) home-based physical exercise (HOME) performed alone during leisure time for 5 × 10 min per week or 2) workplace physical exercise (WORK) performed in groups during working hours for 5 × 10 min per week and up to 5 motivational coaching sessions. PPT (neck, lower back, lower leg) and perceived pain intensity in multiple body regions (feet, knee, hips, lower and upper back, elbow, hand, shoulder, neck, and head) were measured at baseline and 10-week follow-up. RESULTS In some of the body regions, PPT and pain intensity improved more following WORK than HOME. Between-group differences at follow-up (WORK vs. HOME) were 41 kPA [95% CI 13-70, effect size (ES): 0.22] for PPT in the lower back, and -0.7 [95% CI -1.0-0.3, ES: 0.26] and -0.6 points [95% CI -0.9--0.2, ES: 0.23] for pain intensity in the lower back and feet, respectively. HOME did not improve more than WORK for any of the measurements. CONCLUSION Physical exercise recommendations for healthcare workers should consider the setting, i.e. performing supervised group-based exercise at work and motivational coaching sessions is more effective than exercising alone at home.