0
selected
-
1.
Interaction Between Type 2 Diabetes Prevention Strategies and Genetic Determinants of Coronary Artery Disease on Cardiometabolic Risk Factors.
Merino, J, Jablonski, KA, Mercader, JM, Kahn, SE, Chen, L, Harden, M, Delahanty, LM, Araneta, MRG, Walford, GA, Jacobs, SBR, et al
Diabetes. 2020;69(1):112-120
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Individual risk of Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) and type 2 diabetes reflects the interplay between lifestyle behaviours acting on a backdrop of genetic predisposition. The aim of this study was to examine whether type 2 diabetes prevention strategies, either an intensive lifestyle intervention (ILS) or metformin treatment (MET), modify the association between CAD genetic risk and cardiometabolic risk factors (CRFs) in participants at high risk of type 2 diabetes. The study is a randomised controlled trial were participants were randomly allocated to one of the three groups; ILS (n = 1,079), MET (850 mg twice daily [n = 1,073]), or placebo (n = 1,082). Results indicate that there weren’t major significant differences in baseline characteristics, except for lower high-density lipoprotein and higher triglyceride in the placebo individuals compared with individuals assigned to MET or ILS. In fact, either an ILS or MET has a beneficial effect on 1-year change in different CRFs. Authors conclude that type 2 diabetes–preventive strategies for individuals at high risk of type 2 diabetes provide beneficial effects on CRFs regardless of CAD genetic risk profile.
Abstract
Coronary artery disease (CAD) is more frequent among individuals with dysglycemia. Preventive interventions for diabetes can improve cardiometabolic risk factors (CRFs), but it is unclear whether the benefits on CRFs are similar for individuals at different genetic risk for CAD. We built a 201-variant polygenic risk score (PRS) for CAD and tested for interaction with diabetes prevention strategies on 1-year changes in CRFs in 2,658 Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) participants. We also examined whether separate lifestyle behaviors interact with PRS and affect changes in CRFs in each intervention group. Participants in both the lifestyle and metformin interventions had greater improvement in the majority of recognized CRFs compared with placebo (P < 0.001) irrespective of CAD genetic risk (P interaction > 0.05). We detected nominal significant interactions between PRS and dietary quality and physical activity on 1-year change in BMI, fasting glucose, triglycerides, and HDL cholesterol in individuals randomized to metformin or placebo, but none of them achieved the multiple-testing correction for significance. This study confirms that diabetes preventive interventions improve CRFs regardless of CAD genetic risk and delivers hypothesis-generating data on the varying benefit of increasing physical activity and improving diet on intermediate cardiovascular risk factors depending on individual CAD genetic risk profile.
-
2.
Total and Subtypes of Dietary Fat Intake and Its Association with Components of the Metabolic Syndrome in a Mediterranean Population at High Cardiovascular Risk.
Julibert, A, Bibiloni, MDM, Bouzas, C, Martínez-González, MÁ, Salas-Salvadó, J, Corella, D, Zomeño, MD, Romaguera, D, Vioque, J, Alonso-Gómez, ÁM, et al
Nutrients. 2019;11(7)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Obesity, Metabolic Syndrome (MetS) and Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) are becoming a global epidemic and the role of dietary fats is still unclear. The PREDIMED trial is a large study of 6560 Mediterranean men and women, aged 55–75 years old, with overweight/obesity and MetS in which they have tracked all types of dietary fat consumed over a 6-year period to assess the risk factors for CVD. Quality of fat is thought to play an important role in MetS. This study used food questionnaires to measure intake of the following fats: total fat, monounsaturated fatty acids: MUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acids: PUFA, saturated fatty acids: SFA, trans-fatty acids: trans-FA, linoleic acid, a-linolenic acid, and w-3 FA). They were able to divide the participants into groups ranging from highest to lowest fat intake and assess the types of foods and fats being consumed. They found that the group with the highest fat intakes ate less carbohydrates, protein and fibre and had a higher risk of hyperglycaemia (high blood glucose levels). The total fats consumed in this group also included high levels of harmful trans-fatty acids so the researchers concluded that the risk is influenced by the combination of nutrients of the food consumed. They also found that participants who consumed high levels of linoleic acid had significantly higher healthy HDL cholesterol levels and those who consumed high levels of saturated fatty acids and omega 3 had significantly less risk of high triglycerides (another cholesterol marker). Overall they recommend further studies into types of dietary fat to help reduce MetS in the population.
Abstract
Background: The effect of dietary fat intake on the metabolic syndrome (MetS) and in turn on cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains unclear in individuals at high CVD risk. Objective: To assess the association between fat intake and MetS components in an adult Mediterranean population at high CVD risk. Design: Baseline assessment of nutritional adequacy in participants (n = 6560, men and women, 55-75 years old, with overweight/obesity and MetS) in the PREvención con DIeta MEDiterránea (PREDIMED)-Plus randomized trial. Methods: Assessment of fat intake (total fat, monounsatured fatty acids: MUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acids: PUFA, saturated fatty acids: SFA, trans-fatty acids: trans-FA, linoleic acid, α-linolenic acid, and ω-3 FA) using a validated food frequency questionnaire, and diet quality using 17-item Mediterranean dietary questionnaire and fat quality index (FQI). Results: Participants in the highest quintile of total dietary fat intake showed lower intake of energy, carbohydrates, protein and fiber, but higher intake of PUFA, MUFA, SFA, TFA, LA, ALA and ω-3 FA. Differences in MetS components were found according to fat intake. Odds (5th vs. 1st quintile): hyperglycemia: 1.3-1.6 times higher for total fat, MUFA, SFA and ω-3 FA intake; low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c): 1.2 higher for LA; hypertriglyceridemia: 0.7 lower for SFA and ω-3 FA intake. Conclusions: Dietary fats played different role on MetS components of high CVD risk patients. Dietary fat intake was associated with higher risk of hyperglycemia.
-
3.
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures 2 Years After Standard and Distal Gastric Bypass-a Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.
Svanevik, M, Risstad, H, Karlsen, TI, Kristinsson, JA, Småstuen, MC, Kolotkin, RL, Søvik, TT, Sandbu, R, Mala, T, Hjelmesæth, J
Obesity surgery. 2018;28(3):606-614
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Bariatric surgery may induce weight loss, improvement of weight-associated comorbidities, and improved health and well-being. The aim of the study is to compare the effects of standard and distal Rou-en-Y gastric bypass on obesity-specific health related quality of life, weight-related symptoms, eating behaviour, anxiety and depression. The study is a double-blind, parallel-group randomised controlled trial. The participants’ age ranged from 18 to 60 years of age with a BMI of 50 to 60 kg/m2. Results indicated improvements in most patient-reported outcome measures after both surgeries, but no significant difference between groups after surgery in relation to obesity-specific health related quality of life, weight-related symptoms, anxiety and depression, or eating behaviour. Authors conclude that both surgeries lead to sustained weight loss and improved health related quality of life 2 years after surgery in patients with a BMI 50-60kg/m2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The preferred surgical procedure for treating morbid obesity is debated. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are relevant for evaluation of the optimal bariatric procedure. METHODS A total of 113 patients with BMI from 50 to 60 were randomly assigned to standard (n = 57) or distal (n = 56) Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Validated PROMS questionnaires were completed at baseline and 2 years after surgery. Data were analyzed using mixed models for repeated measures and the results are expressed as estimated means and mean changes. RESULTS Obesity-related quality of life improved significantly after both procedures, without significant between-group differences (- 0.4 (95% CI = - 8.4, 7.2) points, p = 0.88, ES = 0.06). Both groups had significant reductions in the number of weight-related symptoms and symptom distress score, with a mean group difference (95% CI) of 1.4 (- 0.3, 3.3) symptoms and 5.0 (2.9. 12.8) symptom distress score points. There were no between-group differences for uncontrolled eating (22.0 (17.2-26.7) vs. 28.9 (23.3-34.5) points), cognitive restraint (57.4 (52.0-62.7) vs. 62.1 (57.9-66.2) points), and emotional eating (26.8 (20.5-33.1) vs. 32.6 (25.5-39.7) points). The prevalence of anxiety was 33% after standard and 25% after distal RYGB (p = 0.53), and for depression 12 and 9%, respectively (p = 0.76). CONCLUSIONS There were no statistically significant differences between standard and distal RYGB 2 years post surgery regarding weight loss, obesity-related quality of life, weight-related symptoms, anxiety, depression, or eating behavior. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinical Trials.gov number NCT00821197.
-
4.
Improvement of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease With Carnitine-Orotate Complex in Type 2 Diabetes (CORONA): A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Bae, JC, Lee, WY, Yoon, KH, Park, JY, Son, HS, Han, KA, Lee, KW, Woo, JT, Ju, YC, Lee, WJ, et al
Diabetes care. 2015;38(7):1245-52
-
-
-
Plain language summary
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is recognized as the hepatic component of metabolic syndrome, and it is associated with insulin resistance independent of obesity and other metabolic components. Carnitine is a modulator of mitochondrial free fatty acid transport and oxidation, and several studies have demonstrated the antioxidant activity of carnitine in hepatocytes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of carnitine-orotate complex in patients with NAFLD and diabetes. This study is a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Patients were randomly assigned to receive carnitine-orotate complex or placebo during the 12-week treatment period. Results show that treatment with carnitine-orotate complex improves hepatic steatosis in patients with diabetes and NAFLD, and has a beneficial effect on glucose metabolism, particularly in relation to improvement of hepatic steatosis. Authors conclude that further studies using more advanced magnetic resonance imaging and liver histology as an end point are needed to assess its efficacy in NAFLD.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We aimed to evaluate the effects of carnitine-orotate complex in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Eight hospitals in Korea participated in this randomized, controlled, double-blind trial of patients with diabetes and NAFLD. Seventy-eight patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive carnitine-orotate complex (824 mg, three times daily) or matching placebo. The primary study outcome was decline in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) to the normal range. Secondary study outcomes were change in ALT, radiological hepatic steatosis, parameters for anthropometry, liver function, lipid profiles, and glycemic control. Hepatic steatosis was assessed using Hounsfield units on noncontrast computed tomography (CT) imaging with hepatic attenuation. RESULTS After 12 weeks of treatment, compared with placebo group, carnitine-orotate complex-treated participants had a significantly higher rate of normalization of serum ALT level (17.9% vs. 89.7%, P < 0.001). On hepatic CT analysis, participants treated with carnitine-orotate complex showed an increased liver attenuation index (0.74 ± 8.05 vs. 6.21 ± 8.96, P < 0.008). A significant decrease in HbA1c was observed in the carnitine-orotate complex group (-0.33 ± 0.82% [-3.6 ± 9.0 mmol/mol], P = 0.007), but no significant change was seen in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS Treatment with carnitine-orotate complex improves serum ALT and may improve hepatic steatosis as assessed by CT in patients with diabetes and NAFLD. Further studies using more advanced magnetic resonance imaging and liver histology as an end point are needed to assess its efficacy in NAFLD.