-
1.
Randomised clinical trial: the analgesic properties of dietary supplementation with palmitoylethanolamide and polydatin in irritable bowel syndrome.
Cremon, C, Stanghellini, V, Barbaro, MR, Cogliandro, RF, Bellacosa, L, Santos, J, Vicario, M, Pigrau, M, Alonso Cotoner, C, Lobo, B, et al
Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics. 2017;(7):909-922
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intestinal immune activation is involved in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) pathophysiology. While most dietary approaches in IBS involve food avoidance, there are fewer indications on food supplementation. Palmithoylethanolamide, structurally related to the endocannabinoid anandamide, and polydatin are dietary compounds which act synergistically to reduce mast cell activation. AIM: To assess the effect on mast cell count and the efficacy of palmithoylethanolamide/polydatin in patients with IBS. METHODS We conducted a pilot, 12-week, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study assessing the effect of palmithoylethanolamide/polydatin 200 mg/20 mg or placebo b.d. on low-grade immune activation, endocannabinoid system and symptoms in IBS patients. Biopsy samples, obtained at screening visit and at the end of the study, were analysed by immunohistochemistry, enzyme-linked immunoassay, liquid chromatography and Western blot. RESULTS A total of 54 patients with IBS and 12 healthy controls were enrolled from five European centres. Compared with controls, IBS patients showed higher mucosal mast cell counts (3.2 ± 1.3 vs. 5.3 ± 2.7%, P = 0.013), reduced fatty acid amide oleoylethanolamide (12.7 ± 9.8 vs. 45.8 ± 55.6 pmol/mg, P = 0.002) and increased expression of cannabinoid receptor 2 (0.7 ± 0.1 vs. 1.0 ± 0.8, P = 0.012). The treatment did not significantly modify IBS biological profile, including mast cell count. Compared with placebo, palmithoylethanolamide/polydatin markedly improved abdominal pain severity (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS The marked effect of the dietary supplement palmithoylethanolamide/polydatin on abdominal pain in patients with IBS suggests that this is a promising natural approach for pain management in this condition. Further studies are now required to elucidate the mechanism of action of palmithoylethanolamide/polydatin in IBS. ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01370720.
-
2.
A multi-center, open-label trial to compare the efficacy and pharmacokinetics of Artemether-Lumefantrine in children with severe acute malnutrition versus children without severe acute malnutrition: study protocol for the MAL-NUT study.
Denoeud-Ndam, L, Dicko, A, Baudin, E, Guindo, O, Grandesso, F, Sagara, I, Lasry, E, Palma, PP, Parra, AM, Stepniewska, K, et al
BMC infectious diseases. 2015;:228
Abstract
BACKGROUND Malnutrition and malaria frequently coexist in sub-Saharan African countries. Studies on efficacy of antimalarial treatments usually follow the WHO standardized protocol in which severely malnourished children are systematically excluded. Few studies have assessed the efficacy of chloroquine, sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine and quinine in severe acute malnourished children. Overall, efficacy of these treatments appeared to be reduced, attributed to lower immunity and for some antimalarials altered pharmacokinetic profiles and lower drug concentrations. However, similar research on the efficacy and pharmacokinetic profiles of artemisinin-combination therapies (ACTs) and especially artemether-lumefantrine in malnourished children is currently lacking. The main objective of this study is to assess whether artemether-lumefantrine is less efficacious in children suffering from severe acute malnutrition (SAM) compared to non-SAM children, and if so, to what extent this can be attributed to a sub-optimal pharmacokinetic profile. METHODS/DESIGN In two sites, Ouelessebougou, Mali and Maradi, Niger, children with uncomplicated microscopically-confirmed P. falciparum malaria aged between 6 and 59 months will be enrolled. Two non-SAM children will be enrolled after the enrolment of each SAM case. Children with severe manifestations of malaria or complications of acute malnutrition needing intensive treatment will be excluded. Treatment intakes will be supervised and children will be followed-up for 42 days, according to WHO guidance for surveillance of antimalarial drug efficacy. Polymerase Chain Reaction genotyping will be used to distinguish recrudescence from re-infection. SAM children will also benefit from the national nutritional rehabilitation program. Outcomes will be compared between the SAM and non-SAM populations. The primary outcome will be adequate clinical and parasitological response at day 28 after PCR correction, estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. To assess the pharmacokinetic profile of lumefantrine, a sparse sampling approach will be used with randomized allocation of sampling times (5 per child). A total of 180 SAM children and 360 non-SAM children will be recruited during the 2013 and 2014 malaria seasons. DISCUSSION This study will provide important information that is currently lacking on the effect of SAM on therapeutic efficacy and pharmacokinetic profile of artemether-lumefantrine. If it shows lower therapeutic efficacy and decreased lumefantrine concentrations, it would inform dose optimization studies in SAM children. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01958905.
-
3.
24-hour bronchodilator efficacy of single doses of indacaterol in patients with persistent asthma: comparison with placebo and formoterol.
LaForce, C, Korenblat, P, Osborne, P, Dong, F, Higgins, M
Current medical research and opinion. 2009;(10):2353-9
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the 24-h bronchodilator efficacy and safety of single-dose indacaterol in asthma. METHODS This was a five-period, double-blind, double-dummy, crossover study in patients with persistent asthma. On separate study days, patients inhaled a single dose of indacaterol (150, 300 or 600 microg) in the morning via a single-dose dry powder inhaler (SDDPI), formoterol 12 microg twice daily via its proprietary SDDPI, or placebo. Study days were separated by a washout period of at least 6 days. RESULTS Of the 45 patients randomized to treatment, 42 completed the study. The 24-h trough FEV(1) (primary endpoint) was significantly higher than placebo following all doses of indacaterol (mean [95% CI] differences of 0.11 [0.06, 0.16], 0.21 [0.17, 0.26] and 0.22 [0.18, 0.27] L for 150, 300, and 600 microg, respectively) and formoterol (by 0.13 [0.08, 0.18] L). The 24-h trough FEV(1) was significantly higher following indacaterol 300 and 600 microg than indacaterol 150 microg (by 0.11 [0.06, 0.15] and 0.12 [0.07, 0.17] L, respectively) or formoterol (by 0.08 [0.03, 0.13] L vs. 300 microg; by 0.09 [0.04, 0.14] L vs. 600 microg). Most adverse events were mild-to-moderate and transient. Examination of serum potassium, blood glucose, QTc interval, pulse rate, and blood pressure raised no concern over the safety of indacaterol. CONCLUSIONS Single doses of indacaterol provided effective 24-h bronchodilation and were well tolerated in patients with persistent asthma. Safety findings were limited by non-standardized diet conditions in this study but suggest a minimal systemic treatment effect.
-
4.
Quality of life and efficacy of nebivolol in an open-label study in hypertensive patients. the QoLaN study.
Hermans, MP, De Coster, O, Seidel, L, Albert, A, Van de Borne, P
Blood pressure. Supplement. 2009;:5-14
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nebivolol is a highly selective beta-adrenoreceptor antagonist with vasodilating properties. This study investigated its effect on quality of life (QoL) and blood pressure (BP) in real life conditions. In total, 1468 patients were enrolled, 12% diabetics. Nebivolol was prescribed as monotherapy, add-on or switch medication. METHODS In this open-label, prospective study, the JNC-VII BP target values were used: < 140/90 and < 130/80 mmHg for diabetics. The responder rate and the QoL was determined at baseline and after 4 and 8 weeks. RESULTS After 4 weeks, 27% of subjects reached target BP, 45% after 8 weeks. The responder rates were 92, 90 and 83% for the monotherapy, add-on and switch groups. Compared with baseline, all showed statistical significance at 8 weeks. Similarly to results for the QoL after 8 weeks, the mean improvement in QoL for all three groups was 9-10 points (total range: 0-88). CONCLUSIONS The study demonstrates that nebivolol in mild to moderate hypertension is associated with overall improvements in QoL, with a marked BP-lowering effect, in monotherapy, add-on or switch, irrespective of the glucose tolerance status. It may be hypothesized that its dual mode of action explains its BP-lowering effect as well as the tolerability.
-
5.
Long duration of airway but not systemic effects of inhaled formoterol in asthmatic patients.
Lötvall, J, Ankerst, J
Respiratory medicine. 2008;(3):449-56
Abstract
RATIONALE Formoterol is approved as asthma rescue medication in many countries. The exact duration of the airway vs. systemic effects of formoterol compared with another rescue medication, salbutamol, has not been evaluated. OBJECTIVE To assess the duration of airway bronchodilatory effects vs. systemic effects of inhaled formoterol and salbutamol in asthmatic patients. METHODS Twenty-six patients with stable and reversible asthma were given single doses of formoterol dry-powder inhaler (OxisTurbuhaler) 2x9 microg (lower dose; LD) and 6x9 microg (higher dose; HD), salbutamol (VentolinDiskhaler) 3x400 microg (LD) and 9x400 microg (HD), and placebo in a randomized, double-blind, crossover trial. Airway and systemic effects were assessed by forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1), serum potassium, blood pressure, corrected QT-interval (QTc), and palpitation and tremor scores. Time with clinically relevant bronchodilation (FEV1 increase 12%) without clinically relevant markers of systemic effects (serum potassium suppression 0.2 mmol/L, QTc-prolongation 20 ms, or heart rate increase 8 beats per minute) was evaluated. RESULTS Bronchodilation was maintained for 24h with both formoterol doses and for 7-11h with salbutamol. Maximum bronchodilation and systemic effects were similar after formoterol and salbutamol, except for statistically significantly larger maximum heart rate and palpitation and tremor scores after salbutamol. Systemic responses were similarly brief for formoterol and salbutamol (7 h). CONCLUSIONS The airway effects of inhaled formoterol are of long duration, whereas the systemic effects are of a similarly short duration as salbutamol. Thus, the time with clinically relevant bronchodilation without systemic effects is substantially longer after formoterol than after salbutamol.
-
6.
Traditional and patient-centred outcomes with three classes of asthma medication.
Jenkins, CR, Thien, FC, Wheatley, JR, Reddel, HK
The European respiratory journal. 2005;(1):36-44
Abstract
Lung function is commonly used as the primary endpoint in asthma clinical trials, but it may not reflect changes which are important to patients. The present study compared changes in, and relationships between, traditional and patient-centred end-points during treatment with three classes of asthma medication. Subjects with mild-to-moderate asthma were randomised to double-blind, double-dummy crossover treatment with eformoterol 12 microg b.i.d. or montelukast 10 mg q.d., then single-blind treatment with fluticasone 250 microg b.i.d./placebo capsules, with 6-week treatment periods and 1-week washouts. Individual "traditional" end-points (symptoms, reliever use, forced expiratory volume in one second per cent predicted, morning peak expiratory flow, airway hyperresponsiveness) and "patient-centred" end-points (asthma control questionnaire, quality of life, patient global assessments) were assessed. Principal component analysis and linear modelling were used to explore overall rank orders for treatment, and relationships between outcomes. A total of 58 subjects were randomised. The rank order of benefit from eformoterol and fluticasone differed for three factors derived from principal component analysis (eformoterol>fluticasone for symptom/reliever use factor, fluticasone>eformoterol for lung function factor, eformoterol=fluticasone for patient-centred factor). Montelukast was ranked third for all three factors. A significant relationship between patient-based variables and lung function was found only for montelukast treatment. In asthma treatment, traditional end-points do not fully capture patient-centred benefits, and the relationship between end-points differs with medication class.
-
7.
Formoterol (OXIS) Turbuhaler as a rescue therapy compared with salbutamol pMDI plus spacer in patients with acute severe asthma.
Boonsawat, W, Charoenratanakul, S, Pothirat, C, Sawanyawisuth, K, Seearamroongruang, T, Bengtsson, T, Brander, R, Selroos, O
Respiratory medicine. 2003;(9):1067-74
Abstract
Formoterol has a similar onset of effect to salbutamol but a prolonged duration of action. However, the relative efficacy of the two drugs in acute severe asthma is not known. This double-blind, double-dummy study compared the safety and efficacy of the maximum recommended daily dose of formoterol and a predicted equivalent dose of salbutamol in 88 patients presenting to the emergency department with acute severe asthma. Patients were randomized to formoterol 54 microg via Turbuhaler or salbutamol 2400 microg via pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) plus spacer in three equal doses over 1 h. Following the full dose, mean FEV1 at 75 min increased by 37% for formoterol and 28% for salbutamol (P = 0.18). The maximum increase in FEV1 over 4 h was significantly greater with formoterol compared with salbutamol (51% vs. 36%, respectively P < 0.05) and formoterol was as effective as salbutamol at improving symptoms and wellbeing. Both treatments were well tolerated. Formoterol caused a greater decrease in serum potassium (difference -0.2 mmol/l). In severe acute asthma, bronchodilator therapy with high-dose (54 microg) formoterol Turbuhaler provided equally rapid improvements in lung function of greater magnitude over 4 h than high-dose (2400 microg) salbutamol pMDI plus spacer.