1.
Ultrarapid Induction of Hypothermia Using Continuous Automated Peritoneal Lavage With Ice-Cold Fluids: Final Results of the Cooling for Cardiac Arrest or Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Trial.
Polderman, KH, Noc, M, Beishuizen, A, Biermann, H, Girbes, AR, Tully, GW, Seidman, D, Albertsson, PA, Holmberg, M, Sterz, F, et al
Critical care medicine. 2015;(10):2191-201
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Hypothermia (32-34 °C) can mitigate ischemic brain injury, and some evidence suggests that it can reduce infarct size in acute myocardial infarction and acute ischemic stroke. For some indications, speed of cooling may be crucial in determining efficacy. We performed a multicenter prospective intervention study to test an ultrarapid cooling technology, the Velomedix Automated Peritoneal Lavage System using ice-cold fluids continuously circulating through the peritoneal cavity to rapidly induce and maintain hypothermia in comatose patients after cardiac arrest and a small number of awake patients with acute myocardial infarction. DESIGN Multicenter prospective intervention study. SETTING Intensive care- and coronary care units of multiple tertiary referral centers. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Access to the peritoneal cavity was gained using a modified blunt dilating instrument, followed by catheter placement. Patients were cooled to a temperature of 32.5 °C, maintained for 24 hours (cardiac arrest) or 3 hours (acute myocardial infarction) followed by controlled rewarming. Forty-nine patients were enrolled, and 46 patients completed treatment. One placement was unsuccessful (abdominal wall not breached), two patients were ultimately not cooled, and only safety data are reported. Average catheter insertion time was 2.3 minutes. Mean time to temperature less than 33 °C was 10.4 minutes (average cooling rate, 14 °C/hr). Median infarct size in patients who had coronary interventions was 16% of LV. No cases of stent thrombosis occurred. Survival in cardiac arrest patients with initial rhythm of ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation was 56%, of whom 82 had a complete neurologic recovery. This compares favorably to outcomes from previous studies. CONCLUSION Automated peritoneal lavage system is a safe and ultrarapid method to induce and maintain hypothermia, which appears feasible in cardiac arrest patients and awake patients with acute myocardial infarction. The shivering response appeared to be delayed and much reduced with this technology, diminishing metabolic disorders associated with cooling and minimizing sedation requirement. Our data suggest that ultrarapid cooling could prevent subtle neurologic damage compared with slower cooling. This will need to be confirmed in direct comparative studies.
2.
Witnessed arrest, but not delayed bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation improves prehospital cardiac arrest survival.
Vukmir, RB, ,
Emergency medicine journal : EMJ. 2004;(3):370-3
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study correlated the effect of witnessing a cardiac arrest and instituting bystander CPR (ByCPR), as a secondary end point in a study evaluating the effect of bicarbonate on survival. METHODS This prospective, randomised, double blinded clinical intervention trial enrolled 874 prehospital cardiopulmonary arrest patients encountered in a prehospital urban, suburban, and rural regional emergency medical service (EMS) area. This group underwent conventional advanced cardiac life support intervention followed by empiric early administration of sodium bicarbonate (1 mEq/l), monitoring conventional resuscitation parameters. Survival was measured as presence of vital signs on emergency department (ED) arrival. Data were analysed using chi(2) with Pearson correlation and odds ratio where appropriate. RESULTS The overall survival rate was 13.9% (110 of 792) of prehospital cardiac arrest patients. The mean (SD) time until provision of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ByCPR) by laymen was 2.08 (2.77) minutes, and basic life support (BLS) by emergency medical technicians was 6.62 (5.73) minutes. There was improved survival noted with witnessed cardiac arrest-a 2.2-fold increase in survival, 18.9% (76 of 402) versus 8.6% (27 of 315) compared with unwitnessed arrests (p<0.001) with a decreased risk ratio of mortality of 0.4534 (95% CI, 0.0857 to 0.1891). The presence of ByCPR occurred in 32% (228 of 716) of patients, but interestingly did not correlate with survival. The survival rate was 18.2% (33 of 181) if ByCPR was performed within two minutes and 12.8% (6 of 47), if performed >two minutes (p = 0.3752). CONCLUSIONS Survival after prehospital cardiac arrest is more likely when witnessed, but not necessarily when ByCPR was performed by laymen.