-
1.
Eribulin in brain metastases of breast cancer: outcomes of the EBRAIM prospective observational trial.
Fabi, A, Terrenato, I, Vidiri, A, Villani, V, Tanzilli, A, Airoldi, M, Pedani, F, Magri, V, Palleschi, M, Donadio, M, et al
Future oncology (London, England). 2021;(26):3445-3456
Abstract
Background: Eribulin shows some activity in controlling brain metastasis in breast cancer. Methods: This observational, multicenter study evaluated brain disease control rates, survival and safety in patients with brain metastatic breast cancer treated with eribulin in clinical practice. Results: A total of 34 patients were enrolled (mean age 49 years, 91% with visceral metastases) and 29 were evaluable for brain disease. Fourteen achieved disease control and showed a longer time without progression: 10 months (95% CI: 2.3-17.7) versus 4 months (95% CI: 3.3-4.7) in the control group (p = 0.029). Patients with clinical benefits at 6 months had longer survival. Leukopenia and neutropenia were the most frequent grade 3-4 toxicities. Conclusion: Eribulin confirms its effectiveness in patients with brain metastatic breast cancer. Further studies on larger cohorts are needed to confirm the results.
-
2.
Second-line Eribulin in Triple Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer patients. Multicentre Retrospective Study: The TETRIS Trial.
Krasniqi, E, Pizzuti, L, Valerio, MR, Capomolla, E, Botti, C, Sanguineti, G, Marchetti, P, Anselmi, E, Tomao, S, Giordano, A, et al
International journal of medical sciences. 2021;(10):2245-2250
Abstract
Introduction: Large and consistent evidence supports the use of eribulin mesylate in clinical practice in third or later line treatment of metastatic triple negative breast cancer (mTNBC). Conversely, there is paucity of data on eribulin efficacy in second line treatment. Methods: We investigated outcomes of 44 mTNBC patients treated from 2013 through 2019 with second line eribulin mesylate in a multicentre retrospective study involving 14 Italian oncologic centres. Results: Median age was 51 years, with 11.4% of these patients being metastatic at diagnosis. Median overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) from eribulin starting were 11.9 (95%CI: 8.4-15.5) and 3.5 months (95%CI: 1.7-5.3), respectively. We observed 8 (18.2%) partial responses and 10 (22.7%) patients had stable disease as best response. A longer PFS on previous first line treatment predicted a better OS (HR=0.87, 95%CI: 0.77-0.99, p= 0.038) and a longer PFS on eribulin treatment (HR=0.92, 95%CI: 0.85-0.98, p=0.018). Progression free survival to eribulin was also favorably influenced by prior adjuvant chemotherapy (HR=0.44, 95%CI: 0.22-0.88, p=0.02). Eribulin was generally well tolerated, with grade 3-4 adverse events being recorded in 15.9% of patients. Conclusions: The outcomes described for our cohort are consistent with those reported in the pivotal Study301 and subsequent observational studies. Further data from adequately-sized, ad hoc trials on eribulin use in second line for mTNBC are warranted to confirm our findings.
-
3.
High absolute lymphocyte counts are associated with longer overall survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with eribulin-but not with treatment of physician's choice-in the EMBRACE study.
Miyoshi, Y, Yoshimura, Y, Saito, K, Muramoto, K, Sugawara, M, Alexis, K, Nomoto, K, Nakamura, S, Saeki, T, Watanabe, J, et al
Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan). 2020;(4):706-715
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Eribulin, a nontaxane synthetic inhibitor of microtubule dynamics, is widely used to manage locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Eribulin has demonstrated immunomodulatory activity on the tumour microenvironment. Baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), a marker of immune status, may predict progression-free survival in eribulin treatment. This post hoc analysis assessed predictors for overall survival (OS). METHODS The phase 3 open-label study (EMBRACE) of eribulin versus treatment of physician's choice (TPC) in patients with MBC provided source data. Baseline absolute lymphocyte counts (ALCs) and NLR were evaluable in 751 and 713 patients, respectively. RESULTS Eribulin prolonged OS versus TPC in patients with baseline ALC ≥ 1500/µl (hazard ratio [HR] 0.586; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.437-0.784; P < 0.001). There was no significant difference by treatment for ALC < 1500/µl (HR 1.002; 95% CI 0.800-1.253; P = 0.989). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed and identified baseline ALC as a potential predictor of OS in eribulin-treated patients. Interaction analysis of OS supported 1500/µl as a potentially differential cutoff value. NLR at a cutoff value of 3 was associated with prolonged OS (eribulin group). However, similar results were also observed in the TPC group, without apparent interaction effect, suggesting that NLR may be a general prognostic marker rather than a specific predictor of OS for eribulin. DISCUSSION This hypothesis-generating study speculates that baseline ALC may be an independent predictor for longer OS in eribulin-treated MBC patients and could be clinically impactful because it can be evaluated without the need for additional invasive procedures. TRIAL REGISTRATION www.ClinicalTrials.gov code: NCT00388726.
-
4.
The Titanium-coated PEEK Cage Maintains Better Bone Fusion With the Endplate Than the PEEK Cage 6 Months After PLIF Surgery: A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Study.
Hasegawa, T, Ushirozako, H, Shigeto, E, Ohba, T, Oba, H, Mukaiyama, K, Shimizu, S, Yamato, Y, Ide, K, Shibata, Y, et al
Spine. 2020;(15):E892-E902
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN A multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group trial. OBJECTIVE To investigate interbody bone fusion rates in titanium-coated polyetheretherketone (TiPEEK) and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Previous clinical studies have not revealed any significant difference in bone fusion rates between TiPEEK and PEEK cages. METHODS During one-level PLIF surgery, 149 patients (84 men, 65 women, mean age 67 yr) were randomly allocated to use either a TiPEEK cage (n = 69) or PEEK cage (n = 80). Blinded radiographic evaluations were performed using computed tomography and assessed by modified intention-to-treat analysis in 149 cases and per-protocol analysis in 143 cases who were followed for 12 months. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Index. RESULTS The interbody union rate at 12 months after surgery was 45% owing to a very strict definition of bone fusion. The rates of bone fusion were significantly higher at 4 and 6 months after surgery in the TiPEEK group than in the PEEK group in the unadjusted modified intention-to-treat analysis and were significantly higher at 6 months in the unadjusted per-protocol analysis. Binary logistic regression analysis adjusted for sex, age, body mass index, bone mineral density, and surgical level showed that using a TiPEEK cage (odds ratio, 2.27; 95% confidence interval: 1.09-4.74; P = 0.03) was independently associated with bone fusion at 6 months after surgery. Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire and Oswestry Disability Index results improved postoperatively in both groups. CONCLUSION Using the TiPEEK cage for PLIF enabled the maintenance of better bone fusion to the endplate than using the PEEK cage at 6 months after the surgery. Our findings suggest the possibility of an earlier return to rigorous work or sports by the use of TiPEEK cage. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 1.
-
5.
Eribulin mesilate versus vinorelbine in women with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer: A randomised clinical trial.
Yuan, P, Hu, X, Sun, T, Li, W, Zhang, Q, Cui, S, Cheng, Y, Ouyang, Q, Wang, X, Chen, Z, et al
European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990). 2019;:57-65
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of eribulin monotherapy, relative to vinorelbine, in Chinese women with locally recurrent/metastatic breast cancer (MBC). METHODS This phase III open-label, randomised, parallel-group, multicentre clinical trial enrolled patients with locally recurrent or MBC who had had 2-5 prior chemotherapy regimens, including an anthracycline and taxane) from September 26, 2013, to May 19, 2015. Women were randomised 1:1 to receive eribulin (1.4 mg/m2, intravenously, on day 1 and day 8) or vinorelbine (25 mg/m2, intravenously, on day 1, day 8 and day 15) every 21 days. The primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end-points included objective response rate (ORR), duration of response and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Five hundred thirty women were randomised to receive eribulin (n = 264) or vinorelbine (n = 266). Improvement in PFS was observed with eribulin compared with vinorelbine (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65-0.98, P = 0.036); median PFS was 2.8 months in both treatment arms. The median OS was 13.4 months with eribulin and 12.5 months with vinorelbine (HR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.80-1.31, P = 0.838). The ORR was 30.7% (95% CI: 25.2%-36.6%) with eribulin and 16.9% (95% CI: 12.6%-22.0%) with vinorelbine (P < 0.001). Treatment-emergent adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation were less frequent with eribulin (7.2%) than with vinorelbine (14.0%). CONCLUSIONS Eribulin achieved statistically significantly superior PFS (and response rate) compared with vinorelbine in previously treated women with locally recurrent or MBC. Eribulin appeared to be better tolerated than vinorelbine, with no new safety signals observed. TRIAL REGISTRATION National Institutes of Health ClinicalTrials.gov registry, NCT02225470. Registered 05 August 2014- Retrospectively registered. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02225470?term=NCT02225470&rank=1.
-
6.
Real-life activity of eribulin mesylate among metastatic breast cancer patients in the multicenter national observational ESME program.
Jacot, W, Heudel, PE, Fraisse, J, Gourgou, S, Guiu, S, Dalenc, F, Pistilli, B, Campone, M, Levy, C, Debled, M, et al
International journal of cancer. 2019;(12):3359-3369
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Eribulin mesylate (EM) was recently approved for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) chemotherapy (CT) in late lines by the FDA, with debated results in second line. We evaluated outcomes in breast cancer patients receiving EM as second, third and fourth line in a national real-life cohort of 16,703 consecutive MBC patients initiating their first metastatic therapeutic line between 2008 and 2014. Primary and secondary objectives were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). An imbalance was seen for HER2+ tumors and concomitant anti-HER2 targeted therapies use, we thus performed a subanalysis in HER2- patients. PFS and OS were significantly better in EM patients in third and fourth lines, compared to "Other chemotherapies" patients (PFS: 4.14 vs. 3.02 months, p = 0.0010; 3.61 vs. 2.53 months, p = 0.0102, third and fourth-line; OS: 11.27 vs. 7.65 months, p = 0.0001; 10.91 vs. 5.95 months, p < 0.0001, third and fourth-line). No significant difference was reported in second-line (PFS: 5.06 vs. 4.14 months, p = 0.1171; OS: 13.99 vs. 11.66 months, p = 0.151). Among HER2- patients, a significant difference was seen for all lines, including 2nd-line (PFS: 4.57 vs. 3.91 months, p = 0.0379; OS: 14.98 vs. 10.51 months, p = 0.0113). In this large real-world database, HER2-negative MBC patients receiving EM in second or later CT line presented significantly better PFS and OS. This difference disappeared in second line in the overall population, probably because of the imbalance in HER2-targeted treatments use. Our results mirror those of the published randomized trials. The effect of anti-HER2 therapies addition in this setting still needs to be defined.
-
7.
Phase II Trial of Eribulin in Patients With Metastatic Hormone Refractory Prostate Cancer: A Trial of the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (E5805).
Stein, MN, Chen, YH, Carducci, MA, Hudes, GR, Lerma, PM, Tan, WW, Dalune, R, Rowland, KM, Kuzel, TM, DiPaola, RS
American journal of clinical oncology. 2019;(4):375-381
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Eribulin mesylate, a synthetic analog of halichondrin B, is a novel tubulin-binding agent that inhibits cancer cell proliferation at low-nanomolar levels. METHODS In a multicenter ECOG trial, patients with progressive metastatic CRPC, ECOG 0-2 were treated with eribulin 1.4 mg/m as an IV bolus over 5 minutes on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. This noncomparative study stratified points to either a chemonaive (CN), prior-taxane (Tax) only, or 2 prior cytotoxic (TCx) chemotherapy arm. The trial was powered to detect a 50% PSA reduction using Consensus Criteria in at least 40% versus 20% (90% power, one-sided α=0.10) for the CN stratum and 25% versus. 10% (power 87%, one-sided α=0.10) for the Tax and TCx strata. RESULTS In total, 119 pts received treatment of which 116 were eligible for the primary response determination in this study. Median age 70 years (range, 45 to 88); median number of treatment cycles 4 (range, 1 to 20+); ECOG 0-1 90%. Confirmed PSA response rates (50% decline from baseline) were 29% (90% [18.2%, 41.2%]; P=0.20), 10% (90% [5.2%, 27.1%]; P=1.00), and 4% ([0.2%, 18.3%]; P=0.59) in the chemonaive stratum, the prior-taxane stratum, and the 2-prior-chemotherapy stratum, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 3.5 months (95% CI, 2.0, 5.9), 2.3 months (95% CI, 2.0, 2.9) and 3.7 months (95% CI, 2.1, 4.2) for the chemonaive stratum, the prior-taxane stratum and the 2-prior-chemotherapy stratum, respectively. Nonhematological toxicities of any grade (mainly grade 1 and 2) were fatigue (74%), neuropathy (40%), alopecia (39%), nausea (35%), and anorexia (34%). Common hematological toxicities were decreased leukocytes (75%), decreased neutrophils (72%), and decreased hemoglobin (66%). The most common grade ≥ 3 toxicities were decreased neutrophils (55%), decreased leukocytes (42%), sensory neuropathy (13%), and fatigue (11%). Overall, there was a 4% rate of febrile neutropenia. CONCLUSIONS In summary, per the prespecified study endpoints, eribulin did not have adequate activity in chemotherapy naïve or chemotherapy pretreated patients with metastatic CRPC to support further study in this setting.
-
8.
Phase II Clinical Trial of First-line Eribulin Plus Trastuzumab for Advanced or Recurrent HER2-positive Breast Cancer.
Sakaguchi, K, Nakatsukasa, K, Koyama, H, Kato, M, Sakuyama, A, Matsuda, T, Tsunoda, N, Fujiwara, I, Yamaguchi, M, Tanaka, H, et al
Anticancer research. 2018;(7):4073-4081
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM: Eribulin mesylate has been approved for advanced or metastatic breast cancers subjected to at least two previous chemotherapy regimens. The present multicenter, phase II, single-arm study assessed the efficacy and safety of a first-line regimen of eribulin plus trastuzumab for untreated advanced or metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Enrolled patients received eribulin (1.4 mg/m2 intravenously; I.V.) on days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle, an initial trastuzumab dose (8 mg/kg I.V.) on day 1, and 6 mg/kg of trastuzumab on day 1 of each subsequent cycle. The primary endpoint was the response rate (RR). The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), duration of response (DOR), and safety. Twenty-eight patients (median age: 62.5 years) received a median of 12 (range: 2-53) cycles of eribulin plus trastuzumab. RESULTS The RR was 53.6% [complete response (CR), 4; partial response (PR), 11] with a median PFS of 344 days. The clinical benefit rate was 64.0%. Grade 3/4 adverse events were observed in 12 (42.9%) patients. For details, neutropenia in 8 (28.6%) patients, peripheral neuropathy in 2 (7.1%) patients, interstitial pneumonia in 1 (3.6%) patient, ALT elevation in 1 (3.6%) patient, osteonecrosis of the jaw in 1 (3.6%) patient, and fatigue in 1 (3.6%) patient. The patient with osteonecrosis received denosumab, too. No symptomatic congestive heart failure was observed. CONCLUSION Combination therapy of eribulin plus trastuzumab is acceptable in efficacy and safety, and a capable option for first-line advanced or recurrent HER2-positive breast cancer.
-
9.
Phase 2 study of eribulin in patients with previously treated advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma.
Kawai, A, Araki, N, Naito, Y, Ozaki, T, Sugiura, H, Yazawa, Y, Morioka, H, Matsumine, A, Saito, K, Asami, S, et al
Japanese journal of clinical oncology. 2017;(2):137-144
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Eribulin, a microtubule dynamics inhibitor, is approved for the treatment of patients with breast cancer and soft tissue sarcoma. We investigated the efficacy and safety of eribulin in Japanese patients with soft tissue sarcoma. METHODS This open-label, multicenter, nonrandomized, Phase 2 study enrolled Japanese patients with measurable, advanced/metastatic soft tissue sarcoma of high/intermediate grade and ≥1 prior chemotherapy for advanced disease. Patients received eribulin mesilate 1.4 mg/m2 intravenously over 2–5 minutes on Days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. The primary endpoint was progression-free rate at 12 weeks. Secondary endpoints included overall survival, progression-free survival and safety. Efficacy analyses were stratified by histology (liposarcoma or leiomyosarcoma, and other subtypes). RESULTS Overall, 52 patients were enrolled and 51 patients were treated. Patients with liposarcoma/leiomyosarcoma (n = 35) had similar characteristics to those with other subtypes (n = 16), except for a higher proportion of women (63% vs 38%, respectively) and patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 (57% vs 44%). Progression-free rate at 12 weeks was 60% in liposarcoma/leiomyosarcoma patients, 31% in other subtypes and 51% overall. Median progression-free survival was 5.5 months in liposarcoma/leiomyosarcoma patients, 2.0 months in other subtypes and 4.1 months overall. Median overall survival was 17.0 months in liposarcoma/leiomyosarcoma patients, 7.6 months in other subtypes and 13.2 months overall. The most common Grade 3–4 adverse events were neutropenia (86%), leukopenia (75%), lymphopenia (33%), anemia (14%) and febrile neutropenia (8%). CONCLUSION Eribulin showed clinical activity with a manageable safety profile in previously treated Japanese patients with advanced/metastatic soft tissue sarcoma.
-
10.
Identification of microRNA biomarkers for response of advanced soft tissue sarcomas to eribulin: Translational results of the EORTC 62052 trial.
Wiemer, EAC, Wozniak, A, Burger, H, Smid, M, Floris, G, Nzokirantevye, A, Sciot, R, Sleijfer, S, Schöffski, P
European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990). 2017;:33-40
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent phase II and III clinical trials demonstrated anti-tumour activity of eribulin, a tubulin-interacting cytotoxic agent, in patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS). In this exploratory study, we aimed to identify putative microRNA biomarkers that associate with eribulin sensitivity or resistance in STS. MATERIALS AND METHODS Archival tumour tissue from primary tumours or metastatic lesions was collected prior to eribulin treatment, from 65 consenting patients involved in the EORTC trial 62052. This phase II study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00413192) included multiple subtypes of STS. Tissue was available from 21 leiomyosarcomas, 14 adipocytic sarcomas, 9 synovial sarcomas and 21 other sarcoma histotypes. Total RNA was isolated from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumour samples and analysed using Taqman® Low Density Arrays to determine microRNA expression profiles. The expression of a total of 756 microRNAs was assessed. Progression-free survival at week 12 (RECIST 1.0) measured as a binary variable, was the primary end-point of the clinical trial and used as a primary response measure for correlative studies. Seventeen of 53 (32.1%) evaluable patients in the analysed subset had non-progressive disease at week 12 and were defined as responders. RESULTS The expression of 26 individual microRNAs (p < 0.05) differed significantly between non-responders and responders. Additional microRNAs of potential relevance were identified when considering the different histological subgroups. CONCLUSIONS The expression level of particular microRNAs in STS tissue samples may predict response to eribulin. Further validation studies as well as a preclinical assessment of the underlying molecular mechanisms are required.