-
1.
Real-world clinical outcomes and predictors of glycaemic and weight response to exenatide once weekly in patients with type 2 diabetes: The CIBELES project.
Gorgojo-Martínez, JJ, Gargallo-Fernández, MA, Brito-Sanfiel, M, Lisbona-Catalán, A
International journal of clinical practice. 2018;(3):e13055
Abstract
AIMS: To evaluate in a real-world setting the effectiveness of exenatide once-weekly (ExQW) in patients with T2D and to determine predictors of glycaemic and weight response to this drug at 6 months. METHODS Observational, retrospective, multicenter study in adult patients with T2D and BMI ≥30 kg/m2 from 4 tertiary Spanish hospitals who started ExQW therapy at least 6 months before the inclusion and had not achieved adequate glycaemic control on oral therapies or other GLP-1 receptor agonists. Glycaemic response was defined as an A1C reduction ≥1.0% and weight response as a weight loss ≥3% 6 months after ExQW. The best predictive models of glycaemic and weight response were estimated by binary logistic regression. RESULTS One hundred and forty eight patients were included, mean age 58.0 years, A1C 7.7%, weight 105.9 kg and BMI 38.4 kg/m2 . A1C (-1.1%), weight (-3.9 kg), systolic blood pressure (-4.0 mm Hg), diastolic blood pressure (-2.9 mm Hg), LDL-cholesterol (-14.2 mg/dL) and triglycerides (-31.0 mg/dL) significantly decreased 6 months after ExQW. 41.5% of patients had an A1C reduction ≥1.0% and 53.1% lost ≥3% of baseline weight. Glycaemic and weight reductions were sustained in patients completing 1 and 2 years of follow-up. The best predictive model of glycaemic response only included higher A1C levels (OR 3.9), whereas higher BMI (OR 1.1) and prior DPP-4i therapy (OR 3.1) were associated to weight response in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS In a real-world setting, ExQW significantly decreased A1C, weight, blood pressure and lipids at 6 months. Our study identified higher baseline A1C as the sole independent predictor of glycaemic response to ExQW and higher BMI and previous DDP4i treatment as predictive factors of meaningful weight response.
-
2.
Pharmacokinetics and Preliminary Pharmacodynamics of Single- and Multiple-dose Lyophilized Recombinant Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist (rE-4) in Chinese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
Wang, Y, Xu, B, Zhu, L, Lou, K, Chen, Y, Zhao, X, Wang, Q, Xu, L, Guo, X, Ji, L, et al
Clinical drug investigation. 2017;(12):1107-1115
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Recombinant glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (rE-4) is a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, which has the same amino acid sequence to exenatide, except for the C-terminal deamidated. This study assessed the pharmacokinetics and preliminary pharmacodynamics of rE-4, following single and multiple subcutaneous injections in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). DESIGN AND METHODS In the randomized, open-label study, Chinese patients with T2DM (n = 36) were randomly assigned to three groups of rE-4 (n = 12), rE-4 with metformin (n = 12) and exenatide (n = 12, as the control group) for 12 weeks. rE-4 and exenatide were administered by subcutaneous injection in the abdomen, and metformin was given by oral administration. Patients received rE-4 or exenatide 5 μg twice a day for the first 4 weeks and adjusted the dose of rE-4 or exenatide to 10 μg twice a day at day 29 for the following 8 weeks, if their glycated albumin (GA) values were still greater than 17%. We evaluated pharmacokinetic parameters of rE-4 and exenatide, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), 2-h postprandial blood glucose (PG2 h), glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and body weight at designated time points. RESULTS Thirty-six patients were enrolled, and 29 subjects finished the study. rE-4 was absorbed quickly with a median peak-reaching time (t max) of 0.8-1.5 h and eliminated rapidly with a median terminal half-life (t 1/2z) of 1.6-1.9 h. The exposure of rE-4 increased in an approximately dose-proportional method without accumulation. rE-4 10 μg twice a day could reduce FPG (~2.29 mmol/L), PG2 h (~6.00 mmol/L), HbA1c (~1.19%) and body weight (~0.48 kg) from baseline to 12 weeks, with no statistical significance compared with exenatide (FPG: ~1.88 mmol/L; PG2 h: ~6.66 mmol/L; HbA1c: ~1.13%; body weight: ~0.47 kg) and rE-4 with metformin (FPG: ~2.33 mmol/L; PG2 h: ~6.51 mmol/L; HbA1c: ~0.84%; body weight: ~1.16 kg) (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS rE-4 twice a day has a pharmacokinetic profile similar to exenatide and rE-4 with metformin after single and multiple doses in Chinese patients with T2DM. Also, rE-4 could improve glycemic control effectively. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER NCT01342042.
-
3.
Effect of exenatide, insulin and pioglitazone on bone metabolism in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes.
Li, R, Xu, W, Luo, S, Xu, H, Tong, G, Zeng, L, Zhu, D, Weng, J
Acta diabetologica. 2015;(6):1083-91
Abstract
AIM: Preclinical studies suggested that insulin, incretin and thiazolidinediones had effect on regulation of bone metabolism. But clinical evidence is limited. We assessed the effects of these antihyperglycemic agents on bone metabolism in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes. METHODS The present study was a two-center, randomized, parallel-group clinical trial. Sixty-two newly diagnosed and drug-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes were randomized to exenatide (EXE, n = 20), mixed protamine zinc recombinant human insulin lispro injection (25R; INS, n = 21) or pioglitazone (PIO, n = 21) group for a 24-week treatment. Glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), body weight, body mineral density (BMD) and fasting serum concentration of bone turnover markers including osteocalcin (OC), C-telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX) and tartrate-resistant alkaline phosphatase 5b (TRAcP5b) were assessed at baseline and week 24. RESULTS Baseline characteristics were similar among groups. At week 24, HbA1c improved in all patients (EXE:-2.4 ± 0.3 %, INS:-2.4 ± 0.3 %, PIO:-2.0 ± 0.2 %; p > 0.05 among groups). Patients treated with exenatide lost body weight remarkably (-4.7 ± 0.8 kg). In spite of the amelioration of glucose control, no significant improvement of OC, CTX or TRAcP5b was observed at week 24 (EXE: OC -0.619 ± 0.728 ng/ml, CTX 0.147 ± 0.046 ng/ml, TRAcP5b 0.302 ± 0.149 U/L;INS: OC 0.637 ± 0.787 ng/ml, CTX -0.012 ± 0.074 ng/ml, TRAcP5b 0.124 ± 0.395 U/L; PIO: OC -0.150 ± 0.691 ng/ml, CTX 0.073 ± 0.094 ng/ml, TRAcP5b 0.586 ± 0.183 U/L; p > 0.05), as well as BMD measurement, regardless of the treatments. CONCLUSIONS Twenty-four-week treatment with exenatide, insulin and pioglitazone improved glucose control in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes, but had no impact on bone turnover markers or BMD.
-
4.
Exenatide once weekly versus insulin glargine for type 2 diabetes (DURATION-3): 3-year results of an open-label randomised trial.
Diamant, M, Van Gaal, L, Guerci, B, Stranks, S, Han, J, Malloy, J, Boardman, MK, Trautmann, ME
The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology. 2014;(6):464-73
Abstract
BACKGROUND When patients with type 2 diabetes start their first injectable therapy, clinicians can choose between glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists and basal insulins. In DURATION-3, exenatide once weekly was compared with insulin glargine (henceforth, glargine) as first injectable therapy. Here, we report the results of the final 3-year follow-up. METHODS DURATION-3 was an open-label randomised trial done between May 13, 2008, and Jan 30, 2012. Patients with type 2 diabetes aged 18 years or older were enrolled at 72 sites worldwide. They were eligible when they had suboptimum glycaemic control (HbA1c 7.1-11.0% [54-97 mmol/mol]) despite maximum tolerated doses of metformin alone or with a sulfonylurea for at least 3 months, a stable bodyweight for at least 3 months, and a BMI of 25-45 kg/m(2) (23-45 kg/m(2) in South Korea and Taiwan). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by computer-generated random sequence with an interactive voice-response system (block size four, stratified by country and concomitant therapy) to once-weekly exenatide (2 mg subcutaneous injection) or once-daily glargine (titrated to target) to be given in addition to their existing oral glucose-lowering regimens. The primary efficacy measure at 3 years was change in HbA1c from baseline in patients given at least one dose of the assigned drug (ie, analyses by modified intention to treat). Patients, investigators, and data analysts were not masked to treatment assignment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00641056. FINDINGS 456 patients underwent randomisation and received at least one dose of the assigned drug (233 given exenatide, 223 glargine). At 3 years, least-squares mean HbA1c change was -1.01% (SE 0.07) in the exenatide group versus -0.81% (0.07) in the glargine group (least-squares mean difference -0.20%, SE 0.10, 95% CI -0.39 to -0.02; p=0.03). Transient gastrointestinal adverse events characteristic of GLP-1 receptor agonists were more frequent with exenatide than glargine (nausea: 36 [15%] of 233 patients vs five [2%] of 223; vomiting: 15 [6%] vs six [3%]; diarrhoea: 32 [14%] vs 15 [7%]), although frequency of these events did decrease after week 26 in the exenatide group. The proportion of patients who reported serious adverse events in the exenatide group (36 patients [15%]) was the same as that in the glargine group (33 [15%]). The exposure-adjusted rate of overall hypoglycaemia was three times higher in patients given glargine (0.9 events per patient per year) than in those given exenatide (0.3 events per patient per year). INTERPRETATION Efficacy of once-weekly exenatide is sustained for 3 years. GLP-1 receptor agonists could be a viable long-term injectable treatment option in patients with type 2 diabetes who have not yet started taking insulin. FUNDING Amylin Pharmaceuticals and Eli Lilly.
-
5.
Effects of exenatide combined with lifestyle modification in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Apovian, CM, Bergenstal, RM, Cuddihy, RM, Qu, Y, Lenox, S, Lewis, MS, Glass, LC
The American journal of medicine. 2010;(5):468.e9-17
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the effect of a lifestyle modification program plus exenatide versus lifestyle modification program plus placebo on weight loss in overweight or obese participants with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin and/or sulfonylurea. METHODS In this 24-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 194 patients participated in a lifestyle modification program, consisting of goals of 600 kcal/day deficit and physical activity of at least 2.5 hours/week. Participants were randomized to 5 microg exenatide twice daily injection + lifestyle modification program (n = 96) or placebo + lifestyle modification program (n = 98), and after 4 weeks increased their exenatide dose to 10 microg twice daily or volume equivalent of placebo. RESULTS Baseline characteristics: (mean +/- standard deviation) age, 54.8 +/- 9.5 years; weight, 95.5 +/- 16.0 kg; hemoglobin A(1c), 7.6 +/- 0.8%. At 24 weeks (least squares mean +/- standard error), treatments showed similar decreases in caloric intake (-378 +/- 58 vs -295 +/- 58 kcal/day, exenatide + lifestyle modification program vs placebo + lifestyle modification program, P = .27) and increases in exercise-derived energy expenditure. Exenatide + lifestyle modification program showed greater change in weight (-6.16 +/- 0.54 kg vs -3.97 +/- 0.52 kg, P = .003), hemoglobin A(1c) (-1.21 +/- 0.09% vs -0.73 +/- 0.09%, P <.0001), systolic (-9.44 +/- 1.40 vs -1.97 +/- 1.40 mm Hg, P <.001) and diastolic blood pressure (-2.22 +/- 1.00 vs 0.47 +/- 0.99 mm Hg, P = .04). Nausea was reported more for exenatide + lifestyle modification program than placebo + lifestyle modification program (44.8% vs 19.4%, respectively, P <.001), with no difference in withdrawal rates due to adverse events (4.2% vs 5.1%, respectively, P = 1.0) or rates of hypoglycemia. CONCLUSIONS When combined with lifestyle modification, exenatide treatment led to significant weight loss, improved glycemic control, and decreased blood pressure compared with lifestyle modification alone in overweight or obese participants with type 2 diabetes on metformin and/or sulfonylurea treatment.
-
6.
Exenatide versus glibenclamide in patients with diabetes.
Derosa, G, Maffioli, P, Salvadeo, SA, Ferrari, I, Ragonesi, PD, Querci, F, Franzetti, IG, Gadaleta, G, Ciccarelli, L, Piccinni, MN, et al
Diabetes technology & therapeutics. 2010;(3):233-40
Abstract
BACKGROUND Incretin-based therapies have provided additional options for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effects of exenatide compared to glibenclamide on body weight, glycemic control, beta-cell function, insulin resistance, and inflammatory state in patients with diabetes. METHODS One hundred twenty-eight patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus receiving therapy with metformin were randomized to take exenatide 5 microg twice a day or glibenclamide 2.5 mg three times a day and titrated to exenatide 10 microg twice a day or glibenclamide 5 mg three times a day. We evaluated body weight, body mass index (BMI), glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), postprandial plasma glucose (PPG), fasting plasma insulin (FPI), homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) index, homeostasis model assessment beta-cell function (HOMA-beta) index, plasma proinsulin (PPr), PPr/FPI ratio, resistin, retinol binding protein-4 (RBP-4), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (Hs-CRP) at baseline and after 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. RESULTS Body weight and BMI decreased with exenatide and increased with glibenclamide. A similar improvement of HbA(1c), FPG, and PPG was obtained in both groups, whereas FPI decreased with exenatide and increased with glibenclamide. The HOMA-IR index decreased and the HOMA-beta index increased with exenatide but not with glibenclamide. A decrease of PPr was reported in both groups, but only glibenclamide decreased the PPr/FPI ratio. Resistin and RBP-4 decreased with exenatide and increased with glibenclamide. A decrease of Hs-CRP was obtained with exenatide, whereas no variations were observed with glibenclamide. CONCLUSIONS Both exenatide and glibenclamide gave a similar improvement of glycemic control, but only exenatide gave improvements of insulin resistance and beta-cell function, giving also a decrease of body weight and of inflammatory state.
-
7.
Improved treatment satisfaction and weight-related quality of life with exenatide once weekly or twice daily.
Best, JH, Boye, KS, Rubin, RR, Cao, D, Kim, TH, Peyrot, M
Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association. 2009;(7):722-8
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
AIMS: To assess treatment satisfaction and weight-related quality of life (QOL) in subjects with Type 2 diabetes treated with exenatide once weekly (QW) or twice daily (BID). METHODS In this 52-week randomized, multi-centre, open-label study, 295 subjects managed with diet and exercise and/or oral glucose-lowering medications received either exenatide QW or BID during weeks 1-30; thereafter, subjects receiving exenatide BID were switched to exenatide QW, with 258 total subjects receiving exenatide QW during weeks 30-52. Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire-status (DTSQ-s) and Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite (IWQOL-Lite) were assessed at baseline and weeks 30 and 52. Mean group changes from baseline to week 30 were estimated by ancova; changes from week 30 to week 52 were assessed by Student's t-test. RESULTS Statistically significant improvements from baseline to week 30 were observed in both treatment groups for DTSQ-s and IWQOL-Lite measures, with significantly greater reduction in perceived frequency of hyperglycaemia and greater satisfaction with continuing treatment in the QW group compared with the BID group. Effect sizes for change in DTSQ-s total scores were 0.84 QW, 0.64 BID; for IWQOL-Lite: 0.96 QW, 0.82 BID. Treatment satisfaction and QOL improved significantly between weeks 30 and 52 for those switching from BID to QW. Occurrence of adverse events did not affect patients' improvements in treatment satisfaction and QOL. CONCLUSIONS Patients treated with exenatide QW or BID experienced significant and clinically meaningful improvements in treatment satisfaction and QOL. Patients who switched from exenatide BID to exenatide QW administration reported further significant improvements.
-
8.
Effects of exenatide versus insulin analogues on weight change in subjects with type 2 diabetes: a pooled post-hoc analysis.
Glass, LC, Qu, Y, Lenox, S, Kim, D, Gates, JR, Brodows, R, Trautmann, M, Bergenstal, RM
Current medical research and opinion. 2008;(3):639-44
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE In two previously reported multi-center, randomized, open-label, comparator (insulin) controlled trials in patients with type 2 diabetes sub-optimally controlled with metformin and a sulfonylurea, treatment with exenatide and insulin analogue therapy produced similar reductions in glycosylated hemoglobin A(1c) (A1C). However, treatment with exenatide was associated with a reduction in body weight while insulin analogue therapy was associated with weight gain. This analysis further characterizes the relative impact of commonly employed insulin analogues versus exenatide on weight change over a 6-month period. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS In this pooled post-hoc analysis of two trials, 1047 subjects with diabetes were compared regarding the relative impact of an adjunctive treatment - an insulin analogue (glargine or biphasic insulin aspart) or exenatide (5 mug twice daily for 4 weeks, 10 mug thereafter) - on body weight. RESULTS While exenatide treatment provided similarly effective glycemic control compared with insulin analogue therapy, it was also associated with weight reduction in the majority of subjects (73.3%, averaging 3 kg decrease by endpoint), with approximately 22% achieving > or =5% weight loss, and 3.2% of subjects achieving > or =10% weight loss. In contrast, by the end of the study most insulin-treated subjects (75.9%) had gained weight (mean 3 kg). Only 2% of insulin-treated subjects achieved > or =5% weight loss, and 0.2% of subjects achieved > or =10% weight loss. CONCLUSIONS These findings support the use of exenatide as a treatment option in insulin-naïve subjects with type 2 diabetes and who are overweight and sub-optimally controlled by metformin and sulfonylurea. However, these results should be interpreted with caution given the exploratory nature of this post-hoc analysis.
-
9.
Exenatide improves glycemic control and reduces body weight in subjects with type 2 diabetes: a dose-ranging study.
Poon, T, Nelson, P, Shen, L, Mihm, M, Taylor, K, Fineman, M, Kim, D
Diabetes technology & therapeutics. 2005;(3):467-77
Abstract
BACKGROUND Exenatide is the first of a new class of agents known as incretin mimetics that are in development for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Exenatide has been shown to reduce fasting and postprandial glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes, as well as provide sustained reductions in hemoglobin A 1c (HbA 1c). This study was designed to assess the dose dependencies of the glucoregulatory effects and tolerability of exenatide when added to diet and exercise or metformin monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS In this randomized, triple-blinded, placebo-controlled Phase 2 clinical trial, 156 patients were randomized to placebo or exenatide at 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, or 10.0 microg administered b.i.d. for 28 days. RESULTS After 28 days of therapy, exenatide was associated with significant (P < 0.0001, linear contrast testing), dose-dependent reductions in HbA 1c (0.1 +/- 0.1%, -0.3 +/- 0.1%, -0.4 +/- 0.1%, +/-0.5 +/- 0.0%, and -0.5 +/- 0.1% for placebo and 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, and 10.0 microg b.i.d. exenatide, respectively) and significant (P = 0.0006, linear contrast testing) reductions in fasting plasma glucose (+6.8 +/- 4.1, -20.1 +/- 5.2, -21.2 +/- 3.9, -17.7 +/- 4.8, and -17.3 +/- 4.4 mg/dL for placebo and 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, and 10.0 microg b.i.d. exenatide, respectively) by Day 28. These reductions were similar for patients treated with diet/exercise and those treated with metformin. In addition, patients receiving exenatide exhibited dose-dependent reductions in body weight (0.0 +/- 0.3, -0.7 +/- 0.3, -0.7 +/- 0.2, -1.4 +/- 0.3, and -1.8 +/- 0.3 kg for placebo and 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, and 10.0 microg b.i.d. exenatide, respectively; P < 0.01 for 7.5 and 10.0 microg b.i.d. exenatide doses compared with placebo) at Day 28. The most common adverse event was mild-to-moderate nausea that was dose-dependent (seven of 123 patients randomized to exenatide withdrew from the study because of gastrointestinal effects). CONCLUSIONS Exenatide dose-dependently improved glycemic control and reduced body weight over 28 days in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with diet/exercise or metformin.