1.
Effects of an educational intervention on frailty status, physical function, physical activity, sleep patterns, and nutritional status of older adults with frailty or pre-frailty: the FRAGSALUD study.
Casals, C, Ávila-Cabeza-de-Vaca, L, González-Mariscal, A, Marín-Galindo, A, Costilla, M, Ponce-Gonzalez, JG, Vázquez-Sánchez, MÁ, Corral-Pérez, J
Frontiers in public health. 2023;11:1267666
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Frailty and pre-frailty are associated with an increased risk of premature mortality. Factors involved in the development of frailty include physical activity, sleep and nutrition. The aim of this 6-month randomised controlled trial was to evaluate the effects of an educational programme on frailty, physical function, physical activity, sleep and nutritional status. 166 community-dwelling individuals aged 65 years or over with frailty or pre-frailty were randomised to either receive a health education programme consisting of 4 group sessions in the first month which included guidelines for physical activity, nutrition and cognitive training as well as the promotion of psychological and social wellbeing and 6 follow-up calls over 6 months or their usual healthcare (control). Compared to the control group, the intervention group had significant reductions in frailty score, exhaustion and fatigue score, increase in gait speed and improvements in various physical function tests. The intervention group also showed significant improvements in mini nutritional assessment compared to the control group although this was not associated with significant changes in anthropometric parameters. There was a significant increase in awakenings in the control group whilst this parameter did not change in the intervention group, whilst there were no changes in other sleep parameters. The authors concluded that the simplicity, affordability and effectiveness of the health education programme may contribute to healthy ageing.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
To improve frailty and physical functioning, a comprehensive programme may be effective, which includes:
- Nutrition
- Physical exercise
- Cognitive training
- Promotion of social and psychological wellbeing.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
- Frailty and pre-frailty increase the risk of premature mortality but are reversible
- The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of a health education programme on frailty status in frail or pre-frail older persons.
Methods
- Randomised controlled trial
- Participants: 166 community-dwelling individuals aged 65 years or over with frailty or pre-frailty living in Spain were enrolled, 163 completed the study (80 in intervention and 83 in control group)
- Four weekly group sessions which included guidelines for physical activity, nutrition and cognitive training as well as the promotion of psychological and social wellbeing and 6 follow-up calls over 6 months versus usual healthcare (control).
Results
- Baseline demographics: The educational group consisted of more women (p=0.001), had a younger average age (p=0.019), lower height (p=0.001) and a higher average education level (p=0.013) compared to the control group.
Effects on intervention group:
- Reductions in frailty score (p<0.05 vs baseline and change vs change in control group), with 30% of participants in the intervention group no longer being classified as frail or pre-frail in contrast to none in the control group
- Reductions in fatigue and exhaustion score (p<0.05 vs baseline and change vs change in control group)
- Increase in gait speed and improvements in various physical function tests (all p<0.05 vs baseline and change vs change in control group)
- Improvements in mini nutritional assessment (p<0.001 vs baseline and change vs change in control group)
- Improvement in sleep behaviour demonstrated by an increase in awakenings in the control group (p<0.05 vs baseline and change vs change in intervention group) whilst this parameter did not change in the intervention group.
No effects (vs control) on:
- Anthropometric parameters/unintended weight loss
- Other sleep parameters
- Physical activity expenditure and physical activity score
- Hand grip strength.
Conclusion
This affordable and simple health education programme is effective in reducing frailty in elderly and may contribute to healthy ageing.
Clinical practice applications:
- A comprehensive programme, encompassing not only nutrition, but also exercise, cognitive training and a focus on social and psychological wellbeing may be most effective in improving frailty and physical functioning
- Nutrition intervention, alongside other lifestyle interventions, may have benefits for nutritional status in older adults, even if this is not reflected in a change in anthropometric parameters, such as weight.
Considerations for future research:
- Studies with longer-term follow-up would help evaluate whether/for how long the benefits are sustained.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The prevalence of frailty is increasing worldwide, emphasizing the importance of prioritizing healthy ageing. To address this, cost-effective and minimally supervised interventions are being sought. This study aimed to assess the impact of an educational program on frailty status, physical function, physical activity, sleep patterns, and nutritional status in community-dwelling older adults with at least 1 Fried's frailty criteria. METHODS A 6-month multicentre randomized controlled trial was conducted from March 2022 to February 2023 in 14 health centres located in Cadiz and Malaga, Spain. The educational intervention consisted of 4 group sessions and 6 follow-up phone calls spread over 6 months. The program focused on educating participants about frailty and its impact on health, providing guidelines for physical activity, healthy dietary habits, cognitive training, psychological well-being and social activities. A total of 163 participants, divided into control (n = 80) and educational groups (n = 83) were assessed before and after the intervention. RESULTS The results showed a significant group-time interaction in the physical function evaluated with a large effect on Short Physical Performance Battery score (η2p = 0.179, -0.1 [-1.2-1.0] points for control group vs. 1.0 [0.0-3.0] points for educational group, p < 0.001), and an effect on the 4-meter gait test ((η2p = 0.122, 0.5 [0.1-0.0] s for control group vs. -0.4 [-0.5- -0.3] s for educational group, p < 0.001), and the 5-repetition sit-to-stand test (η2p = 0.136, 1.0 [0.0-1.2] s for control group vs. -4.3 [-7.0- -2.3] for educational group, p < 0.001). Additionally, the use of accelerometers to assess physical activity, inactivity, and sleep patterns revealed a significant small effect in the number of awakenings at night ((η2p = 0.040, 1.1 [-0.5-3.4] awakenings for control group vs. 0.0 [-2.2-0.0] awakenings for educational group, p = 0.009). The findings also highlighted a significant medium effect regarding malnutrition risk, which was assessed using the Mini-Nutritional Assessment score (η2p = 0.088, -0.7 [-2.3-1.5] points for control group vs. 1.5 [-0.5-3.0] points for educational group, p < 0.001). DISCUSSION Thus, the 6-month educational program effectively improved physical function, sleep patterns, and nutritional status compared to usual healthcare attendance in community-dwelling older adults with frailty or pre-frailty. These findings underscore the potential of minimally supervised interventions in promoting a healthy lifestyle in this vulnerable population.
2.
Impact of a specialized oral nutritional supplement on quality of life in older adults following hospitalization: Post-hoc analysis of the NOURISH trial.
Baggs, GE, Middleton, C, Nelson, JL, Pereira, SL, Hegazi, RM, Matarese, L, Matheson, E, Ziegler, TR, Tappenden, KA, Deutz, N
Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland). 2023;42(11):2116-2123
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Malnutrition in hospitalised adults is recognized as a challenging health concern that is associated with many adverse outcomes. Malnutrition screening and assessment are essential for all patients admitted to the hospital and are particularly important for adults who are vulnerable. The aim of this study was to determine whether specialised oral-nutritional supplements (S-ONS) benefits were further associated with measurable improvements in quality of life (QoL) domains during the post-hospitalisation period. This study was a post-hoc analysis of NOURISH trial data. The NOURISH trial was a multicentre, prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. Six-hundred and twenty-two patients were included in the intent-to-treat analysis. Results showed that malnourished, older patients who received daily interventions with S-ONS (during hospital stay and for 90-day post-discharge) had significantly better QoL domain scores compared to those who received only placebo intervention. Specifically, there were significant differences in the QoL domains of mental health/ cognition, vitality, social functioning, and general health. Further, there were significant QoL differences for physical component, physical functioning, bodily pain, and emotional role. Authors concluded that among malnourished, hospitalised patients (aged 65 years and over), supplementation with S-ONS during the hospitalisation and 90-days post discharge resulted in improvements in QoL.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Both during and after hospitalization, nutritional care with daily intake of oral nutritional supplements (ONS) improves health outcomes and decreases risk of mortality in malnourished older adults. In a post-hoc analysis of data from hospitalized older adults with malnutrition risk, we sought to determine whether consuming a specialized ONS (S-ONS) containing high protein and beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate (HMB) can also improve Quality of Life (QoL). METHODS We analyzed data from the NOURISH trial-a randomized, placebo-controlled, multi-center, double-blind study conducted in patients with congestive heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, pneumonia, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Patients received standard care + S-ONS or placebo beverage (target 2 servings/day) during hospitalization and for 90 days post-discharge. SF-36 and EQ-5D QoL outcomes were assessed at 0-, 30-, 60-, and 90-days post-discharge. To account for the missing QoL observations (27.7%) due to patient dropout, we used multiple imputation. Data represent differences between least squares mean (LSM) values with 95% Confidence Intervals for groups receiving S-ONS or placebo treatments. RESULTS The study population consisted of 622 patients of mean age ±standard deviation: 77.9 ± 8.4 years and of whom 52.1% were females. Patients consuming placebo had lower (worse) QoL domain scores than did those consuming S-ONS. Specifically for the SF-36 health domain scores, group differences (placebo vs S-ONS) in LSM were significant for the mental component summary at day 90 (-4.23 [-7.75, -0.71]; p = 0.019), the domains of mental health at days 60 (-3.76 [-7.40, -0.12]; p = 0.043) and 90 (-4.88 [-8.41, -1.34]; p = 0.007), vitality at day 90 (-3.33 [-6.65, -0.01]; p = 0.049) and social functioning at day 90 (-4.02 [-7.48,-0.55]; p = 0.023). Compared to placebo, differences in LSM values for the SF-36 general health domain were significant with improvement in the S-ONS group at hospital discharge and beyond: day 0 (-2.72 [-5.33, -0.11]; p = 0.041), day 30 (-3.08 [-6.09, -0.08]; p = 0.044), day 60 (-3.95 [-7.13, -0.76]; p = 0.015), and day 90 (-4.56 [-7.74, -1.38]; p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS In hospitalized older adults with cardiopulmonary diseases and evidence of poor nutritional status, daily intake of S-ONS compared to placebo improved post-discharge QoL scores for mental health/cognition, vitality, social functioning, and general health. These QoL benefits complement survival benefits found in the original NOURISH trial analysis. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT01626742.
3.
Dietary Inflammatory Index, Dietary Non-Enzymatic Antioxidant Capacity, and Colorectal and Breast Cancer Risk (MCC-Spain Study).
Obón-Santacana, M, Romaguera, D, Gracia-Lavedan, E, Molinuevo, A, Molina-Montes, E, Shivappa, N, Hebert, JR, Tardón, A, Castaño-Vinyals, G, Moratalla, F, et al
Nutrients. 2019;11(6)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
This study aims to correlate the risk factors of inflammation and antioxidant capacity in cases of colon and breast cancer, using data from a large Spanish case-controlled study (1852 colon cancer subjects, 1567 breast cancer subjects and a total 4933 controls). The role of diet in colon cancer is widely accepted, however it is more controversial with breast cancer where genetic mutations and other lifestyle factors are cited as primary risk factors. What unites these cancers is the inter-related presence of both inflammation and oxidative stress. The dietary inflammatory index (DII®) and non-enzymatic antioxidant capacity (NEAC) were used to evaluate inflammation and oxidative stress using 30 nutrient parameters and 6 inflammatory blood markers. The results showed that colon cancer subjects typically ate a more pro-inflammatory diet compared to controls, with a higher odds ratio of men to women, and tended to be older, heavier and less physically active. The breast cancer subjects also had higher inflammatory scores versus controls but demographically were younger, premenopausal, frequently with a first-degree family link to breast cancer, and including a higher percentage of smokers. For both cancers, inflammation significantly and statistically increased risk factors. Adding in oxidative stress results showed a statistically higher risk of developing colon cancer whilst in breast cancer subjects the risk was increased but non-statistically valid. They did report that meat-eaters had a relative 9% increased risk of Breast cancer. Overall the study concluded that dietary components of inflammation and oxidative stress increased risk of colon cancer but were not statistically valid for breast cancer.
Abstract
Inflammation and antioxidant capacity have been associated with colorectal and breast cancer. We computed the dietary inflammatory index (DII®), and the total dietary non-enzymatic antioxidant capacity (NEAC) and associated them with colorectal and breast cancer risk in the population-based multi case-control study in Spain (MCC-Spain). We included 1852 colorectal cancer and 1567 breast cancer cases, and 3447 and 1486 population controls, respectively. DII score and NEAC were derived using data from a semi-quantitative validated food frequency questionnaire. Unconditional logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) for energy-adjusted DII (E-DII), and a score combining E-DII and NEAC. E-DII was associated with colorectal cancer risk (OR = 1.93, highest quartile versus lowest, 95%CI:1.60-2.32; p-trend: <0.001); this increase was observed for both colon and rectal cancer. Less pronounced increased risks were observed for breast cancer (OR = 1.22, highest quartile versus lowest, 95%CI:0.99-1.52, p-trend: >0.10). The combined score of high E-DII scores and low antioxidant values were associated with colorectal cancer risk (OR = 1.48, highest quartile versus lowest, 95%CI: 1.26-1.74; p-trend: <0.001), but not breast cancer. This study provides evidence that a pro-inflammatory diet is associated with increased colorectal cancer risk while findings for breast cancer were less consistent.