-
1.
Association between ethnicity and degree of improvement in cardiac function following initiation of sacubitril/valsartan.
Holm, N, Bromage, DI, Cannata, A, DeCourcey, J, Bhatti, P, Huang, M, McDonagh, TA
Journal of cardiovascular medicine (Hagerstown, Md.). 2022;(1):37-41
Abstract
AIMS: The aim of this study was to determine the degree of short-term improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), haemodynamics, NT-proBNP and quality of life following initiation of sacubitril/valsartan in black patients when compared with white patients. METHODS This was a retrospective, observational, single-centre, hypothesis-generating study of patients with symptomatic heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) treated with guideline recommended therapy, who were transitioned from an ACE inhibitor (ACE-I) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) to sacubitril/valsartan. RESULTS Our analysis included 83 patients (mean age 57 years) with echocardiography performed before and after transition from ACE-I/ARB to sacubitril/valsartan, after excluding patients with concomitant Cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation. Overall, sacubitril/valsartan was associated with LVEF improvement from 28.8% ± 0.7 to 32.0% ± 1.1% (P = 0.0002), but no reverse remodelling was observed. The association with LVEF improvement was only observed in white patients (n = 46, P = 0.0006), but not in black patients (n = 37, P = 0.1728), and appeared to be associated with reduced blood pressure (baseline vs. 2-week blood pressure 116.5 ± 13.9 vs. 109.4 ± 14.3 mmHg, respectively, in white patients, P = 0.0449). Fifteen patients (18.1%) became ineligible for primary prevention Implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation. CONCLUSION Sacubitril/valsartan was associated with improved LVEF, NT-proBNP concentrations and quality of life in patients with symptomatic HFrEF on guideline recommended therapy. However, in our cohort, improvement of LVEF and quality of life might be attenuated in black patients, which warrants further investigation.
-
2.
Clinical Effectiveness of Sacubitril/Valsartan Among Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.
Greene, SJ, Choi, S, Lippmann, SJ, Mentz, RJ, Greiner, MA, Hardy, NC, Hammill, BG, Luo, N, Samsky, MD, Heidenreich, PA, et al
Journal of the American Heart Association. 2021;(16):e021459
Abstract
Background Sacubitril/Valsartan has been highly efficacious in randomized trials of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, the effectiveness of sacubitril/valsartan in older patients hospitalized for HFrEF in real-world US practice is unclear. Methods and Results This study included Medicare beneficiaries age ≥65 years who were hospitalized for HFrEF ≤40% in the Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure registry between October 2015 and December 2018, and eligible for sacubitril/valsartan. Associations between discharge prescription of sacubitril/valsartan and clinical outcomes were assessed after inverse probability of treatment weighting and adjustment for other HFrEF medications. Overall, 1551 (10.9%) patients were discharged on sacubitril/valsartan. Of those not prescribed sacubitril/valsartan, 7857 (62.0%) were prescribed an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin II receptor blocker. Over 12-month follow-up, compared with a discharge prescription of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin II receptor blocker, sacubitril/valsartan was independently associated with lower all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.82; 95% CI, 0.72-0.94; P=0.004) but not all-cause hospitalization (adjusted HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.89-1.07; P=0.55) or heart failure hospitalization (adjusted HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.91-1.18; P=0.59). Patients prescribed sacubitril/valsartan versus those without a prescription had lower risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.60-0.79; P<0.001), all-cause hospitalization (adjusted HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.82-0.98; P=0.02), but not heart failure hospitalization (adjusted HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.82-1.08; P=0.40). Conclusions Among patients hospitalized for HFrEF, prescription of sacubitril/valsartan at discharge was independently associated with reduced postdischarge mortality compared with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin II receptor blocker, and reduced mortality and all-cause hospitalization compared with no sacubitril/valsartan. These findings support the use of sacubitril/valsartan to improve postdischarge outcomes among older patients hospitalized for HFrEF in routine US clinical practice.
-
3.
Underweight Is Associated with Poor Prognosis in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction.
Matsuhiro, Y, Nishino, M, Ukita, K, Kawamura, A, Nakamura, H, Yasumoto, K, Tsuda, M, Okamoto, N, Tanaka, A, Matsunaga-Lee, Y, et al
International heart journal. 2021;(5):1042-1051
Abstract
The obesity paradox states higher body mass index (BMI) is associated with better outcomes than normal weight in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, underweight was defined by BMI < 18.5 kg/m2, and results have been inconclusive, in part due to small number of participants. The number of underweight patients with HFpEF is higher in Asian than in Western countries. In this study, we aim to determine the prognostic impact of underweight in patients with HFpEF in Asian population.We enrolled 846 consecutive patients from the PURSUIT-HFpEF registry. We then divided them into three groups by BMI, namely, underweight (BMI < 18.5 kg/m2), normal weight (18.5 ≤ BMI < 23), and overweight (23 ≤ BMI). The underweight group consisted of 187 patients (22%). Over a mean follow-up of 407 days, 105 deaths were reported as all-cause mortality. On multivariable Cox analysis, the underweight group was determined to be significantly associated with higher risk of all-cause mortality than the normal and overweight groups (Hazard ratios [HR]: 2.33; 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 1.45-3.75, P < 0.001; HR: 3.54; 95% CI: 1.99-6.29, P < 0.001, respectively), after adjustment for age, sex, vital signs, and comorbidities.Underweight is a useful predictor of poor prognosis in patients with HFpEF in Asian population.
-
4.
Contemporary Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes of Comorbid Diabetes Mellitus and HFrEF: The CHAMP-HF Registry.
Vaduganathan, M, Fonarow, GC, Greene, SJ, DeVore, AD, Kavati, A, Sikirica, S, Albert, NM, Duffy, CI, Hill, CL, Patterson, JH, et al
JACC. Heart failure. 2020;(6):469-480
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to characterize the clinical profile, treatment patterns, and clinical outcomes of patients with comorbid diabetes mellitus (DM) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in a contemporary, real-world U.S. outpatient registry in the context of evolving treatment strategies. BACKGROUND Specific antihyperglycemic classes have differential risks and benefits with respect to HF. Limited data are available evaluating contemporary treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with comorbid DM and HFrEF. METHODS Among 4,970 patients with chronic HFrEF (≤40%) across 152 U.S. sites in the CHAMP-HF prospective, observational registry (2015 to 2017), we examined therapies and clinical outcomes by DM status. RESULTS Median age was 68 (58 to 75) years of age; 29% were women; 73.5% were white; and 64% had coronary artery disease. Overall, 42% (n = 2,085) had comorbid DM with a median hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level of 7.2% (interquartile range [IQR]: 6.4% to 8.3%). One-fourth of DM patients (24%) were not treated with an antihyperglycemic therapy. Most patients with DM were taking 1 (46%) or 2 (23%) antihyperglycemic therapies: metformin (40%); insulin (33%); sulfonylureas (24%); dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (10%); glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 receptor agonists (4%); sodium-glucose cotransporter (SGLT)-2 inhibitors (2%); and thiazolidinediones (2%). Among patients with DM, 62%, 16%, 80%, and 33.5% were receiving any angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), β-blockers, or mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) at baseline, respectively. Among patients without DM, corresponding baseline rates were 65%, 15%, 80%, and 37%, respectively. Patients with or without DM were infrequently treated with guideline-directed HFrEF therapies at target doses (≤27% across classes). During median 15-month follow-up, patients with DM experienced higher rates of all-cause mortality or HF hospitalization (30% vs. 23%, respectively), independent of 11 pre-specified covariates (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.35 (95% confidence interval: 1.21 to 1.52); p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Despite higher risk-adjusted clinical event rates in patients with comorbid HFrEF and DM, guideline-directed medical therapies for both disease states are incomplete and represent an important target for quality improvement through multidisciplinary care pathways.
-
5.
Comparison of clinical characteristics of patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction with atrial fibrillation versus sinus rhythm: Insights from the APOLLON registry.
Özlek, B, Özlek, E, Tekinalp, M, Kahraman, S, Zencirkiran Agus, H, Başaran, Ö, Kaya, BC, Rencüzoğulları, İ, Mert, KU, Çakır, O, et al
Turk Kardiyoloji Dernegi arsivi : Turk Kardiyoloji Derneginin yayin organidir. 2020;(3):234-245
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to assess the clinical characteristics of patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) and compare them with those of HFpEF patients without AF. METHODS This study was a sub-group analysis of a multicenter, observational, and cross-sectional registry conducted in Turkey (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03026114). Patients with HFpEF were divided into 2 groups: HFpEF with AF and HFpEF with sinus rhythm (SR), and the clinical characteristics of the groups were compared. RESULTS In a total of 819 HFpEF patients (median age: 67 years; 58% women), 313 (38.2%) had AF. Compared to the patients with SR, those with AF were older (70 years vs 66 years; p<0.001) and more symptomatic, with a higher rate of classification as New York Heart Association functional class III-IV, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea, orthopnea, palpitations, fatigue, pulmonary crepitations, and peripheral edema. The hospitalization rate for heart failure was higher (28.4% vs 12.6%; p<0.001) in patients with AF, and participants with AF had higher level of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (887 pg/mL vs 394.8 pg/mL; p<0.001) and higher left atrial volume index level. Patients without AF had a higher burden of diabetes mellitus, obstructive sleep apnea, and coronary artery disease. The prescription rate of nondihydropyridine calcium blockers, digoxin, loop diuretics, and anticoagulant drugs was higher in the AF group. CONCLUSION The results of this study revealed that in a large Turkish cohort with HFpEF, significant clinical differences were present between those with and without AF and. Further prospective studies are needed to clarify the prognostic implications of AF in this growing heart failure population in our country.
-
6.
Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitor for Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction: Real-World Experience From Taiwan.
Hsiao, FC, Wang, CL, Chang, PC, Lu, YY, Huang, CY, Chu, PH
Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology and therapeutics. 2020;(2):152-157
Abstract
BACKGROUND Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) was recommended by major guidelines as the frontline therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) since its clinical benefit was proved in the Prospective comparison of ARNI with ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and morbidity in Heart Failure (PARADIGM-HF) trial. However, little is known about its safety and effectiveness in real-world practice, often with sicker and more fragile patients. In addition, East Asia population is underrepresented in PARADIGM-HF trial. METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of patients who received ARNI in 3 medical institutes located in Northern Taiwan. Patients who received a prescription of at least 30 days of ARNI were enrolled. The date of first prescription was defined as the index date, and a period of 12 months preceding the index date was defined as the baseline period. RESULTS A total of 452 patients were identified (age: 61.9 ± 15.0, male: 79.4%). Compared to PARADIGM-HF populations, our patients had higher values of baseline serum creatinine (mean: 1.5 vs 1.1 mg/dL) and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP; median: 554.5 vs 255 pg/mL). After 12 months, 41.6% of the patients received less than half of the standard dose. Overall, all-cause death, cardiovascular death, and heart failure readmission rate were 3.0%, 1.1%, and 6.9% in 12 months, respectively. In those who had both baseline and 12-month data, renal function did not change (1.7-1.8 mg/dL, P = .091), left ventricular ejection fraction improved (30.8%-36.8%, P < .001), BNP decreased (777.0-655.8 pg/mL, P = .032), and uric acid decreased (7.5-7.1 mg/dL, P = .009). CONCLUSION In our study, patients with HFrEF had higher BNP and serum creatinine level at baseline and had received lower dose of ARNI than the PARADIGM-HF populations. Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor appeared to be safe as regard renal function and effective in real-world practice. Left ventricular reverse remodeling was observed 1 year after heart failure medication treatment, including ARNI.
-
7.
Higher doses of loop diuretics limit uptitration of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction.
Ter Maaten, JM, Martens, P, Damman, K, Dickstein, K, Ponikowski, P, Lang, CC, Ng, LL, Anker, SD, Samani, NJ, Filippatos, G, et al
Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society. 2020;(8):1048-1059
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Loop diuretics are frequently prescribed to patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) for the treatment of congestion; however, they might hamper uptitration of inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system. METHODS Loop diuretic dose at baseline was recorded in 2338 patients with HFrEF enrolled in BIOSTAT-CHF, an international study of HF patients on loop diuretic therapy who were eligible for uptitration of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi)/mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA). The association between loop diuretic dose and uptitration of ACEi/MRA to percentage of target dose was adjusted for a previously published model for likelihood of uptitration and a propensity score. RESULTS Baseline median loop diuretic dose was 40 [40-100] mg of furosemide or equivalent. Higher doses of loop diuretics were associated with higher NYHA class and higher levels of NT-proBNP, more severe signs and symptoms of congestion, more frequent MRA use, and lower doses of ACEi reached at 3 and 9 months (all P < 0.01). After propensity adjustment, higher doses of loop diuretics remained significantly associated with poorer uptitration of ACEi (Beta per log doubling of loop diuretic dose: - 1.66, P = 0.021), but not with uptitration of MRAs (P = 0.758). Higher doses of loop diuretics were independently associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality or HF hospitalization [HR per doubling of loop diuretic dose: 1.06 (1.01-1.12), P = 0.021]. CONCLUSIONS Higher doses of loop diuretics limited uptitration of ACEi in patients with HFrEF and were associated with a higher risk of death and/or HF hospitalization, independent of their lower likelihood of uptitration and higher baseline risk. This figure was created with images adapted from Servier Medical Art licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0.
-
8.
Comparison of the Effect of Sacubitril/Valsartan on Left Ventricular Systolic Function in Patients with Non-ischaemic and Ischaemic Cardiomyopathy.
Ioannou, A, Metaxa, S, Simon, S, Mandal, AKJ, Missouris, CG
Cardiovascular drugs and therapy. 2020;(6):755-762
Abstract
PURPOSE Sacubitril/valsartan has been demonstrated to improve prognosis and outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients. We sought to compare the improvement in cardiac function between non-ischaemic and ischaemic cardiomyopathy for patients receiving sacubitril/valsartan. METHODS We conducted a single centre prospective cohort survey of patients reviewed in the Heart Function Clinic between February 2017 and January 2018. Functional evaluation and measurement of biochemical and echocardiographic parameters occurred before the initiation of sacubitril/valsartan, and after 3 months of treatment. RESULTS We identified 52 patients (26 non-ischaemic and 26 ischaemic cardiomyopathy) suitable for treatment with sacubitril/valsartan. Treatment was followed by a significant decrease in a New York Heart Association (NYHA) class in both patients with non-ischaemic (2.3 ± 0.6 vs. 1.6 ± 0.7, P < 0.001) and ischaemic cardiomyopathy (2.3 ± 0.5 vs. 1.5 ± 0.6, P < 0.001), along with an increase in ejection fraction in both patients with non-ischaemic (26.2% ± 6.5% vs. 37.2% ± 13.8%, P < 0.001) and ischaemic cardiomyopathy (28.1% ± 5.7% vs. 31.5% ± 8.4%, P = 0.007). The improvement in ejection fraction was significantly greater in the patients with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy compared to those with ischaemic cardiomyopathy (10.7% ± 13.0% vs. 3.9% ± 6.0%, P = 0.023). CONCLUSION Our study suggests that treatment with sacubitril/valsartan in patients with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy is followed by a greater improvement in ejection fraction than in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy.
-
9.
Impact of sacubitril/valsartan treatment on depression and anxiety in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.
Dereli, S, Kılınçel, O, Çerik, İB, Kaya, A
Acta cardiologica. 2020;(8):774-782
Abstract
Background: In patients with heart failure (HF), depression and anxiety disorders are common and associated with adverse outcomes. Sacubitril/valsartan, which is an angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), has been shown to reduce mortality and hospitalisation in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, its effects on depression and anxiety levels remain unclear.Methods: Sacubitril/valsartan was initiated in 115 symptomatic patients with HFrEF receiving an optimal medical treatment with angiotensin inhibition. Patients underwent 6-minute walk test (6-MWT), The Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) and Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) were administered at the switching to ARNI and at the third-month follow-up of the maximum sacubitril/valsartan dose.Results: A significant improvement was observed in BDI-II and BAI scores when compared before and after the sacubitril/valsartan treatment (13.7 ± 9.7 to 7.6 ± 3.8, p < 0.001 and 13.3 ± 8.9 to 8.1 ± 4.1, p < 0.001, respectively). The 6-MWT distance significantly increased from 213 ± 95 to 327 ± 118 mt (p < 0.001). Overall, the patients exhibited a significant functional improvement following the initiation of sacubitril/valsartan: 27% of the patients improved by two New York Heart Association (NYHA) classes, 52% improved by one NYHA functional class, and 31% remained stable.Conclusion: In patients with HFrEF, the switch from angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin II receptor blocker therapy to sacubitril/valsartan resulted in a significant improvement in both depression, anxiety symptoms and functional statuses.
-
10.
Prognostic Value of Lactate Dehydrogenase for Mid-Term Mortality in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure: A Comparison to Established Biomarkers and Brain Natriuretic Peptide.
Yamaguchi, S, Abe, M, Arakaki, T, Arasaki, O, Shimabukuro, M
Heart, lung & circulation. 2020;(9):1318-1327
Abstract
BACKGROUND Enzyme biomarkers-such as creatine phosphokinase, aspartate aminotransferase, and alanine aminotransferase-are associated with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) severity and, therefore, have a prognostic value in ADHF. However, the prognostic value of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) is unclear. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of LDH in ADHF. METHODS This single-centre observational retrospective study enrolled 396 patients with ADHF between June 2014 and July 2016. The patients were categorised into groups based on the tertile values of serum LDH (LDH-low [<196 U/L], LDH-intermediate [196≤ LDH <239 U/L] and LDH-high [LDH ≥239 U/L]). Survival analysis for all-cause mortality was performed. This study also examined the ability of adding log-transformed LDH (LogLDH) on Get With The Guideline score, which is an established risk score to predict 90-day, 180-day and 365-day mortality using time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS During the follow-up (median, 204 days), 100 (25%) patients died. The LDH-intermediate and LDH-high groups had worse survival (LDH-low vs LDH-intermediate, log-rank p=0.019; LDH-low vs LDH-high, log-rank p<0.001). Log LDH improved the ability to predict 90-day, 180-day and 365-day all-cause mortality, which was statistically significant (90 days, area under curve [AUC] = 0.79, p=0.012; 180 days, AUC = 0.79, p=0.017; and 365 days, AUC = 0.79, p=0.025). CONCLUSIONS Lactate dehydrogenase may be an important predictor of 90-day, 180-day and 365-day all-cause mortality in ADHF patients; however, further studies are needed to confirm these findings.