1.
Randomized Trial of Perioperative Probiotics Among Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Operation.
Franko, J, Raman, S, Krishnan, N, Frankova, D, Tee, MC, Brahmbhatt, R, Goldman, CD, Weigel, RJ
Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2019;(6):533-540.e1
Abstract
BACKGROUND We investigated the utility and safety of short-course oral probiotics among patients undergoing major abdominal operations. Perioperative probiotics can decrease length of stay and lower rates of infectious complications. We assessed whether perioperative probiotics decrease major complications among patients undergoing high-risk gastrointestinal operations in a pragmatic randomized trial. STUDY DESIGN This double-blind trial randomized 135 patients undergoing elective major gastrointestinal operations to perioperative oral probiotic VSL#3 taken just before operation and twice daily up to 15 total doses (n = 67) or placebo (n = 68). The primary outcomes measure was 30-day composite end point of death, unplanned readmission, or any infection. RESULTS Primary end point occurred among 17 patients in the placebo group (25.0%) vs 22 patients in the probiotic group (32.8%; p = 0.315). Thirty-day mortality was 2 (2.9%) in the placebo group compared with 1 (1.5%) in the probiotic group (p = 1.000). The placebo group patients experienced lower 30-day readmission rate (3 of 68 [4.4%]) compared with the probiotic group (11 of 67 [16.4%]; p = 0.022). None of the placebo patients were readmitted for dehydration, but 5 of 11 probiotic group patients (45%; p = 0.049) were readmitted for dehydration as a consequence of diet intolerance and/or diarrhea. There was no difference in 30-day infection rate between the groups (15 or 68 [22%] in the placebo group vs 15 of 67 [22.4%] in the probiotic group; p = 0.963). CONCLUSIONS Perioperative use of VSL#3 probiotic did not affect 30-day composite end point of mortality, readmission, and infection rate. A significantly higher readmission rate was observed among those exposed to probiotics. Additional studies remain warranted.
2.
Effect of Oral Probiotic Streptococcus salivarius K12 on Group A Streptococcus Pharyngitis: A Pragmatic Trial in Schools.
Doyle, H, Pierse, N, Tiatia, R, Williamson, D, Baker, M, Crane, J
The Pediatric infectious disease journal. 2018;(7):619-623
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to examine effectiveness of oral probiotic Streptococcus salivarius K12 in preventing group A streptococcus pharyngitis in 5- to 14-year-old children at high risk of acute rheumatic fever. New Zealand has high rates of acute rheumatic fever among Māori and Pacific children. Children were already enrolled in a school-based Ministry of Health throat swabbing and treatment program. Children self-identified and reported sore throats daily and were swabbed twice weekly. METHODS A total of 1314 children were quasirandomized (based on odd or even birthdates) to receive either K12 (2.5 × 10(9) cfu per lozenge) or placebo lozenges and continued observed daily treatment (in the school week, during school time) for one school year. RESULTS A total of 801 children (61.0%) reported a sore throat on one or more occasions resulting in 2927 pharyngeal swabs. Of these swabs, 1525 (52.1%) were taken from 411 children receiving K12 and 119 (7.8%) of these were positive for group A streptococcus on routine culture. In addition, 1402 (47.8%) swabs were taken from 390 children receiving placebo and 124 (8.8%) were positive. Overall there was a nonsignificant 11.2% relative reduction in positive swabs among children receiving K12. This relative reduction was greater for older children, 7-9 years of age, 15.6%, and for children 10 years and older, 30.2%. CONCLUSIONS S. salivarius K12 had modest nonsignificant effects on culture-positive sore throats when given at school, during the school day. Based on our pragmatic trial, the routine use of this probiotic in the prevention of pharyngitis associated with GAS detection is not supported.
3.
Recommending Oral Probiotics to Reduce Winter Antibiotic Prescriptions in People With Asthma: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial.
Smith, TD, Watt, H, Gunn, L, Car, J, Boyle, RJ
Annals of family medicine. 2016;(5):422-30
Abstract
PURPOSE Evidence from studies mainly in children has shown that orally administered probiotics may prevent respiratory tract infections and associated antibiotic use. We evaluated whether advice to take daily probiotics can reduce antibiotic prescribing for winter respiratory tract infections in people with asthma. METHODS We conducted a randomized controlled, parallel-group pragmatic study for participants aged 5 years and older with asthma in a UK primary care setting. The intervention was a postal leaflet with advice to take daily probiotics from October 2013 to March 2014, compared with a standard winter advice leaflet. Primary outcome was the proportion of participants prescribed antibiotics for respiratory tract infections. RESULTS There were 1,302 participants randomly assigned to a control group (n = 650) or intervention group (n = 652). There was no significant difference in the primary outcome measure, with 27.7% receiving antibiotics in the intervention group and 26.9% receiving antibiotics in the control group (odds ratio = 1.04; 95% CI, 0.82-1.34). Uptake of probiotics was low, but outcomes were similar in those who accessed probiotics (adjusted odds ratio = 1.08; 95% CI, 0.69-1.69, compared with controls). We also found no evidence of an effect on respiratory tract infections or asthma exacerbations. CONCLUSIONS In this pragmatic community-based trial in people with asthma, we found no evidence that advising use of winter probiotics reduces antibiotic prescribing.