-
1.
Early life gut microbiota profiles linked to synbiotic formula effects: a randomized clinical trial in European infants.
Lagkouvardos, I, Intze, E, Schaubeck, M, Rooney, JP, Hecht, C, Piloquet, H, Clavel, T
The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2023;117(2):326-339
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Microbial colonisation of the intestine after birth is a central event that influences infant health with life-long consequences. Although improvement of hygienic conditions reduces infant mortality due to infections, environments with low microbial biomass counteract natural colonisation by commensal microbes. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of a synbiotic intervention formula (IF) on faecal microbiota. This study was a multicentre, randomised, controlled, double-blind intervention trial which enrolled 540 infants. Infants whose parents had chosen not to breastfeed or were not able to breastfeed prior to study inclusion were allocated randomly to 1 of 2 formula groups (n = 230 control formula, n = 230 IF). The infants in the breastfed reference group (n = 80) were mainly fed human milk. Results showed that synbiotic intervention influenced the gut microbiota and milieu parameters during early life to resemble some major characteristics found in breastfed infants (higher relative abundances of bifidobacteria, lower richness, lower faecal pH and butyrate concentrations), and effects depended on the ecosystem profile of the infants. Authors conclude that specific randomised, controlled studies that focus on infants born by Caesarean section and how early nutrition can support the beneficial development of their microbiota are needed.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Infant gut colonisation differs in vaginal versus cesarean section deliveries and between breastfed and infant formula practices.
- Both enriched strain-specific probiotic and standard infant formula were shown to have a marked effect on microbiota colonisation in infants at age 4 months.
- By the age of 2 years, however, there is no significant difference between breastfed and formula fed infants.
Evidence Category:
-
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
X
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
This randomised controlled intervention study compared gut health parameters with the use of a synbiotic pre- and probiotic strain enriched infant formula with human milk and standard formula at three intervals over a period of 2 years.
Methods
This was a double-blinded controlled study of 540 infants from France and Belgium. Participants were randomly allocated to 2 formula groups (n = 230 Control Formula (CF), n = 230 Intervention Formula (IF)) and the breastfed reference group (n = 80) as well as delivery mode (Cesarean and vaginal delivery). The synbiotic IF was a standard infant formula enriched with prebiotic GOS (0.02 g/g) and the probiotic strain L. fermentum CECT5716 (at least 1.0 × 106 cfu/g).
Stool analysis was conducted at three time intervals, 4, 12, and 24 months (infant age). Biomarkers included short chain fatty acids, pH, secretory IgA, calprotectin, and various bacterial phyla via microbiota analysis.
Results
- At 4 months, the IF group tested higher for Bifidobacterium spp., and Lactobacillaceae and lower occurrence of Blautia spp., as well as Ruminoccocus gnavus and relatives compared to CF. They also had lower fecal pH and butyrate levels
- Both the formula cohorts had lower SigA and more basic pH values than the human milk cohort, as well as higher prevalence of anaerobes belonging to the bacterial genera Akkermansia, Collinsella, and Faecalibacterium.
- By age 24 months, the IF cohort exhibited increased levels of Akkermansia, Escherichia-Shigella, and R.gnavus. However there were no significant differences between the formula fed and human milk cohort at this time interval.
- The differences observed at 4 months disappeared over time, except for a significantly higher relative abundance of bifidobacteria and Faecalibacterium spp. in IF infants at 12 months compared with CF infants.
Conclusion:
Although prominent differences between the cohorts were observed at 4 months, it appears that by the age of 2 years, there is little observable difference. This is most likely due to gut ecosystem maturation. The paper draws attention to the fact that changes to microbiota following treatment were more pronounced in infants who tested lower in occurrences of Bacteroides spp at age 4 months. Of note is the prevalence of cesarean birth deliveries in this cohort thereby indicating potential improved alternative feeding options when breastfeeding is not possible for these infants.
Clinical practice applications:
- Probiotic L.fermentum and prebiotic galacto-oligosaccharide enriched infant formula appears to the improve infant microbiome, when compared to that of breastfed infants.
- The most receptive infants were those born via cesarean section.
Limitations to consider:
- The sample groups were from France and Belgium, with no indication as to culture, socio-economic, or sex distribution.
- The two infant formula groups were n=230 each with only 80 infants in the breastfed reference group.
- There was no indication of maternal diet practices pre-, during, and post- pregnancy.
- Stool samples were not collected from the infants at baseline visit prior to formula intervention.
Considerations for future research:
- Future studies need to include more diverse cultural and socio-economic cohorts to ascertain the potential influence of parental diet in baseline infant microbiome.
- It is imperative to establish what role solid food choices, generally introduced at 6 months, might have on gut ecosystem maturation.
- It would be useful to have a larger cesarean section birth cohort to compare to vaginal deliveries for more definitive results.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Microbial colonization of the gastrointestinal tract after birth is an essential event that influences infant health with life-long consequences. Therefore, it is important to investigate strategies to positively modulate colonization in early life. OBJECTIVES This randomized, controlled intervention study included 540 infants to investigate the effects of a synbiotic intervention formula (IF) containing Limosilactobacillus fermentum CECT5716 and galacto-oligosaccharides on the fecal microbiome. METHODS The fecal microbiota from infants was analyzed by 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing at 4, 12, and 24 months of age. Metabolites (e.g., short-chain fatty acids) and other milieu parameters (e.g., pH, humidity, and IgA) were also measured in stool samples. RESULTS Microbiota profiles changed with age, with major differences in diversity and composition. Significant effects of the synbiotic IF compared with control formula (CF) were visible at month 4, including higher occurrence of Bifidobacterium spp. and Lactobacillaceae and lower occurrence of Blautia spp., as well as Ruminoccocus gnavus and relatives. This was accompanied by lower fecal pH and concentrations of butyrate. After de novo clustering at 4 months of age, overall phylogenetic profiles of the infants receiving IF were closer to reference profiles of those fed with human milk than infants fed CF. The changes owing to IF were associated with fecal microbiota states characterized by lower occurrence of Bacteroides compared with higher levels of Firmicutes (valid name Bacillota), Proteobacteria (valid name Pseudomonadota), and Bifidobacterium at 4 months of age. These microbiota states were linked to higher prevalence of infants born by Cesarean section. CONCLUSIONS The synbiotic intervention influenced fecal microbiota and milieu parameters at an early age depending on the overall microbiota profiles of the infants, sharing a few similarities with breastfed infants. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02221687.
-
2.
Efficacy of diet restriction with or without probiotic for treatment of patients with IBS-D: Phase I-II clinical trial.
Zhao, XS, Shi, LJ, Ning, BL, Zhao, ZM, Li, XX, Zhu, MH, Zhang, YB, Fu, J
Immunity, inflammation and disease. 2023;11(5):e857
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a functional intestinal disorder that can significantly affect quality of life. IBS patients suffer from intermittent abdominal pain/ discomfort, altered bowel habits, and abdominal bloating/distension. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of dietary restriction and probiotic use on IBS‐D patients. This study was a 2 × 2 factorial design, single‐centre, randomised trial. Phase 1 was a 12‐week dietary intervention, with 214 participants randomised to an IgG positive restricted diet (IgG res diet) or a control diet (cold/spicy/fried restricted). In Phase 2, 167 participants were randomised into either an IgG res diet + placebo or an IgG res diet + probiotic for 12 weeks. Symptom Severity Scale (IBS‐D‐SSS) and IgG titer were assessed at the beginning and the end of the study. Results showed that both diets reduced IBS‐D symptom severity scores and decreased immunoglobulin (IgG) antibody titer, although the IgG res diet had a greater impact. IBS symptom scores decreased with the addition of a Bifidobacterium probiotic along with dietary exclusion, however, IgG titers did not change with the probiotic compared to placebo. Authors concluded that diet restriction with appropriate and effective probiotics, provides greater symptom reductions for patients with IBS-D.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
For individuals with IBDS-D:
- Establish IgG intolerances to foods and ensure an elimination diet remains nutritionally balanced
- Consider combining elimination diet with a Bifidobacterium supplement.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common functional intestinal disorder, affecting 5-20% of the population and diet is likely a major factor in its development as well as in its management. The aim of this study was to compare 3 dietary interventions and the use of a probiotic supplement in patients with IBS-diarrhoea dominant (IBS-D).
Methods
The study was conducted in 2 phases. The first was a 12-week 2 × 2 factorial design, randomised dietary intervention and included 224 patients (214 completed) with IBS-D. The diets were an Eastern/Chinese restriction diet, avoiding cold/raw, spicy and fried foods (CSF), the second avoided common allergens as determined by an IgG test (IgG diet, 14 foods tested), the third a combination of the two, whilst the control group continued their usual (Eastern/Chinese) diet.
The second phase was a 12-week randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial comparing the CSF + IgG diet plus placebo with the CSF + IgG diet plus a 2 billion Bifidobacterium adolescentis supplement; this part included 202 patients of whom 169 completed the study.
The primary outcomes under observation were a reduction in IBS-D symptom severity Score (IBS-D-SSS) and IgG antibody titre (TigG).
Results
Phase 1: The IBS-D-SSS improved in all four groups from baseline (p<0.001), with the intervention groups improving significantly more than the control group (p<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between the IgG and the IgG + CSF groups, although the authors considered there to be a synergistic effect. Statistically significant (p<0.001) reductions in TIgG were seen in all interventions, but not the control group.
Part 2: Significant (p<0.001) improvements in IBS-D-SSS were seen with both placebo and Bifidobacterium, although this was greater in the probiotic group (p<0.001). Improvements in TIgG were seen in both groups (p<0.001), with no difference between groups.
Conclusion
The authors concluded that the best intervention for patients with IBD-D is an IgG food elimination diet together with a Bifidobacterium probiotic supplement.
Clinical practice applications:
- Consider an elimination diet based on IgG testing for clients with IBS-D
- Consider combining elimination diet with a Bifidobacterium supplement. The dose used in this study was 4x 0.5 billion capsules of Bifidobacterium adolescentis
- Eliminating cold/raw, spicy and fried food could be an alternative to IgG elimination if the latter is not suitable for the client.
Considerations for future research:
- 45% and 35% of screened patients, respectively in the 2 phases of the study, were IgG negative. Screening for more potential food intolerances may extend the suitability of the approach to more patients
- Only a single strain probiotic was tested. Further research could evaluate other or combinations of Bifidobacteria strains in combination with an IgG elimination diet
- The mechanism(s) by which probiotics may affect symptoms of IBS-D are unknown. Adding stool microbiome analyses may shed further light on the effect of the intervention on the composition and function of the microbiome.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Diet is a major contributor to irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and is also a powerful tool for treatment of IBS. This study compared two diets and explored the effectiveness of the diets when combined with a probiotic for treatment of IBS-D patients. METHODS Phase I, patients were randomized into groups; control, cold/spicy/fried restricted diet (CSF res diet), IgG positive restricted diet (IgG res diet), and a combination both diets (CSF + IgG res diet). Phase II, patients were randomized into IgG res diet + placebo and IgG res diet + probiotic. Both interventions were 12 weeks in duration. Symptom Severity Scale (IBS-D-SSS) and IgG titer were assessed at the beginning and the end of the study. RESULTS Totals of 214 and 167 patients completed the two parts of the study, respectively. After intervention, IBS-D-SSS and TIgG grade were significantly improved compared to baseline, with results similar to the control group. In general, there were decreases in IBS-D-SSS and TIgG grade that were significantly different among the groups. There were exceptions; no differences were observed for IBS-D-SSS between the IgG res diet and CSF + IgG res diet, or TIgG grade between the CSF res diet, IgG res diet, and CSF + IgG res diet. However, the CSF res diet and IgG res diet had a synergistic effect that decreased IBS-D-SSS and TIgG titer, with a greater contribution by the IgG res diet. Therefore, we evaluated the IgG res diet with either placebo or probiotic and found that IBS-D-SSS and TIgG grade decreased from baseline. There was a significant decrease in IBS-D-SSS with the probiotic but TIgG grade was not significantly different between the IgG diet + placebo and IgG diet + probiotic diet. CONCLUSIONS Both the CSF res diet and IgG res diet improved IBS symptoms and demonstrated synergy, although the IgG res diet had a greater contribution. Further, when intolerant foods cannot be eliminated from a diet, avoiding uncooked, cold, spicy, fried, and alcoholic foods is a superior choice. The IgG res diet combined with Bifidobacteria was the best dietary choice and may function though a non-IgG pathway.
-
3.
Effect of the probiotic strain, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum P9, on chronic constipation: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Ma, T, Yang, N, Xie, Y, Li, Y, Xiao, Q, Li, Q, Jin, H, Zheng, L, Sun, Z, Zuo, K, et al
Pharmacological research. 2023;191:106755
-
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Chronic constipation (CC) is a common gastroenterological problem encountered in clinical practice, and it negatively impacts patients’ quality of life. Growing evidence indicates that the occurrence of CC is closely linked to gut dysbiosis. Several main probiotics have been used to relieve constipation. The main aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the beneficial effects of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum P9 (P9) administration on alleviating CC and impact on the host gut microbiota and its metabolites. This study was a 42-day longitudinal double-blind randomised controlled trial which enrolled a total of 181 patients with CC. Subjects were randomly assigned to the probiotic or placebo group. Subjects in P9 group received one sachet of P9 powder per day after meal. Results show that P9 administration significantly improved patients’ defecation frequency. In fact, P9 administration effectively alleviated constipation, and the symptom relief effects were linked to desired changes and interactions with different types of host microbes. Authors conclude that administering P9 could effectively relieve chronic constipation in adults and improve some aspects of their quality of life.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- This study suggested that P9-associated constipation symptom relief was not attributed to macroscopic changes in the host gut bacteriome and phageome
- However, results supported that taking P9 could alleviate constipation, with the symptom relief effects linked to desired changes and interactions with different types of host microbes, including the gut commensal bacteria (L. plantarum, Ruminococcus_B gnavus, Oscillospiraceae sp., Lachnospiraceae sp.) and the bacteriophage family, Herelleviridae.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
This study investigated the effect of a specific probiotic strain in alleviating Chronic Constipation (CC).
Methods
- The study employed a 42-day randomised control trial (RTC) double-blind, placebo-controlled design, with 163 patients, (mean age =22.68 ±5.66 years for the probiotic group and 21.59 ±4.59 years for the placebo group), diagnosed with CC (Rome IV criteria)
- The male to female ratio was 15–63 and 17–68 in probiotic and placebo groups respectively
- Groups were standardised with no differences observed in baseline age, gender ratio, drug treatment, high-fibre diet and smoking between the two groups (P >0.18)
- Participants were randomly assigned to the probiotic Lactiplantibacillis plantarum P9 (n=78; 2 g per sachet, 1 ×1011 CFU/day) or the placebo (n =85; maltodextrin powder) groups.
Results
Primary outcomes: weekly mean complete spontaneous bowel movements (CSBMs):
- At 28-days CSBM was 28% higher in the P9 group (P=0.039) compared with the placebo group
- At 42-days CSBM remained significantly higher in the P9 group (P=0.026) compared with the placebo group, and increased 2-fold compared with baseline (P <0.05)
- Authors noted that the CSBM benefits were maintained even after 14 days of not taking the supplement.
Secondary outcomes: The effects of P9 supplementation on constipation-related parameters, including the weekly mean frequency of spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs) demonstrated:
- After 28-days of P9 supplementation, SBMs were 12% higher than the placebo group (P=0.039)
- No differences were observed in the weekly mean stool consistency and straining scores between groups (P>0.05).
Patients’ quality of life and psychological state, using a PAC-QOL questionnaire related to: worries and concerns (WO), physical discomfort, psychosocial discomfort, and satisfaction and found:
- At day 14 WO in the P9 group was 1.22-fold lower than those in the placebo group (P <0.05)
- No differences in the other 3 items between P9 and placebo groups (P >0.05) were observed
- Supplementation resulted in a significant change in relative abundance of the P9 genome (≥0.01%)
- However, no differences were observed in alpha diversity after P9 consumption compared with placebo.
Conclusion
- The results indicated that P9 administration alleviated patients’ constipation symptoms and improved their quality of life but did not impact on gut bacteria or phageome
- Lactiplantibacillis plantarum P9 supplementation impacted several beneficial bacteria species (e.g. (Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and Ruminococcus_B gnavus), and reduced levels of other bacteria and phage taxa (e.g. Oscillospiraceae sp., Lachnospiraceae sp., and Herelleviridae) which may be implicated in constipation relief mechanisms.
Clinical practice applications:
- In this study, the use of P9 administration significantly improved patients’ defecation frequency which could have beneficial implications for patients suffering from chronic constipation
- Probiotic effects are known to be strain- and host-specific, and based on this study P9 administration for relief of constipation needs to be taken for at least two weeks to improve aspects of patients’ quality of life and 4 weeks for improvements in constipation.
Considerations for future research:
- Future trials should include factors that impact gut motility and constipation symptoms, such as: a detailed daily diet (dietary composition, fibre content, and water intake) and physical activity scale (intensity and duration), and longer term use of P9 or comparison across strains
- The relatively small study size and short duration of this study, as well as the younger age groups included may be pertinent when considering future research.
Abstract
Chronic constipation (CC) is a common gastrointestinal condition associated with intestinal inflammation, and the condition considerably impairs patients' quality of life. We conducted a large-scale 42-day randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to investigate the effect of probiotics in alleviating CC. 163 patients diagnosed with CC (following Rome IV criteria) were randomly divided into probiotic (n = 78; received Lactiplantibacillus plantarum P9 [P9]; 1 ×1011 CFU/day) and placebo (n = 85; received placebo material) groups. Ingesting P9 significantly improved the weekly mean frequency of complete spontaneous bowel movements (CSBMs) and spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs), while significantly reducing the level of worries and concerns (WO; P < 0.05). Comparing with the placebo group, P9 group was significantly enriched in potentially beneficial bacteria (Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and Ruminococcus_B gnavus), while depriving of several bacterial and phage taxa (Oscillospiraceae sp., Lachnospiraceae sp., and Herelleviridae; P < 0.05). Interesting significant correlations were also observed between some clinical parameters and subjects' gut microbiome, including: negative correlation between Oscillospiraceae sp. and SBMs; positive correlation between WO and Oscillospiraceae sp., Lachnospiraceae sp. Additionally, P9 group had significantly (P < 0.05) more predicted gut microbial bioactive potential involved in the metabolism of amino acids (L-asparagine, L-pipecolinic acid), short-/medium-chain fatty acids (valeric acid and caprylic acid). Furthermore, several metabolites (p-cresol, methylamine, trimethylamine) related to the intestinal barrier and transit decreased significantly after P9 administration (P < 0.05). In short, the constipation relief effect of P9 intervention was accompanied by desirable changes in the fecal metagenome and metabolome. Our findings support the notion of applying probiotics in managing CC.
-
4.
Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum Reduces Perceived Psychological Stress in Healthy Adults: An Exploratory Clinical Trial.
Boehme, M, Rémond-Derbez, N, Lerond, C, Lavalle, L, Keddani, S, Steinmann, M, Rytz, A, Dalile, B, Verbeke, K, Van Oudenhove, L, et al
Nutrients. 2023;15(14)
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Psychosocial stress is a common issue and one way in which nutrition may modulate the stress response is via the microbiota-gut-brain axis. This 6-week randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 45 healthy adults with mild-to-moderate stress evaluated the effects of Bifidobacterium longum (BL) NCC3001 on psychological and physiological markers of stress and the response to an acute stress test. Outcome measures included cortisol awakening response, heart rate, heart rate variability and various questionnaires assessing stress, anxiety, depression, sleep and gastrointestinal symptoms. Compared to placebo, probiotic intake led to a significant decrease in perceived stress and an improvement in subjective sleep after 6 weeks. There was no difference in cortisol awakening response. The subjects in both groups did not experience significant gastrointestinal symptoms and scored low on anxiety and depression at baseline. In response to the acute stress test, cortisol levels were higher in the probiotic than the placebo group, whilst no clear differences were seen in heart rate and heart rate variability. Subjects in the probiotic group had a lower pain experience during the stress test whilst subjects in the placebo group had an increase in positive mood following the test. The authors conclude that these results support their hypothesis that BL NCC3001 may alleviate stress and improve sleep in adults with moderate stress levels.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- There is mounting evidence to suggest that nutritional interventions can influence our stress responses. One of the routes by which nutrition can influence physiological and psychological stress responses involves the microbiota– gut–brain-axis.
- This exploratory trial suggests that supplementation with Bifidobacterium longum (BL) strain NCC3001 leads to a beneficial effect on stress relief and improves subjective sleep quality in a healthy adult population reporting moderate levels of psychological stress.
Evidence Category:
-
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
X
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
A randomised, placebo-controlled, two-arm, parallel, double-blind exploratory clinical trial was conducted to investigate the effect Bifidobacterium longum (BL) strain NCC3001 on stress-related psychological and physiological parameters and acute stress in healthy adults who typically experience mild-to-moderate-levels of stress.
Method
47 Participants between the ages of 25-65 years old with mild-to-moderate psychological stress received 1x1010 CFU of Bifidobacterium longum (BL) strain NCC3001 daily or a placebo for 6 weeks.
Participants completed the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales (HAD-A and HADS-D), the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRA), the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) questionnaire, the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS), the State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-6), the Maastricht Acute Stress Test (MAST) and the Visual Analog Scales (VAS, which measures pain intensity) during the clinical study. The Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-42) questionnaire was also used to depict the progression of the participants through the study.
Faecal samples were taken at baseline and 6 weeks and awakening saliva samples were taken at baseline, 2, 4, 6 and 8 weeks. At the endpoint, 45/49 (91%) of the subjects completed the study. One participant reported an adverse event and the other withdrew without an explanation. Two participants were excluded from the full analysis.
Results
The primary outcomes were:
- After 6-week of the probiotic intervention, there was a significant decrease in perceived stress in the probiotic group (21.4%) compared to the placebo group (-10.2%), p = 0.017.
- There was a significant improvement in subjective sleep in the probiotic group compared to the placebo group (p = 0.037).
- There was a significant decrease in the positive PANAS change score from the pre-stressor stage in the probiotic group compared to the placebo group (p = 0.01).
- There were lower pain values (VAS) scores from pre-stressor to post-stressor in the probiotic group compared to the placebo group (p = 0.05).
- There was no significant difference between groups in anxiety (HADS-A) and Depression (HADS_D) scores.
Conclusion
Oral supplementation with BL NCC3001 may have beneficial effects on stress relief and improves subjective sleep quality in a healthy adult population reporting moderate levels of psychological stress.
Clinical practice applications:
- While the mechanism underlying the correlation between the microbiota and the gut-brain-axis is not fully understood, it is thought to play a critical role in the links between the microbiota, mood, stress, and brain health.
- This exploratory trial additionally supports the potential of specific probiotics being used to reduce perceived stress and improve subjective sleep quality in healthy adults.
Considerations for future research:
- Larger, powered clinical trials are needed to provide further insights into the mechanisms underlying the stress-relieving and sleep-improving effect of Bifidobacterium longum.
- Furthermore, the dosage and duration of the probiotics need further investigation in a larger healthy population.
- Comparative research is needed to help investigate the effect of different probiotic strains on stress relief and sleep quality.
Abstract
Emerging science shows that probiotic intake may impact stress and mental health. We investigated the effect of a 6-week intervention with Bifidobacterium longum (BL) NCC3001 (1 × 1010 CFU/daily) on stress-related psychological and physiological parameters in 45 healthy adults with mild-to-moderate stress using a randomized, placebo-controlled, two-arm, parallel, double-blind design. The main results showed that supplementation with the probiotic significantly reduced the perceived stress and improved the subjective sleep quality score compared to placebo. Comparing the two groups, momentary subjective assessments concomitant to the Maastricht Acute Stress Test revealed a lower amount of pain experience in the probiotic group and a higher amount of relief at the end of the procedure in the placebo group, reflected by higher scores in the positive affect state. The awakening of the salivary cortisol response was not affected by the intervention, yet the reduction observed in the salivary cortisol stress response post-intervention was higher in the placebo group than the probiotic group. Multivariate analysis further indicated that a reduction in perceived stress correlated with a reduction in anxiety, in depression, and in the cortisol awakening response after the 6-week intervention. This exploratory trial provides promising insights into BL NCC3001 to reduce perceived stress in a healthy population and supports the potential of nutritional solutions including probiotics to improve mental health.
-
5.
Effects of Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris YRC3780 daily intake on the HPA axis response to acute psychological stress in healthy Japanese men.
Matsuura, N, Motoshima, H, Uchida, K, Yamanaka, Y
European journal of clinical nutrition. 2022;76(4):574-580
-
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis is involved in the stress response and is linked to the microbiome through a number of possible mechanisms, including immune-related ones. Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris YRC3780 (YRC3780), a probiotic isolated from kefir, has been shown to have beneficial immune-modulatory properties. The aim of this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, which included 27 healthy young men, was to assess sleep quality, mental health, HPA axis activity (salivary cortisol) and response to an acute stress test during/after 8 weeks of supplementation with YRC3780. At 8 weeks, salivary morning cortisol levels were significantly reduced in the probiotic compared to the placebo group. The effect on the stress test depended on whether or not participants were considered “cortisol-responders” or not. Improvements in sleep quality were seen at 6 weeks (but not at any other time points) in 1 out of 2 sleep questionnaires in the YRC3780 group, whilst no significant differences were observed in actigraphy-measured sleep efficiency. There were no differences in mood between groups, but significant improvements in general health in the probiotic group. Interestingly, no changes in the microbiome of the probiotic group were seen, suggesting that the observed effects may be mediated via the immune system.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Research indicates a bidirectional interaction between the gut microbiome and the central nervous system, affecting the functions of the brain and spinal cord.
- This clinical trial suggests that daily intake of Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris (YRC3780) may enhance the HPA axis response to acute psychological stress, potentially linked to a reduction in morning cortisol levels.
Evidence Category:
-
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
X
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial was conducted to investigate the influence of Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris (YRC3780), isolated from kefir, on stress response, sleep quality, and mental health.
Method
Twenty-seven healthy young men, with an average age of 23.5 years, and mean body mass index of 21.5 kg/m2 , were randomly assigned to either the YRC3780 group or the placebo group. Participants were administered YRC3780 or a placebo daily for 8 weeks.
Throughout the study, participants completed assessments, including the Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS), the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28), and the Profile of Mood States 2nd Edition-Adult Short, Total Mood Disturbance subscale (POMS 2 TMD), every 2 weeks. Additionally, diurnal rhythms of HPA axis activity were assessed every 2 weeks through saliva samples collected at 2-hour intervals during the day. At the end of the 8-week supplementation period, participants underwent the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) to evaluate the effects of daily YRC3780 intake on the HPA axis stress response. In addition, three fecal samples were collected to analyse the gut microbiome (on the last day of baseline, and at 4 and 8 weeks).
A total of 27 out of 33 subjects (81%) completed the study, with six participants withdrawing without providing explanations.
Results
The primary findings of this study were as follows:
- At week 6 of YRC3780 supplementation, salivary cortisol levels at 2 hours and 6 hours after waking were significantly lower in the YRC3780 group compared to the placebo group (p=0.05).
- Salivary cortisol concentrations at 40 minutes after the TSST were significantly lower in the YRC3780 group (4.2 ± 4.4 nmol/L, mean ± SD) than in the placebo group (7.6 ± 4.7 nmol/L) (p=0.043).
- AIS scores at 6 weeks and GHQ-28 scores at 8 weeks were significantly lower in the YRC3780 group compared to the placebo group (AIS, p=0.031; GHQ-28, p=0.038) indicating better sleep quality and a better mental state.
Conclusion:
Oral supplementation with YRC3780 may have beneficial effects on the HPA axis response to acute psychological stress, potentially associated with a decrease in morning cortisol levels. Additionally, the study suggests that the lower basal activity and stress reactivity of the HPA axis may lead to improvements in subjective sleep quality and mental health.
Clinical practice applications:
- The precise mechanisms underlying the correlation between the gut microbiota and the gut-brain axis remain incompletely understood, emphasising the need for further research.
- This clinical trial demonstrated that daily intake of YRC3780 decreased morning salivary cortisol levels at 6 and 8 weeks and reduced the salivary cortisol response to acute psychological stress.
Considerations for future research:
- Larger, adequately powered clinical trials are required to provide deeper insights into the mechanisms responsible for the stress-reducing and sleep-improving effects of Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris.
- Furthermore, investigations into optimal dosage and duration of probiotic supplementation are warranted for a more comprehensive understanding, particularly in diverse demographic groups.
- Comparative research is needed to explore the effects of various probiotic strains on objective stress responses.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris (YRC3780), which is isolated from kefir, has been associated with anti-allergic effects in humans. However, it remains unknown whether daily intake of YRC3780 attenuates the response to psychological stress in humans in parallel with changes to the gut microbiome. We examined the fundamental role of YRC3780 in the gut microbiome, stress response, sleep, and mental health in humans. METHODS Effects of daily intake of YRC3780 on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis response to acute psychological stress were investigated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial involving 27 healthy young men (mean age and body mass index: 23.5 years and 21.5 kg/m2) who were randomly assigned to placebo (n = 13) or YRC3780 (n = 14) groups. The HPA axis response to acute psychological stress, the diurnal rhythm of HPA axis activity, and gut microbiome were assessed and compared between the two groups. RESULTS The results showed that daily intake of YRC3780 significantly lowered morning salivary cortisol levels compared with placebo. In addition, salivary cortisol levels following a social stress test significantly decreased +40 min after beginning the TSST in the YRC3780-treated group compared to placebo. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of actigraphy-based sleep quality, but the subjective sleep quality and mental health were significantly improved in the YRC3780-treated group compared to placebo. CONCLUSIONS Our study suggests that daily intake of YRC3780 improves the HPA axis response to acute psychological stress, which might be associated with a decrease in morning cortisol levels.
-
6.
Gut feelings: A randomised, triple-blind, placebo-controlled trial of probiotics for depressive symptoms.
Chahwan, B, Kwan, S, Isik, A, van Hemert, S, Burke, C, Roberts, L
Journal of affective disorders. 2019;253:317-326
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Depression is a debilitating psychiatric disorder that is the leading cause of disability world-wide. Multiple causes of depression have been identified, including genetic, neurological, inflammatory, personality, cognitive, and environmental factors. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of the multispecies probiotic Ecologic® Barrier for reducing symptoms in adults with mild to severe levels of depression. The study was a triple-blinded parallel, placebo-controlled randomised clinical trial. Participants were randomly allocated into two groups; probiotic and placebo. 71 participants with depressive symptoms were recruited and allocated sequentially over 12 months. Results indicate that all participants across both probiotic and placebo groups exhibited a reduction in depressive symptoms over the time-period of the trial. Thus, the routine involved with daily preparation and consumption of the probiotic and scheduled appointments, as well as involvement in these behaviours with the aim of seeking improvement in depressive symptoms had positive impacts on mood, irrespective of whether the probiotic or placebo was consumed. Authors conclude that their findings offer evidence to indicate that probiotic consumption can exert change on cognitive patterns associated with depression.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- This study offers evidence to indicate that probiotic consumption can exert change on cognitive patterns associated with depression.
- The study suggests that probiotics, rather than having a direct effect on depressive symptoms, potentially act on immune system activity, inflammation and gut barrier integrity which contribute to the expression of depression.
- Probiotics may be a useful adjunct to potentiate the effects of other therapies, such as CBT.
- This study points to the validity of managing physical health as part of mental health treatment.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
With evidence suggesting that decreased gut barrier function and inflammation are correlated with depression, this study set out to determine the effect of consumption of probiotic supplements on depressive symptoms from a sample of 71 participants with depression. The study was a triple-blinded parallel, placebo-controlled randomised clinical trial conducted over 8 weeks in Australia. Pre and post intervention measures of symptoms and vulnerability markers of depression as well as gut microbiota were compared alongside psychological variables and gut microbiota composition to non-depressed, placebo and probiotic groups. All the clinical trial participants demonstrated an improvement in symptoms – participants in the probiotic group demonstrated a significantly greater reduction in cognitive reactivity compared with the placebo group. Probiotics did not significantly alter the microbiota of depressed individuals, however a significant correlation was found between Ruminococcus gnavus and one of the metrics for depression.
Clinical practice applications:
This study was small and carried out over a short period of time. While significant results were found, which signify potential considerations for clinical practice, the results from this study do not offer evidence that the probiotics used had a direct effect on depressive symptoms – they suggest that probiotics potentially act on cognitive processes contributing to depression which may include immune system activity, inflammation, and gut barrier integrity. Overall, this study offers evidence to indicate that probiotic consumption can exert change on cognitive patterns associated with depression. In clinical practice, probiotics may be a useful adjunct to potentiate the effects of therapies, such as CBT. Finally, the use of probiotics promotes the concept of managing physical health as part of mental health treatment.
Considerations for future research:
These preliminary results are promising and offer a number of future research and clinical avenues to build upon. The results do however, indicate that a longer trial may be needed to fully assess the effects of probiotics on mood and the mechanisms by which probiotics may be influencing this. The study also suggests that further research using a range of concentrations in a dose response study may be warranted to determine the optimal dose; a greater dose over a longer period may produce detectable changes in microbiota as well as further differences in psychological data.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Depression is the leading cause of disability worldwide; with evidence suggesting that decreased gut barrier function and inflammation are correlated with depressive symptoms. We conducted a clinical trial to determine the effect of consumption of probiotic supplements (Winclove's Ecologic® Barrier) on depressive symptoms in a sample of participants with mild to severe depression. METHOD 71 participants were randomly allocated to either probiotic or placebo, which was, consumed daily over eight weeks. Pre- and post-intervention measures of symptoms and vulnerability markers of depression as well as gut microbiota composition were compared. Clinical trial participants were also compared on psychological variables and gut microbiota composition to a non-depressed group (n = 20). RESULTS All clinical trial participants demonstrated improvement in symptoms, suggesting non-specific therapeutic effects associated with weekly monitoring visits. Participants in the probiotic group demonstrated a significantly greater reduction in cognitive reactivity compared with the placebo group, particularly in the mild/moderate subgroup. Probiotics did not significantly alter the microbiota of depressed individuals, however, a significant correlation was found between Ruminococcus gnavus and one depression metric. LIMITATIONS There was a high attrition rate, which may be attributed to weekly monitoring visits. Additionally, modulation of the gut microbiota may need more specific testing to distinguish subtle changes. CONCLUSIONS While microbiota composition was similar between all groups, probiotics did affect a psychological variable associated with susceptibility to depression. Further research is needed to investigate how probiotics can be utilised to modify mental wellbeing, and whether they can act as an adjunct to existing treatments.
-
7.
Effect of a Protein Supplement on the Gut Microbiota of Endurance Athletes: A Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind Pilot Study.
Moreno-Pérez, D, Bressa, C, Bailén, M, Hamed-Bousdar, S, Naclerio, F, Carmona, M, Pérez, M, González-Soltero, R, Montalvo-Lominchar, MG, Carabaña, C, et al
Nutrients. 2018;10(3)
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Protein supplements are popular among athletes to improve performance and increase muscle mass. However, their effect on other aspects of health is less well known. Dietary changes can affect gut microbiota balance, with beneficial or harmful consequences for the host. This small pilot study was performed on cross-country runners whose diets were complemented with a protein supplement (whey isolate and beef hydrolysate) or maltodextrin (control) for 10 weeks. Microbiota, water content, pH, ammonia, and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) were analysed in faecal samples, and oxidative stress markers were measured in blood plasma and urine. Faecal pH, water content, ammonia, and SCFA concentrations did not change, indicating that protein supplementation did not increase the presence of these metabolites of fermentation. Similarly, it had no impact on plasma or urine malondialdehyde levels. Protein supplementation did however increase the abundance of the Bacteroidetes phylum and decrease the presence of health-related taxa including Roseburia, Blautia, and Bifidobacterium longum. The authors concluded that long-term protein supplementation may have a negative impact on gut microbiota. Further research is needed to establish the impact of protein supplements on gut microbiota.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Long-term protein supplementation may have a negative impact on gut microbiota.
- Further research is needed to establish the impact of protein supplements on gut microbiota and whether there is a differential impact between protein from animal and plant sources.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
This is a very interesting study that is relevant to athletic populations.
Clinical practice applications:
Potentially there is a role for probiotics / prebiotics when increasing protein intake (particularly of animal origin) to maintain microbiota diversity and prevent ensuing health complications.
Considerations for future research:
Further, larger scale, research is needed to understand whether the same effect of protein supplementation would be seen with plant-based proteins or whether this is unique to animal based protein supplementation. For example, is the hydrolysation of the proteins to account for the largest effect or could a whole food protein, i.e. not hydrolysed, elicit the same effects?
Also, is this effect seen in other sports, e.g. non-endurance. What about the effect under different conditions e.g. energy deficit vs. energy excess?
Abstract
Nutritional supplements are popular among athletes to improve performance and physical recovery. Protein supplements fulfill this function by improving performance and increasing muscle mass; however, their effect on other organs or systems is less well known. Diet alterations can induce gut microbiota imbalance, with beneficial or deleterious consequences for the host. To test this, we performed a randomized pilot study in cross-country runners whose diets were complemented with a protein supplement (whey isolate and beef hydrolysate) (n = 12) or maltodextrin (control) (n = 12) for 10 weeks. Microbiota, water content, pH, ammonia, and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) were analyzed in fecal samples, whereas malondialdehyde levels (oxidative stress marker) were determined in plasma and urine. Fecal pH, water content, ammonia, and SCFA concentrations did not change, indicating that protein supplementation did not increase the presence of these fermentation-derived metabolites. Similarly, it had no impact on plasma or urine malondialdehyde levels; however, it increased the abundance of the Bacteroidetes phylum and decreased the presence of health-related taxa including Roseburia, Blautia, and Bifidobacterium longum. Thus, long-term protein supplementation may have a negative impact on gut microbiota. Further research is needed to establish the impact of protein supplements on gut microbiota.