1.
Effect of a family and interdisciplinary intervention to prevent T2D: randomized clinical trial.
Vargas-Ortiz, K, Lira-Mendiola, G, Gómez-Navarro, CM, Padilla-Estrada, K, Angulo-Romero, F, Hernández-Márquez, JM, Villa-Martínez, AK, González-Mena, JN, Macías-Cervantes, MH, Reyes-Escogido, ML, et al
BMC public health. 2020;20(1):97
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
In individuals at high risk of type 2 diabetes, lifestyle interventions rather than medication have been more successful in preventing development of the disease, however the benefits of lifestyle strategies diminishes over time due to possible adherence issues. Prolonged lifestyle changes may be affected by lack of family support, but research on family support during lifestyle changes in individuals prior to diabetes is lacking. This parallel randomised control trial of 122 patients with prediabetes and 101 of their family members aimed to assess the impact of family supported diet and exercise changes compared to self-motivation on individuals with prediabetes. At 6 months, body measurements and markers of prediabetes improved in both groups. Lipids were significantly improved in the group with family support compared to having no support. At 12 months there were a high number of dropouts due to lack of patient interest. Benefits shown at 6 months in both groups were only maintained or improved upon with family support and the lipid profile of the individual intervention group actually worsened in comparison to when participants entered the trial. After 12 months the incidence rate of type 2 diabetes was similar in both groups. Individuals with prediabetes who had family support whilst undergoing a diet and exercise regime were more successful at maintaining improvements of factors contributing to diabetes, compared to individuals without support. However this did not affect the occurrence of type 2 diabetes. Clinicians could use this paper to communicate the importance of family support during lifestyle changes in patients at high risk of developing type 2 diabetes, although close monitoring may be required to ensure compliance.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lifestyle changes can reduce the risk of T2D; however, no study has evaluated the effect of a lifestyle intervention involving patients´ family. The aim of this study was to compare the impact of an interdisciplinary family (FI) Vs individual intervention (II) on glucose metabolism, insulin resistance (IR), pancreatic β-cell function and cardiovascular risk markers in patients with prediabetes, as well as to measure the impact on their families' metabolic risk. METHODS Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT) to compare the impact of FI and II on IR and pancreatic β-cell function in subjects with prediabetes. There were 122 subjects with prediabetes (and 101 family members) randomized to FI or II. Data were collected in 2015-2016 and analyzed in 2017-2018. FI group had the support of their family members, who also received personalized diet and exercise recommendations; patients and their family members attended monthly a lifestyle enhancement program. II group received personalized diet and exercise recommendations. The follow-up was for 12 months. Glucose, IR, pancreatic β-cell function and secondary outcomes (body composition and lipid profile) were assessed at baseline, 6 and 12 months. RESULTS FI group improved area under the glucose curve (AUC) (from 18,597 ± 2611 to 17,237 ± 2792, p = 0.004) and the Matsuda index (from 3.5 ± 2.3 to 4.7 ± 3.5, p = 0.05) at 12 months. II group improved Disposition Index (from 1.5 ± 0.4 to 1.9 ± 0.73, p < .0001) at 12 months. The improvements achieved in weight and lipids at 6 months, were lost in II group at 12 moths, whereas in FI persisted. Adherence up to 12 months was not different between the study groups (FI 56% Vs II 60%). CONCLUSIONS FI intervention was more effective by improving glucose AUC, insulin sensitivity and lipid profile, besides that, metabolic risk in family members of the FI group was maintained, while the risk of II group was increased. TRIAL REGISTRATION This study was retrospectively registered at clinicaltrials.gov on December 15, 2015 (NTC026365646).
2.
The Effect of Moderate Weight Loss on a Non-Invasive Biomarker of Liver Fibrosis: A Randomised Controlled Trial.
Koutoukidis, DA, Jebb, SA, Aveyard, P, Astbury, NM
Obesity facts. 2020;13(2):144-151
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease covers a range of conditions from excess fat in the liver through inflammation and fibrosis, to advanced fibrosis, and cirrhosis. The Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) score is emerging as a promising blood biomarker for fibrosis. The aim of this study was to examine whether a community weight loss programme reduces ELF score over 12 months compared with a weight-loss intervention which is less effective. This study is a secondary analysis of a published randomised controlled trial. Participants (n=73) were equally randomised to a community weight loss programme (WeightWatchers) or usual care. Results indicate that there was no evidence of an effect of a community weight loss programme on changes in the ELF score and no association between weight loss and the ELF score in people who had, on average, an ELF score compatible with moderate fibrosis. Authors conclude that using the ELF test to assess weight loss treatment efficacy in improving liver fibrosis may be of limited value, thus biopsy remains the gold-standard assessment for liver fibrosis.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Referral to weight loss programmes is the only effective treatment for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Clinicians should advise weight loss and screen for liver fibrosis using the Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) score. AIM: To examine if the ELF score changes with weight loss. DESIGN AND SETTING Randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN85485463) in UK primary care during 2007-2008. METHOD Adults with a BMI of 27-35 kg/m2 and ≥1 risk factor for obesity-related disease were randomised to attend a community weight loss programme (n = 45) or receive usual weight loss advice from a practice nurse (n = 28). Weight and the ELF score were measured at baseline and 1 year. Analysis of covariance examined mean changes in the ELF score between groups and its relationship with weight loss. RESULTS Mean (SD) BMI was 31.10 kg/m2 (2.55) with evidence of moderate levels of liver fibrosis at baseline (mean ELF score: 8.93 [0.99]). There was no evidence that the community weight loss programme reduced the ELF score compared with usual care (difference +0.13 points, 95% CI: -0.25 to 0.52) despite greater weight loss (difference: -2.66 kg, 95% CI: -5.02 to -0.30). Mean weight loss in the whole cohort was 7.8% (5.9). There was no evidence of an association between weight change and change in ELF; the coefficient for a 5% weight loss was -0.15 (95% CI: -0.30 to 0.0002). CONCLUSION We found no evidence that the ELF score changed meaningfully following moderate weight loss. Clinicians should not use the ELF score to measure improvements in NAFLD fibrosis following weight loss programmes.
3.
Vitamin D supplementation improves SIRT1, Irisin, and glucose indices in overweight or obese type 2 diabetic patients: a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial.
Safarpour, P, Daneshi-Maskooni, M, Vafa, M, Nourbakhsh, M, Janani, L, Maddah, M, Amiri, FS, Mohammadi, F, Sadeghi, H
BMC family practice. 2020;21(1):26
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is often preceded by a condition known as insulin resistance (IR). Recent studies have shown that low levels of vitamin D in the body are related to an increased incidence of IR and individuals with T2D have lower levels of vitamin D than healthy individuals. Vitamin D may have the ability to increase enzymes in the body that breakdown sugar and decrease IR. This 12-month double blind randomised control trial on 90 obese type 2 diabetics, aimed to assess the effects of vitamin D on these enzymes and blood sugar levels. The results showed that individuals on vitamin D had significantly increased enzymes which are involved in sugar breakdown and this translated into improved blood sugar levels, however this did not translate into improved markers for IR. It was concluded that compared to placebo, vitamin D supplementation improved blood sugar levels possibly due to the increase in enzymes involved in sugar breakdown. Healthcare professionals could use this study to recommend vitamin D supplementation to obese type 2 diabetics to improve their blood sugar levels.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vitamin D (VD) may increase sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) and subsequently PPAR-γ coactivator 1α (PGC-1α) and irisin levels and these improvements may reduce insulin resistance (IR). The aim was to assess the effects of vitamin D supplementation on SIRT1, irisin, and IR in overweight/obese type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients. METHODS Ninety T2D males and females were recruited as a clinical trial study (mean of age and body mass index (BMI) of intervention and placebo groups were 50.05 ± 10.17 and 50.36 ± 10.2 yrs. and 31.37 ± 3.4 and 30.43 ± 3.2 kg/m2, respectively). The inclusion criteria were T2D, VD deficient, BMI > 25 kg/m2, and serum HbA1c < 8.5%. The exclusion criteria were using vitamin and mineral supplements, having any acute disease, recent modifying dose or type of drugs. The supplementation was 50,000 IU/week VD or placebo for 8 weeks. The demographic characteristics, anthropometrics, dietary intakes and physical activity status, sun exposure status, fasting blood sugar (FBS) and insulin, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), irisin, SIRT1, 25-hydroxy D3 (25(OH)VD), homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), and quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI) were determined. The significant P-value was ≤0.05. RESULTS The increase of serum VD, SIRT1, and irisin in the intervention group was significant (p < 0.001). HbA1c was decreased significantly by 1%. The changes in the other glucose indices (FBS, insulin, and IR) were non-significant. CONCLUSIONS VD supplementation may improve T2D by decreasing HbA1c and increasing SIRT1 and irisin in VD deficient T2D patients. Further trials are suggested. TRIAL REGISTRATION Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials, IRCT201604202365N11. Registered 21/08/2016, http://en.irct.ir/trial/2019.