0
selected
-
1.
The Effect of Probiotic Supplements on Metabolic Parameters of People with Type 2 Diabetes in Greece-A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study.
Zikou, E, Dovrolis, N, Dimosthenopoulos, C, Gazouli, M, Makrilakis, K
Nutrients. 2023;15(21)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Type 2 diabetes is a multifaceted disease caused by both genetic and environmental factors such as excessive energy intake and lack of exercise. The gut microbiome has been shown to contribute to many different diseases including diabetes through its effects on the immune system, appetite, and fat storage. Probiotics are living organisms that have health benefits to humans and they have been studied for their effects on individuals with type 2 diabetes. However, the studies that have been performed have shown inconsistent results due to poorly designed trials. This randomised control trial aimed to determine the effects of a probiotic supplement containing Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, and Saccharomyces species on measures of blood sugar control over a period of 6 months. The results showed that compared to controls, there were significant reductions in measures of blood sugar and total cholesterol. Interestingly the probiotics did not change the diversity of the subjects gut microbiome but did alter their function noting changes in enzymes and metabolites involved in diabetes. It was concluded that over a 6-month period, the supplementation of probiotics containing Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, and Saccharomyces was of benefit to blood sugar balance and cholesterol levels. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to recommend a specific probiotic to individuals with type 2 diabetes.
Abstract
The role of probiotic supplementation in type 2 diabetes (T2D) treatment is controversial. The present study aimed to assess the effects of a multi-strain probiotic supplement (LactoLevureR (containing Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus plantarum, Bifidobacterium lactis, and Saccharomyces boulardii)) over 6 months, primarily on glycemic control as well as on lipid levels and alterations in the gut microbiome, among individuals with T2D residing in Greece. A total of 91 adults with T2D (mean age [±SD] 65.12 ± 10.92 years, 62.6% males) were randomized to receive the probiotic supplement or a matching placebo capsule, once daily, for 6 months. Blood chemistries and anthropometric parameters were conducted every 3 months, and stool samples were collected at baseline and at 6 months. Significant reductions in HbA1c, fasting blood glucose, and total cholesterol were observed in participants treated with the probiotic supplement (n = 46) compared to the controls (n = 45), even after adjustment for a greater decrease in adiposity (waist circumference). Although there were no statistically significant differences in the diversity of the gut microbiome (α and β diversity), the administration of probiotics did influence several genera, metabolites, and key enzymes associated with diabetes. Overall, the administration of the multi-strain probiotic LactoLevureR over a 6-month period in individuals with T2D was well-tolerated and had a positive impact on metabolic parameters, alongside improvements in indices of adiposity.
-
2.
Small Interfering RNA to Reduce Lipoprotein(a) in Cardiovascular Disease.
O'Donoghue, ML, Rosenson, RS, Gencer, B, López, JAG, Lepor, NE, Baum, SJ, Stout, E, Gaudet, D, Knusel, B, Kuder, JF, et al
The New England journal of medicine. 2022;387(20):1855-1864
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Numerous epidemiologic studies over the past three decades have shown an association between higher circulating lipoprotein(a) concentrations and an increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of repeated administration of a small interfering RNA designed to lower the body's production of apolipoprotein(a). This study is a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding trial. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1:1:1 ratio to receive one of four doses of small interfering RNA (n= 281) (10 mg every 12 weeks, 75 mg every 12 weeks, 225 mg every 12 weeks, or 225 mg every 24 weeks) or matching placebo, administered subcutaneously. Results show that treatment with small interfering RNA markedly reduced the concentration of lipoprotein(a) in a dose-dependent manner and appeared to be safe. At higher doses, the treatment reduced the lipoprotein(a) concentration by more than 95%, as compared with placebo, with nearly all patients who received the treatment with small interfering RNA having a lipoprotein(a) concentration of less than 125 nmol per litre. Authors conclude that further large-scale interventions are needed to confirm a causal role for lipoprotein(a) in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lipoprotein(a) is a presumed risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Olpasiran is a small interfering RNA that reduces lipoprotein(a) synthesis in the liver. METHODS We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding trial involving patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and a lipoprotein(a) concentration of more than 150 nmol per liter. Patients were randomly assigned to receive one of four doses of olpasiran (10 mg every 12 weeks, 75 mg every 12 weeks, 225 mg every 12 weeks, or 225 mg every 24 weeks) or matching placebo, administered subcutaneously. The primary end point was the percent change in the lipoprotein(a) concentration from baseline to week 36 (reported as the placebo-adjusted mean percent change). Safety was also assessed. RESULTS Among the 281 enrolled patients, the median concentration of lipoprotein(a) at baseline was 260.3 nmol per liter, and the median concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was 67.5 mg per deciliter. At baseline, 88% of the patients were taking statin therapy, 52% were taking ezetimibe, and 23% were taking a proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor. At 36 weeks, the lipoprotein(a) concentration had increased by a mean of 3.6% in the placebo group, whereas olpasiran therapy had significantly and substantially reduced the lipoprotein(a) concentration in a dose-dependent manner, resulting in placebo-adjusted mean percent changes of -70.5% with the 10-mg dose, -97.4% with the 75-mg dose, -101.1% with the 225-mg dose administered every 12 weeks, and -100.5% with the 225-mg dose administered every 24 weeks (P<0.001 for all comparisons with baseline). The overall incidence of adverse events was similar across the trial groups. The most common olpasiran-related adverse events were injection-site reactions, primarily pain. CONCLUSIONS Olpasiran therapy significantly reduced lipoprotein(a) concentrations in patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Longer and larger trials will be necessary to determine the effect of olpasiran therapy on cardiovascular disease. (Funded by Amgen; OCEAN[a]-DOSE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04270760.).
-
3.
Assessment of causal association between thyroid function and lipid metabolism: a Mendelian randomization study.
Wang, JJ, Zhuang, ZH, Shao, CL, Yu, CQ, Wang, WY, Zhang, K, Meng, XB, Gao, J, Tian, J, Zheng, JL, et al
Chinese medical journal. 2021;134(9):1064-1069
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Obesity, dyslipidaemia, and metabolic syndrome are major risk factors for cardiovascular disease, however, effect of thyroid dysfunction on dyslipidaemia and cardiovascular disease is largely unknown. This study used mendelian randomisation (MR), where a genetic variant is used as an instrumental variable to detect the causal effects of exposure to disease. This study used two sample MR analyses to find out whether clinical thyroid function measures show a causal relationship with the changes in lipid levels. The results showed a significant association between the elevated thyrotropin (TSH) level and increased total cholesterol. Also, there was a significant correlation between the free triiodothyronine (FT3): free thyroxine (FT4) ratio and total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein (LDL). Further robust studies are required to confirm the results and investigate the causal effect of thyroid hormone dysregulation and cardiometabolic diseases due to the limitations of this study. However, healthcare professionals can use the results of this study to understand the importance of the pituitary-thyroid-cardiac axis in lipid metabolism and its impact on cardiometabolic health.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Thyroid dysfunction is associated with cardiovascular diseases. However, the role of thyroid function in lipid metabolism remains partly unknown. The present study aimed to investigate the causal association between thyroid function and serum lipid metabolism via a genetic analysis termed Mendelian randomization (MR). METHODS The MR approach uses a genetic variant as the instrumental variable in epidemiological studies to mimic a randomized controlled trial. A two-sample MR was performed to assess the causal association, using summary statistics from the Atrial Fibrillation Genetics Consortium (n = 537,409) and the Global Lipids Genetics Consortium (n = 188,577). The clinical measures of thyroid function include thyrotropin (TSH), free triiodothyronine (FT3) and free thyroxine (FT4) levels, FT3:FT4 ratio and concentration of thyroid peroxidase antibodies (TPOAb). The serum lipid metabolism traits include total cholesterol (TC) and triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels. The MR estimate and MR inverse variance-weighted method were used to assess the association between thyroid function and serum lipid metabolism. RESULTS The results demonstrated that increased TSH levels were significantly associated with higher TC (β = 0.052, P = 0.002) and LDL (β = 0.041, P = 0.018) levels. In addition, the FT3:FT4 ratio was significantly associated with TC (β = 0.240, P = 0.033) and LDL (β = 0.025, P = 0.027) levels. However, no significant differences were observed between genetically predicted FT4 and TPOAb and serum lipids. CONCLUSION Taken together, the results of the present study suggest an association between thyroid function and serum lipid metabolism, highlighting the importance of the pituitary-thyroid-cardiac axis in dyslipidemia susceptibility.
-
4.
Oral versus intravenous iron replacement therapy distinctly alters the gut microbiota and metabolome in patients with IBD.
Lee, T, Clavel, T, Smirnov, K, Schmidt, A, Lagkouvardos, I, Walker, A, Lucio, M, Michalke, B, Schmitt-Kopplin, P, Fedorak, R, et al
Gut. 2017;66(5):863-871
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Iron deficiency is common in patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) and the standard management is with oral iron replacement therapy. However, this is thought to worsen IBD symptoms, as free iron in the gut can alter the composition of the resident gut bacteria and may contribute to inflammation. This open-labelled clinical trial compared oral iron replacement to intravenous iron replacement in subjects with Crohn’s disease (CD), Ulcerative Colitis and iron-deficient, non-inflamed subjects. The data collected included microbiome sequencing, metabolic profiling, serum iron and inflammation markers. Whilst both interventions alleviated deficiency, the intravenous iron replacement was slightly more effective at raising ferritin levels. The results showed that iron replacement therapy shifted the microbiome diversity and composition depending on free iron availability in the gut. A reduced microbiome diversity already distinguishes IBD from healthy subjects and a further decline in abundance following iron replacement therapy was particularly noticeable with oral iron supplementation and in Crohn's Disease subjects. However, over the short course of three months, this was not linked to disease severity in this study. This study affirms the importance of assessing for iron deficiency in IBD clients whilst supporting IV iron replacement being a favourable alternative to oral supplementation for individuals with unstable microbiota.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Iron deficiency is a common complication in patients with IBD and oral iron therapy is suggested to exacerbate IBD symptoms. We performed an open-labelled clinical trial to compare the effects of per oral (PO) versus intravenous (IV) iron replacement therapy (IRT). DESIGN The study population included patients with Crohn's disease (CD; N=31), UC (N=22) and control subjects with iron deficiency (non-inflamed, NI=19). After randomisation, participants received iron sulfate (PO) or iron sucrose (IV) over 3 months. Clinical parameters, faecal bacterial communities and metabolomes were assessed before and after intervention. RESULTS Both PO and IV treatments ameliorated iron deficiency, but higher ferritin levels were observed with IV. Changes in disease activity were independent of iron treatment types. Faecal samples in IBD were characterised by marked interindividual differences, lower phylotype richness and proportions of Clostridiales. Metabolite analysis also showed separation of both UC and CD from control anaemic participants. Major shifts in bacterial diversity occurred in approximately half of all participants after IRT, but patients with CD were most susceptible. Despite individual-specific changes in phylotypes due to IRT, PO treatment was associated with decreased abundances of operational taxonomic units assigned to the species Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Ruminococcus bromii, Dorea sp. and Collinsella aerofaciens. Clear IV-specific and PO-specific fingerprints were evident at the level of metabolomes, with changes affecting cholesterol-derived host substrates. CONCLUSIONS Shifts in gut bacterial diversity and composition associated with iron treatment are pronounced in IBD participants. Despite similar clinical outcome, oral administration differentially affects bacterial phylotypes and faecal metabolites compared with IV therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER clinicaltrial.gov (NCT01067547).
-
5.
Randomized placebo control study of insulin sensitizers (Metformin and Pioglitazone) in psoriasis patients with metabolic syndrome (Topical Treatment Cohort).
Singh, S, Bhansali, A
BMC dermatology. 2016;16(1):12
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
As an immune-mediated chronic inflammatory skin condition, psoriasis is associated with obesity, metabolic syndrome, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. Medications capable of sensitising insulin, such as Metformin and Pioglitazone, have also shown benefits in improving factors associated with metabolic syndrome and psoriasis. This single-centre, parallel-group, randomised, open-label with blinded endpoint evaluated the effects of Metformin with Pioglitazone and placebo in psoriatic patients. Patients with mild-to-moderate psoriasis were randomised to a topical treatment cohort to take 1000 mg metformin daily or 30 mg pioglitazone or placebo groups for 12 weeks. Each participant received a topical ointment containing 5% coal tar during the treatment period. The Metformin and Pioglitazone groups showed significant improvements in psoriasis and metabolic syndrome parameters, such as fasting plasma glucose, total cholesterol, and triglyceride levels, after 12 weeks of treatment. The treatment with metformin resulted in significant improvements in weight, BMI, waist circumference, FPG, triglycerides, and total cholesterol, while the treatment with pioglitazone resulted in significant improvements in FPG, triglycerides, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, cholesterol levels, and LDL cholesterol levels. There was no significant improvement in inflammatory cytokine levels in any group. For further evaluation of the beneficial effects of insulin-sensitising drugs in patients suffering from psoriasis and metabolic syndrome, more robust studies are needed. The study results can be used by healthcare professionals to better understand how insulin-sensitising drugs may decrease the risk of diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and psoriasis in psoriasis patients with metabolic syndrome.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increased prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MS) is observed in psoriasis. Metformin has shown improvement in cardiovascular risk factors while pioglitazone demonstrated anti proliferative, anti-inflammatory and anti angiogenic effects. Study objective is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Insulin sensitizers (metformin and pioglitazone) in psoriasis patients with metabolic syndrome (MS). METHODS Single centre, parallel group, randomized, study of metformin, pioglitazone and placebo in psoriasis patients with MS. RESULTS Statistically significant improvement was observed in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), Erythema, Scaling and Induration (ESI) and Physician global assessment (PGA) scores in pioglitazone (p values - PASI = 0.001, ESI = 0.002, PGA = 0.008) and metformin groups (p values - PASI = 0.001, ESI = 0.016, PGA = 0.012) as compared to placebo. There was statistically significant difference in percentage of patients achieving 75 % reduction in PASI and ESI scores in metformin (p value - PASI = 0.001, ESI = 0.001) and pioglitazone groups (p vaue - PASI = 0.001, ESI = 0.001). Significant improvement was observed in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and triglycerides levels in metformin and pioglitazone arms. Significant improvement was noted in weight, BMI, waist circumference, FPG, triglycerides and total cholesterol after 12 weeks of treatment with metformin while pioglitazone showed improvement in FPG, triglyceride levels, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol levels. There was no difference in pattern of adverse drug reaction in three groups. CONCLUSION Insulin sensitizers have shown improvement in the parameters of MS as well as disease severity in psoriasis patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION CTRI Registration Number: CTRI/2011/12/002252 . Registered on 19/12/2011.