-
1.
Early life gut microbiota profiles linked to synbiotic formula effects: a randomized clinical trial in European infants.
Lagkouvardos, I, Intze, E, Schaubeck, M, Rooney, JP, Hecht, C, Piloquet, H, Clavel, T
The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2023;117(2):326-339
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Microbial colonisation of the intestine after birth is a central event that influences infant health with life-long consequences. Although improvement of hygienic conditions reduces infant mortality due to infections, environments with low microbial biomass counteract natural colonisation by commensal microbes. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of a synbiotic intervention formula (IF) on faecal microbiota. This study was a multicentre, randomised, controlled, double-blind intervention trial which enrolled 540 infants. Infants whose parents had chosen not to breastfeed or were not able to breastfeed prior to study inclusion were allocated randomly to 1 of 2 formula groups (n = 230 control formula, n = 230 IF). The infants in the breastfed reference group (n = 80) were mainly fed human milk. Results showed that synbiotic intervention influenced the gut microbiota and milieu parameters during early life to resemble some major characteristics found in breastfed infants (higher relative abundances of bifidobacteria, lower richness, lower faecal pH and butyrate concentrations), and effects depended on the ecosystem profile of the infants. Authors conclude that specific randomised, controlled studies that focus on infants born by Caesarean section and how early nutrition can support the beneficial development of their microbiota are needed.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Infant gut colonisation differs in vaginal versus cesarean section deliveries and between breastfed and infant formula practices.
- Both enriched strain-specific probiotic and standard infant formula were shown to have a marked effect on microbiota colonisation in infants at age 4 months.
- By the age of 2 years, however, there is no significant difference between breastfed and formula fed infants.
Evidence Category:
-
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
X
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
This randomised controlled intervention study compared gut health parameters with the use of a synbiotic pre- and probiotic strain enriched infant formula with human milk and standard formula at three intervals over a period of 2 years.
Methods
This was a double-blinded controlled study of 540 infants from France and Belgium. Participants were randomly allocated to 2 formula groups (n = 230 Control Formula (CF), n = 230 Intervention Formula (IF)) and the breastfed reference group (n = 80) as well as delivery mode (Cesarean and vaginal delivery). The synbiotic IF was a standard infant formula enriched with prebiotic GOS (0.02 g/g) and the probiotic strain L. fermentum CECT5716 (at least 1.0 × 106 cfu/g).
Stool analysis was conducted at three time intervals, 4, 12, and 24 months (infant age). Biomarkers included short chain fatty acids, pH, secretory IgA, calprotectin, and various bacterial phyla via microbiota analysis.
Results
- At 4 months, the IF group tested higher for Bifidobacterium spp., and Lactobacillaceae and lower occurrence of Blautia spp., as well as Ruminoccocus gnavus and relatives compared to CF. They also had lower fecal pH and butyrate levels
- Both the formula cohorts had lower SigA and more basic pH values than the human milk cohort, as well as higher prevalence of anaerobes belonging to the bacterial genera Akkermansia, Collinsella, and Faecalibacterium.
- By age 24 months, the IF cohort exhibited increased levels of Akkermansia, Escherichia-Shigella, and R.gnavus. However there were no significant differences between the formula fed and human milk cohort at this time interval.
- The differences observed at 4 months disappeared over time, except for a significantly higher relative abundance of bifidobacteria and Faecalibacterium spp. in IF infants at 12 months compared with CF infants.
Conclusion:
Although prominent differences between the cohorts were observed at 4 months, it appears that by the age of 2 years, there is little observable difference. This is most likely due to gut ecosystem maturation. The paper draws attention to the fact that changes to microbiota following treatment were more pronounced in infants who tested lower in occurrences of Bacteroides spp at age 4 months. Of note is the prevalence of cesarean birth deliveries in this cohort thereby indicating potential improved alternative feeding options when breastfeeding is not possible for these infants.
Clinical practice applications:
- Probiotic L.fermentum and prebiotic galacto-oligosaccharide enriched infant formula appears to the improve infant microbiome, when compared to that of breastfed infants.
- The most receptive infants were those born via cesarean section.
Limitations to consider:
- The sample groups were from France and Belgium, with no indication as to culture, socio-economic, or sex distribution.
- The two infant formula groups were n=230 each with only 80 infants in the breastfed reference group.
- There was no indication of maternal diet practices pre-, during, and post- pregnancy.
- Stool samples were not collected from the infants at baseline visit prior to formula intervention.
Considerations for future research:
- Future studies need to include more diverse cultural and socio-economic cohorts to ascertain the potential influence of parental diet in baseline infant microbiome.
- It is imperative to establish what role solid food choices, generally introduced at 6 months, might have on gut ecosystem maturation.
- It would be useful to have a larger cesarean section birth cohort to compare to vaginal deliveries for more definitive results.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Microbial colonization of the gastrointestinal tract after birth is an essential event that influences infant health with life-long consequences. Therefore, it is important to investigate strategies to positively modulate colonization in early life. OBJECTIVES This randomized, controlled intervention study included 540 infants to investigate the effects of a synbiotic intervention formula (IF) containing Limosilactobacillus fermentum CECT5716 and galacto-oligosaccharides on the fecal microbiome. METHODS The fecal microbiota from infants was analyzed by 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing at 4, 12, and 24 months of age. Metabolites (e.g., short-chain fatty acids) and other milieu parameters (e.g., pH, humidity, and IgA) were also measured in stool samples. RESULTS Microbiota profiles changed with age, with major differences in diversity and composition. Significant effects of the synbiotic IF compared with control formula (CF) were visible at month 4, including higher occurrence of Bifidobacterium spp. and Lactobacillaceae and lower occurrence of Blautia spp., as well as Ruminoccocus gnavus and relatives. This was accompanied by lower fecal pH and concentrations of butyrate. After de novo clustering at 4 months of age, overall phylogenetic profiles of the infants receiving IF were closer to reference profiles of those fed with human milk than infants fed CF. The changes owing to IF were associated with fecal microbiota states characterized by lower occurrence of Bacteroides compared with higher levels of Firmicutes (valid name Bacillota), Proteobacteria (valid name Pseudomonadota), and Bifidobacterium at 4 months of age. These microbiota states were linked to higher prevalence of infants born by Cesarean section. CONCLUSIONS The synbiotic intervention influenced fecal microbiota and milieu parameters at an early age depending on the overall microbiota profiles of the infants, sharing a few similarities with breastfed infants. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02221687.
-
2.
Effect of an Exclusive Human Milk Diet on the Gut Microbiome in Preterm Infants: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Embleton, ND, Sproat, T, Uthaya, S, Young, GR, Garg, S, Vasu, V, Masi, AC, Beck, L, Modi, N, Stewart, CJ, et al
JAMA network open. 2023;6(3):e231165
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Receipt of mother’s own breast milk (MOM) is associated with lower rates of neonatal morbidities in preterm infants and improved long-term metabolic and neurocognitive outcomes. However, many experience a shortfall in MOM supply necessitating the use of either bovine formula or pasteurised human milk. The hypothesis of this study was that gut bacterial diversity and proportions of specific bacterial taxa would differ between trial groups as part of the mechanism by which exclusive human milk diets benefits preterm infants. This study was a randomised clinical trial for which preterm infants in the first 72 hours of life (born less than 30 weeks of gestation) were recruited. Infants (n=126) were randomly assigned to standard (control) or exclusive human milk diet (intervention). Results showed that the intervention group had no overall effect on gut microbiome richness or Shannon diversity. Furthermore, Bifidobacterium relative abundance was not associated with an exclusive human milk diet. Authors conclude that their findings show that pasteurized human milk (or products derived from human milk) do not exert a major impact on gut bacteria when used in addition to MOM.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE The effect of using an exclusive human milk diet compared with one that uses bovine products in preterm infants is uncertain, but some studies demonstrate lower rates of key neonatal morbidities. A potential mediating pathway is the gut microbiome. OBJECTIVE To determine the effect of an exclusive human milk diet on gut bacterial richness, diversity, and proportions of specific taxa in preterm infants from enrollment to 34 weeks' postmenstrual age. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In this randomized clinical trial conducted at 4 neonatal intensive care units in the United Kingdom from 2017 to 2020, microbiome analyses were blind to group. Infants less than 30 weeks' gestation who had only received own mother's milk were recruited before 72 hours of age. Statistical analysis was performed from July 2019 to September 2021. INTERVENTIONS Exclusive human milk diet using pasteurized human milk for any shortfall in mother's own milk supply and human milk-derived fortifiers (intervention) compared with bovine formula and bovine-derived fortifier (control) until 34 weeks' postmenstrual age. Fortifier commenced less than 48 hours of tolerating 150 mL/kg per day. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Gut microbiome profile including alpha and beta diversity, and presence of specific bacterial taxa. RESULTS Of 126 preterm infants enrolled in the study, 63 were randomized to control (median [IQR] gestation: 27.0 weeks [26.0-28.1 weeks]; median [IQR] birthweight: 910 g [704-1054 g]; 32 [51%] male) and 63 were randomized to intervention (median [IQR] gestation: 27.1 weeks [25.7-28.1 weeks]; median [IQR] birthweight: 930 g [733-1095 g]; 38 [60%] male); 472 stool samples from 116 infants were analyzed. There were no differences in bacterial richness or Shannon diversity over time, or at 34 weeks between trial groups. The exclusive human milk diet group had reduced relative abundance of Lactobacillus after adjustment for confounders (coefficient estimate, 0.056; P = .03), but not after false discovery rate adjustment. There were no differences in time to full feeds, necrotizing enterocolitis, or other key neonatal morbidities. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this randomized clinical trial in preterm infants using human milk-derived formula and/or fortifier to enable an exclusive human milk diet, there were no effects on overall measures of gut bacterial diversity but there were effects on specific bacterial taxa previously associated with human milk receipt. These findings suggest that the clinical impact of human milk-derived products is not modulated via microbiomic mechanisms. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN trial registry identifier: ISRCTN16799022.
-
3.
The Effects of Black Tea Consumption on Intestinal Microflora-A Randomized Single-Blind Parallel-Group, Placebo-Controlled Study.
Tomioka, R, Tanaka, Y, Suzuki, M, Ebihara, S
Journal of nutritional science and vitaminology. 2023;69(5):326-339
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Tea from the leaves of the tea plant (Camelia sinensis) is consumed around the world. Tea has many health benefits, and in part, this is due to its rich content in compounds classed as polyphenols. Through the fermentation process, black tea is particularly high in polyphenols. Previous studies around respiratory infections indicated that regular consumption of black tea appeared to improve immune defence mechanisms that protect mucous membranes, called mucosal immunity. As this mucosal immunity is closely influenced by gut bacteria, the authors speculated whether the previously seen impact of improved mucosal immunity is related to the ability of black tea to also modulate bacteria in the gut. A previously run randomised single-blinded, placebo-controlled trial with 72 Japanese participants who consumed three cups of black tea (2g) or a placebo of barley tea for 12 weeks provided the data for this study. Data gathered included gut flora analysis, short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) levels - fats that play a role in maintaining gut health, and saliva IgA (SIgA) concentrations - which are antibodies made in the lymph tissue of the gut. The results showed that black tea consumption led to a significant increase in the abundance of Prevotella bacteria, which mediate SCFA production and are involved in normalising immune function. Furthermore, tea increased butyrate-producing bacteria. Butyrate is associated with improved barrier function of the gut walls but also helps to manage pathogens and immune responses. Black tea consumption also increased salivary SIgA concentration - a type of antibody on the mucous membranes that prevents pathogens from entering the body -, and a decrease in stool acetic acid concentration, which may be due to the increase in butyrate-producing bacteria which use acetic acid to make butyrate. Notably, participants with low salivary SIgA levels at the start had a more pronounced positive change in total bacteria, after consuming black tea compared to the placebo group. The authors concluded that regular consumption of black tea may help to improve mucosal immunity by increasing the abundance of beneficial bacteria in the gut.
Abstract
We previously reported that black tea consumption for 12 wk reduced the risk of acute upper respiratory tract inflammation, and improved secretory capacity in individuals with low salivary SIgA levels (Tanaka Y et al. 2021. Jpn Pharmacol Ther 49: 273-288). These results suggested that habitual black tea consumption improves mucosal immunity. Therefore, in this study we evaluated the effect of black tea intake on gut microbiota, which is known to be involved in mucosal immunity, by analyzing the bacterial flora and the short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) concentration of feces collected during the above clinical study. The clinical design was a randomized, single-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study with 72 healthy Japanese adult males and females, who consumed three cups of black tea (Black Tea Polymerized Polyphenols 76.2 mg per day) or placebo per day for 12 wk. In all subjects intake of black tea significantly increased abundance of Prevotella and decreased fecal acetic acid concentration. Particularly in the subjects with low salivary SIgA levels, the change over time of total bacteria, Prevotella, and butyrate-producing bacteria, which are involved in normalizing immune function, were higher in the black tea group than in the placebo group. In subjects with low abundance of Flavonifractor plautii a butyrate-producing bacteria, black tea consumption significantly increased salivary SIgA concentration and the absolute number of Flavonifractor plautii. In conclusion, our results suggest that improvement of mucosal immunity via an increase in butyrate-producing bacteria in the gut may partly contribute to the suppressive effect of black tea consumption on acute upper respiratory tract inflammation observed in our previous report.
-
4.
Microbiological and clinical effects of probiotics and antibiotics on nonsurgical treatment of chronic periodontitis: a randomized placebo- controlled trial with 9-month follow-up.
Morales, A, Gandolfo, A, Bravo, J, Carvajal, P, Silva, N, Godoy, C, Garcia-Sesnich, J, Hoare, A, Diaz, P, Gamonal, J
Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB. 2018;26:e20170075
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Chronic periodontitis is an inflammatory disease affecting the gums caused by the accumulation of dental bacterial plaque. There has been evidence that certain bacteria, like Tannerella forsythia, Porphyromonas gingivalis and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, are related to the development of chronic perdontitis. Research has shown that probiotic species such as Lactobacillus rhamnosus inhibit the growth of bacteria that cause gum disease. This parallel-arm, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial investigated the effects of Lactobacillus rhamnosus SP1 or Azithromycin tablets as an addition to non-surgical therapy on clinical and microbiological parameters of chronic periodontitis in healthy subjects. Participants in the intervention group consumed a probiotic sachet containing Lactobacillus rhamnosus SP1 and an antibiotic placebo daily for three months, whereas the placebo group consumed azithromycin 500 mg for five days and a probiotic placebo. At 6 weeks follow-up, both the probiotic group and the antibiotic group demonstrated improvements in clinical and microbiological parameters with a reduction in cultivable microbiota such as Tannerella forsythia, Porphyromonas gingivalis, and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans. The antibiotic group reduced the number of people with chronic periodontitis more effectively than the probiotic group, but there was no significant difference between the two. To identify the most effective probiotic therapy for chronic periodontitis, more robust studies are required. The results of this study can be used by healthcare professionals to learn about the effects of probiotic therapy in patients with chronic periodontitis.
Abstract
The aim of this double-blind, placebo-controlled and parallel- arm randomized clinical trial was to evaluate the effects of Lactobacillus rhamnosus SP1-containing probiotic sachet and azithromycin tablets as an adjunct to nonsurgical therapy in clinical parameters and in presence and levels of Tannerella forsythia, Porphyromonas gingivalis and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans. Forty-seven systemically healthy volunteers with chronic periodontitis were recruited and monitored clinically and microbiologically at baseline for 3, 6 and 9 months after therapy. Subgingival plaque samples were collected from four periodontal sites with clinical attachment level ≥1 mm, probing pocket depth ≥4 mm and bleeding on probing, one site in each quadrant. Samples were cultivated and processed using the PCR technique. Patients received nonsurgical therapy including scaling and root planing (SRP) and were randomly assigned to a probiotic (n=16), antibiotic (n = 16) or placebo (n = 15) group. L. rhamnosus SP1 was taken once a day for 3 months. Azithromycin 500mg was taken once a day for 5 days. All groups showed improvements in clinical and microbiological parameters at all time points evaluated. Probiotic and antibiotic groups showed greater reductions in cultivable microbiota compared with baseline. The placebo group showed greater reduction in number of subjects with P. gingivalis compared with baseline. However, there were no significant differences between groups. The adjunctive use of L. rhamnosus SP1 sachets and azithromycin during initial therapy resulted in similar clinical and microbiological improvements compared with the placebo group.
-
5.
Effect of a Protein Supplement on the Gut Microbiota of Endurance Athletes: A Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind Pilot Study.
Moreno-Pérez, D, Bressa, C, Bailén, M, Hamed-Bousdar, S, Naclerio, F, Carmona, M, Pérez, M, González-Soltero, R, Montalvo-Lominchar, MG, Carabaña, C, et al
Nutrients. 2018;10(3)
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Protein supplements are popular among athletes to improve performance and increase muscle mass. However, their effect on other aspects of health is less well known. Dietary changes can affect gut microbiota balance, with beneficial or harmful consequences for the host. This small pilot study was performed on cross-country runners whose diets were complemented with a protein supplement (whey isolate and beef hydrolysate) or maltodextrin (control) for 10 weeks. Microbiota, water content, pH, ammonia, and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) were analysed in faecal samples, and oxidative stress markers were measured in blood plasma and urine. Faecal pH, water content, ammonia, and SCFA concentrations did not change, indicating that protein supplementation did not increase the presence of these metabolites of fermentation. Similarly, it had no impact on plasma or urine malondialdehyde levels. Protein supplementation did however increase the abundance of the Bacteroidetes phylum and decrease the presence of health-related taxa including Roseburia, Blautia, and Bifidobacterium longum. The authors concluded that long-term protein supplementation may have a negative impact on gut microbiota. Further research is needed to establish the impact of protein supplements on gut microbiota.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Long-term protein supplementation may have a negative impact on gut microbiota.
- Further research is needed to establish the impact of protein supplements on gut microbiota and whether there is a differential impact between protein from animal and plant sources.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
This is a very interesting study that is relevant to athletic populations.
Clinical practice applications:
Potentially there is a role for probiotics / prebiotics when increasing protein intake (particularly of animal origin) to maintain microbiota diversity and prevent ensuing health complications.
Considerations for future research:
Further, larger scale, research is needed to understand whether the same effect of protein supplementation would be seen with plant-based proteins or whether this is unique to animal based protein supplementation. For example, is the hydrolysation of the proteins to account for the largest effect or could a whole food protein, i.e. not hydrolysed, elicit the same effects?
Also, is this effect seen in other sports, e.g. non-endurance. What about the effect under different conditions e.g. energy deficit vs. energy excess?
Abstract
Nutritional supplements are popular among athletes to improve performance and physical recovery. Protein supplements fulfill this function by improving performance and increasing muscle mass; however, their effect on other organs or systems is less well known. Diet alterations can induce gut microbiota imbalance, with beneficial or deleterious consequences for the host. To test this, we performed a randomized pilot study in cross-country runners whose diets were complemented with a protein supplement (whey isolate and beef hydrolysate) (n = 12) or maltodextrin (control) (n = 12) for 10 weeks. Microbiota, water content, pH, ammonia, and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) were analyzed in fecal samples, whereas malondialdehyde levels (oxidative stress marker) were determined in plasma and urine. Fecal pH, water content, ammonia, and SCFA concentrations did not change, indicating that protein supplementation did not increase the presence of these fermentation-derived metabolites. Similarly, it had no impact on plasma or urine malondialdehyde levels; however, it increased the abundance of the Bacteroidetes phylum and decreased the presence of health-related taxa including Roseburia, Blautia, and Bifidobacterium longum. Thus, long-term protein supplementation may have a negative impact on gut microbiota. Further research is needed to establish the impact of protein supplements on gut microbiota.
-
6.
A Walnut-Enriched Diet Affects Gut Microbiome in Healthy Caucasian Subjects: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.
Bamberger, C, Rossmeier, A, Lechner, K, Wu, L, Waldmann, E, Fischer, S, Stark, RG, Altenhofer, J, Henze, K, Parhofer, KG
Nutrients. 2018;10(2)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
There is a clear link between health, disease and the diversity of the human gut microbiome. Diet is one of the main factors that influences microbial composition in the gut. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of walnut consumption on the gut microbiome composition and microbial diversity. 194 healthy adults, of average age 63 years, were included in this study. Participants were allocated to two diet phases of eight weeks each. 96 subjects first followed a walnut-enriched diet (43g walnuts/day) and then switched to a nut-free diet, while 98 subjects followed the diets in reverse order. While consuming the walnut-enriched diet, participants were advised to either reduce fat or carbohydrates or both to account for the additional calories. Faecal samples were collected at the end of the walnut-diet and the control-diet period for microbiome analyses. Walnut consumption significantly affected microbiome composition and diversity. The abundance of Ruminococcaceae and Bifidobacteria increased significantly while Clostridium species decreased significantly after walnut consumption. The effect of walnut consumption on the microbiome only marginally depended on whether subjects replaced fat, carbohydrates or both while on walnuts. The authors concluded that daily intake of 43 g walnuts over eight weeks significantly affects the gut microbiome by enhancing probiotic- and butyric acid-producing species in healthy individuals.
Abstract
Regular walnut consumption is associated with better health. We have previously shown that eight weeks of walnut consumption (43 g/day) significantly improves lipids in healthy subjects. In the same study, gut microbiome was evaluated. We included 194 healthy subjects (134 females, 63 ± 7 years, BMI 25.1 ± 4.0 kg/m²) in a randomized, controlled, prospective, cross-over study. Following a nut-free run-in period, subjects were randomized to two diet phases (eight weeks each); 96 subjects first followed a walnut-enriched diet (43 g/day) and then switched to a nut-free diet, while 98 subjects followed the diets in reverse order. While consuming the walnut-enriched diet, subjects were advised to either reduce fat or carbohydrates or both to account for the additional calories. Fecal samples were collected from 135 subjects at the end of the walnut-diet and the control-diet period for microbiome analyses. The 16S rRNA gene sequencing data was clustered with a 97% similarity into Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs). UniFrac distances were used to determine diversity between groups. Differential abundance was evaluated using the Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test. All analyses were performed using Rhea. Generalized UniFrac distance shows that walnut consumption significantly affects microbiome composition and diversity. Multidimensional scaling (metric and non-metric) indicates dissimilarities of approximately 5% between walnut and control (p = 0.02). The abundance of Ruminococcaceae and Bifidobacteria increased significantly (p < 0.02) while Clostridium sp. cluster XIVa species (Blautia; Anaerostipes) decreased significantly (p < 0.05) during walnut consumption. The effect of walnut consumption on the microbiome only marginally depended on whether subjects replaced fat, carbohydrates or both while on walnuts. Daily intake of 43 g walnuts over eight weeks significantly affects the gut microbiome by enhancing probiotic- and butyric acid-producing species in healthy individuals. Further evaluation is required to establish whether these changes are preserved during longer walnut consumption and how these are linked to the observed changes in lipid metabolism.
-
7.
Clinical trial: effect of active lactic acid bacteria on mucosal barrier function in patients with diarrhoea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome.
Zeng, J, Li, YQ, Zuo, XL, Zhen, YB, Yang, J, Liu, CH
Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics. 2008;28(8):994-1002
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Impaired intestinal mucosal barrier function may be involved in the pathogenesis of diarrhoea-predominant IBS (D-IBS) accompanied by persistent low-grade intestinal inflammation. Attenuating the inflammation and preserving mucosal barrier function may be a potential therapeutic target in D-IBS. This study investigates whether probiotic fermented milk containing multistrain lactic acid bacteria (LAB) can improve intestinal mucosal barrier function in D-IBS. 30 Chinese adults with D-IBS and 12 asymptomatic controls were randomized (1:1 ratio) to consume a probiotic fermented milk (containing Streptococcus thermophilus, Lactobacillus bulgaricus, Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium longum) or a placebo drink twice daily half an hour before meals for 4 weeks. IBS symptoms and intestinal permeability were evaluated at weeks 0 and 4. Before treatment, intestinal permeability of the 30 patients with D-IBS was increased compared to normal controls. After treatment, intestinal permeability in the probiotics group decreased significantly, compared to the placebo group. IBS symptoms score in the probiotics group improved compared with baseline values, but not in the placebo group. This study found that small intestinal permeability was significantly increased in D-IBS patients compared with normal controls. The results indicate that multistrain LAB was associated with the improvement in intestinal barrier function as measured by a reduction in small bowel permeability, in turn accompanied by relief of IBS symptoms, which suggests that increased intestinal permeability may partially contribute to the pathogenesis of IBS symptoms. The mechanisms of increased intestinal permeability involvement in D-IBS were lacking.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The intestinal permeability is increased in patients with diarrhoea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (D-IBS). AIM: To determine the possible efficacy of lactic acid bacteria on the increased intestinal permeability in D-IBS. METHODS Treatment was employed for 4 weeks in a randomized single blind placebo controlled study with 30 D-IBS patients. Patients were given either probiotic fermented milk (Streptococcus thermophilus, Lactobacillus bulgaricus, Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium Longum) or milk beverage containing no bacteria. The clinical symptoms were scored and intestinal permeability was measured by a triple sugar test before and after treatment. RESULTS Small bowel permeability was measured as the ratio of lactulose and mannitol recovery and colonic permeability was measured as the total mass of sucralose excretion (mg). After probiotics treatment, small bowel permeability decreased significantly from 0.038 (0.024) at baseline to 0.023 (0.020) (P = 0.004), the proportion of patients with increased small bowel permeability was lower than baseline (28.6% vs. 64.3%, P = 0.023). However, colonic permeability improved neither in the probiotics group nor in the placebo group at week 4. Treatment with probiotics significantly decreased the mean global IBS scores compared with the baseline scores (9.62 +/- 1.05 vs. 7.64 +/- 1.24, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Short-term active lactic acid bacteria treatment for D-IBS improved mucosal barrier function.