1.
Multi-strain probiotics (Hexbio) containing MCP BCMC strains improved constipation and gut motility in Parkinson's disease: A randomised controlled trial.
Ibrahim, A, Ali, RAR, Manaf, MRA, Ahmad, N, Tajurruddin, FW, Qin, WZ, Desa, SHM, Ibrahim, NM
PloS one. 2020;15(12):e0244680
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Constipation is one of the commonest non-motor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease (PD). Recently, gut dysbiosis with alterations in faecal microbial composition was associated with the pathogenesis of PD and constipation. The aim of this study was to analyse the efficacy of a multi-strain probiotic combined with a prebiotic fibre (fructo-oligosaccharide) compared to placebo, on constipation symptoms and intestinal motility, in PD patients with constipation. This study is an eight-week investigator-initiated, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled single centre clinical trial involving 55 idiopathic PD patients. Patients were randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups. Results showed that: - the consumption of a multi-strain probiotic (Hexbio) over 8 weeks, significantly improved bowel opening frequency and gut transit time in PD patients with constipation. - PD patients who consumed probiotics experienced a significantly higher mean weekly bowel movement compared to the placebo group. - patients who received probiotics reported increased weekly bowel opening frequency. - the percentage of patients who remained constipated was also significantly lower in the probiotic group (22.7%) compared to 57.7% in the placebo group. Authors conclude that Hexbio containing MCP BCMC strains was safe and effective in improving bowel opening frequency and gastrointestinal motility in PD patients with constipation.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We determined the effectiveness of a multi-strain probiotic (Hexbio®) containing microbial cell preparation MCP®BCMC® on constipation symptoms and gut motility in PD patients with constipation. METHODS PD patients with constipation (ROME III criteria) were randomized to receive a multi-strain probiotic (Lactobacillus sp and Bifidobacterium sp at 30 X 109 CFU) with fructo-oligosaccaride or placebo (fermented milk) twice daily for 8 weeks. Primary outcomes were changes in the presence of constipation symptoms using 9 items of Garrigues Questionnaire (GQ), which included an item on bowel opening frequency. Secondary outcomes were gut transit time (GTT), quality of life (PDQ39-SI), motor (MDS-UPDRS) and non-motor symptoms (NMSS). RESULTS Of 55 recruited, 48 patients completed the study: 22 received probiotic and 26 received placebo. At 8 weeks, there was a significantly higher mean weekly BOF in the probiotic group compared to placebo [SD 4.18 (1.44) vs SD 2.81(1.06); (mean difference 1.37, 95% CI 0.68, 2.07, uncorrected p<0.001)]. Patients in the probiotic group reported five times higher odds (odds ratio = 5.48, 95% CI 1.57, 19.12, uncorrected p = 0.008) for having higher BOF (< 3 to 3-5 to >5 times/week) compared to the placebo group. The GTT in the probiotic group [77.32 (SD55.35) hours] reduced significantly compared to placebo [113.54 (SD 61.54) hours]; mean difference -36.22, 95% CI -68.90, -3.54, uncorrected p = 0.030). The mean change in GTT was 58.04 (SD59.04) hour vs 20.73 (SD60.48) hours respectively (mean difference 37.32, 95% CI 4.00, 70.63, uncorrected p = 0.028). No between-groups differences were observed in the NMSS, PDQ39-SI, MDS-UPDRS II and MDS-UPDRS III scores. Four patients in the probiotics group experienced mild reversible side effects. CONCLUSION This study showed that consumption of a multi-strain probiotic (Hexbio®) over 8 weeks improved bowel opening frequency and whole gut transit time in PD patients with constipation.
2.
Probiotic Lactobacillus casei: Effective for Managing Childhood Diarrhea by Altering Gut Microbiota and Attenuating Fecal Inflammatory Markers.
Lai, HH, Chiu, CH, Kong, MS, Chang, CJ, Chen, CC
Nutrients. 2019;11(5)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Acute diarrhoea caused by pathogens may induce gastroenteritis (inflammation of the stomach and intestines), bloody stool, or severe intra-abdominal infections that establish disease and increase the economic burden, especially among infantile and childhood populations. The aim of the study was to determine whether probiotics (Lactobacilluscasei) inhibited gastrointestinal infection and reduced the associated inflammatory response. The study is a prospective, randomized, case-controlled study which enrolled 81 children aged between 6 months and 6 years. The participants were divided into 2 groups (Lactobacilluscasei variety rhamnosus treatment and a no probiotic control). Study results indicate that probiotics can reduce the severity and duration of diarrhoea. Furthermore, probiotic colonisation improved bowel habits and reduced abdominal pain or colic and bloating. Authors conclude that the efficacy of probiotic preparations for the treatment of acute childhood diarrhoea is related to individual bacteria strains. Thus, the population and modulation of intestinal gut/probiotic bacteria can be restored through the reduction of intestinal inflammatory reactions.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acute diarrhea is a major cause of childhood morbidity and an economic burden for families. The aim of this study is to explore the effect of probiotics on clinical symptoms, intestinal microbiota, and inflammatory markers during childhood diarrhea. METHODS Children (n = 81) aged six months to six years (mean age 2.31 years) hospitalized for acute diarrhea were randomized to receive probiotics (Lactobacillus casei variety rhamnosus; n = 42) or no probiotics (n = 39) orally twice daily for seven days. Feces samples were also collected to evaluate microbial content using a traditional agar plate and next-generation sequencing. Immunoglobulin A (IgA), lactoferrin, and calprotectin were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and compared in different groups. Other clinical symptoms or signs, including fever, vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal pain, bloated abdomen, daily intake, appetite, and body weight were also assessed. RESULTS Data were collected from 81 individuals across three different time points. Total fecal IgA levels in fecal extracts of the probiotics group were higher than those in the control group, reaching statistical significance (p < 0.05). Concentrations of fecal lactoferrin and calprotectin were significantly downregulated in patients with probiotic Lactobacillus casei variety rhamnosus (Lc) consumption compared to those of the control (p < 0.05). Probiotic Lc administration may be beneficial for gut-microbiota modulation, as shown by the data collected at one week after enrollment. Counts of Bifidobacteria and Lactobacillus species were elevated in stool culture of the probiotic group. Appetite and oral intake, body-weight gain, abdominal pain, bloating, as well as bowel habits (diarrhea) were much better in children receiving probiotics compared with those in the control group. CONCLUSION Fecal IgA increased during acute diarrhea under Lc treatment; in contrast, fecal lactoferrin and calprotectin were downregulated during acute diarrhea under Lc treatment. Probiotic Lc may be a useful supplement for application in children during acute diarrhea to reduce clinical severity and intestinal inflammatory reaction.
3.
Fecal microbiota transplantation in patients with slow-transit constipation: A randomized, clinical trial.
Tian, H, Ge, X, Nie, Y, Yang, L, Ding, C, McFarland, LV, Zhang, X, Chen, Q, Gong, J, Li, N
PloS one. 2017;12(2):e0171308
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Repopulating an individual’s digestive tract with bacteria, using the faeces of a healthy donor, has been tested for the treatment of pathogens such as Clostridium Difficile, inflammatory bowel diseases and Irritable Bowel Syndrome. This small, single blind, controlled trial aimed to assess the effects of faecal transplant in patients with slow-transit constipation. The patients involved in the trial were split into two groups. One group (control) received standard education, behavioural strategies and oral laxatives only. The other group (intervention) received the conventional treatment as above and in addition, 6 days of faecal transplant during the first week of the 12 week trial. After 12 weeks, the trial found a significant difference in the number of people in the intervention group having a bowel movement more than 3 times per week, when compared to the control group (36% v. 13%). Other markers of constipation were also improved in the intervention group, such as stool consistency and colonic transit time. The authors conclude that faecal transplant is a significantly more effective treatment for slow-transit constipation than conventional treatment.
Abstract
Fecal microbiota transplantation has been proposed as a therapeutic approach for chronic constipation. This randomized, controlled trial aimed to compare the effects of conventional treatment alone (control) with additional treatment with FMT (intervention) in patients with slow-transit constipation (STC). Adults with STC were randomized to receive intervention or control treatment. The control group received education, behavioral strategies, and oral laxatives. The intervention group was additionally provided 6 days of FMT. The primary endpoint was the clinical cure rate (proportion of patients achieving a mean of ≥ three complete spontaneous bowel movements [CSBMs] per week]. Secondary outcomes and safety parameters were assessed throughout the study. Sixty patients were randomized to either conventional treatment alone (n = 30) or FMT (n = 30) through a nasointestinal tube. There were significant differences between the intervention group and control group in the clinical improvement rate (intention-to-treat [ITT]: 53.3% vs. 20.0%, P = 0.009), clinical cure rate (ITT: 36.7% vs. 13.3%, P = 0.04), mean number of CSBMs per week (ITT: 3.2 ± 1.4 vs. 2.1 ± 1.2, P = 0.001), and the Wexner constipation score (ITT: 8.6 ± 1.5 vs. 12.7 ± 2.5, P < 0.00001). Compared with the control group, the intervention group showed better results in the stool consistency score (ITT: 3.9 vs. 2.4, P < 0.00001) and colonic transit time (ITT: 58.5 vs. 73.6 h, P < 0.00001). The intervention group had more treatment-related adverse events than did the control group (50 vs. 4 cases). FMT was significantly more effective (30% higher cure rate) for treatment of STC than conventional treatment. No serious adverse events were observed.