1.
Feasibility outcomes of a presurgical randomized controlled trial exploring the impact of caloric restriction and increased physical activity versus a wait-list control on tumor characteristics and circulating biomarkers in men electing prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
Demark-Wahnefried, W, Nix, JW, Hunter, GR, Rais-Bahrami, S, Desmond, RA, Chacko, B, Morrow, CD, Azrad, M, Frugé, AD, Tsuruta, Y, et al
BMC cancer. 2016;16:61
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
There is a strong body of evidence associating obesity and increased risk for more aggressive and progressive cancer. This paper aims to assess the feasibility of a presurgical diet and exercise weight loss intervention in men with newly-diagnosed prostate cancer who elected for prostatectomy. It also aims to explore the intervention’s effects on tumour proliferation rates and other biomarkers. The 3-weeks randomised controlled study included 40 overweight or obese men newly-diagnosed with prostate cancer. Participants in experimental arm were assigned to a healthy energy-restricted diet versus wait-list control arm. All feasibility endpoints were achieved with accrual completed within 2 years, retention of 85%, adherence of 95% and no adverse events. Biologic outcomes were not included in this paper, as biological testing was still ongoing. Authors concluded that this study’s methods and data on feasibility could provide useful framework for the design of future trials. They also highlighted the importance of presurgical trials as a feasible and safe means to assess the impacts of diet and exercise on tumour tissue.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Obesity is associated with tumor aggressiveness and disease-specific mortality for more than 15 defined malignancies, including prostate cancer. Preclinical studies suggest that weight loss from caloric restriction and increased physical activity may suppress hormonal, energy-sensing, and inflammatory factors that drive neoplastic progression; however, exact mechanisms are yet to be determined, and experiments in humans are limited. METHODS We conducted a randomized controlled trial among 40 overweight or obese, newly-diagnosed prostate cancer patients who elected prostatectomy to explore feasibility of a presurgical weight loss intervention that promoted a weight loss of roughly one kg. week(-1) via caloric restriction and physical activity, as well as to assess effects on tumor biology and circulating biomarkers. Measures of feasibility (accrual, retention, adherence, and safety) were primary endpoints. Exploratory aims were directed at the intervention's effect on tumor proliferation (Ki-67) and other tumor markers (activated caspase-3, insulin and androgen receptors, VEGF, TNFβ, NFκB, and 4E-BP1), circulating biomarkers (PSA, insulin, glucose, VEGF, TNFβ, leptin, SHBG, and testosterone), lymphocytic gene expression of corresponding factors and cellular bioenergetics in neutrophils, and effects on the gut microbiome. Consenting patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either: 1) weight loss via a healthful, guidelines-based diet and exercise regimen; or 2) a wait-list control. While biological testing is currently ongoing, this paper details our methods and feasibility outcomes. RESULTS The accrual target was met after screening 101 cases (enrollment rate: 39.6%). Other outcomes included a retention rate of 85%, excellent adherence (95%), and no serious reported adverse events. No significant differences by age, race, or weight status were noted between enrollees vs. non-enrollees. The most common reasons for non-participation were "too busy" (30%), medical exclusions (21%), and "distance" (16%). CONCLUSIONS Presurgical trials offer a means to study the impact of diet and exercise interventions directly on tumor tissue, and other host factors that are feasible and safe, though modifications are needed to conduct trials within an abbreviated period of time and via distance medicine-based approaches. Pre-surgical trials are critical to elucidate the impact of lifestyle interventions on specific mechanisms that mediate carcinogenesis and which can be used subsequently as therapeutic targets. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT01886677.
2.
Three 15-min bouts of moderate postmeal walking significantly improves 24-h glycemic control in older people at risk for impaired glucose tolerance.
DiPietro, L, Gribok, A, Stevens, MS, Hamm, LF, Rumpler, W
Diabetes care. 2013;36(10):3262-8
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
The insulin response is known to decline with age, which puts older people at risk of hyperglycaemia after eating. Insulin and exercise stimulate the uptake of glucose into skeletal muscle so exercise could aid insulin in age-related impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). This small randomised controlled trial (RCT) used a multiple crossover design to compare the effect of exercise timing and frequency on glycaemia control in older people. The ten trial subjects were at risk of impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), but were otherwise healthy with an average age of sixty-nine years old. Subjects were housed in whole room calorimeters, fed three standardised meals a day and glucose levels were monitored. Subjects were randomly assigned to walk on a treadmill for either fifteen minutes after each of the three meals, or walk for forty-five minutes either at mid-morning or mid-afternoon. It was found that that both the morning walk and the post-meal walking decreased 24 hour glucose concentration, whilst the afternoon walk had little impact. Post-meal walking was effective at lowering glucose levels after each meal including dinner, where the other exercise protocols were not. The author concluded that the timing of the exercise may be as important, if not more, than volume. Short (15 minute) bouts of post-meal walking could be manageable for older people and appears to be an effective way of controlling post eating hyperglycaemia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of three 15-min bouts of postmeal walking with 45 min of sustained walking on 24-h glycemic control in older persons at risk for glucose intolerance. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Inactive older (≥60 years of age) participants (N=10) were recruited from the community and were nonsmoking, with a BMI<35 kg/m2 and a fasting blood glucose concentration between 105 and 125 mg dL(-1). Participants completed three randomly ordered exercise protocols spaced 4 weeks apart. Each protocol comprised a 48-h stay in a whole-room calorimeter, with the first day serving as the control day. On the second day, participants engaged in either 1) postmeal walking for 15 min or 45 min of sustained walking performed at 2) 10:30 a.m. or 3) 4:30 p.m. All walking was on a treadmill at an absolute intensity of 3 METs. Interstitial glucose concentrations were determined over 48 h with a continuous glucose monitor. Substrate utilization was measured continuously by respiratory exchange (VCO2/VO2). RESULTS Both sustained morning walking (127±23 vs. 118±14 mg dL(-1)) and postmeal walking (129±24 vs. 116±13 mg dL(-1)) significantly improved 24-h glycemic control relative to the control day (P<0.05). Moreover, postmeal walking was significantly (P<0.01) more effective than 45 min of sustained morning or afternoon walking in lowering 3-h postdinner glucose between the control and experimental day. CONCLUSIONS Short, intermittent bouts of postmeal walking appear to be an effective way to control postprandial hyperglycemia in older people.