0
selected
-
1.
Sleep, Stress, and Symptoms Among People With Heart Failure During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
O'Connell, M, Jeon, S, Conley, S, Linsky, S, Redeker, NS
The Journal of cardiovascular nursing. 202301;38(2):E55-E60
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
COVID-19 pandemic raised concerns about the effects of stress on mental health and sleep deficiency. Cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) has been shown to improve sleep quality and insomnia severity, as well as anxiety and depression, and may be protective during times of stress, including the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this study was to examine changes in sleep, sleep-related cognitions, stress, anxiety, and depression among people with heart failure (HF). This study was a randomised controlled trial of the effects of CBT-I compared with HF self-management education (attention-control condition), the “HeartSleep Study.” Results showed that improvements in insomnia severity, sleep quality, latency, and efficiency, sleep-related cognitions and stress, anxiety, and depression after participation in CBT-I or an HF self-management class were sustained during the pandemic. Authors conclude that their findings confirm the clinical benefits of CBT-I for people with HF and comorbidities and also suggest the potential benefits of HF self-management education.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic raised concerns about the effects of stress on sleep and mental health, particularly among people with chronic conditions, including people with heart failure (HF). OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to examine changes in sleep, sleep-related cognitions, stress, anxiety, and depression among people with HF who participated in a randomized controlled trial of cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia before the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS Participants self-reported sleep characteristics, symptoms, mood, and stress at baseline, 6 months after cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia or HF self-management education (attention control), and during the pandemic. RESULTS The sample included 112 participants (mean age, 63 ± 12.9 years; 47% women; 13% Black; 68% New York Heart Association class II or III). Statistically significant improvements in sleep, stress, mood, and symptoms that occurred 6 months post treatment were sustained during the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS Improving sleep and symptoms among people with HF may improve coping during stressful events, and cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia may be protective.
-
2.
Sleep disruption and activation of cellular inflammation mediate heightened pain sensitivity: a randomized clinical trial.
Irwin, MR, Olmstead, R, Bjurstrom, MF, Finan, PH, Smith, MT
Pain. 2023;164(5):1128-1137
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Sleep disturbance is associated with elevated levels of inflammation. Experimental studies have found that even a modest amount of sleep loss activates inflammatory processes. Experimental sleep disruption also induces alterations in sleep architecture including loss of slow wave or N3 sleep and loss of rapid eye movement sleep. The aim of this study was to clarify whether changes in the amount of N3 sleep and cellular inflammation mediate thermal pain sensitivity (i.e., heat pain threshold) in response to experimental sleep disruption. This study was a secondary analysis (assessor-blind) of a randomised controlled trial. The enrolled participants were randomised to 1 of 2 groups: 2 nights of undisturbed sleep (US) and 2 nights of sleep disruption or forced awakening (FA). Participants underwent 2 consecutive nights of US (or FA), followed by a 2-week washout interval in their home environment, and then completed 2 consecutive nights of the opposing sleep condition FA (or US). Results showed that in healthy adults, experimental disruption of sleep due to the administration of FA induced a significant decrease in heat pain threshold, as compared with responses after US. Experimental manipulation of sleep with FA also led to disturbance in sleep continuity and changes in sleep architecture, including loss of N3 sleep. Moreover, in the morning after FA, there was a robust activation of cellular inflammation Authors conclude that the differential loss of N3 sleep and increases in cellular inflammation may be important drivers of pain sensitivity in response to sleep disruption.
Abstract
Sleep loss heightens pain sensitivity, but the pathways underlying this association are not known. Given that experimental sleep disruption induces increases in cellular inflammation as well as selective loss of slow wave, N3 sleep, this study examined whether these mechanisms contribute to pain sensitivity following sleep loss in healthy adults. This assessor-blinded, cross-over sleep condition, single-site, randomized clinical trial enrolled 95 healthy adults (mean [SD] age, 27.8 [6.4]; female, 44 [53.7%]). The 2 sleep conditions were 2 nights of undisturbed sleep (US) and 2 nights of sleep disruption or forced awakening (FA, 8 pseudorandomly distributed awakenings and 200 minutes wake time during the 8-hour sleep opportunity), administered in a cross-over design after 2 weeks of washout and in a random order (FA-US; US-FA). Primary outcome was heat pain threshold (hPTH). Sleep architecture was assessed by polysomnography, and morning levels of cellular inflammation were evaluated by Toll-like receptor-4 stimulated monocyte intracellular proinflammatory cytokine production. As compared with US, FA was associated with decreases in the amount of slow wave or N3 sleep ( P < 0.001), increases in Toll-like receptor-4 stimulated production of interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α ( P = 0.03), and decreases in hPTH ( P = 0.02). A comprehensive causal mediation analysis found that FA had an indirect effect on hPTH by decreases in N3 sleep and subsequent increases in inflammation (estimate=-0.15; 95% confidence interval, -0.30 to -0.03; P < 0.05) with the proportion mediated 34.9%. Differential loss of slow wave, N3 sleep, and increases in cellular inflammation are important drivers of pain sensitivity after sleep disruption.Clinical Trials Registration: NCT01794689.
-
3.
Improving perinatal sleep via a scalable cognitive behavioural intervention: findings from a randomised controlled trial from pregnancy to 2 years postpartum.
Bei, B, Pinnington, DM, Quin, N, Shen, L, Blumfield, M, Wiley, JF, Drummond, SPA, Newman, LK, Manber, R
Psychological medicine. 2023;53(2):513-523
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Sleep disturbance is a universal experience during the pregnancy and postpartum periods. Sleep disturbance is linked to a range of negative consequences. Literature shows that cognitive behavioural Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) is an effective treatment, with comparable short-term and superior long-term effects to sleep medication alone. The aim of this study was to evaluate the short-, medium-, and long-term efficacy of a non-pharmacological sleep intervention in the perinatal periods. The study was a longitudinal randomised controlled trial based on the SEED (Sleep Eat Emotions and Development) project which was a two-arm, parallel-group, single-blind, superiority randomised controlled trial. Participants were pregnant women enrolled in Childbirth Education and were randomised 1:1 to the intervention or a comparison condition. Results showed that compared to receiving an attention- and time-matched control, receiving a cognitive behavioural sleep intervention was associated with lower symptoms of insomnia, sleep disturbance, and sleep-related impairment during late pregnancy. Moreover, the intervention had long-term benefits to gestational parents’ sleep at 2-year postpartum. Authors conclude that a scalable cognitive behavioural sleep intervention, tailored for the perinatal periods, is feasible, acceptable, and efficacious in buffering against the natural increase in sleep complaints during the 3rd trimester.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sleep disturbance is common in gestational parents during pregnancy and postpartum periods. This study evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of a scalable cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) sleep intervention tailored for these periods. METHODS This is a two-arm, parallel-group, single-blind, superiority randomised controlled trial. Nulliparous females without severe medical/psychiatric conditions were randomised 1:1 to CBT or attention- and time-matched control. All participants received a 1 h telephone session and automated multimedia emails from the third trimester until 6 months postpartum. Outcomes were assessed with validated instruments at gestation weeks 30 (baseline) and 35 (pregnancy endpoint), and postpartum months 1.5, 3, 6 (postpartum endpoint), 12 and 24. RESULTS In total, 163 eligible participants (age M ± s.d. = 33.35 ± 3.42) were randomised. The CBT intervention was well accepted, with no reported adverse effect. Intention-to-treat analyses showed that compared to control, receiving CBT was associated with lower insomnia severity and sleep disturbance (two primary outcomes), and lower sleep-related impairment at the pregnancy endpoint (p values ⩽ 0.001), as well as at 24 months postpartum (p ranges 0.012-0.052). Group differences across the first postpartum year were non-significant. Participants with elevated insomnia symptoms at baseline benefitted substantially more from CBT (v. control), including having significantly lower insomnia symptoms throughout the first postpartum year. Group differences in symptoms of depression or anxiety were non-significant. CONCLUSIONS A scalable CBT sleep intervention is efficacious in buffering against sleep disturbance during pregnancy and benefitted sleep at 2-year postpartum, especially for individuals with insomnia symptoms during pregnancy. The intervention holds promise for implementation into routine perinatal care.
-
4.
Sleep restriction increases the neuronal response to unhealthy food in normal-weight individuals.
St-Onge, MP, Wolfe, S, Sy, M, Shechter, A, Hirsch, J
International journal of obesity (2005). 2014;38(3):411-6
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Sleep patterns influence eating behaviour and the body’s response to food. Previous studies suggest that short sleep duration leads to increased caloric intake and a desire for high-fat foods, however the specific neural mechanisms explaining how sleep restriction modulates this response is unknown. The aim of this study was to determine whether a specific area of the brain is activated in response to unhealthy compared with healthy foods. 25 participants were included, all of which were normal weight and had normal sleeping patterns. Each participant was tested after five nights of either 4 or 9 hours in bed by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). The test was performed while the participant was shown healthy and unhealthy food photos in the fasted state. This study found that after a period of restricted sleep compared with habitual sleep, unhealthy foods led to greater activation in brain regions associated with reward compared with healthy foods. This finding provides a model of neuronal mechanisms relating short sleep duration to obesity and cardio-metabolic risk factors and warrants further investigation.
Abstract
CONTEXT Sleep restriction alters responses to food. However, the underlying neural mechanisms for this effect are not well understood. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to determine whether there is a neural system that is preferentially activated in response to unhealthy compared with healthy foods. PARTICIPANTS Twenty-five normal-weight individuals, who normally slept 7-9 h per night, completed both phases of this randomized controlled study. INTERVENTION Each participant was tested after a period of five nights of either 4 or 9 h in bed. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was performed in the fasted state, presenting healthy and unhealthy food stimuli and objects in a block design. Neuronal responses to unhealthy, relative to healthy food stimuli after each sleep period were assessed and compared. RESULTS After a period of restricted sleep, viewing unhealthy foods led to greater activation in the superior and middle temporal gyri, middle and superior frontal gyri, left inferior parietal lobule, orbitofrontal cortex, and right insula compared with healthy foods. These same stimuli presented after a period of habitual sleep did not produce marked activity patterns specific to unhealthy foods. Further, food intake during restricted sleep increased in association with a relative decrease in brain oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) activity observed in the right insula. CONCLUSION This inverse relationship between insula activity and food intake and enhanced activation in brain reward and food-sensitive centers in response to unhealthy foods provides a model of neuronal mechanisms relating short sleep duration to obesity.
-
5.
Sleep restriction for 1 week reduces insulin sensitivity in healthy men.
Buxton, OM, Pavlova, M, Reid, EW, Wang, W, Simonson, DC, Adler, GK
Diabetes. 2010;59(9):2126-33
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Short sleep duration is associated with an increased risk of many chronic diseases including diabetes, however the effects of sleep restriction on insulin sensitivity have not yet been established. The aim of study was to assess the effects of decreased sleep duration on insulin sensitivity in a controlled environment. This 12-day inpatient study included 20 healthy men who were randmoised to receive a wakefulness-promoting drug, modafinil, or placebo during the sleep restriction phase. This study showed that sleep restriction for one week significantly reduces insulin sensitivity. These findings raise concerns about chronic insufficient sleep on the development of metabolic diseases and promote further research into these effects.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Short sleep duration is associated with impaired glucose tolerance and an increased risk of diabetes. The effects of sleep restriction on insulin sensitivity have not been established. This study tests the hypothesis that decreasing nighttime sleep duration reduces insulin sensitivity and assesses the effects of a drug, modafinil, that increases alertness during wakefulness. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This 12-day inpatient General Clinical Research Center study included 20 healthy men (age 20-35 years and BMI 20-30 kg/m(2)). Subjects spent 10 h/night in bed for >or=8 nights including three inpatient nights (sleep-replete condition), followed by 5 h/night in bed for 7 nights (sleep-restricted condition). Subjects received 300 mg/day modafinil or placebo during sleep restriction. Diet and activity were controlled. On the last 2 days of each condition, we assessed glucose metabolism by intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT) and euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp. Salivary cortisol, 24-h urinary catecholamines, and neurobehavioral performance were measured. RESULTS IVGTT-derived insulin sensitivity was reduced by (means +/- SD) 20 +/- 24% after sleep restriction (P = 0.001), without significant alterations in the insulin secretory response. Similarly, insulin sensitivity assessed by clamp was reduced by 11 +/- 5.5% (P < 0.04) after sleep restriction. Glucose tolerance and the disposition index were reduced by sleep restriction. These outcomes were not affected by modafinil treatment. Changes in insulin sensitivity did not correlate with changes in salivary cortisol (increase of 51 +/- 8% with sleep restriction, P < 0.02), urinary catecholamines, or slow wave sleep. CONCLUSIONS Sleep restriction (5 h/night) for 1 week significantly reduces insulin sensitivity, raising concerns about effects of chronic insufficient sleep on disease processes associated with insulin resistance.