1.
Early life gut microbiota profiles linked to synbiotic formula effects: a randomized clinical trial in European infants.
Lagkouvardos, I, Intze, E, Schaubeck, M, Rooney, JP, Hecht, C, Piloquet, H, Clavel, T
The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2023;117(2):326-339
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Microbial colonisation of the intestine after birth is a central event that influences infant health with life-long consequences. Although improvement of hygienic conditions reduces infant mortality due to infections, environments with low microbial biomass counteract natural colonisation by commensal microbes. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of a synbiotic intervention formula (IF) on faecal microbiota. This study was a multicentre, randomised, controlled, double-blind intervention trial which enrolled 540 infants. Infants whose parents had chosen not to breastfeed or were not able to breastfeed prior to study inclusion were allocated randomly to 1 of 2 formula groups (n = 230 control formula, n = 230 IF). The infants in the breastfed reference group (n = 80) were mainly fed human milk. Results showed that synbiotic intervention influenced the gut microbiota and milieu parameters during early life to resemble some major characteristics found in breastfed infants (higher relative abundances of bifidobacteria, lower richness, lower faecal pH and butyrate concentrations), and effects depended on the ecosystem profile of the infants. Authors conclude that specific randomised, controlled studies that focus on infants born by Caesarean section and how early nutrition can support the beneficial development of their microbiota are needed.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Infant gut colonisation differs in vaginal versus cesarean section deliveries and between breastfed and infant formula practices.
- Both enriched strain-specific probiotic and standard infant formula were shown to have a marked effect on microbiota colonisation in infants at age 4 months.
- By the age of 2 years, however, there is no significant difference between breastfed and formula fed infants.
Evidence Category:
-
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
X
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
This randomised controlled intervention study compared gut health parameters with the use of a synbiotic pre- and probiotic strain enriched infant formula with human milk and standard formula at three intervals over a period of 2 years.
Methods
This was a double-blinded controlled study of 540 infants from France and Belgium. Participants were randomly allocated to 2 formula groups (n = 230 Control Formula (CF), n = 230 Intervention Formula (IF)) and the breastfed reference group (n = 80) as well as delivery mode (Cesarean and vaginal delivery). The synbiotic IF was a standard infant formula enriched with prebiotic GOS (0.02 g/g) and the probiotic strain L. fermentum CECT5716 (at least 1.0 × 106 cfu/g).
Stool analysis was conducted at three time intervals, 4, 12, and 24 months (infant age). Biomarkers included short chain fatty acids, pH, secretory IgA, calprotectin, and various bacterial phyla via microbiota analysis.
Results
- At 4 months, the IF group tested higher for Bifidobacterium spp., and Lactobacillaceae and lower occurrence of Blautia spp., as well as Ruminoccocus gnavus and relatives compared to CF. They also had lower fecal pH and butyrate levels
- Both the formula cohorts had lower SigA and more basic pH values than the human milk cohort, as well as higher prevalence of anaerobes belonging to the bacterial genera Akkermansia, Collinsella, and Faecalibacterium.
- By age 24 months, the IF cohort exhibited increased levels of Akkermansia, Escherichia-Shigella, and R.gnavus. However there were no significant differences between the formula fed and human milk cohort at this time interval.
- The differences observed at 4 months disappeared over time, except for a significantly higher relative abundance of bifidobacteria and Faecalibacterium spp. in IF infants at 12 months compared with CF infants.
Conclusion:
Although prominent differences between the cohorts were observed at 4 months, it appears that by the age of 2 years, there is little observable difference. This is most likely due to gut ecosystem maturation. The paper draws attention to the fact that changes to microbiota following treatment were more pronounced in infants who tested lower in occurrences of Bacteroides spp at age 4 months. Of note is the prevalence of cesarean birth deliveries in this cohort thereby indicating potential improved alternative feeding options when breastfeeding is not possible for these infants.
Clinical practice applications:
- Probiotic L.fermentum and prebiotic galacto-oligosaccharide enriched infant formula appears to the improve infant microbiome, when compared to that of breastfed infants.
- The most receptive infants were those born via cesarean section.
Limitations to consider:
- The sample groups were from France and Belgium, with no indication as to culture, socio-economic, or sex distribution.
- The two infant formula groups were n=230 each with only 80 infants in the breastfed reference group.
- There was no indication of maternal diet practices pre-, during, and post- pregnancy.
- Stool samples were not collected from the infants at baseline visit prior to formula intervention.
Considerations for future research:
- Future studies need to include more diverse cultural and socio-economic cohorts to ascertain the potential influence of parental diet in baseline infant microbiome.
- It is imperative to establish what role solid food choices, generally introduced at 6 months, might have on gut ecosystem maturation.
- It would be useful to have a larger cesarean section birth cohort to compare to vaginal deliveries for more definitive results.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Microbial colonization of the gastrointestinal tract after birth is an essential event that influences infant health with life-long consequences. Therefore, it is important to investigate strategies to positively modulate colonization in early life. OBJECTIVES This randomized, controlled intervention study included 540 infants to investigate the effects of a synbiotic intervention formula (IF) containing Limosilactobacillus fermentum CECT5716 and galacto-oligosaccharides on the fecal microbiome. METHODS The fecal microbiota from infants was analyzed by 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing at 4, 12, and 24 months of age. Metabolites (e.g., short-chain fatty acids) and other milieu parameters (e.g., pH, humidity, and IgA) were also measured in stool samples. RESULTS Microbiota profiles changed with age, with major differences in diversity and composition. Significant effects of the synbiotic IF compared with control formula (CF) were visible at month 4, including higher occurrence of Bifidobacterium spp. and Lactobacillaceae and lower occurrence of Blautia spp., as well as Ruminoccocus gnavus and relatives. This was accompanied by lower fecal pH and concentrations of butyrate. After de novo clustering at 4 months of age, overall phylogenetic profiles of the infants receiving IF were closer to reference profiles of those fed with human milk than infants fed CF. The changes owing to IF were associated with fecal microbiota states characterized by lower occurrence of Bacteroides compared with higher levels of Firmicutes (valid name Bacillota), Proteobacteria (valid name Pseudomonadota), and Bifidobacterium at 4 months of age. These microbiota states were linked to higher prevalence of infants born by Cesarean section. CONCLUSIONS The synbiotic intervention influenced fecal microbiota and milieu parameters at an early age depending on the overall microbiota profiles of the infants, sharing a few similarities with breastfed infants. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02221687.
2.
The Impact of Synbiotic Treatment on the Levels of Gut-Derived Uremic Toxins, Inflammation, and Gut Microbiome of Chronic Kidney Disease Patients-A Randomized Trial.
Mitrović, M, Stanković-Popović, V, Tolinački, M, Golić, N, Soković Bajić, S, Veljović, K, Nastasijević, B, Soldatović, I, Svorcan, P, Dimković, N
Journal of renal nutrition : the official journal of the Council on Renal Nutrition of the National Kidney Foundation. 2023;33(2):278-288
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The gut microbiome consists of more than 100 trillion bacteria and plays an important role in normal body functioning. There is increasing evidence that gut microbiome alteration can affect multiple organ systems and also lead to numerous chronic diseases, such as chronic kidney disease (CKD). The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of synbiotic treatment in reducing the levels of gut-derived uremic toxins and serum inflammatory markers and its impact on gut microbiome, with controlled factors such as diet and antibiotic usage. This study was a single-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. After a 2-week run-in period under prescribed diet, patients were randomised into 2 groups, one receiving synbiotic therapy and the other receiving placebo. Results showed that in comparison to placebo: - synbiotic treatment significantly altered levels of indoxyl sulfate [uremic toxin] and p-cresyl sulfate [uremic toxin] in the intervention arm, and - only the dynamic of total serum indoxyl sulfate was significant. Authors conclude that synbiotics are a safe and an effective therapeutic strategy that may help to decrease levels of uremic toxins and microinflammation in chronic kidney disease patients.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Altering dysbiotic gut flora through synbiotic supplementation has recently been recognized as a potential treatment strategy to reduce the levels of gut-derived uremic toxins and decrease inflammation. Assessing its efficacy and safety has been the main goal of our randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. METHODS A total of 34 nondialyzed chronic kidney disease patients, aged ≥18 years, with an estimated glomerular filtration rate between 15 and 45 mL/minute, were randomized either to an intervention group (n = 17), receiving synbiotic (Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus casei, and Bifidobacterium lactis, 32 billion colony forming units per day plus 3.2 g of inulin), or control group (n = 17), receiving placebo during 12 weeks. The impact of treatment on the dynamic of serum levels of gut-derived uremic toxins, total serum indoxyl sulfate, p-cresyl sulfate, and trimethylamine N-oxide, was defined as the primary outcome of the study. Secondary outcomes included changes in the stool microbiome, serum interleukin-6 levels, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, estimated glomerular filtration rate, albuminuria, diet, gastrointestinal symptom dynamics, and safety. Serum levels of uremic toxins were determined using ultraperformance liquid chromatography. The stool microbiome analysis was performed using the 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid gene sequencing approach. RESULTS Synbiotic treatment significantly modified gut microbiome with Bifidobacteria, Lactobacillus, and Subdoligranulum genera enrichment and consequently reduced serum level of indoxyl sulfate (ΔIS -21.5% vs. 5.3%, P < .001), improved estimated glomerular filtration rate (ΔeGFR 12% vs. 8%, P = .029), and decreased level of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (-39.5 vs. -8.5%, P < .001) in treated patients. Two patients of the intervention arm complained of increased flatulence. No other safety issues were noted. CONCLUSION Synbiotics could be available, safe, and an effective therapeutic strategy we could use in daily practice in order to decrease levels of uremic toxins and microinflammation in chronic kidney disease patients.
3.
Targeting the gut-lung axis by synbiotic feeding to infants in a randomized controlled trial.
Sjödin, KS, Sjödin, A, Ruszczyński, M, Kristensen, MB, Hernell, O, Szajewska, H, West, CE
BMC biology. 2023;21(1):38
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Infants are at increased risk of infections, and respiratory tract infections are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally. Although the respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts are separate, they share a mucosal immune system called the “gut-lung axis.” The aim of this study was to compare the impacts of feeding prebiotic infant formula with the same prebiotic infant formula supplemented with probiotic Lactobacillus F19 (synbiotics) until 6 months of age on infant gut microbiota development in the first year of life. This study was a multicentre, double-blind randomised controlled study. Infants were randomised to control group - prebiotic formula or experimental group - synbiotic formula. Results showed additional benefit of feeding specific synbiotics to formula-fed infants over prebiotics only. In fact, synbiotic feeding led to the underrepresentation of Klebsiella [bacteria], enrichment of bifidobacteria, and slight increases in microbial degradation metabolites. Authors concluded that their findings support future clinical evaluation of synbiotic formula in the prevention of infections and associated antibiotic treatment as a primary outcome when breastfeeding is not feasible.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Formula-fed infants are at increased risk of infections. Due to the cross-talk between the mucosal systems of the gastrointestinal and respiratory tracts, adding synbiotics (prebiotics and probiotics) to infant formula may prevent infections even at distant sites. Infants that were born full term and weaned from breast milk were randomized to prebiotic formula (fructo- and galactooligosaccharides) or the same prebiotic formula with Lactobacillus paracasei ssp. paracasei F19 (synbiotics) from 1 to 6 months of age. The objective was to examine the synbiotic effects on gut microbiota development. RESULTS Fecal samples collected at ages 1, 4, 6, and 12 months were analyzed using 16S rRNA gene sequencing and a combination of untargeted gas chromatography-mass spectrometry/liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. These analyses revealed that the synbiotic group had a lower abundance of Klebsiella, a higher abundance of Bifidobacterium breve compared to the prebiotic group, and increases in the anti-microbial metabolite d-3-phenyllactic acid. We also analyzed the fecal metagenome and antibiotic resistome in the 11 infants that had been diagnosed with lower respiratory tract infection (cases) and 11 matched controls using deep metagenomic sequencing. Cases with lower respiratory tract infection had a higher abundance of Klebsiella species and antimicrobial resistance genes related to Klebsiella pneumoniae, compared to controls. The results obtained using 16S rRNA gene amplicon and metagenomic sequencing were confirmed in silico by successful recovery of the metagenome-assembled genomes of the bacteria of interest. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates the additional benefit of feeding specific synbiotics to formula-fed infants over prebiotics only. Synbiotic feeding led to the underrepresentation of Klebsiella, enrichment of bifidobacteria, and increases in microbial degradation metabolites implicated in immune signaling and in the gut-lung and gut-skin axes. Our findings support future clinical evaluation of synbiotic formula in the prevention of infections and associated antibiotic treatment as a primary outcome when breastfeeding is not feasible. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01625273 . Retrospectively registered on 21 June 2012.
4.
Ameliorating effects of L-carnitine and synbiotic co-supplementation on anthropometric measures and cardiometabolic traits in women with obesity: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Fallah, F, Mahdavi, R
Frontiers in endocrinology. 2023;14:1237882
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Obesity is a multifactorial relapsing chronic disease attributed to the complicated interaction of behavioural, environmental, and genetic factors. Given the adverse effects of anti-obesity medications, there has been a great appeal in the consumption of weight loss supplements among individuals suffering from obesity seeking a “magic bullet,” which is less demanding than conventional weight management protocols. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of concomitant supplementation of L-carnitine and a multistrain/multispecies synbiotic compared with L-carnitine single therapy on the anthropometric and cardiometabolic indices in healthy women with obesity. This study was a double-blind, controlled, randomised clinical trial. Following a 2-week run-in period, the participants were randomly allocated to the “L-carnitine + synbiotic” or “L-carnitine + placebo” groups (1:1 ratio). Results showed that supplementation of multistrain/multispecies synbiotic (250 mg/day) concomitant with L-carnitine (2 × 500 mg/day) for 8 weeks led to greater amendments in anthropometric and glycaemic indices, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in healthy female individuals with obesity without any severe side effects. Authors concluded that co-administration of L-carnitine and synbiotic may be an encouraging therapeutic strategy for obesity and related cardiometabolic complications.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Obesity, a multifactorial disorder with pandemic dimensions, is conceded a major culprit of morbidity and mortality worldwide, necessitating efficient therapeutic strategies. Nutraceuticals and functional foods are considered promising adjuvant/complementary approaches for weight management in individuals with obesity who have low adherence to conventional treatments. Current literature supports the weight-reducing efficacy of pro/pre/synbiotics or L-carnitine; however, the superiority of the nutraceutical joint supplementation approach over common single therapies to counter obesity and accompanying comorbidities is well documented. This study was designed to assess the effects of L-carnitine single therapy compared with L-carnitine and multistrain/multispecies synbiotic co-supplementation on anthropometric and cardiometabolic indicators in women with obesity. METHODS The current placebo-controlled double-blind randomized clinical trial was performed on 46 women with obesity, randomly allocated to either concomitant supplementation [L-carnitine tartrate (2 × 500 mg/day) + multistrain/multispecies synbiotic (1 capsule/day)] or monotherapy [L-carnitine tartrate (2 × 500 mg/day) + maltodextrin (1 capsule/day)] groups for 8 weeks. Participants in both groups received healthy eating dietary advice. RESULTS Anthropometric, lipid, and glycemic indices significantly improved in both intervention groups; however, L-carnitine + synbiotic co-administration elicited a greater reduction in the anthropometric measures including body mass index (BMI), body weight, and neck, waist, and hip circumferences (p < 0.001, <0.001, <0.001, = 0.012, and =0.030, respectively) after adjusting for probable confounders. Moreover, L-carnitine + synbiotic joint supplementation resulted in a greater reduction in fasting blood sugar (FBS), insulin (though marginal), and homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and more increment in quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI; p = 0.014, 0.051, 0.024, and 0.019, respectively) compared with the L-carnitine + placebo monosupplementation. No significant intergroup changes were found for the lipid profile biomarkers, except for a greater increase in high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol concentrations (HDL-C) in the L-carnitine + synbiotic group (p = 0.009). CONCLUSION L-carnitine + synbiotic co-supplementation was more beneficial in ameliorating anthropometric indices as well as some cardiometabolic parameters compared with L-carnitine single therapy, suggesting that it is a promising adjuvant approach to ameliorate obesity or associated metabolic complications through potential synergistic or complementary mechanisms. Further longer duration clinical trials in a three-group design are demanded to verify the complementary or synergistic mechanisms. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION www.irct.ir, Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials IRCT20080904001197N13.