1.
Dietary macronutrients and the gut microbiome: a precision nutrition approach to improve cardiometabolic health.
Jardon, KM, Canfora, EE, Goossens, GH, Blaak, EE
Gut. 2022;71(6):1214-1226
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
The global rise in the prevalence of obesity is strongly associated with an increase in the incidence and prevalence of cardiometabolic diseases, including insulin resistance (IR) and type 2 diabetes mellitus. In recent years, advancements have been made in understanding the involvement of the gut microbiome in obesity and related cardiometabolic complications as regulator of host energy and substrate metabolism. This study is a review that discusses the latest research describing interactions between dietary composition, the gut microbiome and host metabolism. Results show that current evidence for developing optimal dietary interventions targeting bodyweight control and IR via the gut microbiota is still in its infancy and does not capture the complexity of the integration of a whole-diet approach, the microbial and the host’s metabolic phenotype. Furthermore, implementation of targeted, precision nutrition intervention strategies or dietary guidelines for individuals or subgroups in public health requires further insight in the mechanisms involved in (non-)response to dietary intervention. Authors conclude that future studies are needed and these should focus on assessing detailed individual phenotyping and gaining insight into the balance between carbohydrate and protein fermentation by the gut microbiota as well as the site of fermentation in the colon.
Abstract
Accumulating evidence indicates that the gut microbiome is an important regulator of body weight, glucose and lipid metabolism, and inflammatory processes, and may thereby play a key role in the aetiology of obesity, insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. Interindividual responsiveness to specific dietary interventions may be partially determined by differences in baseline gut microbiota composition and functionality between individuals with distinct metabolic phenotypes. However, the relationship between an individual's diet, gut microbiome and host metabolic phenotype is multidirectional and complex, yielding a challenge for practical implementation of targeted dietary guidelines. In this review, we discuss the latest research describing interactions between dietary composition, the gut microbiome and host metabolism. Furthermore, we describe how this knowledge can be integrated to develop precision-based nutritional strategies to improve bodyweight control and metabolic health in humans. Specifically, we will address that (1) insight in the role of the baseline gut microbial and metabolic phenotype in dietary intervention response may provide leads for precision-based nutritional strategies; that (2) the balance between carbohydrate and protein fermentation by the gut microbiota, as well as the site of fermentation in the colon, seems important determinants of host metabolism; and that (3) 'big data', including multiple omics and advanced modelling, are of undeniable importance in predicting (non-)response to dietary interventions. Clearly, detailed metabolic and microbial phenotyping in humans is necessary to better understand the link between diet, the gut microbiome and host metabolism, which is required to develop targeted dietary strategies and guidelines for different subgroups of the population.
2.
Efficacy and safety of dietary polyphenol supplementation in the treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Yang, K, Chen, J, Zhang, T, Yuan, X, Ge, A, Wang, S, Xu, H, Zeng, L, Ge, J
Frontiers in immunology. 2022;13:949746
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is characterised by fat accumulation in the liver that can result in liver damage. NAFLD affects approximately 25% of the global population. There is evidence that dietary polyphenols can improve metabolism and insulin resistance and reduce inflammation and oxidative stress, which are the mechanisms that lead to liver damage in NAFLD. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the effectiveness of dietary polyphenols in the treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Eight dietary polyphenols, such as curcumin, resveratrol, naringenin, anthocyanin, hesperidin, catechin, silymarin, and genistein, were evaluated for their efficacy and safety. The administration of 80-3,000 mg of Curcumin for an 8-12 week duration is effective and safe for reducing body mass index, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), triglycerides (TG), total cholesterol (TC), and insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). Compared with the placebo, Naringenin reduced the percentage of NAFLD grade, TG, TC, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Hesperidin may potentially decrease body mass index (BMI), AST, ALT, TG, TC, and HOMA-IR. Catechin is safe, and 500-1000 mg supplementation for 12 weeks may reduce BMI, HOMA-IR, and TG. NAFLD patients who received silymarin showed improvements in ALT and AST, as well as reductions in hepatic fat accumulation and liver stiffness. 94–2100 mg of Silymarin supplementation for 8–48 weeks may reduce liver enzyme levels. Researchers can use the results of this study to understand the clinical utility of different polyphenol supplements in the treatment of NAFLD. Because the current evidence is highly heterogeneous in nature and limited in scope, further robust research is required on various classes of polyphenols and their effectiveness in reducing the severity of NAFLD.
Abstract
Background: Dietary polyphenol treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a novel direction, and the existing clinical studies have little effective evidence for its therapeutic effect, and some studies have inconsistent results. The effectiveness of dietary polyphenols in the treatment of NAFLD is still controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of oral dietary polyphenols in patients with NAFLD. Methods: The literature (both Chinese and English) published before 30 April 2022 in PubMed, Cochrane, Medline, CNKI, and other databases on the treatment of NAFLD with dietary polyphenols was searched. Manual screening, quality assessment, and data extraction of search results were conducted strictly according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. RevMan 5.3 software was used to perform the meta-analysis. Results: The RCTs included in this study involved dietary supplementation with eight polyphenols (curcumin, resveratrol, naringenin, anthocyanin, hesperidin, catechin, silymarin, and genistein) and 2,173 participants. This systematic review and meta-analysis found that 1) curcumin may decrease body mass index (BMI), Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), Triglycerides (TG) total cholesterol (TC), and Homeostasis Model Assessment-Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) compared to placebo; and curcumin does not increase the occurrence of adverse events. 2) Although the meta-analysis results of all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) did not reveal significant positive changes, individual RCTs showed meaningful results. 3) Naringenin significantly decreased the percentage of NAFLD grade, TG, TC, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) but had no significant effect on AST and ALT, and it is a safe supplementation. 4) Only one team presents a protocol about anthocyanin (from Cornus mas L. fruit extract) in the treatment of NAFLD. 5) Hesperidin may decrease BMI, AST, ALT, TG, TC, HOMA-IR, and so on. 6) Catechin may decrease BMI, HOMA-IR, and TG level, and it was well tolerated by the patients. 7) Silymarin was effective in improving ALT and AST and reducing hepatic fat accumulation and liver stiffness in NAFLD patients. Conclusion: Based on current evidence, curcumin can reduce BMI, TG, TC, liver enzymes, and insulin resistance; catechin can reduce BMI, insulin resistance, and TG effectively; silymarin can reduce liver enzymes. For resveratrol, naringenin, anthocyanin, hesperidin, and catechin, more RCTs are needed to further evaluate their efficacy and safety.
3.
Green tea (Camellia sinensis) for the prevention of cancer.
Filippini, T, Malavolti, M, Borrelli, F, Izzo, AA, Fairweather-Tait, SJ, Horneber, M, Vinceti, M
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2020;3(3):CD005004
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Brewed tea is obtained from the infusion of leaves and buds of Camellia sinensis. The most consumed types of tea are green and black tea. Due to the high content of antioxidant compounds, a great deal of attention has been given to green tea regarding the possible prevention of chronic diseases and cancer, as well as possible beneficial effects on cardiovascular disease, insulin sensitivity and lipid profiles. The main aim of this review was to assess the association between green tea consumption and the risk of developing cancer in epidemiologic studies. This study is an update of a previously published Cochrane review based on studies in which participants consumed green tea orally, either as drinkable tea or as extracts. One hundred and forty-two epidemiological studies of experimental and nonexperimental design were included with a total of 1,100,000 participants. Findings yielded inconsistent results for the effect of green tea consumption on cancer risk, despite some indications of a beneficial effect of green tea on a few site-specific cancers. Authors conclude that the epidemiological evidence appears to be still inadequate to support a beneficial effect of green tea on cancer risk.
Abstract
BACKGROUND This review is an update of a previously published review in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2009, Issue 3).Tea is one of the most commonly consumed beverages worldwide. Teas from the plant Camellia sinensis can be grouped into green, black and oolong tea, and drinking habits vary cross-culturally. C sinensis contains polyphenols, one subgroup being catechins. Catechins are powerful antioxidants, and laboratory studies have suggested that these compounds may inhibit cancer cell proliferation. Some experimental and nonexperimental epidemiological studies have suggested that green tea may have cancer-preventative effects. OBJECTIVES To assess possible associations between green tea consumption and the risk of cancer incidence and mortality as primary outcomes, and safety data and quality of life as secondary outcomes. SEARCH METHODS We searched eligible studies up to January 2019 in CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and reference lists of previous reviews and included studies. SELECTION CRITERIA We included all epidemiological studies, experimental (i.e. randomised controlled trials (RCTs)) and nonexperimental (non-randomised studies, i.e. observational studies with both cohort and case-control design) that investigated the association of green tea consumption with cancer risk or quality of life, or both. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two or more review authors independently applied the study criteria, extracted data and assessed methodological quality of studies. We summarised the results according to diagnosis of cancer type. MAIN RESULTS In this review update, we included in total 142 completed studies (11 experimental and 131 nonexperimental) and two ongoing studies. This is an additional 10 experimental and 85 nonexperimental studies from those included in the previous version of the review. Eleven experimental studies allocated a total of 1795 participants to either green tea extract or placebo, all demonstrating an overall high methodological quality based on 'Risk of bias' assessment. For incident prostate cancer, the summary risk ratio (RR) in the green tea-supplemented participants was 0.50 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.18 to 1.36), based on three studies and involving 201 participants (low-certainty evidence). The summary RR for gynaecological cancer was 1.50 (95% CI 0.41 to 5.48; 2 studies, 1157 participants; low-certainty evidence). No evidence of effect of non-melanoma skin cancer emerged (summary RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.06 to 15.92; 1 study, 1075 participants; low-certainty evidence). In addition, adverse effects of green tea extract intake were reported, including gastrointestinal disorders, elevation of liver enzymes, and, more rarely, insomnia, raised blood pressure and skin/subcutaneous reactions. Consumption of green tea extracts induced a slight improvement in quality of life, compared with placebo, based on three experimental studies. In nonexperimental studies, we included over 1,100,000 participants from 46 cohort studies and 85 case-control studies, which were on average of intermediate to high methodological quality based on Newcastle-Ottawa Scale 'Risk of bias' assessment. When comparing the highest intake of green tea with the lowest, we found a lower overall cancer incidence (summary RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.07), based on three studies, involving 52,479 participants (low-certainty evidence). Conversely, we found no association between green tea consumption and cancer-related mortality (summary RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.07), based on eight studies and 504,366 participants (low-certainty evidence). For most of the site-specific cancers we observed a decreased RR in the highest category of green tea consumption compared with the lowest one. After stratifying the analysis according to study design, we found strongly conflicting results for some cancer sites: oesophageal, prostate and urinary tract cancer, and leukaemia showed an increased RR in cohort studies and a decreased RR or no difference in case-control studies. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Overall, findings from experimental and nonexperimental epidemiological studies yielded inconsistent results, thus providing limited evidence for the beneficial effect of green tea consumption on the overall risk of cancer or on specific cancer sites. Some evidence of a beneficial effect of green tea at some cancer sites emerged from the RCTs and from case-control studies, but their methodological limitations, such as the low number and size of the studies, and the inconsistencies with the results of cohort studies, limit the interpretability of the RR estimates. The studies also indicated the occurrence of several side effects associated with high intakes of green tea. In addition, the majority of included studies were carried out in Asian populations characterised by a high intake of green tea, thus limiting the generalisability of the findings to other populations. Well conducted and adequately powered RCTs would be needed to draw conclusions on the possible beneficial effects of green tea consumption on cancer risk.