1.
Effect of selenium on thyroid autoimmunity and regulatory T cells in patients with Hashimoto's thyroiditis: A prospective randomized-controlled trial.
Hu, Y, Feng, W, Chen, H, Shi, H, Jiang, L, Zheng, X, Liu, X, Zhang, W, Ge, Y, Liu, Y, et al
Clinical and translational science. 2021;14(4):1390-1402
-
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Hashimoto thyroiditis (HT) is the most common thyroid autoimmune disease. Multiple factors contribute to the development of the disease leading to immune system-mediated destruction of the thyroid gland. In the absence of specific therapeutic approaches that address the immunological activity, thyroid hormone replacement is the primary treatment. Selenium (Se) is an essential trace element for humans and the thyroid gland utilises high amounts of selenium for the production of enzymes and antioxidants. Supplementing Se has shown positive effects in HT, as demonstrated in some studies. Yet, there have been inconsistencies in the results and the understanding of the mechanisms involved are limited. The authors of this prospective, randomized controlled study tried to shed some light on the efficacy of Se supplementation and its mechanisms. 43 HT-patients on no thyroid medication, received 200mcg Se per day for 6 months. Various markers were assessed including antibodies, thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), antioxidant enzymes and T-helper immune cells that regulate immunological activity, which were compared to the HT-control group (n=47) and healthy individuals (n=36). The outcome of the intervention showed that Se supplementation can reduce thyroid antibodies, and TSH and can increase antioxidant enzymes in patients with HT and along with the findings the authors discussed some potential mechanisms at play. This study suggests that supplementary Se can benefit HT, particularly subclinical HT.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Selenium supplementation is reported to reduce TPOAb, TGAb, and TSH levels, as well as increase Se, GPx3, and SePP1 concentrations in patients with HT without the use of levothyroxine replacement.
- Practitioners could consider selenium supplementation in patients with HT who have serum selenium levels less than 120ug/L.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
A prospective randomised controlled trial was conducted to investigate the effect of selenium (Se) supplementation in patients with Hashimoto’s thyroiditis (HT). The study also explored the potential mechanisms of action of Selenium in thyroid autoimmunity.
One hundred and twenty-six subjects (90 with HT and 36 healthy individuals) were included in the study. The patients with HT were randomly assigned into two groups. The Se-treated group (n=43) received 200ug of selenium in a selenious yeast tablet (SYT) per day for 6 months. No treatment was given to the control group (n=47). At the endpoint, 126/126 subjects completed the study.
Primary clinical outcomes were:
- Antithyroid peroxidase antibodies (TPOAb) levels were significantly lower compared with the control group at 6 months (ΔTPOAb [IU/ml] = −28.4 [−103.9,0] vs. 0 [−18.1, 20.5], p = 0.001).
- There was a significant difference in antithyroglobulin antibodies TGAb titers between the Se-treated group and the control group at 6 months (ΔTGAb [IU/ml] = −48.8 [−139.7, −2.0] vs. 18.3 [−23.5, 77.4], p = 0.001.
- Compared with baseline, thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) presented slightly lower levels in the Se-treated group, whereas there was a statistical increase in the control group at 6 months (ΔTSH [mIU/L] = −0.16 [−2.1, 0.28] vs. 0.48 [−0.15, 1.47], p = 0.001).
Secondary clinical outcomes were:
- aTreg cells in the Se-treated group were significantly higher than the control group at 6 months (13.19 ± 3.5 vs. 11.49 ± 2.79, p = 0.012)
- There was a pronounced increase in glutathione peroxidase (GPx3) at 6 months of treatment in the Se-treated group compared with the control group (p=0.028).
- Furthermore, Selenoprotein P1 (SePP1) levels increased in the Se-treated group compared with the control group at 6 months (17.2 [9.8, 22.1] vs. 10.7 [8.9, 14.6], p = 0.007).
Clinical practice applications:
- There is no specific approach to suppress autoimmunity, thus thyroxine replacement has become the generally accepted therapy for patients with Hashimoto’s thyroiditis (HT) with hypothyroidism.
- The thyroid gland contains the highest concentration of selenium, which is incorporated into selenoproteins, such as glutathione peroxidase (GPx), selenoprotein P (SePP), thioredoxin reductase, and iodothyronine deiodinases. These selenoenzymes play important roles in thyroid hormone metabolism by acting as antioxidants and immunomodulators.
- Based on this study, practitioners could therefore consider using 200ug of selenium for six months as a supportive measure specifically in patients with serum selenium levels less than 120ug/L.
Considerations for future research:
- Although about 20 studies have investigated the treatment of selenium in HT further research is warranted to help explore the appropriate use of selenium.
- Furthermore, investigations are needed to establish if certain HT patients could benefit more from Se supplementation.
- Additionally, investigations are needed to understand the relationship between selenium and Treg cells and their impact on thyroid antibodies.
- This study was completed over six months, longer studies are required to investigate the effect of selenium supplementation over the clinical course of HT.
Abstract
Selenium (Se) is an essential trace element in human. Recent studies of Se supplementation on the effect of Hashimoto's thyroiditis (HT) have been reported, but the exact benefit is unclear as well as the underlying immunologic mechanism. We aimed to evaluate the clinical effect of Se supplement in patients with HT, and explore the potential mechanism against thyroid autoimmunity. A prospective, randomized-controlled study was performed in patients with HT assigned to two groups. Se-treated group (n = 43) received selenious yeast tablet (SYT) for 6 months, whereas no treatment in control group (n = 47). The primary outcome is the change of thyroid peroxidase antibody (TPOAb) or thyroglobulin antibody (TGAb). Second, thyroid function, urinary iodine, Se, Glutathione peroxidase3 (GPx3), and Selenoprotein P1 (SePP1) levels were measured during the SYT treatment. Meanwhile, regulatory T cells (Tregs) and their subsets activated Tregs (aTregs), resting Tregs, and secreting Tregs, as well as Helios and PD-1 expression on these cells were also detected. The results showed that SYT treatment significantly decreased TPOAb, TGAb, and thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) levels, accompanied with the increased Se, GPx3, and SePP1, compared with the control group. Subgroup analysis revealed that subclinical HT may benefit more from this treatment in the decrease of TSH levels by interaction test. Moreover, the percentage of aTregs, Helios/Tregs, and Helios/aTregs were significantly higher in the Se-treated group than control. In conclusion, Se supplementation may have a beneficial effect on thyroid autoantibodies and thyroid function by increasing the antioxidant activity and upregulating the activated Treg cells.
2.
Lifestyle changes for treating psoriasis.
Ko, SH, Chi, CC, Yeh, ML, Wang, SH, Tsai, YS, Hsu, MY
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2019;7:CD011972
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Psoriasis is an inflammatory skin disease that results in patches of dry, scaly skin that can be itchy or sore. This Cochrane Database Systematic Review aimed to review and assess the effects of lifestyle factors such as diet, smoking, obesity, alcohol consumption and exercise on the severity of psoriasis. The study authors examined the research evidence up to July 2018. 10 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with a total of 163 participants were included in the qualitative analysis, and 6 studies in the meta-analysis. Most of the studies included co-interventions such as medication or light therapy. The authors didn’t find any RCTs for smoking cessation or reduced alcohol consumption. Dietary interventions (low-calorie diets, based on the Ornish diet or South Beach diet) were likely to result in a 75% improvement in severity of psoriasis symptoms in obese people after 6 months. A combined low-calorie diet and exercise programme improved the severity of psoriasis compared to providing information on weight loss to improve psoriasis, although the difference wasn’t statistically significant. Participants generally adhered well to the lifestyle interventions assessed in the review. The authors concluded that the body of evidence regarding the effects of lifestyle changes for treating psoriasis is limited. More trials are needed on the effects of different dietary interventions such as vegetarian or ketogenic diets, different types of exercise programmes (e.g. yoga, walking, jogging) and whether other lifestyle changes such as reducing smoking and alcohol consumption, or stress management techniques are effective.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Psoriasis is an inflammatory skin disease that presents with itching, red, scaling plaques; its worsening has been associated with obesity, drinking, smoking, lack of sleep, and a sedentary lifestyle. Lifestyle changes may improve psoriasis. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of lifestyle changes for psoriasis, including weight reduction, alcohol abstinence, smoking cessation, dietary modification, exercise, and other lifestyle change interventions. SEARCH METHODS We searched the following databases up to July 2018: the Cochrane Skin Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and LILACS. We also searched the China National Knowledge Infrastructure, the Airiti Library, and five trials registers up to July 2018. We checked the references of included trials for further relevant trials, and we asked the authors of the included trials if they were aware of any relevant unpublished data. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of lifestyle changes (either alone or in combination) for treating psoriasis in people diagnosed by a healthcare professional. Treatment had to be given for at least 12 weeks. Eligible comparisons were no lifestyle changes or another active intervention. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. The primary outcome measures were 'Severity of psoriasis' and 'Adherence to the intervention'. Secondary outcomes were 'Quality of life', 'Time to relapse', and 'Reduction in comorbidities'. We used GRADE to assess the quality of the evidence for each outcome. MAIN RESULTS We included 10 RCTs with 1163 participants (mean age: 43 to 61 years; 656 men and 478 women were reported). Six trials examined the effects of dietary intervention (low-calorie diet) in 499 obese participants (mean age: 44.3 to 61 years; where reported, 395 had moderate-to-severe psoriasis). One trial assessed a combined dietary intervention and exercise programme in 303 obese participants with moderate-to-severe psoriasis who had started a systemic therapy for psoriasis and had not achieved clearance after four weeks of continuous treatment (median age: 53 years). Another trial assessed a walking exercise and continuous health education in 200 participants (mean age: 43.1 years, severity not reported). Finally, two trials included education programmes promoting a healthy lifestyle in 161 participants (aged 18 to 78 years), with one trial on mild psoriasis and the other trial not reporting severity.Comparisons included information only; no intervention; medical therapy alone; and usual care (such as continuing healthy eating).All trials were conducted in hospitals and treated participants for between 12 weeks and three years. One trial did not report the treatment period. Seven trials measured the outcomes at the end of treatment and there was no additional follow-up. In two trials, there was follow-up after the treatment ended. Five trials had a high risk of performance bias, and four trials had a high risk of attrition bias.We found no trials assessing interventions for alcohol abstinence or smoking cessation. No trials assessed time to relapse. Only two trials assessed adverse events; in one trial these were caused by the add-on therapy ciclosporin (given in both groups). The trial comparing two dietary interventions to a no-treatment group observed no adverse events.The results presented in this abstract are based on trials of obese participants.Outcomes for dietary interventions versus usual care were measured 24 weeks to six months from baseline. Compared to usual care, dietary intervention (strict caloric restriction) may lead to 75% or greater improvement from baseline in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75) (risk ratio (RR) 1.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07 to 2.58; 2 trials, 323 participants; low-quality evidence). Adherence to the intervention may be greater with the dietary intervention than usual care, but the 95% CI indicates that the dietary intervention might also make little or no difference (RR 1.26, 95% CI 0.76 to 2.09; 2 trials, 105 participants; low-quality evidence). Dietary intervention probably achieves a greater improvement in dermatology quality-of-life index (DLQI) score compared to usual care (MD -12.20, 95% CI -13.92 to -10.48; 1 trial, 36 participants; moderate-quality evidence), and probably reduces the BMI compared to usual care (MD -4.65, 95% CI -5.93 to -3.36; 2 trials, 78 participants; moderate-quality evidence).Outcomes for dietary interventions plus exercise programme were measured 16 weeks from baseline and are based on one trial (303 participants). Compared to information only (on reducing weight to improve psoriasis), combined dietary intervention and exercise programme (dietetic plan and physical activities) probably improves psoriasis severity, but the 95% CI indicates that the intervention might make little or no difference (PASI 75: RR 1.28, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.98). This combined intervention probably results in a greater reduction in BMI (median change -1.10 kg/m², P = 0.002), but there is probably no difference in adherence (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.01; 137/151 and 145/152 participants adhered in the treatment and control group, respectively). There were no data on quality of life. These outcomes are based on moderate-quality evidence. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Dietary intervention may reduce the severity of psoriasis (low-quality evidence) and probably improves quality of life and reduces BMI (moderate-quality evidence) in obese people when compared with usual care, while combined dietary intervention and exercise programme probably improves psoriasis severity and BMI when compared with information only (moderate-quality evidence). None of the trials measured quality of life.We did not detect a clear difference in treatment adherence between those in the combined dietary intervention and exercise programme group and those given information only (moderate-quality evidence). Adherence may be improved through dietary intervention compared with usual care (low-quality evidence). Participants generally adhered well to the lifestyle interventions assessed in the review.No trials assessed the time to relapse. Trial limitations included unblinded participants and high dropout rate.Future trials should reduce dropouts and include comprehensive outcome measures; they should examine whether dietary intervention with or without an exercise programme is effective in non-obese people with psoriasis, whether an additional exercise programme is more effective than dietary intervention alone, whether the time to relapse prolongs in people who receive dietary intervention with or without exercise programme, and whether smoking cessation and alcohol abstinence are effective in treating psoriasis.
3.
The effects of two vitamin D regimens on ulcerative colitis activity index, quality of life and oxidant/anti-oxidant status.
Karimi, S, Tabataba-Vakili, S, Yari, Z, Alborzi, F, Hedayati, M, Ebrahimi-Daryani, N, Hekmatdoost, A
Nutrition journal. 2019;18(1):16
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a type of Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which involves the immune system attacking healthy bowel tissue. Vitamin D has an effect on the immune response, possibly by reducing inflammation, promoting immune system tolerance and improving the health of the bowel lining. Several studies have found a link between vitamin D deficiency and IBD, but the optimum dosage for vitamin D supplementation is not yet known. The aim of this study was to look at the effects of two dosages of vitamin D supplementation on serum vitamin D, total antioxidant capacity (TAC), total oxidant status (TOS), quality of life, and disease activity index in patients with UC. In this double blind randomised clinical trial, 50 patients with mild to moderate UC received either 1,000 (‘low dose’) or 2,000 (‘high dose’) IU/day of vitamin D for 12 weeks. At the end of study, serum 25-OHD levels had significantly increased in the high dose group and the increase was significantly more (6.7 ± 3.8 ng/mL) than the low dose (0.2 ± 0.5 ng/mL) group. Serum TOS concentration decreased significantly (- 0.37 ± 0.26) only in the high dose group. There was no significant change in serum TAC between two groups during the study. The quality of life score significantly improved in the high dose group compared to the low dose group and disease activity index score reduce in both groups but was significant only in the high dose group. The authors concluded that 2,000 IU a day of vitamin D can increase serum 25-OHD concentration and quality of life, and reduce disease activity in UC patients with vitamin D deficiency. They recommend that all patients with UC should have their vitamin D status assessed because they may benefit from vitamin D therapy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimum dosage for vitamin D supplementation has not yet been elucidated in patients with Ulcerative colitis (UC). The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of two vitamin D regimens in UC patients with vitamin D deficiency. METHODS In this double blind randomized clinical trial, 50 patients with mild to moderate UC, who met inclusion criteria, received either 1000 or 2000 IU/day of vitamin D (as low dose or high dose group, respectively) for 12 weeks. Serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D (25-OHD) level, total antioxidant capacity (TAC), and Total Oxidant Status (TOS), the inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire - 9 (IBDQ-9) score and the Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index Questionnaire (SCCAI) score were assessed before and after intervention. RESULTS At the end of study, serum 25-OHD levels significantly increased in the high dose group (P < 0.001) and the increase was significantly more than low dose group (6.7 ± 3.8 ng/mL in the high dose group versus 0.2 ± 0.5 ng/mL in the low dose group) (P < 0.001). Serum TOS concentration decreased significantly (- 0.37 ± 0.26) only in the high dose group (P value = 0.023). There was no statistically significant change in serum TAC between two groups during the study. IBDQ-9 mean score significantly increased in high dose group compared to the low dose group (P value = 0.001) and SCCAI score in both groups reduced (- 2.58 ± 2.16 and - 0.9 ± 0.3 in high dose and low dose respectively), while this reduction was significant only in the high dose group (P value ≥0.001). CONCLUSION Our results indicate that 2000 IU daily dose of vitamin D can increase serum 25-OHD concentration, and quality of life, while it reduces disease activity in UC patients with vitamin D deficiency. We recommend assessment of the vitamin D status in all patients with UC because they may benefit from vitamin D therapy.
4.
Nutritional strategies for psoriasis: current scientific evidence in clinical trials.
Zuccotti, E, Oliveri, M, Girometta, C, Ratto, D, Di Iorio, C, Occhinegro, A, Rossi, P
European review for medical and pharmacological sciences. 2018;22(23):8537-8551
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Psoriasis is an inflammatory skin disease that results in patches of dry, scaly skin that can be itchy or sore. This review looked at the evidence for a variety of nutritional and herbal strategies for reducing the risk and severity of psoriasis. Obesity is associated with both an increased risk of psoriasis, and increased severity of the disease, with obese patients being twice as likely to suffer from psoriasis as people of normal weight. Abdominal obesity in particular is associated with chronic low-grade inflammation that contributes to immune dysregulation. In obese patients, weight reduction via a low-calorie diet has been shown to reduce the severity of psoriasis. A Mediterranean-style diet, rich in extra virgin olive oil, fish, fruit vegetables, legumes, nuts and seeds is associated with a lower incidence of psoriasis. In contrast, a diet high in simple carbohydrates, high in arachidonic acid, and a low omega 3: omega 6 ratio is likely to drive inflammation, worsening severity of the disease. The microbiota plays a role in the development of psoriasis, with disruption of the gut and skin microbiomes both associated with psoriasis. In particular, psoriasis patients have a reduced abundance of Akkermansia muciniphilia in their gut. Several Lactobacillus strains have demonstrated potential for therapeutic effects in psoriasis patients when taken as a supplement. Common nutritional supplements used by psoriasis patients are fish oil, selenium, and zinc. In a review of the efficacy of fish oil supplementation, 12 of 15 trials showed a benefit. The evidence for zinc supplementation is less robust. There is limited data on the effectiveness of selenium supplementation, however low serum selenium levels are associated with increased psoriasis severity. Vitamin D levels are lower in psoriasis patients and correlate with disease severity. In individuals who are deficient, supplementing with vitamin D may prevent psoriasis-related comorbidities. Amongst the herbal and botanical remedies studied, neem, turmeric, Tripterygium wilfordii (Thunder God Vine), and the carotenoid-rich alga Dunaliella bardawil may reduce the severity of psoriasis. The review authors concluded that an integrated multidisciplinary approach should be considered for the management of psoriasis patients. Education to modify lifestyle and environmental risk factors is important. A collaboration between nutritionists and medical specialists with a holistic approach may be useful for psoriasis patients.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Several nutritional strategies for the management of psoriasis are promising. Even if recent data support that nutrition may play a pivotal role in prevention and co-treatment and despite patient's concerns regarding the best nutritional habits, the consensus regarding the nutritional strategies to be adopted lacks in clinical settings. In this manuscript, the effects of several nutritional strategies for psoriasis patients such as hypocaloric diet, vitamin D, fish oil, selenium, and zinc supplementation were systematically reviewed. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on beneficial botanical oral supplements were also included in the analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS For each topic, a search was conducted in MEDLINE electronic databases for articles published in English between January 1, 1990 and September 2018. Two independent reviewers assessed and extracted the data. Only controlled clinical trials were selected. RESULTS The evidence regarding the current nutritional strategies for psoriasis patients were summarized and translated into a global, comprehensible recommendation. CONCLUSIONS Weight loss combined with a healthy lifestyle was shown to be very beneficial for patients with moderate to severe disease with a significant reduction of the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score. Currently, oral vitamin D supplementation for prevention or treatment of psoriasis in adults with normal vitamin D levels is not recommended; however, psoriasis patients with a deficit in plasma vitamin D levels are advised to complement with oral supplements to prevent psoriasis-related comorbidities. Instead of zinc, selenium, and omega 3 supplements have been proven beneficial for psoriasis patients. Among botanical species, Dunaliella bardawil (D. bardawil), Tripterygium wilfordii (T. wilfordii), Azadirachta indica (A. indica), Curcuma longa (C. longa), and HESA-A are the most beneficial. In conclusion, a close cooperation between nutritionists and dermatologists may be useful for the management of psoriasis.