1.
Comparison of non-vertebral fracture between minodronate and risedronate therapy in elderly female patients with Alzheimer disease.
Sato, Y, Honda, Y, Iwamoto, J, Amano, N
Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions. 2013;(3):346-52
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Minodronate is a nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate that is commercially available for the treatment of osteoporosis in Japan. Preclinical studies demonstrated that minodronate is at least 10 times more potent than alendronate in inhibiting bone resorption in vivo. A high incidence of fractures, particularly of the hip, represents an important problem in Alzheimer disease (AD) patients who are prone to falls and may have osteoporosis. METHODS A total of 256 elderly patients with AD were assigned to daily treatment with 1.0 mg of minodronate or a daily treatment with risedronate combined with daily 1000 IU ergocalciferol and 1200 mg elemental calcium, and followed up for 12 months. RESULTS At baseline, patients of both groups showed low 25-hydroxyvitamin D with compensatory hyperparathyroidism. Non-vertebral fractures occurred in 5 patients in the minodronate group and 7 patients in the risedronate group (5 hip fractures; one fracture each at the distal forearm and pelvis). There was no difference in risk of hip fracture between the two groups (p=.70; odds ratio=0.8). CONCLUSIONS The study medications were well tolerated with relatively few adverse events and were equivalent in reducing the risk of a fracture in elderly patients with AD.
2.
Comparison of the effects of alendronate and alfacalcidol on hip bone mineral density and bone turnover in Japanese men having osteoporosis or osteopenia with clinical risk factors for fractures.
Iwamoto, J, Sato, Y, Uzawa, M, Takeda, T, Matsumoto, H
Yonsei medical journal. 2009;(4):474-81
Abstract
PURPOSE The comparative effects of alendronate and alfacalcidol on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover have already been established in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. An open-labeled prospective study was conducted to compare the treatment effects of alendronate and alfacalcidol on hip BMD and bone turnover in Japanese men with osteoporosis or osteopenia with clinical risk factors for fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS One hundred twelve men with osteoporosis or osteopenia with clinical risk factors for fractures (mean age: 71.4 years) were randomly divided into two groups of 56 patients each: the alendronate (5 mg daily) and alfacalcidol (1 microg daily) groups. The BMD of the total hip, urinary level of cross-linked N-terminal telopeptides of type I collagen (NTX), and serum levels of bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP) were measured during the 12-month-treatment period. RESULTS Forty-five patients in the alendronate group and 42 patients in the alfacalcidol group completed the trial. Alendronate increased BMD (+2.3% at 12 months) following reductions in the urinary level of NTX (-46.4% at 3 months) and serum level of BSAP (-34.1% at 12 months), while alfacalcidol sustained BMD (-1.9% at 12 months) as well as the urinary level of NTX (+13.2% at 3 months) and serum level of BSAP (+1.8% at 12 months). CONCLUSION The present study confirmed that alendronate has better efficacy than alfacalcidol (active control) in increasing hip BMD and reducing bone turnover in Japanese men with osteoporosis or osteopenia with clinical risk factors for fractures.