-
1.
Aortic valvular stenosis: Novel therapeutic strategies.
Natorska, J, Kopytek, M, Undas, A
European journal of clinical investigation. 2021;(7):e13527
Abstract
BACKGROUND Aortic stenosis (AS) prevalence is estimated to reach 4.5 million cases worldwide by the year 2030. AS is a progressive disease without a pharmacological treatment. In the current review, we aimed to investigate novel therapeutic approaches for non-surgical AS treatment, at least in patients with mild-to-moderate AS. MATERIALS AND METHODS The most recent and relevant papers concerned with novel molecular pathways that have potential as therapeutic targets in AS were selected from searches of PubMed and Web of Science up to February 2021. RESULTS Growing evidence indicates that therapies using proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors, simvastatin/ezetimibe combination, cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitors or antisense oligonucleotides targeting apolipoprotein(a) reduce the risk of AS progression. It has been shown that enhanced valvular lipid oxidation may drive AS development by leading to the activation of valvular interstitial cells (VICs), the most abundant valvular cells having a major contribution to valve calcification. Since VICs are able to release pro-inflammatory cytokines, clotting factors and proteins involved in calcification, strategies targeting these cell activations seem promising as therapeutic interventions. Recently, non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have been shown to inhibit activation of VICs. CONCLUSION Several novel molecular pathways of AS development have been identified over the past few years. Therapies using PCSK9 inhibitors, simvastatin/ezetimibe combination, lipoprotein(a)-lowering therapy are highly promising candidates as therapeutics in the prevention of mild AS progression, while preclinical studies show that NOACs may inhibit valvular inflammation and coagulation activation and slower the rate of AS progression.
-
2.
Is Anacetrapib Better Than Its CETP Inhibitor Counterparts?
Grabie, M, Tai, CH, Frishman, WH
Cardiology in review. 2019;(5):242-248
Abstract
Cholesterol metabolism and transport has been a major focus in cardiovascular disease risk modification over the past several decades. Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) have been the most commonly used agents, with the greatest benefit in reducing both the primary and secondary risks of cardiovascular disease. However, heart disease remains the leading cause of death in both men and women in the United States. Further investigation and intervention are required to further reduce the risk for cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular-related deaths. This review will focus on high-density lipoprotein metabolism and transport, looking particularly at cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitors. While studies of the other CETP inhibitors in its class have not shown a significant improvement in the prevention of primary or secondary cardiovascular risk, anacetrapib, the fourth and latest of the CETP inhibitors to be investigated, may be more promising.
-
3.
Plasma lipid transfer proteins: The role of PLTP and CETP in atherogenesis.
Chowaniec, Z, Skoczyńska, A
Advances in clinical and experimental medicine : official organ Wroclaw Medical University. 2018;(3):429-436
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases are still the main cause of death in Poland and throughout the world. Independent risk factors of cardiovascular disease, in addition to elevated LDL cholesterol, are both low HDL levels and high levels of non-HDL cholesterol. Plasma phospholipid-transfer protein (PLTP) and cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) both play a major role in the metabolism of those lipoproteins. A lack of these proteins increases HDL and lowers LDL levels. In the light of current knowledge, it seems reasonable to search for compounds that may decrease the activity of CETP, and thus reduce the incidence of cardiovascular disease. Whereas on the one hand there are reports about the adverse effect of torcetrapib and the lack of therapeutic effects of dalcetrapib, on the other hand the question arises whether the CETP inhibitors that are currently in clinical trials will rise to the challenges before them. Currently, it is known that the activity of PLTP, while affecting the metabolism of lipoproteins, especially HDL, plays a major role in atherogenesis. Still, there are some contradictions and controversies about the effect of PLTP on reverse cholesterol transport (RCT). There are a number of studies about the role that PLTP plays in the pathogenesis of various diseases. Further studies are needed to clearly determine the impact of PLTP activity on the formation and development of pathological processes in the cardiovascular system.
-
4.
CETP inhibition, statins and diabetes.
Barter, PJ, Cochran, BJ, Rye, KA
Atherosclerosis. 2018;:143-146
Abstract
Type 2 diabetes is a causal risk factor for the development of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). While treatment with a statin reduces the risk of having an ASCVD event in all people, including those with type-2 diabetes, statin treatment also increases the likelihood of new onset diabetes when given to those with risk factors for developing diabetes. Treatment with the cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitor, anacetrapib, reduces the risk of having a coronary event over and above that achieved with a statin. However, unlike statins, anacetrapib decreases the risk of developing diabetes. If the reduced risk of new-onset diabetes is confirmed in another CETP inhibitor outcome trial, there will be a case for considering the use of the combination of a statin plus a CETP inhibitor in high ASCVD-risk people who are also at increased risk of developing diabetes.
-
5.
Evacetrapib: Another CETP Inhibitor for Dyslipidemia With No Clinical Benefit.
Eyvazian, VA, Frishman, WH
Cardiology in review. 2017;(2):43-52
Abstract
Evacetrapib is a cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitor that has been recently studied as a cholesterol modifying agent to reduce cardiovascular risk and mortality in high risk cardiovascular disease patients. Evacetrapib acts to decrease lipid exchange through CETP inhibition. CETP acts to transfer cholesteryl esters from high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL-C). HDL-C is involved in reverse cholesterol transport and its blood levels have been shown to be inversely correlated with cardiovascular risk. Thus, a pharmacologic agent that can elevate HDL-C has been seen as an exciting area of research. In recent studies, evacetrapib was shown to be safe and efficacious. It produced an increase in HDL-C up to 128% and a 35% decrease in LDL-C, in comparison to placebo. In addition, evacetrapib was also shown to be more potent than previous CETP inhibitors. HDL-C particles treated with evacetrapib remained functional and had improved cholesterol efflux. A previously studied CETP inhibitor, torcetrapib, exhibited side effects of hyperaldosteronism, manifesting in electrolyte disturbances, and hypertension. These detrimental effects were not seen with evacetrapib. Recently, the results of evacetrapib's phase III ACCELERATE trial showed no significant reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events or mortality, and the drug will not be marketed. Although beneficial cholesterol effects were seen with this drug, more needs to be known to understand what role, if any, evacetrapib has in the reduction of cardiovascular risk.
-
6.
Cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitors: challenges and perspectives.
Filippatos, TD, Klouras, E, Barkas, F, Elisaf, M
Expert review of cardiovascular therapy. 2016;(8):953-62
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitors substantially increase the concentration of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), which may have a possible beneficial effect for cardiovascular disease risk reduction. AREAS COVERED Current data regarding the effects of CETP inhibitors on cardiovascular disease risk and possible mechanisms for their effects and safety are presented in this review. Expert commentary: The first CETP inhibitor, torcetrapib, was discontinued because of increased off-target adverse effects (increased serum aldosterone and blood pressure levels). The development program of dalcetrapib and evacetrapib, which were not associated with increased blood pressure, was terminated due to futility (insufficient efficacy) concerning cardiovascular outcomes. Although the failure of torcetrapib has been attributed to specific off-target effects, there are some common characteristics between CETP inhibitors pointing to the possibility that certain adverse effects may be class-specific. The newer CETP inhibitors anacetrapib and TA-8995 have promising effects on lipid profile and metabolism (increase of HDL-C and reduction of both low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and lipoprotein (a) levels), but their cardiovascular effects and safety profile have not yet been confirmed in large outcome trials.
-
7.
Clinical benefit from pharmacological elevation of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol: meta-regression analysis.
Hourcade-Potelleret, F, Laporte, S, Lehnert, V, Delmar, P, Benghozi, R, Torriani, U, Koch, R, Mismetti, P
Heart (British Cardiac Society). 2015;(11):847-53
Abstract
CONTEXT Epidemiological evidence that the risk of coronary heart disease is inversely associated with the level of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) has motivated several phase III programmes with cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitors. OBJECTIVES To assess alternative methods to predict clinical response of CETP inhibitors. METHODS Meta-regression analysis on raising HDL-C drugs (statins, fibrates, niacin) in randomised controlled trials. RESULTS 51 trials in secondary prevention with a total of 167,311 patients for a follow-up >1 year where HDL-C was measured at baseline and during treatment. The meta-regression analysis showed no significant association between change in HDL-C (treatment vs comparator) and log risk ratio (RR) of clinical endpoint (non-fatal myocardial infarction or cardiac death). CETP inhibitors data are consistent with this finding (RR: 1.03; P5-P95: 0.99-1.21). A prespecified sensitivity analysis by drug class suggested that the strength of relationship might differ between pharmacological groups. A significant association for both statins (p<0.02, log RR=-0.169-0.0499*HDL-C change, R(2)=0.21) and niacin (p=0.02, log RR=1.07-0.185*HDL-C change, R(2)=0.61) but not fibrates (p=0.18, log RR=-0.367+0.077*HDL-C change, R(2)=0.40) was shown. However, the association was no longer detectable after adjustment for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol for statins or exclusion of open trials for niacin. CONCLUSIONS Meta-regression suggested that CETP inhibitors might not influence coronary risk. The relation between change in HDL-C level and clinical endpoint may be drug dependent, which limits the use of HDL-C as a surrogate marker of coronary events. Other markers of HDL function may be more relevant.
-
8.
Newer therapeutic strategies to alter high-density lipoprotein level and function.
Bosch, N, Frishman, WH
Cardiology in review. 2014;(1):17-24
Abstract
Measurements of low levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol have been identified as a risk factor for premature coronary artery disease, however, to date, current pharmacologic approaches for raising HDL have provided little benefit, if at all, in reducing cardiovascular outcomes. It has been shown that HDL can modify many aspects of plaque pathogenesis. Its most established role is in reverse cholesterol transportation, but HDL can also affect oxidation, inflammation, cellular adhesion, and vasodilatation. Considering these potential benefits of HDL, newer treatments have been developed to modify HDL activity, which include the use of oral cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitors, apolipoprotein (apo)A-I infusions, apoA-I mimetics, drugs to increase apoA-I synthesis, and agonists of the liver X receptor. These new therapies are reviewed in this article.
-
9.
Effect on cardiovascular risk of high density lipoprotein targeted drug treatments niacin, fibrates, and CETP inhibitors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials including 117,411 patients.
Keene, D, Price, C, Shun-Shin, MJ, Francis, DP
BMJ (Clinical research ed.). 2014;:g4379
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the effects on cardiovascular outcomes of drug interventions that increase high density lipoprotein levels. DESIGN Meta-analysis. STUDIES REVIEWED Therapeutic benefit of niacin, fibrates, and cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitors on cardiovascular events (all cause mortality, coronary heart disease mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and stroke). RESULTS 117,411 patients were randomised in a total of 39 trials. All interventions increased the levels of high density lipoprotein cholesterol. No significant effect was seen on all cause mortality for niacin (odds ratio 1.03, 95% confidence interval 0.92 to 1.15, P=0.59), fibrates (0.98, 0.89 to 1.08, P=0.66), or CETP inhibitors (1.16, 0.93 to 1.44, P=0.19); on coronary heart disease mortality for niacin (0.93, 0.76 to 1.12, P=0.44), fibrates (0.92, 0.81 to 1.04, P=0.19), or CETP inhibitors (1.00, 0.80 to 1.24, P=0.99); or on stroke outcomes for niacin (0.96, 0.75 to 1.22, P=0.72), fibrates (1.01, 0.90 to 1.13, P=0.84), or CETP inhibitors (1.14, 0.90 to 1.45, P=0.29). In studies with patients not receiving statins (before the statin era), niacin was associated with a significant reduction in non-fatal myocardial infarction (0.69, 0.56 to 0.85, P=0.0004). However, in studies where statins were already being taken, niacin showed no significant effect (0.96, 0.85 to 1.09, P=0.52). A significant difference was seen between these subgroups (P=0.007). A similar trend relating to non-fatal myocardial infarction was seen with fibrates: without statin treatment (0.78, 0.71 to 0.86, P<0.001) and with all or some patients taking statins (0.83, 0.69 to 1.01, P=0.07); P=0.58 for difference. CONCLUSIONS Neither niacin, fibrates, nor CETP inhibitors, three highly effective agents for increasing high density lipoprotein levels, reduced all cause mortality, coronary heart disease mortality, myocardial infarction, or stroke in patients treated with statins. Although observational studies might suggest a simplistic hypothesis for high density lipoprotein cholesterol, that increasing the levels pharmacologically would generally reduce cardiovascular events, in the current era of widespread use of statins in dyslipidaemia, substantial trials of these three agents do not support this concept.
-
10.
Meta-analysis of cholesteryl ester transfer protein TaqIB polymorphism and risk of myocardial infarction.
Cao, M, Zhou, ZW, Fang, BJ, Zhao, CG, Zhou, D
Medicine. 2014;(26):e160
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
A number of studies have been conducted to explore the association between the cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) TaqIB polymorphism and risk of myocardial infarction (MI); however, the results are inconsistent. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to clarify the issue based on all the data available.Eligible studies were retrieved by searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. We calculated the crude odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) to assess the association between the TaqIB polymorphism and risk of MI.We included 13 studies involving 8733 MI cases and 8573 controls in the meta-analysis. The pooled results from all included studies showed decreased MI risk in the analysis of the B2B2 versus B1B1 (OR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.68-0.91), dominant (OR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.77-0.99), and recessive genetic models (OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.78-0.91). The frequency of the B2B2 genotype in MI patients was lower (OR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.81-0.94). However, there was no significant association in the B1B2 versus B1B1 analysis (OR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.81-1.05) and no significant difference for the B1B1 genotype (OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.98-1.11) and B1B2 genotype (OR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.97-1.08). Cumulative analysis confirmed these results.Our results suggest that the B2B2 genotype of the CETP TaqIB polymorphism is a protective factor against the development of MI.