0
selected
-
1.
Cadmium exposure and risk of diabetes and prediabetes: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis.
Filippini, T, Wise, LA, Vinceti, M
Environment international. 2022;158:106920
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Cadmium is a toxic metal released in the environment after both natural and anthropogenic activities, particularly in contaminated and industrial areas devoted to smelting and refining of metals, and the manufacturing of batteries, coatings, or plastics. Exposure to cadmium may occur through occupational activities, smoking, food, and air pollution. The aim of this study was to provide updated literature on cadmium exposure and the risk of both type 2 diabetes and prediabetes, and to model the shape of these associations using a dose response approach. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of forty-two studies. Diabetes was investigated as an outcome in thirty-one studies, prediabetes in four studies, and both diabetes and prediabetes in seven studies. Results show that higher cadmium exposure was associated with increased risks of both diabetes and prediabetes. Diabetes risk increased linearly in studies using urinary cadmium concentrations, while disease risk increased only at the highest exposure levels when assessed using blood concentrations. The analysis for prediabetes also showed a linear increase in risk from low exposure, with a flattening effect at higher urinary cadmium concentrations. Authors conclude that their findings add to the available evidence on potential adverse health effects of environmental exposure to cadmium.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Cadmium exposure through diet, occupational exposure and smoking may increase the risk of type 2 diabetes in affected individuals.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Background
Cadmium exposure might occur through occupational activities, food, air pollution, and smoking. Smokers, in particular, have higher blood cadmium concentrations than non-smokers. Food is the main transmission route for non-smokers, particularly cereals, vegetables, mollusks, and offal. Females and older adults are at a greater risk due to an increased risk of iron deficiency in these population groups, leading to increased absorption, as well as greater age-related bioaccumulation.
Furthermore, cadmium exposure has been associated with an increased risk of diabetes in a number of studies, as referenced in the present manuscript. However, the magnitude and shape of the correlation are uncertain.This systematic review and meta-analysis therefore investigates the relationship between exposure to cadmium and type 2 diabetes and prediabetes risk.
Methods
- The systematic review was conducted and reported in line with the PRISMA 2020 statement. Search strings related to the terms “cadmium” and “diabetes”, or “prediabetes state” in PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science and EMBASE databases were employed to search for relevant articles. Latest search date: 1 October 2021.
- Eligibility criteria included: studies evaluating cadmium exposure via biomarker levels with outcomes of interest being type 2 diabetes or prediabetes using WHO criteria and the American Diabetes Association; and reporting of relative risk estimates using the hazard ratio (HR), risk ratio (RR), or odds ratio (OR) with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CIs). For inclusion in dose-response meta-analysis: reported effect estimates for all exposure categories along with dose in each category.
- Studies were assessed for risk of bias using theROBINS-E tool. Overall certainty of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach.
- The meta-analysis involved estimating RRs with corresponding 95% CIs from each study. Generalised least-squares regression with a random effects model and restricted maximum likelihood estimation were used. The highest versus lowest exposure categories were compared. The association between exposure and risk of diabetes or prediabetes was investigated using a one-stage dose-response meta-analysis. Sensitivity analyses were performed and heterogeneity between studies was assessed..
Results
- 42 eligible studies (case-control, cross-sectional, and cohort studies), ranging 65-34, 814 male and female adult participants, were identified investigating the association between cadmium exposure and risk of diabetes or prediabetes. Seven of the included studies were at overall high risk of bias; heterogeneity in the resulting meta-analyses was moderate to substantial. Sensitivity analyses indicated comparable results. Assessment with GRADE found no major inconsistency, indirectness or imprecision for either outcome.
- Comparing the highest versus lowest cadmium exposure concentrations associated with type 2 diabetes resulted in a RR of 1.24 (95% CI 0.96–1.59), RR 1.21 (CI 95% 1.00–1.45), and RR 1.47 (CI 95% 1.01–2.13) for blood, urinary, and toenail matrices, respectively. Concurrently, there was an elevated risk of prediabetes for cadmium levels in urine of RR 1.41 (95% CI: 1.15–1.73) and blood RR 1.38 (95% CI: 1.16–1.63), respectively.
- In the dose-response meta-analysis, a linear positive correlation between increasing urinary cadmium levels and diabetes risk was observed, with a RR 1.25 (95% CI 0.90–1.72) at concentration 2.0 µg/g of creatinine compared with no exposure. Conversely, for blood cadmium concentrations, the diabetes risk seemed to rise above 1 µg/L compared with no exposure. Moreover, prediabetes risk increased up to approximately 2 µg/g creatinine beyond which a plateau was reached with RR 1.40 (95% CI 1.12–1.76) at 2 µg/g creatinine.
- The meta-regression showed a negligible correlation between blood cadmium levels and diabetes risk. However, a positive yet imprecise association was found with increasing urinary cadmium concentrations. Similarly, no association was observed between blood cadmium concentrations and risk of prediabetes, whereas a positive relationship with urinary cadmium levels was observed. However, these findings were based on a limited cohort of studies.
Conclusions
- A positive linear correlation between cadmium concentration (measured in multiple matrices) and risk of both type 2 diabetes and prediabetes with a dose-response relationship (moderate-certainty evidence) were observed in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes risk increased linearly in studies using urinary cadmium concentrations, whereas disease risk increased only at the highest exposure levels when assessed using blood levels. The analysis for prediabetes also demonstrated a linear increase in risk from low exposure, which plateaued at higher urinary cadmium concentrations.
Clinical practice applications:
- To inform practitioners and clients of the risks of cadmium exposure in the diet, through occupational exposure, and through smoking.
- To motivate practitioners to educate themselves and their clients regarding the foods which may pose a higher risk of cadmium exposure (not reviewed in the present article).
- To advise clients on prediabetes and type 2 diabetes risk from cadmium exposure through smoking.
Considerations for future research:
- As cited by the authors, future studies could incorporate stratified analysis in specific subgroups, e.g., non-smokers, or could be restricted to prospective cohort studies with more sufficient data,
- Large-scale observational studies could be conducted investigating cadmium exposure in smokers versus non-smokers.
- Clinical trials could be performed to evaluate the effect of reduction or cessation of tobacco smoking on total body cadmium concentrations .
- Continuous surveillance of dietary cadmium exposure and other heavy metals should be prioritised to inform public health.
- Dietary interventions could assess the possibility to attenuate the risk of cadmium exposure.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cadmium exposure has been associated with increased diabetes risk in several studies, though there is still considerable debate about the magnitude and shape of the association. OBJECTIVE To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies investigating the relation between cadmium exposure and risk of type 2 diabetes and prediabetes, and to summarize data on the magnitude and shape of the association. DATA SOURCE After conducting an online literature search through October 1, 2021, we identified 42 eligible studies investigating the association between cadmium exposure and risk of diabetes and prediabetes. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA We included studies that assessed cadmium exposure through biomarker levels; examined type 2 diabetes or prediabetes among outcomes; and reported effect estimates for cadmium exposure for meta-analysis only. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS Studies were evaluated using ROBINS-E risk of bias tool. We quantitively assessed the relation between exposure and study outcomes using one-stage dose-response meta-analysis with a random effects meta-analytical model. RESULTS In the meta-analysis, comparing highest-versus-lowest cadmium exposure levels, summary relative risks (RRs) for type 2 diabetes were 1.24 (95% confidence interval 0.96-1.59), 1.21 (1.00-1.45), and 1.47 (1.01-2.13) for blood, urinary, and toenail matrices, respectively. Similarly, there was an increased risk of prediabetes for cadmium concentrations in both urine (RR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.15-1.73) and blood (RR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.16-1.63). In the dose-response meta-analysis, we observed a consistent linear positive association between cadmium exposure and diabetes risk, with RRs of 1.25 (0.90-1.72) at 2.0 µg/g of creatinine. Conversely for blood cadmium, diabetes risk appeared to increase only above 1 µg/L. Prediabetes risk increased up to approximately 2 µg/g creatinine above which it reached a plateau with RR of 1.42 (1.12-1.76) at 2 µg/g creatinine. LIMITATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS This analysis provides moderate-certainty evidence for a positive association between cadmium exposure (measured in multiple matrices) and risk of both diabetes and prediabetes.
-
2.
Sociodemographic and lifestyle-related risk factors for identifying vulnerable groups for type 2 diabetes: a narrative review with emphasis on data from Europe.
Kyrou, I, Tsigos, C, Mavrogianni, C, Cardon, G, Van Stappen, V, Latomme, J, Kivelä, J, Wikström, K, Tsochev, K, Nanasi, A, et al
BMC endocrine disorders. 2020;20(Suppl 1):134
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) results from progressive loss of insulin secretion, which is typically combined with various degrees of insulin resistance. The aim of this study is to provide a comprehensive overview of key sociodemographic and lifestyle-related risk factors for identifying vulnerable groups for T2DM with emphasis on data from Europe. This study is a narrative review which includes 101 publications. Literature shows that prevention of T2DM should be a collaborative effort which mobilizes multiple partners/ stakeholders at a national and international (e.g. European) level. In addition, a holistic approach is becoming increasingly essential in order to put into effect multidimensional public health programs and integrated interventions for effective T2DM prevention which will take into account both traditional and socioeconomic/socioecological factors. Authors conclude that a multidimensional approach for the prevention of T2DM may have a broader impact against the current diabesity epidemic within and across countries in Europe.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) comprises the vast majority of all diabetes cases in adults, with alarmingly increasing prevalence over the past few decades worldwide. A particularly heavy healthcare burden of diabetes is noted in Europe, where 8.8% of the population aged 20-79 years is estimated to have diabetes according to the International Diabetes Federation. Multiple risk factors are implicated in the pathogenesis of T2DM with complex underlying interplay and intricate gene-environment interactions. Thus, intense research has been focused on studying the role of T2DM risk factors and on identifying vulnerable groups for T2DM in the general population which can then be targeted for prevention interventions. METHODS For this narrative review, we conducted a comprehensive search of the existing literature on T2DM risk factors, focusing on studies in adult cohorts from European countries which were published in English after January 2000. RESULTS Multiple lifestyle-related and sociodemographic factors were identified as related to high T2DM risk, including age, ethnicity, family history, low socioeconomic status, obesity, metabolic syndrome and each of its components, as well as certain unhealthy lifestyle behaviors. As Europe has an increasingly aging population, multiple migrant and ethnic minority groups and significant socioeconomic diversity both within and across different countries, this review focuses not only on modifiable T2DM risk factors, but also on the impact of pertinent demographic and socioeconomic factors. CONCLUSION In addition to other T2DM risk factors, low socioeconomic status can significantly increase the risk for prediabetes and T2DM, but is often overlooked. In multinational and multicultural regions such as Europe, a holistic approach, which will take into account both traditional and socioeconomic/socioecological factors, is becoming increasingly crucial in order to implement multidimensional public health programs and integrated community-based interventions for effective T2DM prevention.
-
3.
The Effect of Probiotic Yogurt on Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes or Obesity: A Meta-Analysis of Nine Randomized Controlled Trials.
Barengolts, E, Smith, ED, Reutrakul, S, Tonucci, L, Anothaisintawee, T
Nutrients. 2019;11(3)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The metabolic disorders type 2 diabetes and obesity are highly prevalent worldwide. There are multiple merging treatments for type 2 diabetes and obesity, but the management of both conditions remains challenging. The aim of the study was to review the effects of probiotics on glycaemic outcomes in type 2 diabetes or obesity. The study is a meta-analysis of RCTs that utilized probiotic yoghurt as a main intervention in participants with type 2 diabetes or obesity. Nine studies were included in the meta-analysis, seven of which were conducted in subjects with type 2 diabetes and the rest were conducted in subjects with obesity. Results indicate that probiotic yoghurt provides no significant improvement compared with the control in glycaemic markers. Authors conclude that their study did not demonstrate the benefits of consuming probiotic yoghurt compared with conventional yoghurt for improving glucose control in patients with type 2 diabetes or obesity.
Abstract
Probiotic yogurt is suggested as a nutritional approach in type 2 diabetes (T2D) and obesity. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effects of probiotic yogurt on glycemic outcomes in T2D or obesity. The databases used to search for RCTs included Medline and Scopus. The RCTs were eligible if outcomes included selected glycemic markers. In nine eligible trials, 237 and 235 subjects were in treatment (probiotic yogurt) and control (mostly conventional yogurt) groups, respectively. There was no significant difference for pooled unstandardized mean difference (USMD) hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) by probiotic yogurt compared with the control in T2D (USMD: -0.366; 95% CI: -0.755, 0.024, p = 0.066) and obesity (USMD: 0.116, 95% CI: -0.007, 0.238, p = 0.065). Similarly, there were no effects of probiotic yogurt on fasting blood glucose, fasting insulin, or insulin resistance (estimated by homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR)) in either T2D or obesity. In conclusion, the present meta-analysis has not demonstrated the benefits of consuming probiotic compared with conventional yogurt for improving glucose control in patients with diabetes or obesity. Larger trials are needed to verify the benefits of probiotic and/or conventional yogurt or other probiotic fermented milk (e.g., kefir) on glycemic markers in patients with diabetes and obesity.
-
4.
Dietary Flaxseed as a Strategy for Improving Human Health.
Parikh, M, Maddaford, TG, Austria, JA, Aliani, M, Netticadan, T, Pierce, GN
Nutrients. 2019;11(5)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Flaxseed is a rich source of the omega-3 fatty acid, alpha-linolenic acid, lignans and fibre. Four common forms of flaxseed include whole flaxseed, ground flaxseed, flaxseed oil, partially defatted flaxseed meal and flax “milk”. The aim of this review was to provide a broad summary of the highlights of the research that have supported the growth of flaxseed as a commodity with significance in the fields of health and medicine. Research shows that: - flaxseed supplementation reduced blood glucose in subjects with type 2 diabetes and lowered blood glucose in subjects with prediabetes. - flaxseeds are used extensively in animal studies to treat a variety of cancers namely breast cancer. - dietary flaxseed may also improve aspects of brain function during conditions of neural disease. - dietary flaxseed may also exhibit a protective effect against menopausal symptoms. - flaxseed supplementation in the diet may alter the bacterial flora in the intestines of animals. Authors conclude that supplementation of the diet with milled flaxseed has many healthy benefits to the body.
Abstract
Flaxseed is a rich source of the omega-3 fatty acid, alpha linolenic acid, the lignan secoisolariciresinol diglucoside and fiber. These compounds provide bioactivity of value to the health of animals and humans through their anti-inflammatory action, anti-oxidative capacity and lipid modulating properties. The characteristics of ingesting flaxseed or its bioactive components are discussed in this article. The benefits of administering flaxseed or the individual bioactive components on health and disease are also discussed in this review. Specifically, the current evidence on the benefits or limitations of dietary flaxseed in a variety of cardiovascular diseases, cancer, gastro-intestinal health and brain development and function, as well as hormonal status in menopausal women, are comprehensive topics for discussion.
-
5.
Olive Polyphenols and the Metabolic Syndrome.
Saibandith, B, Spencer, JPE, Rowland, IR, Commane, DM
Molecules (Basel, Switzerland). 2017;22(7)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Up to 25% of the world’s population has metabolic syndrome (MetS), characterised by a combination of high blood pressure, high blood sugar, obesity and abnormal levels of fats in the blood. People with MetS have an increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes and heart disease. The development of MetS is related to modifiable diet and lifestyle factors. This review presents evidence from previous studies investigating the relationship between consumption of olive products, and aspects of MetS, and discusses potential mechanisms linking olive consumption to improvements in markers of health. The authors found good evidence from previous human studies showing that the consumption of olives and olive oil lowers blood pressure in people diagnosed with high blood pressure. There is also good evidence that olives and olive oil can improve blood glucose levels in those with prediabetes and improve markers of lipid peroxidation. There is limited, but promising evidence for effects on dyslipidaemia and the inhibition of weight gain. Studies that used extra virgin olive oil (EVOO) used doses of up to 50g per day, well above the amount that is consumed habitually in most diets. Further evidence is needed to confirm the mechanisms and benefits of olive polyphenols, but the authors suggest that they may explain some of the metabolic benefits associated with a Mediterranean diet.
Abstract
Here, the effects of consuming polyphenol-rich olive products, including olive leaves, their crude extract, and extra virgin olive oil, on aspects of the metabolic syndrome are reviewed. We have sought to summarize the available scientific evidence from dietary intervention trials demonstrating a role for these phytochemicals in ameliorating aberrant glucose metabolism, high blood pressure and elevated blood lipids, and we discuss the potential mechanisms underpinning these observations. Searches for relevant literature published in English were conducted via PubMed and Science Direct. Based on published dietary intervention studies, there is convincing evidence to show that olive polyphenols, independently of olive lipids, reduce risk factors for metabolic syndrome, in particular by improving blood sugar and blood pressure control, and in reducing low density lipoprotein oxidation. There is more limited evidence to suggest that the consumption of olive polyphenols or related products can reduce body weight and visceral fat or impede weight gain, and similarly there are some limited data suggesting improved lipid profiles. There is some mechanistic data to support observations made in human volunteers, but further work is needed in this area. The consumption of olive polyphenols within the context of a healthy pattern of food intake may, in part, explain the reduced risk of metabolic disease associated with adherence to the Mediterranean diet.
-
6.
Dietary and Policy Priorities for Cardiovascular Disease, Diabetes, and Obesity: A Comprehensive Review.
Mozaffarian, D
Circulation. 2016;133(2):187-225
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Diet-related cardiometabolic conditions, such as heart disease and diabetes, pose a significant health and economic burden across the world. In recent years, scientific advances and research have generated enormous insights, yet there remain many controversies and unanswered questions. This extensive review summarizes recent evidence of key-dietary components and their impact on cardiometabolic health. Amongst the topics covered are dietary patterns, food quality and processing, genetics, personalized nutrition, supplements, functional foods and the existing knowledge on selected food groups such as carbohydrates, meat and fats alongside relevant vitamins, minerals and plant compounds. The author highlights how an oversimplified concept of nutrition from previous decades, has led to an array of conflicting advice and undermined the nuanced and complex impact that diet and nutrition can have on the body. Thus in light of the evidence, food-based interventions and dietary patterns are suggested as favourable, with less focus on dietary components in isolation. Throughout the paper, the need for adjunct support to facilitate sustainable health-promoting behaviour changes is recognized. Calling for additional measures to address behaviour change, health systems reforms, targeting socioeconomic inequalities, employing novel technologies, and adequate policymaking. This overview of recent evidence yields a comprehensive source of information, worthwhile reviewing when designing personalised diet plans in support of cardiometabolic health.
Abstract
Suboptimal nutrition is a leading cause of poor health. Nutrition and policy science have advanced rapidly, creating confusion yet also providing powerful opportunities to reduce the adverse health and economic impacts of poor diets. This review considers the history, new evidence, controversies, and corresponding lessons for modern dietary and policy priorities for cardiovascular diseases, obesity, and diabetes mellitus. Major identified themes include the importance of evaluating the full diversity of diet-related risk pathways, not only blood lipids or obesity; focusing on foods and overall diet patterns, rather than single isolated nutrients; recognizing the complex influences of different foods on long-term weight regulation, rather than simply counting calories; and characterizing and implementing evidence-based strategies, including policy approaches, for lifestyle change. Evidence-informed dietary priorities include increased fruits, nonstarchy vegetables, nuts, legumes, fish, vegetable oils, yogurt, and minimally processed whole grains; and fewer red meats, processed (eg, sodium-preserved) meats, and foods rich in refined grains, starch, added sugars, salt, and trans fat. More investigation is needed on the cardiometabolic effects of phenolics, dairy fat, probiotics, fermentation, coffee, tea, cocoa, eggs, specific vegetable and tropical oils, vitamin D, individual fatty acids, and diet-microbiome interactions. Little evidence to date supports the cardiometabolic relevance of other popular priorities: eg, local, organic, grass-fed, farmed/wild, or non-genetically modified. Evidence-based personalized nutrition appears to depend more on nongenetic characteristics (eg, physical activity, abdominal adiposity, gender, socioeconomic status, culture) than genetic factors. Food choices must be strongly supported by clinical behavior change efforts, health systems reforms, novel technologies, and robust policy strategies targeting economic incentives, schools and workplaces, neighborhood environments, and the food system. Scientific advances provide crucial new insights on optimal targets and best practices to reduce the burdens of diet-related cardiometabolic diseases.