1.
COVID-19-associated lung weakness (CALW): Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Redruello-Guerrero, P, Ruiz-Del-Pino, M, Jiménez-Gutiérrez, C, Jiménez-Gutiérrez, P, Carrascos-Cáliz, A, Romero-Linares, A, Láinez Ramos-Bossini, AJ, Rivera-Izquierdo, M, Cárdenas-Cruz, A
Medicina intensiva. 2023;47(10):583-593
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
During the Covid-19 pandemic there was an increase in the number of individuals experiencing a collapsed lung, otherwise known as a pneumothorax (PNX) or pneumomediastinum (PNMD). The reasons for increased PNX are unclear and this systematic review and meta-analysis of 12 studies including 4901 individuals with Covid-19 aimed to determine what may be responsible for this. The results showed that 1629 individuals experienced a PNX and 253 a PNMD, and death was higher amongst those who developed PNX and PNMD. There were strong associations between the occurrence of PNX and PNMD and death. It was concluded that PNX and PNMD significantly increased the risk of dying in individuals with Covid-19 and it was proposed that the term Covid-19-Associated Lung Weakness (CALW) should be applied to those who experience PNX of PNMD. There was some concern that the quality of the research used was very low and so this study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand that PNX and PNMD in Covid-19 patients should be closely monitored and managed.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess mortality and different clinical factors derived from the development of atraumatic pneumothorax (PNX) and/or pneumomediastinum (PNMD) in critically ill patients as a consequence of COVID-19-associated lung weakness (CALW). DESIGN Systematic review with meta-analysis. SETTING Intensive Care Unit (ICU). PARTICIPANTS Original research evaluating patients, with or without the need for protective invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), with a diagnosis of COVID-19, who developed atraumatic PNX or PNMD on admission or during hospital stay. INTERVENTIONS Data of interest were obtained from each article and analyzed and assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The risk of the variables of interest was assessed with data derived from studies including patients who developed atraumatic PNX or PNMD. MAIN VARIABLES OF INTEREST Mortality, mean ICU stay and mean PaO2/FiO2 at diagnosis. RESULTS Information was collected from 12 longitudinal studies. Data from a total of 4901 patients were included in the meta-analysis. A total of 1629 patients had an episode of atraumatic PNX and 253 patients had an episode of atraumatic PNMD. Despite the finding of significantly strong associations, the great heterogeneity between studies implies that the interpretation of results should be made with caution. CONCLUSIONS Mortality among COVID-19 patients was higher in those who developed atraumatic PNX and/or PNMD compared to those who did not. The mean PaO2/FiO2 index was lower in patients who developed atraumatic PNX and/or PNMD. We propose grouping these cases under the term COVID-19-associated lung weakness (CALW). OBJETIVO Evaluar la mortalidad y diversos factores clínicos derivados del desarrollo de neumotórax (NTX) y/o neumomediastino (NMD) atraumáticos en pacientes críticos como consecuencia de la debilidad pulmonar asociada a COVID-19 (DPAC). DISEÑO: Revisión sistemática con metaanálisis. ÁMBITO Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos (UCI). PARTICIPANTES Investigaciones originales en las que se evaluase a pacientes, con o sin necesidad de ventilación mecánica invasiva (VMI), con diagnóstico de COVID-19 que hubiesen desarrollado NTX o NMD atraumáticos al ingreso o durante su estancia hospitalaria. INTERVENCIONES Se obtuvieron los datos de interés de cada artículo que fueron analizados y evaluados por la Escala Newcastle-Ottawa. El riesgo de las variables de interés principales se evaluó por los datos derivados de los estudios que incluyeron a pacientes que desarrollaron NTX o NMD atraumáticos. VARIABLES DE INTERÉS PRINCIPALS Mortalidad, estancia media en la UCI y PaO2/FiO2 media en el momento diagnóstico. RESULTADOS Se recogieron datos de 12 estudios longitudinales. En el metaanálisis se incluyeron datos de un total de 4.901 pacientes, entre los cuales 1.629 presentaron un episodio de NTX y 253 de NMD atraumáticos. A pesar de encontrar asociaciones significativamente fuertes, la alta heterogeneidad entre los estudios hace que la interpretación de los resultados deba hacerse con cautela. CONCLUSIONES La mortalidad de los pacientes COVID-19 fue mayor en los que desarrollaron NTX y/o NMD atraumáticos con respecto a los que no lo hicieron. La media del índice PaO2/FiO2 fue menor en los pacientes que desarrollaron NTX y/o NMD atraumáticos. Proponemos agrupar bajo el término deDPAC estos casos.
2.
Effect of Chamomile on the Complications of Cancer: A Systematic Review.
Maleki, M, Mardani, A, Manouchehri, M, Ashghali Farahani, M, Vaismoradi, M, Glarcher, M
Integrative cancer therapies. 2023;22:15347354231164600
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Cancer and its treatments are associated with a wide range of complications such as mucositis, nausea/vomiting and dermatitis as well as implication for mental health, such as anxiety and depression, which can reduce quality of life (QOL) of patients. Chamomile is a commonly used medicinal herbal that is used in various forms orally and topically. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness of chamomile, in its various forms of administration, for complications of cancer (any type) and its treatments. 18 controlled intervention studies including 1099 patients were included in the review. Due to the heterogeneity of the studies a meta-analysis was not possible. Benefits were reported for locally applied forms of chamomile for prevention of mucositis (7 of 8 studies), topical application for prevention of dermatitis or phlebitis (4/5), aromatherapy massage for anxiety (2) and QOL (2), tea for depression but not anxiety (1). No effect was seen of syrup for QOL (1). No side effects were reported in the included studies. The authors conclude that chamomile is a safe method to help mitigate the suffering from cancer complications.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Oral use of chamomile infusion may be helpful for people receiving treatment for cancer.
- Studies of this intervention report no safety concerns.
Evidence Category:
-
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
X
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
This systematic review examined the use of chamomile in the support of people receiving treatment for cancer. Studies of a variety of chamomile preparations were considered.
Methods
- The authors retrieved 2240 studies from 5 on-line databases, from which 18 studies met the inclusion criteria for analysis.
- Fifteen of these studies were randomised control trials (RCT), three were non-randomised studies. German (Matricaria recutita) and Roman (Chamaemelum nobile) chamomile varieties were included. Studies using blends with other herbs were excluded.
- A narrative review was produced due to heterogeneous patient groups, preparations and trial protocols.
Results
- 1099 patients were included in the analysis, 57% female.
- Risk of bias assessment of 15 RCTs identified 2 RCTs with high risk of bias in blinding or in reporting outcome data.
- Studies in several cancer types were included, four in head and neck cancer (HNC), four in leukaemia, three in breast cancer, one in digestive system cancers, remaining in mixed cancer types.
- Eight studies reported the impact on oral mucositis of chamomile infusions used as mouthwash, or ice chips, or applied as an oral gel. Patients were receiving chemotherapy orstem cell transplantation, with interventions for up to 21 days after chemotherapy. Seven studies reported reduced severity and/or duration of mucositis and associated pain. One study of 14 days’ use after 5-fluorouracil treatment for colorectal cancer showed no impact on oral mucositis.
- One of three studies of psychological impact of cancer treatment used chamomile tea and reported no impact on anxiety but decreased depression. In comparison, two studies of weekly aromatherapy massage using chamomile oil reported reduced anxiety.
- One RCT in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia reported increased neutrophil count with 125mg chamomile in syrup versus placebo (p=0.019, 955 CI 15.076-171.324)
- One RCT in breast cancer randomised 45 women receiving usual antiemetics to additional chamomile capsules (500mg) or ginger (500mg) capsules, twice daily for 5 days before and after chemotherapy, or control group of no additional botanicals. Both botanical interventions reduced frequency of vomiting compared with the control group. Frequency of nausea was also reduced by ginger but not by chamomile.
- Five studies evaluated external treatments of chamomile on skin complications of radiotherapy. Reduction in radiation dermatitis in HNC patients with compresses soaked in chamomile infusion was reported.
- No side effects of using chamomile preparations were reported by the studies included in the systematic review.
Conclusion
Chamomile has been studied in a variety of preparations for people receiving treatment for cancer. Several RCTs reported significant amelioration of common side effects of cancer treatments, with reduced severity and/or duration of oral mucositis and associated pain.
Clinical practice applications:
- Chamomile infusion used in the mouth, as mouthwash or ice chips, may be useful for oral mucositis, a common side effect of cancer treatment
- Chamomile infusion may also be considered for mental wellbeing
- Several protocols for using chamomile preparations are described in the review and practitioners may refer to the individual studies cited
- This use of chamomile in the described applications appears to be safe
- (Reviewer’s note: allergy to ragwort would be a contraindication for use of chamomile preparations)
Considerations for future research:
- More detailed comparisons of chamomile preparations would be useful, for use in oral mucositis
- Topical applications may be studied further by researchers in aromatherapy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Despite significant advances in the diagnosis and treatment of cancer, many people across the world still suffer from this chronic disease and its complications. Chamomile as an herbal medicine has gained an increasing attention for relieving cancer complications. This study aimed to integrate and synthesize current international evidence regarding the effect of chamomile on cancer complications. METHODS A systematic review was undertaken. Five online databases including Web of Science, PubMed [including MEDLINE], Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Embase were searched and articles published from inception to January 2023 were retrieved. All clinical trials and similar interventional studies on human subjects examining the effects of chamomile on cancer complications were included in the review and research synthesis. Relevant data were extracted from eligible studies after quality appraisals using proper methodological tools. The review results were presented narratively given that meta-analysis was impossible. RESULTS A total of 2240 studies were retrieved during the search process, but 18 articles were selected. The total sample size was 1099 patients with cancer of which 622 participants were female. Fifteen studies used an RCT design. Various forms of chamomile were used such as mouthwash, topical material, tea, capsule, syrup and aromatherapy massage. Chamomile effectively reduced oral mucositis, skin complications, depression, and vomiting and also improved appetite and quality of life among cancer patients. CONCLUSION The use of chamomile as a non-pharmacologic and safe method can be helpful for mitigating cancer complications in patients with cancer. Therefore, it can be incorporated into routine care along with other therapeutic measures to reduce patients' suffering related to cancer. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER (PROSPERO): CRD42022307887.