1.
Effects of oral nutrition supplements in persons with dementia: A systematic review.
Tangvik, RJ, Bruvik, FK, Drageset, J, Kyte, K, Hunskår, I
Geriatric nursing (New York, N.Y.). 2021;42(1):117-123
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Dementia is a chronic condition characterised as a decline in cognitive functioning that leads to dependence in the performance of daily activities, including nutritional sufficiency. As the dis-ease progresses, eating and drinking may become more difficult. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of oral nutrition supplements (ONS) on nutritional intake and clinical outcomes in older persons with dementia. This study is a systemic review which included ten studies of which 9 where experimental studies (n=6 RCTs; n=3 non RCTs) based on patients with dementia who were undernourished. Results indicate that ONS improved daily intake of energy and protein, compliance was high, and more persons met the recommended nutrition intake. In fact, intervention with ONS improved nutritional status; however, no effects on cognitive or functional outcomes were reported. Authors conclude that there is the need for a more comprehensive intervention plan for people with cognitive impairments that addresses the individual nutritional challenges in order to systematically meet nutritional needs.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Persons with dementia are at risk of malnutrition, evidenced by low dietary intake, which has consequences for nutritional status, activity of daily living and disease progression. The effects of oral nutrition supplements (ONS) on nutritional intake, nutritional status, and cognitive and physical outcomes in older persons with dementia were evaluated. METHODS PubMed, Medline, Embase, CINAHL and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched in December 2017, and this was repeated in May 2019. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Analysis (PRISMA) checklist was used. Papers were considered if they presented experimental clinical trials using oral nutritional supplements to persons diagnosed with dementia, including Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment, and conducted in hospitals, nursing homes or homes. RESULTS We included ten articles reporting nine clinical trials. A total of 407 persons with dementia were included, of whom 228 used ONS for 7 to 180 days. Nutritional intake improved by 201 to 600 kcal/day. Energy intake from ordinary foods was not affected, thus ONS improved the persons daily intake of energy and protein. Body weight, muscle mass, and nutritional biomarkers in blood improved in the intervention groups compared with the control groups. No effects on cognition or physical outcomes were observed. CONCLUSION ONS increases the intake of energy and protein and improves nutritional status in persons with dementia; however, RCTs with longer intervention periods are needed to investigate the impact on cognitive and functional outcomes.
2.
Headache Associated with Coeliac Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Zis, P, Julian, T, Hadjivassiliou, M
Nutrients. 2018;10(10)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Coeliac disease (CD) is the best-recognised gluten-related disorder (GRD), and it is characterized by a small bowel enteropathy occurring in genetically susceptible individuals whilst exposed to the protein gliadin. The aim of this study was to systematically review the current literature in order to establish the relationship between headache and CD. This study is a systematic review of 40 articles, studying a total of 42,388 individuals with either headache or GRD. Results show that: - There is an increased prevalence of headache amongst patients with CD. - There is an increased prevalence of CD amongst patients with idiopathic headache. - Headaches associated with CD are mainly migraines. - Gluten-free diet is a very effective treatment for headaches associated with CD. Authors conclude that further studies on the prevalence of gluten sensitivity in patients with idiopathic headache are needed, including further research on the pathogenetic mechanisms.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this systematic review was to explore the relationship between coeliac disease (CD) and headache. The objectives were to establish the prevalence of each entity amongst the other, to explore the role of gluten free diet (GFD), and to describe the imaging findings in those affected by headaches associated with CD. METHODOLOGY A systematic computer-based literature search was conducted on the PubMed database. Information regarding study type, population size, the age group included, prevalence of CD amongst those with headache and vice versa, imaging results, the nature of headache, and response to GFD. RESULTS In total, 40 articles published between 1987 and 2017 qualified for inclusion in this review. The mean pooled prevalence of headache amongst those with CD was 26% (95% CI 19.5⁻33.9%) in adult populations and 18.3% (95% CI 10.4⁻30.2%) in paediatric populations. The headaches are most often migraine-like. In children with idiopathic headache, the prevalence of CD is 2.4% (95% CI 1.5⁻3.7%), whereas data for adult populations is presently unavailable. Brain imaging can be normal, although, cerebral calcifications on CT, white matter abnormalities on MRI and deranged regional cerebral blood flow on SPECT can be present. GFD appears to be an effective management for headache in the context of CD, leading to total resolution of headaches in up to 75% of patients. CONCLUSIONS There is an increased prevalence of CD amongst idiopathic headache and vice versa. Therefore, patients with headache of unknown origin should be screened for CD, as such patients may symptomatically benefit from a GFD.
3.
Vegetarian, vegan diets and multiple health outcomes: A systematic review with meta-analysis of observational studies.
Dinu, M, Abbate, R, Gensini, GF, Casini, A, Sofi, F
Critical reviews in food science and nutrition. 2017;57(17):3640-3649
-
-
-
Plain language summary
Vegetarian diet is experiencing a considerable popularity in the general population. The aim of this study was to obtain an estimate of the association between vegetarian, vegan diets, and multiple health outcomes, including risk factors for chronic diseases, risk of all-cause mortality, incidence and mortality from cardio-cerebrovascular diseases, total cancer and specific types of cancer. This study is a comprehensive systematic review with meta-analysis of all cross-sectional and cohort studies. A total of 108 articles were included in the meta-analysis with a total population of over 130,000 vegetarians and 15,000 vegans. Results indicate that: - vegetarians and vegans show significantly lower levels of the most relevant risk factor for chronic disease such as body mass index, lipid variables and fasting glucose, when compared to non-vegetarians and nonvegans. - a significant protection versus ischemic heart disease and cancer is present in vegetarian subjects, however this protection is not significant for overall mortality, cardio and cerebrovascular diseases. - vegan diet seems to be associated with a lower rate of cancer incidence (interpreted with caution due to the small sample size of the study). Authors conclude that their findings may be useful for helping to give correct information to subjects who want to adopt vegetarian or vegan dietary patterns.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Beneficial effects of vegetarian and vegan diets on health outcomes have been supposed in previous studies. OBJECTIVES Aim of this study was to clarify the association between vegetarian, vegan diets, risk factors for chronic diseases, risk of all-cause mortality, incidence, and mortality from cardio-cerebrovascular diseases, total cancer and specific type of cancer (colorectal, breast, prostate and lung), through meta-analysis. METHODS A comprehensive search of Medline, EMBASE, Scopus, The Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar was conducted. RESULTS Eighty-six cross-sectional and 10 cohort prospective studies were included. The overall analysis among cross-sectional studies reported significant reduced levels of body mass index, total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, and glucose levels in vegetarians and vegans versus omnivores. With regard to prospective cohort studies, the analysis showed a significant reduced risk of incidence and/or mortality from ischemic heart disease (RR 0.75; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.82) and incidence of total cancer (RR 0.92; 95% CI 0.87 to 0.98) but not of total cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, all-cause mortality and mortality from cancer. No significant association was evidenced when specific types of cancer were analyzed. The analysis conducted among vegans reported significant association with the risk of incidence from total cancer (RR 0.85; 95% CI, 0.75 to 0.95), despite obtained only in a limited number of studies. CONCLUSIONS This comprehensive meta-analysis reports a significant protective effect of a vegetarian diet versus the incidence and/or mortality from ischemic heart disease (-25%) and incidence from total cancer (-8%). Vegan diet conferred a significant reduced risk (-15%) of incidence from total cancer.