0
selected
-
1.
Effectiveness of wearable activity trackers to increase physical activity and improve health: a systematic review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Ferguson, T, Olds, T, Curtis, R, Blake, H, Crozier, AJ, Dankiw, K, Dumuid, D, Kasai, D, O'Connor, E, Virgara, R, et al
The Lancet. Digital health. 2022;4(8):e615-e626
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
A sedentary or physically inactive lifestyle significantly contributes to non-communicable diseases such as coronary heart disease, type 2 diabetes and stroke. Wearable activity trackers are low-cost solutions that encourage users to engage in physical activity. This umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses investigated the benefits of wearable activity trackers in improving physical activity levels and their beneficial effects on physiological and psychosocial outcomes. This umbrella review included thirty-nine systematic reviews, of which twenty-five systematic reviews included meta-analyses of the benefits of wearable trackers on physical activity levels. Results of this umbrella review suggest that wearable trackers increased physical activity levels, especially daily steps count and energy expenditure. The physiological outcomes included improvements in BMI, blood pressure, cholesterol, glycosylated haemoglobin, waist circumference, and body weight. There was also a slight improvement in the quality of life of the participants who used wearable activity trackers. Further robust studies are required to evaluate the effects of wearable trackers on the psychosocial outcomes in people with mental illness. However, healthcare professionals can use the results of this study to understand the impact of wearable trackers on physiological and psychosocial effects in a non-clinical population.
Abstract
Wearable activity trackers offer an appealing, low-cost tool to address physical inactivity. This systematic review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses (umbrella review) aimed to examine the effectiveness of activity trackers for improving physical activity and related physiological and psychosocial outcomes in clinical and non-clinical populations. Seven databases (Embase, MEDLINE, Ovid Emcare, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) were searched from database inception to April 8, 2021. Systematic reviews of primary studies using activity trackers as interventions and reporting physical activity, physiological, or psychosocial outcomes were eligible for inclusion. In total, 39 systematic reviews and meta-analyses were identified, reporting results from 163 992 participants spanning all age groups, from both healthy and clinical populations. Taken together, the meta-analyses suggested activity trackers improved physical activity (standardised mean difference [SMD] 0·3-0·6), body composition (SMD 0·7-2·0), and fitness (SMD 0·3), equating to approximately 1800 extra steps per day, 40 min per day more walking, and reductions of approximately 1 kg in bodyweight. Effects for other physiological (blood pressure, cholesterol, and glycosylated haemoglobin) and psychosocial (quality of life and pain) outcomes were typically small and often non-significant. Activity trackers appear to be effective at increasing physical activity in a variety of age groups and clinical and non-clinical populations. The benefit is clinically important and is sustained over time. Based on the studies evaluated, there is sufficient evidence to recommend the use of activity trackers.
-
2.
Effect of Peanut Consumption on Cardiovascular Risk Factors: A Randomized Clinical Trial and Meta-Analysis.
Parilli-Moser, I, Hurtado-Barroso, S, Guasch-Ferré, M, Lamuela-Raventós, RM
Frontiers in nutrition. 2022;9:853378
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Peanuts contain bioactive substances that are beneficial for cardiovascular health. This three-arm, parallel-group randomised controlled trial (ARISTOTLE) and meta-analysis evaluated the beneficial effects of high-oleic peanuts and peanut butter in improving cardiometabolic health. Participants in the randomised controlled trial consumed 25 g of skin-roasted peanuts or 32 g of peanut butter, or a control butter made with peanut oil without fibre and polyphenols for six months. The skin-roasted peanuts group showed a reduction in total cholesterol/HDL-cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol/HDL-cholesterol ratios. The meta-analysis was highly heterogeneous in participant ethnicity, health status, peanut intervention dosage and duration. The dosage of peanuts, peanut butter and high oleic peanuts used was between 25 and 200 g/day. The participants were healthy, with metabolic syndrome (MeS), or at risk of MeS. There was a significant increase in body weight among those with or at risk of MeS. In addition, healthy participants showed reduced triglycerides, total cholesterol, and LDL-cholesterol/HDL-cholesterol ratios. Healthcare professionals can use the results of this research to understand the beneficial impact of peanut consumption on the lipid profile. However, further robust studies are required due to the high heterogeneity of the included studies in the meta-analysis.
Abstract
UNLABELLED Although numerous studies have reported the protective effect of nut consumption on cardiovascular risk, evidence for the role of peanuts in maintaining cardiometabolic health is inconclusive. Presented here are the results from the ARISTOTLE study, a parallel randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of regular peanut intake on anthropometric, biochemical, and clinical measurements. The 63 healthy subjects that completed the study consumed their habitual diet plus either: a) 25 g/day of skin roasted peanuts (SRP, n = 21), b) two tablespoons (32 g)/day of peanut butter (PB, n = 23) or c) two tablespoons (32 g)/day of a control butter based on peanut oil (CB, n = 19) for 6 months. In addition, a meta-analysis of clinical trials, including data from the ARISTOTLE study, was carried out to update the evidence for the effects of consuming peanuts, including high-oleic peanuts, and peanut butter on healthy subjects and those at high cardiometabolic risk. After a systematic search on PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Scopus databases up to July 2021, 11 studies were found to meet the eligibility criteria. In the ARISTOTLE study, lower total cholesterol/HDL-cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol/HDL-cholesterol ratios were found in the SRP group compared to the CB group (p = 0.019 and p = 0.008). The meta-analysis of clinical trials revealed that peanut consumption is associated with a decrease in triglycerides (MD: -0.13; 95% CI, -0.20 to -0.07; p < 0.0001) and that healthy consumers had lower total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol/HDL-cholesterol ratios compared to the control groups (MD: -0.40; 95% CI, -0.71 to -0.09; p = 0.01 and MD: -0.19; 95% CI, -0.36 to -0.01; p = 0.03, respectively). However, individuals at high cardiometabolic risk experienced an increase in body weight after the peanut interventions (MD: 0.97; 95% CI, 0.54 to 1.41; p < 0.0001), although not in body fat or body mass index. According to the dose-response analyses, body weight increased slightly with higher doses of peanuts. In conclusion, a regular consumption of peanuts seems to modulate lipid metabolism, reducing triglyceride blood levels. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION https://osf.io/jx34y/, identifier: 10.17605/OSF.IO/MK35Y.
-
3.
Intermittent Fasting versus Continuous Calorie Restriction: Which Is Better for Weight Loss?
Zhang, Q, Zhang, C, Wang, H, Ma, Z, Liu, D, Guan, X, Liu, Y, Fu, Y, Cui, M, Dong, J
Nutrients. 2022;14(9)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Obesity increases the risk of developing metabolic syndrome, diabetes, cardiovascular disease and associated comorbidities. Intermittent fasting (IF) and continuous calorie restriction (CCR) are fasting regimens known to reduce weight, which is at the heart of strategy in reducing obesity. IF and CCR restricts energy intake; however, CCR is harder to follow than IF. IF focuses more on time-restricted eating. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the effectiveness of IF and CCR on body mass index (BMI), body weight, and metabolism in overweight and obese participants. This research showed that IF is significantly superior to CCR in weight loss in obese people. However, there was no difference in BMI between both regimens. There was a significant difference between IF and CCR for total cholesterol, triacylglycerol, and waist circumference. Further larger long-term robust studies are required to evaluate the effectiveness of different fasting regimens due to the high heterogeneity in this research. Healthcare professionals can use the results of this study to distinguish the weight loss effects between different fasting regimens.
Abstract
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials and pilot trial studies to compare the effectiveness of intermittent fasting (IF) and continuous calorie restriction (CCR) in overweight and obese people. The parameters included body mass index (BMI), body weight, and other metabolism-related indicators. A systematic search in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was conducted up to January 2022. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to measure the effectiveness. Publication bias was assessed using Egger's test. The stability of the results was evaluated using sensitivity analyses. The significance of body weight change (SMD = -0.21, 95% CI (-0.40, -0.02) p = 0.028) was more significant after IF than CCR. There was no significant difference in BMI (SMD = 0.02, 95% CI (-0.16, 0.20) p = 0.848) between IF and CCR. These findings suggest that IF may be superior to CCR for weight loss in some respects.
-
4.
Astaxanthin Influence on Health Outcomes of Adults at Risk of Metabolic Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Leung, LY, Chan, SM, Tam, HL, Wong, ES
Nutrients. 2022;14(10)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Metabolic syndrome is a term used to describe a combination of three or more health issues that can increase the risk of cardiovascular disease by 70%. Risk factors include hypertension, hyperglycaemia, obesity, and dyslipidaemia. Astaxanthin is a powerful antioxidant that can potentially reduce the risk of metabolic syndrome. This systematic review and meta-analysis included seven double-blinded randomised controlled trials that evaluated the beneficial effects of Astaxanthin in reducing the risk factors associated with metabolic syndrome. More than eight weeks of daily ≤6 mg Astaxanthin supplementation significantly reduced systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, triglycerides, and LDL cholesterol. The therapeutic value of Astaxanthin supplementation requires long-term robust research since studies included in this study are highly heterogeneous in terms of the intervention period, the dosage of the supplements, participant health, and sample size. This study can assist healthcare professionals in understanding the beneficial effects of Astaxanthin supplements on people with metabolic syndrome.
Abstract
The use of medication is effective in managing metabolic syndrome (MetS), but side effects have led to increased attention on using nutraceuticals and supplements. Astaxanthin shows positive effects in reducing the risk of MetS, but results from individual studies are inconclusive. This systematic review summarizes the latest evidence of astaxanthin in adults with risk factors of MetS. A systematic search of English and Chinese randomized controlled trials in 14 electronic databases from inception to 30 June 2021 was performed. Two reviewers independently screened the titles and abstracts, and conducted full-text review, quality appraisal, and extraction of data. Risk of bias was assessed by PEDro. A total of 7 studies met the inclusion criteria with 321 participants. Six studies were rated to have excellent methodological quality, while the remaining one was rated at good. Results show marginal effects of astaxanthin on reduction in total cholesterol and systolic blood pressure, and a significant attenuating effect on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Further robust evidence is needed to examine the effects of astaxanthin in adults at risk of MetS.
-
5.
Effectiveness and safety of carbohydrate counting in the management of adult patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Vaz, EC, Porfírio, GJM, Nunes, HRC, Nunes-Nogueira, VDS
Archives of endocrinology and metabolism. 2018;62(3):337-345
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Glycaemic control of patients with diabetes mellitus is important because it impacts the development of diabetic complications. Carbohydrate counting is a meal planning tool that allows for great variation and flexibility in food choices among individuals with diabetes mellitus. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of carbohydrate counting in the treatment of adult patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus using a systematic literature review. The study included randomised controlled trials with at least 3 months of follow-up, and evaluation of outcomes in which patients were randomly divided into two groups. The meta-analysis showed that the final haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) - a test that shows the average blood glucose levels for the last two to three months - was significantly lower in the carbohydrate counting group than in the control group. Authors conclude that the meta-analysis showed evidence favouring the use of carbohydrate counting in the management of adult patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. However, this benefit was limited to the final HbA1c.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of carbohydrate counting (CHOC) in the treatment of adult patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM1). MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed a systematic review of randomized studies that compared CHOC with general dietary advice in adult patients with DM1. The primary outcomes were changes in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), quality of life, and episodes of severe hypoglycemia. We searched the following electronic databases: Embase, PubMed, Lilacs, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The quality of evidence was analyzed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). RESULTS A total of 3,190 articles were identified, and two reviewers independently screened the titles and abstracts. From the 15 potentially eligible studies, five were included, and 10 were excluded because of the lack of randomization or different control/intervention groups. Meta-analysis showed that the final HbA1c was significantly lower in the CHOC group than in the control group (mean difference, random, 95% CI: -0.49 (-0.85, -0.13), p = 0.006). The meta-analysis of severe hypoglycemia and quality of life did not show any significant differences between the groups. According to the GRADE, the quality of evidence for severe hypoglycemia, quality of life, and change in HbA1c was low, very low, and moderate, respectively. CONCLUSION The meta-analysis showed evidence favoring the use of CHOC in the management of DM1. However, this benefit was limited to final HbA1c, which was significantly lower in the CHOC than in the control group.