1.
A Low-FODMAP Diet Provides Benefits for Functional Gastrointestinal Symptoms but Not for Improving Stool Consistency and Mucosal Inflammation in IBD: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Peng, Z, Yi, J, Liu, X
Nutrients. 2022;14(10)
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The low-FODMAP diet eliminates carbohydrates that cannot be easily digested in order to reduce functional gastrointestinal symptoms associated with irritable bowel disease (IBD). The symptoms of irritable bowel disease include abdominal pain and bloating. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate whether a low-FODMAP diet can alleviate functional gastrointestinal symptoms in individuals with inflammatory bowel disease. In comparison with a regular diet, a low-FODMAP diet significantly reduced symptoms of bloating, wind, flatulence, abdominal pain, fatigue, and lethargy in patients with IBD. In addition, patients with Crohn's disease have achieved remission or reduced symptoms after following a low-FODMAP diet. Healthcare professionals can use this study to understand better the effects of a low-FODMAP diet on patients with IBD who have functional gastrointestinal symptoms. Further robust studies are, however, required to evaluate the evidence's robustness and identify the mechanism behind the improvement of symptoms.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- LFD use in IBD improved symptoms of bloating, wind or flatulence, borborygmi, abdominal pain, and fatigue or lethargy, but not nausea and vomiting.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
This meta-analysis assesses the efficacy of a low fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols diet (LFD) in inflammatory bowel disease [IBD: ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (UC)] participants with functional gastrointestinal symptoms (FGSs).
Methods
A search was performed on PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WanFang (Chinese) Database up to March 2022. Quality assessment of all included studies was performed.
Results
9 studies (4 randomised controlled trials, 5 non-randomised studies) with a total of 351 participants diagnosed with IBD were included, and compared LFD with a placebo diet or normal diet (ND), overall and individual
LFD Effects of FGS:
- Overall 9 studies: an improvement (0.47, 0.33–0.66, p = 0.0000)
- No difference in the subgroup classified by disease type
- CD and UC: no improvement
Individual improvement:
- Bloating (0.37, 0,24-0,57, p=0.0000); wind or flatulence (0.38, 0,28-0,51, p=0.0000); borborygmi (0.48, 0,26-0,89, p=0.0000), abdominal pain (0.5, 0,37-0,68, p=0.0000), fatigue/lethargy (0.71, 0,61-0,82, p=0.0000)
- No difference in nausea and vomiting (0.54, 0,22-1,32, p=018)
IBS Quality of Life Score:
- 2 studies: reduced Short IBD Questionnaire (SIBDQ) score (11.24, 6.61-15.87, p=0.0000)
Bristol Stool Form Chart:
- 2 studies: normal stool consistency (type 3-4); no difference (5.99, 0.17-216.51, p=0.33)
- 2 other studies: no difference (-0.17, 0.48 - 0.15, p=0.30)
Diseases activity (Harvey-Bradshaw index):
- 2 studies using the Mayo score: no difference (-32, -1,09-0.45, p=0.41)
- 3 studies using BHi score: reduction (-1.09, -1,77-0.42, p=0.002)
Faecal calprotectin:
- 2 studies: no change (-16.03, -36,78-4.73, p=0.13)
Limitations
- Comparison diets were not standardised, suggesting the potential of different dietary habits to bias results..
- Heterogeneity of included studies, and the relatively small sample size of the studies can reduce the reliability of the results.
Conclusion
While the study found inconsistent definition standards for FGS, all the nine studies showed that LFD was associated with an improvement in some symptoms.
Clinical practice applications:
- This study suggests that IBD patients with FGSs may benefit from LFD treatment with the assistance of a healthcare professional.
Considerations for future research:
- This study has shown that LFD can improve FGSs in IBD, but further research with a larger sample size and more comprehensive analysis is warranted to replicate the results.
- The description of the findings and Quality of Life data are a little unclear. The impact on Quality of Life warrants further investigation, as clinicians need to consider the impact of following a restrictive diet on Quality of Life.
Abstract
BACKGROUND A low fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols diet (LFD) is claimed to improve functional gastrointestinal symptoms (FGSs). However, the role of LFD in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients with FGSs remains unclear. OBJECTIVE To systematically assess the efficacy of LFD in IBD patients with FGSs. METHODS Six databases were searched from inception to 1 January 2022. Data were synthesized as the relative risk of symptoms improvement and normal stool consistency, mean difference of Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS), Short IBD Questionnaire (SIBDQ), IBS Quality of Life (IBS-QoL), Harvey-Bradshaw index (HBi), Mayo score, and fecal calprotectin (FC). Risk of bias was assessed based on study types. A funnel plot and Egger's test were used to analyze publication bias. RESULTS This review screened and included nine eligible studies, including four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and five before-after studies, involving a total of 446 participants (351 patients with LFD vs. 95 controls). LFD alleviated overall FGSs (RR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.33-0.66, p = 0.0000) and obtained higher SIBDQ scores (MD = 11.24, 95% CI 6.61 to 15.87, p = 0.0000) and lower HBi score of Crohn's disease (MD = -1.09, 95% CI -1.77 to -0.42, p = 0.002). However, there were no statistically significant differences in normal stool consistency, BSFS, IBS-QoL, Mayo score of ulcerative colitis, and FC. No publication bias was found. CONCLUSIONS LFD provides a benefit in FGSs and QoL but not for improving stool consistency and mucosal inflammation in IBD patients. Further well-designed RCTs are needed to develop the optimal LFD strategy for IBD.
2.
Augmenting Clinical Interventions in Psychiatric Disorders: Systematic Review and Update on Nutrition.
Offor, SJ, Orish, CN, Frazzoli, C, Orisakwe, OE
Frontiers in psychiatry. 2021;12:565583
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Mental disorders are widespread and impact significantly on health. “Nutritional psychiatry” pivots on the impact of nutrition (food) on the state of mind and mood. The aim of this study was to justify the inclusion and recognition of nutrition in the management of psychiatric illnesses. This study is a systemic review which included 97 studies. The literature shows that several foods and food compounds modulate biomarkers and molecular mechanisms involved in the aetiogenesis [the origin and development of a pathological condition] of several mental disorders. Furthermore, the evidence-based approach warrants the inclusion and co-recognition of nutrition in the management of psychiatric illnesses. Authors conclude that there is a need to advocate for policies aimed at bridging the knowledge gap and encourage the utilization and integration of nutrition in addition to contemporary therapies in clinical settings.
Abstract
There is a strong relationship between a healthy diet and mental well-being. Several foods and food compounds are known to modulate biomarkers and molecular mechanisms involved in the aetiogenesis of several mental disorders, and this can be useful in containing the disease progression, including its prophylaxis. This is an updated systematic review of the literature to justify the inclusion and recognition of nutrition in the management of psychiatric illnesses. Such foods and their compounds include dietary flavanols from fruits and vegetables, notable antioxidant and anti-inflammatory agents, probiotics (fermented foods) known to protect good gut bacteria, foods rich in polyunsaturated fatty acids (e.g., Omega-3), and avoiding diets high in saturated fats and refined sugars among others. While the exact mechanism(s) of mitigation of many nutritional interventions are yet to be fully understood, the evidence-based approach warrants the inclusion and co-recognition of nutrition in the management of psychiatric illnesses. For the greater public health benefit, there is a need for policy advocacy aimed at bridging the knowledge gap and encouraging the integration of nutritional intervention with contemporary therapies in clinical settings, as deficiencies of certain nutrients make therapy difficult even with appropriate medication.
3.
Gluten and FODMAPs Relationship with Mental Disorders: Systematic Review.
Aranburu, E, Matias, S, Simón, E, Larretxi, I, Martínez, O, Bustamante, MÁ, Fernández-Gil, MDP, Miranda, J
Nutrients. 2021;13(6)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
There is growing evidence that gluten and FODMAPs, such as fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides and polyols, can cause gastrointestinal symptoms, inflammation, and immune responses in patients with celiac disease and irritable bowel syndrome. In addition, a high intake of gluten and FODMAPs may also be associated with neurological and psychiatric disorders. Thirteen studies were included in this systematic review to examine the relationship between gluten and FODMAP consumption and illnesses affecting the central nervous system. In addition, the studies examined the effects of potential dietary strategies that consider gluten and FODMAP intake on mental disorders, anxiety, depression, schizophrenia, Alzheimer’s disease, and autism spectrum disorders. Several possible mechanisms identified in this systematic review could contribute to neurological and psychiatric disorders, including the release of proinflammatory cytokines, immune responses, gut dysbiosis, intestinal permeability, and interactions between the gut-brain axis. In patients with fibromyalgia, celiac disease, and irritable bowel syndrome, avoiding or limiting gluten may reduce depression, anxiety, and cognitive impairment. However, the effects of a low-FODMAP diet on the central nervous system are inconclusive. There is some evidence that gluten-free diets can improve cognition in schizophrenia patients. In addition, those with autism spectrum disorders may benefit from a gluten-free diet and a low-FODMAP diet. Further robust research is required to evaluate the beneficial effects of interventions that avoid or restrict the consumption of foods high in FODMAPs and gluten. However, healthcare professionals can use the results of this systematic review to understand the potential benefits of therapeutic interventions that consider the intake of FODMAPs and gluten on illnesses affecting the central nervous system and their possible mechanisms of action.
Abstract
Nowadays, gluten and FODMAP food components (fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides and polyols) are increasingly studied due to their possible relation with extraintestinal-associated conditions. In recent years, gluten-free diets (GFD) and low-FODMAP diets (LFD) are becoming more popular not only in order to avoid the food components that cause intolerances or allergies in some people, but also due to the direct influence of marketing movements or diet trends on feeding habits. Likewise, neurological and psychiatric diseases are currently of increasing importance in developed countries. For this reason, a bibliographic systematic review has been carried out to analyse whether there is a pathophysiological relationship between the dietary intake of gluten or FODMAPs with mental disorders. This review collects 13 clinical and randomized controlled trials, based on the PRISMA statement, which have been published in the last ten years. Based on these results, limiting or ruling out gluten or FODMAPs in the diet might be beneficial for symptoms such as depression, anxiety (7 out of 7 articles found any positive effect), or cognition deficiency (improvements in several cognition test measurements in one trial), and to a lesser extent for schizophrenia and the autism spectrum. Nevertheless, further studies are needed to obtain completely reliable conclusions.
4.
The Role of Diet, Eating Behavior, and Nutrition Intervention in Seasonal Affective Disorder: A Systematic Review.
Yang, Y, Zhang, S, Zhang, X, Xu, Y, Cheng, J, Yang, X
Frontiers in psychology. 2020;11:1451
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Seasonal affective disorder (SAD) is a mood disorder characterised by annual depression or bipolar disorder in a seasonal pattern. Recent evidence suggests dietary intervention and nutrition status can affect the symptoms in depressed patients, but none have specifically considered depression among SAD patients. The aim of this review was to assess the associations between diet, eating behaviour and nutrition intervention in SAD patients. Eleven studies were included and found vegetarian diet patterns and alcoholism to be associated with higher SAD prevalence. Additionally, SAD patients tend to consume larger dinners, more snacks, and show more cravings for starch-rich foods. Despite these patterns, dietary supplementation or nutrition intervention did not show benefit for SAD symptoms. Overall, the authors conclude there is a lack of evidence to draw conclusions on dietary pattern and nutritional interventions for preventing and managing SAD. The authors suggest further evidence is needed from larger controlled trials and encourage investigation of the role of the B vitamin group, rather than an isolated B12 supplementation.
Abstract
Background: Seasonal affective disorder (SAD) is a biological and mood disorder with a seasonal pattern. Dietary intervention and nutritional status have been reported to affect SAD severity. The objective of this study was to systematically review the evidence of associations between SAD and diet, eating behavior, and nutrition intervention. Methods: We performed a comprehensive search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar from inception up to July 1, 2019. Studies that examined diet and eating behaviors in SAD patients and tests of nutrition interventions for SAD were included. Two independent investigators extracted data based on study designs, participants, outcomes, exposures, and association measures. Results: Eleven studies were included: six studies examined distinctive dietary patterns and eating behaviors in SAD patients and five studies explored the efficacy of nutrition interventions for SAD. Vegetarianism and alcoholism were associated with higher SAD prevalence, but normal alcohol intake was not correlated with SAD severity. Compared with non-clinical subjects, SAD patients tended to consume significantly larger dinners and more evening snacks during weekdays and weekends and exhibit a higher frequency of binge eating, external eating, and emotional eating. Additionally, compared to healthy controls, SAD patients presented more cravings for starch-rich food and food with high fiber. However, neither the ingestion of carbohydrate-loaded meals nor Vitamin D/B12 supplementation showed benefit for SAD. Conclusion: Studies suggest that SAD patients may exhibit distinctive diet preferences and eating behaviors, but no current nutrition intervention has demonstrated efficacy for ameliorating SAD symptoms. Further evidence is needed from randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes and longer durations.