1.
Can dementia risk be reduced by following the American Heart Association's Life's Simple 7? A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis.
Wu, J, Xiong, Y, Xia, X, Orsini, N, Qiu, C, Kivipelto, M, Rizzuto, D, Wang, R
Ageing research reviews. 2023;83:101788
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The American Heart Association (AHA) has defined ideal levels of seven modifiable cardiovascular health (CVH) factors, known as Life's Simple 7, that consist of smoking, physical activity, diet, body mass index, fasting blood glucose, total cholesterol, and blood pressure. Maintaining ideal levels of these factors has been recommended as a prevention strategy against not only cardiovascular diseases but also neurodegenerative disorders, e.g., cognitive decline and dementia. However, studies exploring the beneficial effects of the AHA’s CVH metrics on cognitive outcomes, especially among older populations, have been uncertain, and solid evidence is lacking in this field. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to quantify the relationship between the AHA’s CVH metrics and cognitive outcomes. 14 longitudinal studies were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed a considerable effect of a favourable total CVH score on reduced risk of incident dementia in adults aged 70 years or older. When looking at the individual factors, dementia risk can be reduced significantly if older adults achieved the recommended level of physical activity, blood glucose, or total cholesterol. The association with smoking appeared to be borderline, and there was no association between diet, body mass index hazard ratio or blood pressure and dementia risk. The authors concluded that their findings provide evidence that maintaining a favourable level of CVH score, either in mid- or late- life, would substantially reduce the risk of dementia among older adults. Preserving cardiovascular health by quitting smoking, engaging in physical exercise, controlling blood glucose and total cholesterol might be especially effective for forestalling cognitive decline and dementia.
Abstract
This study aimed to quantify the relationships between the American Heart Association (AHA) Cardiovascular Health (CVH) metrics, namely AHA Life's Simple 7, and cognitive outcomes. We searched PubMed and Embase (January 1, 2010-August 24, 2022) and finally included 14 longitudinal studies (311654 participants with 8006 incident dementia cases). Random-effects meta-analysis and one-stage linear mixed-effects models were performed. Increased CVH score seemed to associate with decreased risk of incident dementia in a linear manner, but this relationship varied by the measurement age of CVH metrics. That is, midlife CVH tended to have a linear association with late-life dementia risk, whereas a J-shaped association was observed between the late-life CVH score and dementia. In addition, late-life dementia risk was reduced significantly if individuals maintained an ideal level of AHA's CVH guidelines of physical activity, fasting plasma glucose, total cholesterol, and smoking. However, our meta-analysis did not show a significant association between CVH score and global cognitive decline rate. Following AHA's CVH guidelines and maintaining CVH at an optimal level would substantially reduce the late-life dementia risk. More research is required to explore the link between a favorable CVH score and cognitive trajectories among cognitively asymptomatic older populations.
2.
Cognitive behavioral therapy for lifestyle changes in patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kurnik Mesarič, K, Pajek, J, Logar Zakrajšek, B, Bogataj, Š, Kodrič, J
Scientific reports. 2023;13(1):12793
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are two of the most common chronic diseases and lifestyle modification, including diet, exercise and weight management, are recognised as important for prevention. Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) has been shown to contribute to lifestyle modification. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect of CBT, compared to no intervention/standard care only, in patients with obesity and/or T2DM, with a focus on health outcomes and implementation of changes long-term. Nine randomised controlled trials (RCT) with 902 participants were included in this meta-analysis. The health outcomes included weight loss and maintenance and glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c, a measure of blood glucose control) whilst the lifestyle changes included diet, physical activity, smoking, and compliance with treatments. There was a statistically significant benefit of CBT for weight loss and weight maintenance (based on 3 RCTs each) with a medium effect size, but no significant effect on HbA1c (based on 3 RCTs). In all 3 RCTs that evaluated depression, a significant benefit was observed. As the behavioural outcomes were too heterogenous to be pooled for a meta-analysis, they were reviewed in a descriptive manner only. Benefits were reported in terms of better dietary choices/reduced energy intake, increased physical activity, better adherence to medication and glucose monitoring as well as a reduction in smoking. The authors suggest that CBT appears to be moderately effective in promoting lifestyle modifications and weight loss.
Abstract
The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the contribution of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) to the implementation of lifestyle changes, considering health-related and behavioral outcomes. A systematic literature review was performed using multiple databases (PsycInfo, PubMed and MEDLINE). The inclusion criteria comprised randomised controlled trials of CBT for lifestyle changes in patients with obesity and/or type 2 diabetes. The quality of study reporting was assessed with the revised Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool. A meta-analysis was conducted on studies with appropriate outcomes. Nine randomised controlled trials, with a total sample size of 902 participants, met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis has shown a medium, significant effect size of CBT interventions for weight loss and weight maintenance, and a low, non-significant effect size of CBT interventions for reducing glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels. A separate, combined, meta-analysis for all nine calculated effect sizes has yielded a medium and significant overall effect size for the model. Our review of the studies about the effectiveness of CBT in implementing lifestyle changes has, in comparison to usual control groups, proven the efficacy of CBT interventions in implementing lifestyle changes, especially for weight loss and weight maintenance.
3.
An updated systematic review and meta-analysis on adherence to mediterranean diet and risk of cancer.
Morze, J, Danielewicz, A, Przybyłowicz, K, Zeng, H, Hoffmann, G, Schwingshackl, L
European journal of nutrition. 2021;60(3):1561-1586
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
The development of cancer is associated with a number of risk factors, including smoking, obesity, sedentary lifestyles, alcohol consumption, infections, pollution, and dietary imbalances. Based on previous research, optimal consumption of fruits, vegetables, and whole grains, along with reduced consumption of red and processed meat, reduces cancer risk. According to this systematic review and meta-analysis, adherence to the Mediterranean diet is associated with lower cancer mortality and site-specific cancer development. A Mediterranean diet includes fruits, vegetables, nuts, legumes, fish, whole grains, extra virgin olive oil, and low amounts of red meat, processed meat, egg, and dairy, along with moderate amounts of red wine. According to this systematic review and meta-analysis, adherence to the Mediterranean diet reduces the risk of cancer mortality and the risk of developing cancers specific to the site, such as colorectal cancer, bladder cancer, gastric cancer, and lung cancer. Among the components of the Mediterranean diet, fruits, vegetables, and whole grains have been shown to reduce cancer risk. Bioactive substances found in Mediterranean diet components require additional robust studies to evaluate their benefits. A healthcare professional can use the results of this study to make clinical decisions and recommend therapeutic interventions to cancer patients.
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of current systematic review was to update the body of evidence on associations between adherence to the Mediterranean diet (MedDiet) and risk of cancer mortality, site-specific cancer in the general population; all-cause, and cancer mortality as well as cancer reoccurrence among cancer survivors. METHODS A literature search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), case-control and cohort studies published up to April 2020 was performed using PubMed and Scopus. Study-specific risk estimates for the highest versus lowest adherence to the MedDiet category were pooled using random-effects meta-analyses. Certainty of evidence from cohort studies and RCTs was evaluated using the NutriGrade scoring system. RESULTS The updated search revealed 44 studies not identified in the previous review. Altogether, 117 studies including 3,202,496 participants were enclosed for meta-analysis. The highest adherence to MedDiet was inversely associated with cancer mortality (RRcohort: 0.87, 95% CI 0.82, 0.92; N = 18 studies), all-cause mortality among cancer survivors (RRcohort: 0.75, 95% CI 0.66, 0.86; N = 8), breast (RRobservational: 0.94, 95% CI 0.90, 0.97; N = 23), colorectal (RRobservational: 0.83, 95% CI 0.76, 0.90; N = 17), head and neck (RRobservational: 0.56, 95% CI 0.44, 0.72; N = 9), respiratory (RRcohort: 0.84, 95% CI 0.76, 0.94; N = 5), gastric (RRobservational: 0.70, 95% CI 0.61, 0.80; N = 7), bladder (RRobservational: 0.87, 95% CI 0.76, 0.98; N = 4), and liver cancer (RRobservational: 0.64, 95% CI 0.54, 0.75; N = 4). Adhering to MedDiet did not modify risk of blood, esophageal, pancreatic and prostate cancer risk. CONCLUSION In conclusion, our results suggest that highest adherence to the MedDiet was related to lower risk of cancer mortality in the general population, and all-cause mortality among cancer survivors as well as colorectal, head and neck, respiratory, gastric, liver and bladder cancer risks. Moderate certainty of evidence from cohort studies suggest an inverse association for cancer mortality and colorectal cancer, but most of the comparisons were rated as low or very low certainty of evidence.
4.
Prevalence, Severity and Mortality associated with COPD and Smoking in patients with COVID-19: A Rapid Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Alqahtani, JS, Oyelade, T, Aldhahir, AM, Alghamdi, SM, Almehmadi, M, Alqahtani, AS, Quaderi, S, Mandal, S, Hurst, JR
PloS one. 2020;15(5):e0233147
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
This meta-analysis reviewed 15 studies covering a total of 2473 confirmed COVID-19 patients to summarise the potential risk factors for smokers and patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), a dysfunction of the lung associated with limitation in airflow. They found that neither COPD or smoking increased the initial risk of contracting COVID-19 with only 2% and 9% respectively of the cases falling into these categories. However, both groups had increased risk of developing more servere forms of COVID-19 requiring hospitalisation, admission to Intensive Care Units (ICU), mechanical ventilation, and ultimately death, with a much higher mortality rate of 60% versus other patients. Current smokers were also shown to have double the risk of complications versus ex-smokers. The most severe cases were generally in the older age brackets, with coexisting comorbidities and a hypothesized greater amount of lung damage. Both groups showed signs of acute inflammation and had a much slower recovery compared to non-smokers and patients without COPD. Despite the low prevalence of these groups contracting COVID-19, these people should be considered vulnerable because of the severity of symptoms and greater burden on healthcare.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an evolving infectious disease that dramatically spread all over the world in the early part of 2020. No studies have yet summarized the potential severity and mortality risks caused by COVID-19 in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and we update information in smokers. METHODS We systematically searched electronic databases from inception to March 24, 2020. Data were extracted by two independent authors in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Study quality was assessed using a modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. We synthesized a narrative from eligible studies and conducted a meta-analysis using a random-effects model to calculate pooled prevalence rates and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). RESULTS In total, 123 abstracts were screened and 61 full-text manuscripts were reviewed. A total of 15 studies met the inclusion criteria, which included a total of 2473 confirmed COVID-19 patients. All studies were included in the meta-analysis. The crude case fatality rate of COVID-19 was 7.4%. The pooled prevalence rates of COPD patients and smokers in COVID-19 cases were 2% (95% CI, 1%-3%) and 9% (95% CI, 4%-14%) respectively. COPD patients were at a higher risk of more severe disease (risk of severity = 63%, (22/35) compared to patients without COPD 33.4% (409/1224) [calculated RR, 1.88 (95% CI, 1.4-2.4)]. This was associated with higher mortality (60%). Our results showed that 22% (31/139) of current smokers and 46% (13/28) of ex-smokers had severe complications. The calculated RR showed that current smokers were 1.45 times more likely [95% CI: 1.03-2.04] to have severe complications compared to former and never smokers. Current smokers also had a higher mortality rate of 38.5%. CONCLUSION Although COPD prevalence in COVID-19 cases was low in current reports, COVID-19 infection was associated with substantial severity and mortality rates in COPD. Compared to former and never smokers, current smokers were at greater risk of severe complications and higher mortality rate. Effective preventive measures are required to reduce COVID-19 risk in COPD patients and current smokers.
5.
Environmental Factors and the Risk of Brain Tumours in Young People: A Systematic Review.
Zumel-Marne, A, Castano-Vinyals, G, Kundi, M, Alguacil, J, Cardis, E
Neuroepidemiology. 2019;53(3-4):121-141
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Brain tumours (BT) are the second most common cancer type in children and young adults. The aim of this study was to review and summarize the scientific literature about exposure to environmental factors and BT risk. This study is a systematic review of 70 articles of which 69% (n = 49) had >200 cases recruited. Results indicate a possible association between exposure to heavy metals, passive smoking, water and air pollutants, use of pesticides and living on a farm with farm animals, meat consumption during preconception, pregnancy or early infancy and an increased risk of BT in children and young adults. Authors conclude that larger scale studies with better exposure assessment are needed to evaluate possible associations between environmental risk factors and BT in young people.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Brain tumours (BT) are one of the most frequent tumour types in young people, although little is known about their risk factors. OBJECTIVE The objective of the current work was to review and summarize the scientific literature concerning exposure to environmental factors and BT risk in young people (<25 years old). METHODS PUBMED, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, IME-Biomedina (bibliographic database of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas) and Web of science databases were searched. A score to assess the quality of the methodological information was created. RESULTS Some possible associations between BT risk in young people were reported for cadmium, consumption of well water, presence of nitrate or nitrate-nitrogen in tap water, mother's passive smoking, air pollution, parental handling of pesticides at home and/or professional pesticide treatment within houses, living on a farm and/or with farm animals, some parental occupations and high amount of meat consumption. CONCLUSIONS Although many of the studies reviewed suggest associations between the environmental exposures and BT in children and young adults, at present no reliable conclusion can be drawn as most results are based on small number of cases and exposure assessment is limited. Large-scale studies with better exposure assessment are needed to shed light on these possible associations, especially on exposure to heavy metals, tab water consumption, pesticides and parental smoking.