-
1.
Treating asthma patients with probiotics: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Xie, Q, Yuan, J, Wang, Y
Nutricion hospitalaria. 2023;40(4):829-838
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Asthma is a common chronic inflammatory respiratory disease, with high morbidity and mortality. Recently, the efficacy of probiotics in allergic diseases has received special attention. Experiments have shown that probiotics have a clear effect on allergic diseases. The aim of this study was to study the efficacy of probiotics in the treatment of asthma and evaluate it, so as to provide a reference for the selection of treatment options for asthma patients. This study was a systematic review and meta-analysis of ten randomised controlled trials. Results showed that probiotics can improve symptoms and airway inflammation in patients with asthma, reduce acute exacerbation of asthma, and have no significant improvement in lung function. Authors concluded that the use of probiotics in patients with asthma can improve lung inflammation and asthma symptoms, as well as reduce the number of asthma attacks.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the role of probiotics in the treatment of asthma patients by meta-analysis. Methods: PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and other databases were searched by computer, and the relevant literature on the treatment of asthma by probiotics that met the inclusion criteria was screened by manual retrieval. Meta-analysis was performed using Revman 5.4 software and the combined effect was evaluated by odds ratio (OR) or mean difference (MD) and 95 % confidence interval (CI). Results: a total of ten references were included, all of which were randomized controlled studies, and a total of 1,101 people were investigated. Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) (MD = -7.17, 95 % CI: -12.81, -1.54), asthma symptom severity (MD = -0.07, 95 % CI: -0.10, -0.04), Childhood Asthma Control Test (CACT) (MD = 2.26, 95 % CI: 1.14, 3.39), and the number of acute episodes of asthma (OR = 0.30, 95 % CI: 0.19, 0.47) in the probiotics group were better than those in the control group. There was no significant difference in forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) (MD = 0.11, 95 % CI: -0.05, 0.26) and FEV1/FVC (%) (MD = 0.32, 95 % CI: -1.48, 2.12). Conclusion: the use of probiotics in patients with asthma can improve lung inflammation and asthma symptoms, reduce the number of asthma attacks, and have no effect on lung function. Objetivo: evaluar el papel de los probióticos en el tratamiento de pacientes con asma mediante metaanálisis. Métodos: se realizaron búsquedas informáticas en PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science y otras bases de datos, y se examinó la literatura relevante sobre el tratamiento del asma con probióticos que cumplía con los criterios de inclusión mediante recuperación manual. El metaanálisis se realizó con el software Revman 5.4 y el efecto combinado se evaluó mediante la razón de probabilidades (OR) o diferencia media (MD) y el intervalo de confianza (IC) del 95 %. Resultados: se incluyó un total de diez referencias, todas ellas estudios controlados aleatorios, y se investigó un total de 1.101 personas. El óxido nítrico exhalado (FeNO) (MD = -7,17, IC 95 %: -12,81, -1,54), la gravedad de los síntomas del asma (MD = -0,07, IC 95 %: -0,10, -0,04), la Prueba de Control del Asma (CACT-ACT) (MD = 2,26, IC 95 %: 1,14, 3,39) y el número de episodios agudos de asma (OR = 0,30, IC 95 %: 0,19, 0,47) en el grupo de probióticos fueron mejores que en el grupo de control. No hubo diferencia significativa en volumen espiratorio forzado en el primer segundo (FEV1) (DM = 0,11, IC 95 %: -0,05, 0,26) y FEV1/FVC (%) (DM = 0,32, IC 95 %: -1,48, 2,12). Conclusión: el uso de probióticos en pacientes con asma puede mejorar la inflamación pulmonar y los síntomas del asma, reducir el número de ataques de asma y no tener efecto sobre la función pulmonar.
-
2.
Effects of probiotics on preventing caries in preschool children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Meng, N, Liu, Q, Dong, Q, Gu, J, Yang, Y
The Journal of clinical pediatric dentistry. 2023;47(2):85-100
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Caries are caused by cariogenic microorganisms in plaque biofilms that ferment dietary carbohydrates to produce acids, resulting in the loss of minerals from the hard tissue of teeth and the formation of cavities. This study's aim was to evaluate the potential of probiotics in preventing caries in preschool children. This study was a systematic review and meta-analysis of seventeen studies with a total of 3781 preschool children (divided into an experimental group (n = 2047) and a control group (n = 1734)). Results showed that probiotics could effectively prevent dental caries, of which Lactobacillus rhamnosus was more effective than other bacteria in preventing dental caries. Probiotics reduced the high concentration of Streptococcus mutans in saliva but could not reduce the number of lactic acid bacteria in saliva and dental plaques. Authors concluded that since there is still a lack of relevant research on the dose, route of administration, and frequency of probiotic use, further randomised controlled studies are needed to standardise the use of probiotics and achieve more beneficial effects before they are generally used in clinical practice.
Abstract
This paper systematically evaluate the effects of probiotics on preventing caries in preschool children. The present systematic review was conducted following the Transparent Reporting of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and recorded in the International prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) database (registration no: CRD42022325286). Literature were screened from PubMed, Embase, Web of Sciences, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang and other databases from inception to April 2022 to identify randomized controlled trials on the clinical efficacies of probiotics in preventing dental caries in preschool children and extract relevant data. The meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan5.4 software and the Stata16. Cochrane handbook was used to assess the risk of bias. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADEprofiler 3.6) was used to determine the evidence quality. A total of 17 randomized controlled trials were eligible, of which two trials had certain levels of bias and 15 had a low risk of bias. Evidence quality assessment showed that the included trials were of medium quality. The meta-analysis results showed that Lactobacillus rhamnosus was associated with a reduced incidence (p = 0.005) and progression (p < 0.001) of caries in preschool children. Probiotics could reduce the number of high-level Streptococcus mutans in saliva (p < 0.00001) but could not reduce the number of Streptococcus mutans in dental plaque nor the amount of Lactobacillus in the saliva and dental plaque. Current evidence shows that probiotics could prevent caries in preschool children, but Lactobacillus rhamnosus was more effective in preventing caries than others. Although probiotics could reduce high levels of Streptococcus mutans in saliva, they could not reduce the amount of Lactobacillus in saliva and dental plaque.
-
3.
Probiotics and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in children and adolescents: a systematic review.
Avelar-Rodríguez, D, Peña-Vélez, R, Popov, J, Hill, L, Ryan, PM
Revista espanola de enfermedades digestivas. 2023;115(8):418-427
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), as a direct result of the escalating childhood obesity epidemic, is a significant public health issue globally. NAFLD is the most common cause of chronic liver disease in the paediatric population. The aim of this study was to assess the quality of evidence currently available for the use of microbial therapies (i.e., prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics) in the treatment of NAFLD in children with obesity. This study was a systematic review and meta-analysis of five randomised controlled studies. Results showed that although there is a range of promising effects on both clinical and biochemical parameters, significant interstudy discrepancies reduce reliability and generalisability of these results. Authors concluded there is insufficient evidence to support the beneficial role of probiotics and synbiotics in the treatment of pediatric NAFLD given the substantial degree of discordance amongst the available trials.
Abstract
BACKGROUND non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in childhood is an increasing global public health issue with significant long-term consequences. NAFLD management mainly consists of lifestyle modifications, however, adjunct pharmacological therapies are currently lacking. Gut microbiota manipulation via probiotics may alter the course of pediatric NAFLD. The objective of this systematic review was to synthesize all the available literature on the use of probiotics in children and adolescents with NAFLD. METHODS PubMed, EBSCOhost, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched for trials on the use of probiotics in pediatric NAFLD. A quantitative DerSimonian Laird random effects meta-analysis was performed when possible; otherwise, a narrative summary of the study outcomes was presented and discussed. A separate search was completed to include all the ongoing registered trials on probiotics use in pediatric NAFLD. RESULTS five randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. Of these, four trials were included in the final quantitative analysis. Probiotic therapy significantly reduced the levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (mean difference: -10.39 [-19.85, -0.93]), however significant heterogeneity between studies was identified (I2, 93 %). CONCLUSIONS there is insufficient evidence to support probiotics in the treatment of pediatric NAFLD given the substantial degree of discordance amongst the available trials. Lifestyle modifications focusing on maintaining a normal BMI and regular exercise continue to be the gold standard approach to treating NAFLD in children.
-
4.
Effects of probiotics on neurocognitive outcomes in infants and young children: a meta-analysis.
Lin, FL, Chen, CM, Sun, CK, Cheng, YS, Tzang, RF, Chiu, HJ, Wang, MY, Cheng, YC, Hung, KC
Frontiers in public health. 2023;11:1323511
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
There have been increasing investigations into the use of probiotics for treating a variety of neurodevelopmental disorders and also for improvement of neurocognitive outcomes in preterm infants or children. The aim of this study was to provide updated evidence of the therapeutic effects of probiotics on enhancing different neurocognitive functions in infants and children as well as to identify important factors that may influence their treatment efficacies. This study was a meta-analysis of nine randomised controlled studies with 3,026 participants. Results did not show significantly better neurocognitive outcomes in those receiving probiotic treatments than those in the placebo group. However, significantly better neurocognitive development was noted in the probiotic group when focusing on studies that used probiotics for more than six months. Authors concluded that further investigations into the enhancement of therapeutic effects of probiotics on neurocognitive development is required since current evidence is still not strong enough to rule out the beneficial effects of probiotics on neurocognitive development.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Therapeutic efficacies of probiotics in improving neurocognitive functions in infants and young children remained unclear. This meta-analysis focused on different cognitive outcomes in this population. METHODS Major databases were searched electronically from inception to October 2023 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the therapeutic efficacy of probiotics in enhancing cognitive functions assessed by standardized tasks. The overall effect size was calculated as standardized mean difference (SMD) based on a random effects model. RESULTS Nine RCTs with 3,026 participants were identified. Both our primary and secondary results demonstrated no significant difference in neurocognitive outcomes between infants/children treated with probiotics and those receiving placebos. However, our subgroup analysis of studies that offered a probiotics treatment course of over six months demonstrated a significantly better neurocognitive outcome than placebos (SMD = 0.21, p = 0.03, two studies with 451 participants), but this finding was based on only two RCTs. CONCLUSION Despite lack of significant therapeutic effects of probiotics on neurocognitive outcomes, our finding of a positive impact of probiotics on neurocognitive development in those undergoing treatment for over six months may provide an important direction for further investigations into the enhancement of therapeutic effects of probiotics on neurocognitive development in infants and young children. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42023463412.
-
5.
Effects of probiotic administration on overweight or obese children: a meta-analysis and systematic review.
Li, Y, Liu, T, Qin, L, Wu, L
Journal of translational medicine. 2023;21(1):525
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The prevalence of overweight or obesity in children is increasing due to changes in dietary structure and exercise habits, as determined by the body mass index (BMI) calculated from height and weight. Childhood obesity can cause some clinical complications such as hypertension, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), and cardiovascular disease. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of probiotics on eight factors in children with overweight or obesity. This study was a systematic review and meta-analysis of four studies with a total of 206 overweight or obesity children. Among them, 105 were in the probiotic group, and 101 were in the placebo group. Results showed that probiotics can improve high- and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, adiponectin, leptin, and TNF-α in overweight or obese children. The systematic review showed that probiotics work mainly by reshaping disturbed intestinal microbiota, regulating lipid metabolism, reducing inflammation and immune response, playing a positive effect of short-chain fatty acids produced, alleviating oxidative stress and endoplasmic reticulum stress, and inhibiting the growth and reproduction of pathogens in the gut. Authors concluded that probiotics could regulate lipid metabolism and immune response to some degree in children with overweight or obesity.
Abstract
BACKGROUND This paper aimed to examine the effects of probiotics on eight factors in overweight or obese children by meta-analysis, namely, body mass index (BMI), total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), adiponectin, leptin and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and summarize the mechanisms of action of probiotics based on the existing researches. METHODS Six databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, SinoMed and CNKI) were searched until March 2023. Review Manager 5.4 was used for meta-analysis. The data were analysed using weighted mean differences (WMDs) or standardized mean differences (SMDs) under a fixed effect model or random effect model to observe the effects of probiotic administration on the included indicators. RESULTS Four publications with a total of 206 overweight or obesity children were included. According to the meta-analysis, probiotics were able to significantly decrease the levels of HDL-C (MD, 0.06; 95% CI 0.03, 0.09; P = 0.0001), LDL-C (MD, - 0.06; 95% CI - 0.12, - 0.00; P = 0.04), adiponectin (MD, 1.39; 95% CI 1.19, 1.59; P < 0.00001), leptin (MD, - 2.72; 95% CI - 2.9, - 2.54; P < 0.00001) and TNF-α (MD, - 4.91; 95% CI - 7.15, - 2.67; P < 0.0001) compared to those in the placebo group. Still, for BMI, the palcebo group seemed to be better than the probiotic group (MD, 0.85; 95% CI 0.04, 1.66; P = 0.04). TC (MD, - 0.05; 95% CI - 0.12, 0.02; P = 0.14) and TG (MD, - 0.16; 95% CI - 0.36, 0.05; P = 0.14) were not different between two groups. CONCLUSIONS This review drew that probiotics might act as a role in regulating HDL-C, LDL-C, adiponectin, leptin and TNF-α in overweight or obesity children. Additionally, our systematic review yielded that probiotics might regulate lipid metabolism and improve obese associated symptoms by some paths. This meta-analysis has been registered at PROSPERO with ID: CRD42023408359.
-
6.
The effect of probiotics on gestational diabetes and its complications in pregnant mother and newborn: A systematic review and meta-analysis during 2010-2020.
Mahdizade Ari, M, Teymouri, S, Fazlalian, T, Asadollahi, P, Afifirad, R, Sabaghan, M, Valizadeh, F, Ghanavati, R, Darbandi, A
Journal of clinical laboratory analysis. 2022;36(4):e24326
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Gestational diabetes (GD) refers to glucose intolerance in pregnant women at 24–28 weeks without a history of diabetes that results in hyperglycaemia. Some studies suggest that probiotics are able to overcome insulin resistance in pregnant women with GD. The aim of this study was to investigate the inhibitory effects of probiotics supplementation on GD among pregnant women based on Randomized Controlled Trial studies during in the last 10 years (2010–2020). This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of 28 studies. The age range of the pregnant women following the probiotics treatment was 18–40 years. Results show that taking probiotic supplements during pregnancy by women with GD has beneficial effects on the metabolic status, colostrum adiponectin levels, microbiome composition, and the maternal and infant health. However, 4 of the analysed studies did not find any significant effect for the probiotic intervention on the incidence of GD. Authors conclude that more homogeneous studies are needed to generalize the findings of this study. Thus, specific probiotic supplementation may be introduced as one of the adjuvant therapies for GD patients.
Abstract
This study was aimed to evaluate the effect of probiotics consumption on gestational diabetes (GD) and its complications in pregnant mother and newborn. The study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021243409) and all the enrolled articles were collected from four databases (Medline, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar) as randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from 2010 to 2020. A total of 4865 study participants from 28 selected studies were included in this review. The present meta-analysis showed that the consumption of probiotics supplementation has the potential to decrease GD-predisposing metabolic parameters such as blood glucose level, lipid profile, inflammation, and oxidative markers which may reduce GD occurrence among pregnant women.
-
7.
The Clinical, Microbiological, and Immunological Effects of Probiotic Supplementation on Prevention and Treatment of Periodontal Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Gheisary, Z, Mahmood, R, Harri Shivanantham, A, Liu, J, Lieffers, JRL, Papagerakis, P, Papagerakis, S
Nutrients. 2022;14(5)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Periodontal disease is preventable and reversible in its early stages; however, it can progress to chronic, irreversible states with significant destruction of the tooth-supporting tissues. The cause of periodontal disease is multifactorial with modifiable risk factors, including smoking, unhealthy diet (e.g., a western diet with high sugars and saturated fats), poor oral hygiene, hormonal changes, stress, various medications, and poorly managed comorbidities (e.g., type 2 diabetes), while non-modifiable risk factors include age, sex, and genetics. The aim of this study was to assess the effects on the clinical, microbiological, and immunological outcomes related to periodontal disease prevention and management. This study is systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials involving adults with periodontal diseases or healthy volunteers receiving probiotic supplementation (control groups did not receive probiotic supplementation). Results show that probiotic supplementation improved the clinical parameters, reduced the subgingival bacterial counts of specific periodontopathogens, and reduced the gingival crevicular fluid levels of some proinflammatory mediators in periodontal disease patients. Authors conclude that further research is required to better assess the therapeutic and preventive value of probiotic supplementation in patients with gingivitis (early disease), as well as in healthy (without periodontal disease) individuals.
Abstract
(1) Background: Periodontal diseases are a global health concern. They are multi-stage, progressive inflammatory diseases triggered by the inflammation of the gums in response to periodontopathogens and may lead to the destruction of tooth-supporting structures, tooth loss, and systemic health problems. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effects of probiotic supplementation on the prevention and treatment of periodontal disease based on the assessment of clinical, microbiological, and immunological outcomes. (2) Methods: This study was registered under PROSPERO (CRD42021249120). Six databases were searched: PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Dentistry and Oral Science Source. The meta-analysis assessed the effects of probiotic supplementation on the prevention and treatment of periodontal diseases and reported them using Hedge's g standardized mean difference (SMD). (3) Results: Of the 1883 articles initially identified, 64 randomized clinical trials were included in this study. The results of this meta-analysis indicated statistically significant improvements after probiotic supplementation in the majority of the clinical outcomes in periodontal disease patients, including the plaque index (SMD = 0.557, 95% CI: 0.228, 0.885), gingival index, SMD = 0.920, 95% CI: 0.426, 1.414), probing pocket depth (SMD = 0.578, 95% CI: 0.365, 0.790), clinical attachment level (SMD = 0.413, 95% CI: 0.262, 0.563), bleeding on probing (SMD = 0.841, 95% CI: 0.479, 1.20), gingival crevicular fluid volume (SMD = 0.568, 95% CI: 0.235, 0.902), reduction in the subgingival periodontopathogen count of P. gingivalis (SMD = 0.402, 95% CI: 0.120, 0.685), F. nucleatum (SMD = 0.392, 95% CI: 0.127, 0.658), and T. forsythia (SMD = 0.341, 95% CI: 0.050, 0.633), and immunological markers MMP-8 (SMD = 0.819, 95% CI: 0.417, 1.221) and IL-6 (SMD = 0.361, 95% CI: 0.079, 0.644). (4) Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that probiotic supplementation improves clinical parameters, and reduces the periodontopathogen load and pro-inflammatory markers in periodontal disease patients. However, we were unable to assess the preventive role of probiotic supplementation due to the paucity of studies. Further clinical studies are needed to determine the efficacy of probiotic supplementation in the prevention of periodontal diseases.
-
8.
Infectious complications following probiotic ingestion: a potentially underestimated problem? A systematic review of reports and case series.
Costa, RL, Moreira, J, Lorenzo, A, Lamas, CC
BMC complementary and alternative medicine. 2018;18(1):329
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
This article is a systematic review of case reports and case series published between 1976 and 2018, evaluating serious infections in the context of probiotic intake. The authors found 67 articles, 60 case reports and 7 case series, corresponding to 93 patients. Whilst they believe that these cases represent only a small proportion of existing cases, they also point out that the proportion of cases of infectious complications is small when the total number of people who use probiotics is considered. Fungemia was the most commonly observed complication, with 37.6% of the cases, sepsis was identified in 31.2% patients; bacteraemia was responsible for 20.4% of cases, followed by endocarditis and abscess, with 4 and 3 cases, respectively. Of the fungal complications, 50.5% were due to Saccharomyces spp., Lactobacillus spp. were the etiologic agents in 26 and Bifidobacterium in 12 cases of infectious complications. Infectious complications were more likely in the elderly, children under 1 (especially premature babies), and patients with central venous access or receiving enteral or parenteral nutrition. Immunosuppressive medication was reported in 15% of patients and antibiotic use in 43%. All-cause mortality was 19.6%. The authors conclude that the use of probiotics cannot be considered risk free and should be carefully evaluated for high-risk groups of patients.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is studied about complications related to probiotic ingestion. This study proposes to present a synthesis and critical evaluation of the reports and series of cases on the infectious complications related to the ingestion of probiotics, which can raise awareness for the prescribing and use of probiotics for certain groups of patients. METHODS Systematic review of reports and series of cases researched in the PubMed, SciELO and Scopus databases published until August 2018. The references of the articles were investigated manually for the search of cross references. SPSS version 23.0 was used for descriptive statistics and univariate analysis. RESULTS We found 60 case reports and 7 case series, making up a total of 93 patients. Fungemia was the most common infectious complications with 35 (37.6%) cases. The genus Saccharomyces was the most frequent with 47 (50.6%) cases, followed by Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Bacillus, Pedioccocus and Escherichia with 26 (27.9%), 12 (12.8%), 5 (5.4%), 2 (2.2%) and 1 (1.1%) case, respectively. Adults over 60 years of age, Clostridium difficile colitis, antibiotic use and Saccharomyces infections were associated with overall mortality. HIV infections, immunosuppressive drugs, solid organ transplantation, deep intravenous lines, enteral or parenteral nutrition were not associated with death. CONCLUSION The use of probiotics cannot be considered risk-free and should be carefully evaluated for some patient groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION CRD42016042289.