-
1.
Laboratory features of severe vs. non-severe COVID-19 patients in Asian populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ghahramani, S, Tabrizi, R, Lankarani, KB, Kashani, SMA, Rezaei, S, Zeidi, N, Akbari, M, Heydari, ST, Akbari, H, Nowrouzi-Sohrabi, P, et al
European journal of medical research. 2020;25(1):30
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak started in December 2019 in China has spread sharply all over the world. Apart from the clinical symptoms and pulmonary computed tomography findings, a large number of COVID-19 confirmed patients showed laboratory fluctuations. The aim of this study was to quantify the results of previously published studies, comparing the laboratory fluctuations, and some new combined inflammatory laboratory tests in severe/critical versus non-severe confirmed infected cases of COVID-19. This study is a systemic review and meta-analysis which included 22 studies with a total of 3396 patients who were classed into two groups: 720 in severe and 2676 in non-severe groups. Results showed that the results of complete blood count test, liver and kidney function tests, inflammatory/infection markers, serum electrolytes and glucose were significantly different between severe and non-severe cases of COVID-19. In fact, there was significant decreased levels of certain types of white blood cells (lymphocyte, monocyte, eosinophil), haemoglobin, and platelet, whereas elevated neutrophil [white blood cell] counts among the complete blood count indices in severe vs. non-severe patients. Authors conclude that further well-methodologically designed studies from other populations are strongly recommended.
Abstract
BACKGROUND More severe cases of COVID- 19 are more likely to be hospitalized and around one-fifth, needing ICU admission. Understanding the common laboratory features of COVID-19 in more severe cases versus non-severe patients could be quite useful for clinicians and might help to predict the model of disease progression. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the laboratory test findings in severe vs. non-severe confirmed infected cases of COVID-19. METHODS Electronic databases were systematically searched in PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar from the beginning of 2019 to 3rd of March 2020. Heterogeneity across included studies was determined using Cochrane's Q test and the I2 statistic. We used the fixed or random-effect models to pool the weighted mean differences (WMDs) or standardized mean differences and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). FINDINGS Out of a total of 3009 citations, 17 articles (22 studies, 21 from China and one study from Singapore) with 3396 ranging from 12 to1099 patients were included. Our meta-analyses showed a significant decrease in lymphocyte, monocyte, and eosinophil, hemoglobin, platelet, albumin, serum sodium, lymphocyte to C-reactive protein ratio (LCR), leukocyte to C-reactive protein ratio (LeCR), leukocyte to IL-6 ratio (LeIR), and an increase in the neutrophil, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), total bilirubin, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine (Cr), erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), Procalcitonin (PCT), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), fibrinogen, prothrombin time (PT), D-dimer, glucose level, and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in the severe group compared with the non-severe group. No significant changes in white blood cells (WBC), Creatine Kinase (CK), troponin I, myoglobin, IL-6 and K between the two groups were observed. INTERPRETATION This meta-analysis provides evidence for the differentiation of severe cases of COVID-19 based on laboratory test results at the time of ICU admission. Future well-methodologically designed studies from other populations are strongly recommended.
-
2.
The role of cytokine profile and lymphocyte subsets in the severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Akbari, H, Tabrizi, R, Lankarani, KB, Aria, H, Vakili, S, Asadian, F, Noroozi, S, Keshavarz, P, Faramarz, S
Life sciences. 2020;258:118167
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Literature shows that lymphopenia [reduced level of the blood cell lymphocyte] and cytokine release syndrome are among the characteristics caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) - the new infectious Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). The main aims of this study were (a) to analyse the different characteristics of cytokine levels, lymphocyte subsets, complete blood count (CBC) indices, and a number of infection-related factors between mild/moderate and severe/critical patients, and (b) to screen out suitable indicators for the prediction of the disease severity in order to provide some insight into the subsequent clinical interventions. This study is a systemic review and meta-analysis of 50 studies (44 articles) with a total of 7865 patients including 2286 in the severe group and 5579 in the non-severe group. Results demonstrated a significant lymphopenia in severe/critical infected cases compared to mild/moderate COVID-19 ones across 46 studies. The severity of COVID-19 has also a significant, positive association with a number of infection related factors (such as C-reactive protein) and ferritin levels. Moreover, with respect to CBC indices, the findings revealed significantly higher levels in white blood cells and neutrophil, while lower lymphocyte and monocyte levels in severe than in non-severe confirmed COVID-19 patients. Authors conclude that it is essential that clinicians have access to reliable quick pathogen tests and feasible differential diagnoses based on the clinical descriptions in their first contact with suspected patients.
Abstract
AIMS: This study aimed to make a comparison between the clinical laboratory-related factors, complete blood count (CBC) indices, cytokines, and lymphocyte subsets in order to distinguish severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases from the non-severe ones. MATERIALS AND METHODS Relevant studies were searched in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases until March 31, 2020. Cochrane's Q test and the I2 statistic were used to determine heterogeneity. We used the random-effect models to pool the weighted mean differences (WMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). KEY FINDINGS Out of a total of 8557 initial records, 44 articles (50 studies) with 7865 patients (ranging from 13 to 1582), were included. Our meta-analyses with random-effect models showed a significant decrease in lymphocytes, monocyte, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, CD3 cells, CD19 cells, and natural killer (NK) cells and an increase in the white blood cell (WBC), neutrophils, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), C-reactive protein (CRP)/hs-CRP, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), ferritin, procalcitonin (PCT), and serum amyloid A (SAA), interleukin-2 (IL-2), IL-2R, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and interferon-gamma (INF-γ) in the severe group compared to the non-severe group. However, no significant differences were found in IL-1β, IL-17, and CD4/CD8 T cell ratio between the two groups. SIGNIFICANCE Decrease in total lymphocytes and lymphocyte subsets as well as the elevation of CRP, ESR, SAA, PCT, ferritin, and cytokines, but not IL-1β and IL-17, were closely associated with COVID-19 severity, implying reliable indicators of severe COVID-19.
-
3.
Long-term clinical outcomes in survivors of severe acute respiratory syndrome and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus outbreaks after hospitalisation or ICU admission: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ahmed, H, Patel, K, Greenwood, DC, Halpin, S, Lewthwaite, P, Salawu, A, Eyre, L, Breen, A, O'Connor, R, Jones, A, et al
Journal of rehabilitation medicine. 2020;52(5):jrm00063
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Alongside acute challenges, the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) outbreaks resulted in significant long-term clinical problems for survivors, with implications for rehabilitation services and healthcare utilization. The aim of this study was to determine the long-term clinical complications for survivors of SARS and MERS after hospitalization and intensive care unit admission. This study is a systemic review and meta-analysis which included a total of 28 studies in the systematic review and 23 in the meta-analysis. Results indicate that health-related quality of life, measured using SF-36, was considerably reduced in survivors at 6 months post-infection, and showed only slight improvement beyond 6 months. Health-related quality of life of survivors remained below that of the normal population and of those with chronic conditions. Authors conclude that clinicians should monitor the survivors of COVID-19 for the range of physical and mental health impairments in order to manage these patients appropriately.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine long-term clinical outcomes in survivors of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) coronavirus infections after hospitalization or intensive care unit admission. DATA SOURCES Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL Plus, and PsycINFO were searched. STUDY SELECTION Original studies reporting clinical outcomes of adult SARS and MERS survivors 3 months after admission or 2 months after discharge were included. DATA EXTRACTION Studies were graded using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine 2009 Level of Evidence Tool. Meta-analysis was used to derive pooled estimates for prevalence/severity of outcomes up to 6 months after hospital discharge, and beyond 6 months after discharge. DATA SYNTHESIS Of 1,169 identified studies, 28 were included in the analysis. Pooled analysis revealed that common complications up to 6 months after discharge were: impaired diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (prevalence 27%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 15–45%); and reduced exercise capacity (mean 6-min walking distance 461 m, CI 450–473 m). The prevalences of post-traumatic stress disorder (39%, 95% CI 31–47%), depression (33%, 95% CI 20–50%) and anxiety (30%, 95% CI 10–61) beyond 6 months after discharge were considerable. Low scores on Short-Form 36 were identified beyond 6 months after discharge. CONCLUSION Lung function abnormalities, psychological impairment and reduced exercise capacity were common in SARS and MERS survivors. Clinicians should anticipate and investigate similar long-term outcomes in COVID-19 survivors.
-
4.
Enhancing immunity in viral infections, with special emphasis on COVID-19: A review.
Jayawardena, R, Sooriyaarachchi, P, Chourdakis, M, Jeewandara, C, Ranasinghe, P
Diabetes & metabolic syndrome. 2020;14(4):367-382
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
A healthy immune system is one of the most important weapons in relation to the current pandemic of COVID-19 where no effective preventive and curative medicine is available. The main aim of this study was to evaluate the evidence on enhancing immunity in viral infections. This review focuses on influenza-like viral infections; however, other studies on viral infections have also been included. It included 43 articles of which 13 were on vitamins, 8 on minerals, 18 on nutraceuticals and 4 on probiotics. Results indicate that: - vitamin supplementation, especially vitamin D may be beneficial in people who are either deficient or insufficient. - adverse effects of vitamin E supplementation on the immune response have been reported. - there are several beneficial nutraceuticals, however their efficacy and safety depend on their ingredients, as well as various other factors including, methods of extraction. - in addition to basic hygienic practices, proper dietary and lifestyle behaviours are essential for prevention and treatment of respiratory viral diseases. Authors conclude that achieving recommended amounts of calories and micronutrient will be a challenge and elective micronutrient supplementations may be beneficial especially for vulnerable populations such as the elderly.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Balanced nutrition which can help in maintaining immunity is essential for prevention and management of viral infections. While data regarding nutrition in coronavirus infection (COVID-19) are not available, in this review, we aimed to evaluate evidence from previous clinical trials that studied nutrition-based interventions for viral diseases (with special emphasis on respiratory infections), and summarise our observations. METHODS A systematic search strategy was employed using keywords to search the literature in 3 key medical databases: PubMed®, Web of Science® and SciVerse Scopus®. Studies were considered eligible if they were controlled trials in humans, measuring immunological parameters, on viral and respiratory infections. Clinical trials on vitamins, minerals, nutraceuticals and probiotics were included. RESULTS A total of 640 records were identified initially and 22 studies were included from other sources. After excluding duplicates and articles that did not meet the inclusion criteria, 43 studies were obtained (vitamins: 13; minerals: 8; nutraceuticals: 18 and probiotics: 4). Among vitamins, A and D showed a potential benefit, especially in deficient populations. Among trace elements, selenium and zinc have also shown favourable immune-modulatory effects in viral respiratory infections. Several nutraceuticals and probiotics may also have some role in enhancing immune functions. Micronutrients may be beneficial in nutritionally depleted elderly population. CONCLUSIONS We summaries possible benefits of some vitamins, trace elements, nutraceuticals and probiotics in viral infections. Nutrition principles based on these data could be useful in possible prevention and management of COVID-19.
-
5.
Chinese herbal medicine for coronavirus disease 2019: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Xiong, X, Wang, P, Su, K, Cho, WC, Xing, Y
Pharmacological research. 2020;160:105056
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Coronavirus- 2019 (COVID-19) infection, the cause of a global pandemic, can lead to respiratory failure and death. Whilst no specific antiviral drugs or vaccines were available in the early stages of the outbreak, in China Chinese Herbal Medicine (CHM) had been widely used since the beginning. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the efficacy of CHM to conventional Western medicine treatments for COVID-19 infections, involving 2275 patients from 18 trials. The outcome suggested that the use of CHM exhibited many positive effects on the course of the disease, including fever severity, length of hospital stay, cough, fatigue, anti-inflammatory markers and lung imaging, therefore presenting a promising treatment for reducing the severity and duration of the disease, whilst having little to no side effects. The trials included various formulations predominantly based on traditional Chinese herbal medicine, with the therapeutic principles of ‘dispelling cold’, ‘relieving exterior’, ‘dissipating phlegm’, ‘clearing away heat’, ‘invigorating spleen’, and ‘replenishing qi’. In the included trials a total of 100 different herbs were identified. The five most frequently used herbs being Liquorice Root (Glycyrrhiza spp.), Baikal Skullcap Root (Scutellaria baicalensis), Pinellia Rhizome (Pinelliae tematae), Forsythia Fruit (Forsythia suspensa), and Bitter Apricot Seed (Armeniacae amarum). The treatment course ranged from 5 to 15 days and the most common dosage were tea preparations. The authors describe the meta-analysis as one of the larger ones conducted so far and briefly discuss some of the therapeutic effects and mechanisms of the herbs most used. This meta-analysis yields evidence for alternative strategies in the support and management of COVID-19 infections.
Abstract
Currently, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which can lead to severe respiratory failure and death, is now a global pandemic with no specific anti-viral drugs or vaccines. However, It is worth noting that traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), especially Chinese herbal medicine (CHM), has been widely applied in mainland China since outbreak, bringing new hope for the prevention and control of COVID-19. A comprehensive literature searching was conducted in 7 electronic databases from their inception up to June 21, 2020 to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CHM for COVID-19. Eighteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 2275 patients were enrolled. Most of CHMs were originated from classical Chinese herbal formulas. Liquoric Root (Gancao, Radix Glycyrrhizae), Baical Skullcap Root (Huangqin, Radix Scutellariae Baicalensis), Pinellia Rhizome (Banxia, Rhizoma Pinelliae Tematae), Forsythia Fruit (Lianqiao, Fructus Forsythiae Suspensae), and Bitter Apricot Seed (Kuxingren, Semen Armeniacae Amarum) were most frequently used Chinese herbs. The most commonly used dosage formulation was decoction. Our meta-analyses found that comparing CHM group and conventional western medicine group, CHM group has improvements in several clinical parameters including lung CT, clinical cure rate, ranging from mild to critical cases, length of hospital stay, total score of clinical symptoms, fever reduction time, symptom score of fever, number of cough reduction cases, symptom score of cough, number of fatigue reduction cases, symptom score of fatigue, disappearing time of fatigue, TCM syndrome, viral nucleic acid testing, and inflammatory biomarkers (C-reactive protein). Besides, no severe adverse effects was identified by CHM. CHM, especially classical Chinese herbal formulas, could be used as potential candidates for COVID-19 in this battle.
-
6.
Potential causal factors of CFS/ME: a concise and systematic scoping review of factors researched.
Muller, AE, Tveito, K, Bakken, IJ, Flottorp, SA, Mjaaland, S, Larun, L
Journal of translational medicine. 2020;18(1):484
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Chronic fatigue syndrome /myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME) is complex and probably triggered by several interconnected factors and the identification of these is essential to develop better treatments and preventative measures. This systematic scoping review of 1161 studies aimed to discuss potential causal factors of CFS/ME. The results showed that there were several main causal factors that were investigated in the literature and no single factor dominated the research; immunological, psychological/psychosocial/socioeconomic, infectious, and neuroendocrinal/hormonal/metabolic. Studies varied in their design and methods. Interestingly research in this area was at its highest before 1995 and from 2015-2019, studies have markedly decreased. It was concluded that large variations in methods and design of studies of causal factor studies, is problematic. More large, well designed studies are required especially as research has declined recently and considering post covid-19 fatigue. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand where there are gaps in the research to design more robust studies in the future.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME) is understood as a complex condition, likely triggered and sustained by an interplay of biological, psychological, and social factors. Little oversight exists of the field of causal research. This systematic scoping review explores potential causal factors of CFS/ME as researched by primary studies. METHODS We searched eight databases for primary studies that examined potential causal factors of CFS/ME. Based on title/abstract review, two researchers independently sorted each study's factors into nine main categories and 71 subordinate categories, using a system developed with input given during a 2018 ME conference, specialists and representatives from a ME patient advocacy group, and using BMJ Best Practice's description of CFS/ME etiology. We also extracted data related to study design, size, diagnostic criteria and comparison groups. RESULTS We included 1161 primary studies published between January 1979 and June 2019. Based on title/abstract analysis, no single causal factor dominated in these studies, and studies reported a mean of 2.73 factors. The four most common factors were: immunological (297 studies), psychological (243), infections (198), and neuroendocrinal (198). The most frequent study designs were case-control studies (894 studies) comparing CFS/ME patients with healthy participants. More than half of the studies (that reported study size in the title/abstract) included 100 or fewer participants. CONCLUSION The field of causal hypotheses of CFS/ME is diverse, and we found that the studies examined all the main categories of possible factors that we had defined a priori. Most studies were not designed to adequately explore causality, rather to establish hypotheses. We need larger studies with stronger study designs to gain better knowledge of causal factors of CFS/ME.
-
7.
Exercise and Nutrition Interventions in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer during Curative Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Bye, A, Sandmael, JA, Stene, GB, Thorsen, L, Balstad, TR, Solheim, TS, Pripp, AH, Oldervoll, LM
Nutrients. 2020;12(11)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Head and neck cancers (HNCs) comprises malignancies of the oral cavity, throat, larynx, salivary glands as well as nasal and paranasal sinuses. Surgery and radiotherapy (RT), sometimes combined with chemotherapy (CT) are the main treatment approaches. The aim of this study was to examine current evidence for nutritional interventions alone, physical exercise interventions alone and interventions combining nutrition and physical exercise during RT treatment for patients with HNCs. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of thirteen randomised controlled studies. Findings show that nutrition and physical exercise interventions have a positive effect on body composition and physical function for patients with HNCs undergoing RT (+/- concomitant CT) with a curative intent. Authors conclude that due to the pilot and feasibility design of the studies combining physical exercise and nutrition, no conclusions can be drawn concerning the effects from these studies.
Abstract
The aim of this meta-analysis was to examine the effects of nutritional and physical exercise interventions and interventions combining these interventions during radiotherapy treatment for patients with head and neck cancer on body composition, objectively measured physical function and nutritional status. Systematic electronic searches were conducted in MEDLINE (PubMed interface), EMBASE (Ovid interface), CINAHL (EBSCO interface) and Cochrane Library (Wiley interface). We identified 13 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that included 858 patients. For body composition, using only nutrition as intervention, a significant difference between treatment and control group were observed (SMD 0.42 (95CI 0.23-0.62), p < 0.001). Only pilot RCTs investigated combination treatment and no significant difference between the treatment and control groups were found (SMD 0.21 (95CI -0.16-0.58), p = 0.259). For physical function, a significant difference between treatment and control group with a better outcome for the treatment group were observed (SMD 0.78 (95CI 0.51-1.04), p < 0.001). No effects on nutritional status were found. This meta-analysis found significantly positive effects of nutrition and physical exercise interventions alone in favor of the treatment groups. No effects in studies with combined interventions were observed. Future full-scaled RCTs combining nutrition and physical exercise is warranted.
-
8.
Nutritional Interventions in the Management of Fibromyalgia Syndrome.
Pagliai, G, Giangrandi, I, Dinu, M, Sofi, F, Colombini, B
Nutrients. 2020;12(9)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Fibromyalgia (FM) is a chronic pain condition, often presenting with widespread body pain, joint stiffness, sleep disorders, depression, anxiety, gastrointestinal and cognitive complaints. Despite being common, the cause of FM is not well understood. In the absence of effective treatments, the current management of FM involves a multidisciplinary approach utilizing pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions. Growing evidence suggests a role for nutrition as a complementary strategy for FM management. This brief review summarises the possible impact of nutritional supplements and dietary interventions on FM. Previous reviews concluded that vitamin and mineral deficiencies themselves are unlikely to be significant in the development of FM. Yet, a few interventional studies investigating the use of Vitamin D, magnesium, iron and probiotics showed promising results. To date, there is no or limited evidence for the use of Vitamin C, E, selected amino acids, botanical or antioxidant supplements. Food-wise the inclusion of quality olive oil and the grain Khorasan proved helpful on FM presentation, whilst findings around the role of dietary monosodium glutamate and aspartame seem mixed. Regarding diet patterns, gluten-free, low-calorie, vegetarian, vegan, raw food or Mediterranean diets were all associated with improvement of symptoms. Equally a FODMAP diet can aid FM associated digestive complaints due to the significant overlap of Irritable Bowel Syndrome with FM. The authors concluded that the clinical application of dietary supplements in the management of FM remains controversial. Yet, dietary interventions appear to be an effective tool in the management of FM. Since various diet interventions demonstrated benefits, dietary adequacy and weight loss may be most critical from a clinical perspective.
Abstract
Fibromyalgia (FM) is a multifactorial syndrome of unknown etiology, characterized by widespread chronic pain and various somatic and psychological manifestations. The management of FM requires a multidisciplinary approach combining both pharmacological and nonpharmacological strategies. Among nonpharmacological strategies, growing evidence suggests a potential beneficial role for nutrition. This review summarizes the possible relationship between FM and nutrition, exploring the available evidence on the effect of dietary supplements and dietary interventions in these patients. Analysis of the literature has shown that the role of dietary supplements remains controversial, although clinical trials with vitamin D, magnesium, iron and probiotics' supplementation show promising results. With regard to dietary interventions, the administration of olive oil, the replacement diet with ancient grains, low-calorie diets, the low FODMAPs diet, the gluten-free diet, the monosodium glutamate and aspartame-free diet, vegetarian diets as well as the Mediterranean diet all appear to be effective in reducing the FM symptoms. These results may suggest that weight loss, together with the psychosomatic component of the disease, should be taken into account. Therefore, although dietary aspects appear to be a promising complementary approach to the treatment of FM, further research is needed to provide the most effective strategies for the management of FM.
-
9.
Dietary Interventions in the Management of Fibromyalgia: A Systematic Review and Best-Evidence Synthesis.
Lowry, E, Marley, J, McVeigh, JG, McSorley, E, Allsopp, P, Kerr, D
Nutrients. 2020;12(9)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) is a complex multifaceted condition with chronic widespread pain as the most common symptom. Currently there is no standard diagnostic process nor treatment protocol for individuals diagnosed with FMS as symptoms and co-morbidities vary widely among individuals. Since most dietary advice regarding FMS has been anecdotal, this review evaluates the impact of dietary changes on symptoms related to fibromyalgia and discusses the potential mechanisms by which nutrition could help reduce symptoms. This review included 22 studies that found pain to be significantly improved after the consumption of chlorella green algae, a vegan diet, a low FODMAP diet, coenzyme Q10 and acetyl-L-carnitine. Outcome measures aside from pain were inconclusive. Overall, the authors found insufficient evidence to soundly recommend a specific nutritional intervention for the management of fibromyalgia. They suggest further research is needed that include improved study design, larger sample sizes and measurements of oxidative stress and inflammatory biomarkers.
Abstract
Fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) is characterised by chronic widespread pain alongside fatigue, poor sleep quality and numerous comorbidities. It is estimated to have a worldwide prevalence of 1.78%, with a predominance in females. Treatment interventions for fibromyalgia have limited success, leading to many patients seeking alternative forms of treatment, including modifications to their diet and lifestyle. The effectiveness of dietary changes in fibromyalgia has not been widely researched or evaluated. This systematic review identified twenty-two studies, including 18 randomised control trials (RCTs) and four cohort studies which were eligible for inclusion. In total these studies investigated 17 different nutritional interventions. Significant improvements in reported pain were observed for those following a vegan diet, as well as with the low fermentable oligo di-mono-saccharides and polyols (FODMAP) diets. Supplementation with Chlorella green algae, coenzyme Q10, acetyl-l-carnitine or a combination of vitamin C and E significantly improved measures of pain. Interpretation of these studies was limited due to the frequent poor quality of the study design, the wide heterogeneity between studies, the small sample size and a high degree of bias. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to recommend any one particular nutritional intervention for the management of fibromyalgia and further research is needed.
-
10.
Dietary Patterns and Interventions to Alleviate Chronic Pain.
Dragan, S, Șerban, MC, Damian, G, Buleu, F, Valcovici, M, Christodorescu, R
Nutrients. 2020;12(9)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
A common symptom of many conditions is pain, with chronic pain being a significant cause of emotional distress and disability. Chronic pain is associated with a pro-inflammatory state. Diet interventions can be a helpful tool for the management of chronic pain and its associated inflammation. The increase of nutrient-dense, antioxidant-rich foods and the reduction of pro-inflammatory foods, as well as correcting nutrient deficiencies, all appear to have a positive effect on pain. Whilst previous research on the impact of diet therapy in chronic pain yielded varied results, the authors of this article sought to analyse the most important literature to gain more clarity and direction for future research. After a detailed introduction on the different types of pain, the article summarises the outcome of a range of dietary interventions for chronic pain management. These include calorie restriction and fasting, polyunsaturated fatty acids, low-fat plant-based diets, high protein diet, elimination diet, antioxidants and vitamins including vitamin D, fruits and fibres, prebiotics and probiotics. In the discussion, a helpful table presents the key results organised by type of pain (chronic musculoskeletal pain, chronic headache, neuropathic pain, chronic abdominal pain) and the clinical interventions that showed positive outcomes. In conclusion, diet interventions could be part of a multidisciplinary approach in the management of chronic pain. This article yields an oversight of the possible interventions to consider when supporting people with different types of chronic pain.
Abstract
Pain is one of the main problems for modern society and medicine, being the most common symptom described by almost all patients. When pain becomes chronic, the life of the patients is dramatically affected, being associated with significant emotional distress and/or functional disability. A complex biopsychosocial evaluation is necessary to better understand chronic pain, where good results can be obtained through interconnected biological, psychological, and social factors. The aim of this study was to find the most relevant articles existent in the PubMed database, one of the most comprehensive databases for medical literature, comprising dietary patterns to alleviate chronic pain. Through a combined search using the keywords "chronic pain" and "diet" limited to the last 10 years we obtained 272 results containing the types of diets used for chronic pain published in the PubMed database. Besides classical and alternative methods of treatment described in literature, it was observed that different diets are also a valid solution, due to many components with antioxidant and anti-inflammatory qualities capable to influence chronic pain and to improve the quality of life. Thirty-eight clinical studies and randomized controlled trials are analyzed, in an attempt to characterize present-day dietary patterns and interventions to alleviate chronic pain.