1.
Long COVID: An overview.
Raveendran, AV, Jayadevan, R, Sashidharan, S
Diabetes & metabolic syndrome. 2021;15(3):869-875
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19) is a major pandemic resulting in considerable mortality and morbidity worldwide. For some people who recover from COVID-19, symptoms persist or new ones develop for weeks or months after infection despite testing PCR negative. This is termed long-COVID or post-COVID syndrome and divided into two stages: post-acute-COVID with symptoms extending beyond three weeks, and chronic-COVID with symptoms extending beyond 12 weeks. Factors that increase the risk for long-COVID include being female, age, having more than five symptoms in the acute stage of infection and pre-existing health conditions. A mild disease course is not exclusive to long-COVID. Typically affected by long-COVID are the pulmonary or cardiovascular system, with neuropsychiatric presentations also being reported. Common symptoms are one or more of the following such as fatigue, breathlessness, cough, chest pain, heart racing, headache, joint pain, muscle pain and weakness, insomnia, pins and needles, diarrhoea, rash, hair loss, impaired balance, neurocognitive issues. Due to the novelty of the virus, the underline pathophysiology of long-COVID still requires further investigation. Contributing factors mentioned include: compromised body functions after illness and inactivity, organ damage, persistent inflammation, altered immune response and auto-antibody generation and viral persistence. The impact of medication, treatments, hospitalisation or associated post-traumatic stress is also urged to be accounted for. Diagnosis of long-COVID is made by thorough history taking, clinical examination and the exclusion of other conditions. For the management of long-COVID, the authors in this review suggest the sub-categorisation depending on the body system most affected to optimize treatment options. Furthermore, it is encouraged that medical treatment should also consider the monitoring for worsening of any pre-existing health conditions post-infection. This review yields a informative summary of the definition, symptom presentations, risk factors, diagnosis and medical treatment options relating to long-COVID.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Long COVID is the collective term to denote persistence of symptoms in those who have recovered from SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS WE searched the pubmed and scopus databases for original articles and reviews. Based on the search result, in this review article we are analyzing various aspects of Long COVID. RESULTS Fatigue, cough, chest tightness, breathlessness, palpitations, myalgia and difficulty to focus are symptoms reported in long COVID. It could be related to organ damage, post viral syndrome, post-critical care syndrome and others. Clinical evaluation should focus on identifying the pathophysiology, followed by appropriate remedial measures. In people with symptoms suggestive of long COVID but without known history of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, serology may help confirm the diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS This review will helps the clinicians to manage various aspects of Long COVID.
2.
Safety and efficacy of alpha-lipoic acid oral supplementation in the reduction of pain with unknown etiology: A monocentric, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.
Esposito, C, Ugo Garzarella, E, Santarcangelo, C, Di Minno, A, Dacrema, M, Sacchi, R, Piccinocchi, G, Piccinocchi, R, Daglia, M
Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie. 2021;144:112308
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The management of pain with no apparent cause, or idiopathic pain, is a real challenge. In the absence of any underlying disease that is treatable, idiopathic pain is usually addressed by relieving symptomatic pain with medication. Whereby these medications can be fast and effective, they can have limited benefits and, in some cases, considerable side effects. Alpha-lipoic acid (ALA) is a food supplement and naturally occurring compound in humans, animals and plants. Previous research suggested that it is effective in managing diabetic nerve pain. As reactive oxygen species and antioxidants appear to play a role in pain regulation, the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of ALA are of interest here. In addition, ALA has a strong safety record. This study sought to investigate the safety and effectiveness of ALA in non-diabetic individuals who were diagnosed with idiopathic pain. 210 male and female subjects, from age 18-75, who were non-diabetic and on no pain medication were randomly assigned to receive either a placebo or 400 mg/day or 800 mg/day of ALA over a course of two months. The pain was tracked with two pain scoring questionnaires, whilst blood samples were monitored for adverse effects, including blood sugar, kidney and liver markers. The ALA intervention group showed a significant reduction in both pain scores compared to placebo. Treated subjects showed a marginal decrease in blood sugars of no clinical significance and no other adverse effects were reported. The authors concluded that ALA as a food supplement has suitable potential for the management of idiopathic pain. And given its safety and efficacy compared to commonly used pain medication it could be of interest in clinical application.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Extensive evidence suggests that alpha-lipoic acid (ALA) is effective in diabetic neuropathy pain management. However, little is known on its safety and efficacy in reducing idiopathic pain in normoglycemic subjects. The aim of this study was to evaluate ALA food supplement safety and efficacy in the reduction of different forms of idiopathic pain. METHODS Two-hundred and ten normoglycemic adults suffering from idiopathic pain (i.e. 57 subjects with primitive neuropathic pain, 141 subjects with arthralgia with unknown etiology, and 12 subjects with idiopathic myalgia) were randomized to receive placebo, 400 mg/day, or 800 mg/day of ALA. Participants underwent two visits (at baseline = t0, and after 2 months = t1) in which two validated questionaries for pain (numerical rating scale [NRS] and visual analogue scale [VAS]) were collected; fasting blood glucose assessment, adverse effects, and renal and hepatic toxicity were also monitored. RESULTS At t1, none of subjects treated with ALA reported a decreased glycemia or adverse effects. The treated subjects showed a significant reduction in NRS (p < 0.001) while the placebo group did not show any NRS reduction (p = 0.86). Similar results were also obtained for VAS. Statistical analysis aimed at detecting possible differences in NRS and VAS scores among treatment groups based on the source of pain did not reveal any significant effect. CONCLUSIONS Since the management of idiopathic pain is challenging for physicians, the use of ALA food supplements could be a feasible option, based on its safety and efficacy compared to commonly-used analgesic drugs.