1.
Flavonoid intake and bone health.
Weaver, CM, Alekel, DL, Ward, WE, Ronis, MJ
Journal of nutrition in gerontology and geriatrics. 2012;(3):239-53
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Flavonoids, found in a wide diversity of plant foods from fruits and vegetables, herbs and spices, essential oils, and beverages, have the most potential of dietary components for promotion of bone health beyond calcium and vitamin D. Recent epidemiological studies show flavonoid consumption to have a stronger association with bone than general fruit and vegetable consumption. Bioactive flavonoids are being assessed for properties beyond their chemical antioxidant capacity, including anti-inflammatory actions. Some have been reported to enhance bone formation and to inhibit bone resorption through their action on cell signaling pathways that influence osteoblast and osteoclast differentiation. Future research is needed to determine which of the flavonoids and their metabolites are most effective and at what dose, as well as the mechanism of modulating cellular events, in order to set priorities for clinical trials.
2.
Botanicals for age-related diseases: from field to practice.
Weaver, CM, Barnes, S, Wyss, JM, Kim, H, Morré, DM, Morré, DJ, Simon, JE, Lila, MA, Janle, EM, Ferruzzi, MG
The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2008;(2):493S-7S
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
The Purdue-University of Alabama Botanicals Research Center for Age Related Disease joins novel technologies to study the bioavailability of bioactive polyphenolic constituents and their relation to health. Many diseases that manifest with age relate to oxidative stress and tissue damage. Our goal is to follow the fate of bioactive constituents from a complex mixture to the organ affected by the disease and relate that to a protective mechanism. Equally important is to screen commercially available botanicals for their efficacy and safety. Botanicals and their relation to bone antiresorptive capacity, cognitive function, vascular effects, and cancer are principal themes in our center.
3.
Rebalancing bone turnover in favour of formation with strontium ranelate: implications for bone strength.
Fonseca, JE
Rheumatology (Oxford, England). 2008;(Suppl 4):iv17-19
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
This review updates our current knowledge on the mechanism of action of strontium ranelate and analyses the way it rebalances bone turnover and how it influences bone biomechanics. Strontium ranelate is able to increase pre-osteoblast replication, osteoblast differentiation, collagen type I synthesis and bone matrix mineralization probably through a calcium-sensing receptor (CaR)-dependent mechanism. Paralleling this anabolic effect there is inhibition of osteoclast differentiation and activity mediated by an increase in osteoprotegerin (OPG) and a decrease in RANK ligand (RANKL). The overall effect is a rebalanced bone turnover in favour of improved bone geometry, cortical thickness, trabecular bone morphology and intrinsic bone tissue quality, which translates into enhanced bone strength.
4.
Preventing osteoporotic fractures with antiresorptive therapy: implications of microarchitectural changes.
Boonen, S, Haentjens, P, Vandenput, L, Vanderschueren, D
Journal of internal medicine. 2004;(1):1-12
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Prospective studies have demonstrated that low bone mass correlates well with increased risk of osteoporotic fractures at various skeletal sites. Trials have likewise confirmed that enhancing bone mass with antiresorptive therapy reduces fracture incidence in individuals at risk. However, correlation of bone mineral density (BMD) increases with therapeutic risk reduction has proved less consistent than correlation of BMD decreases with greater fracture risk in the untreated. Indeed, various analyses have indicated that - even during treatment with potent bisphosphonates like alendronate and risedronate - BMD changes from baseline account for <30% of the reduction in vertebral fractures in treated women. It is clearly, therefore, that factors other than BMD are involved in the reduction of fracture risk achieved by antiresorptive therapies. According to recent micro-computed tomography imaging and other studies, antiresorptive therapy can help rebuild the microarchitecture of bone as well as strengthen the materials that go into it. When treating individuals with osteoporosis, these microarchitectural changes contribute to the reduction of fracture risk achieved by antiresorptive therapies.
5.
The clinical use of bone resorption markers in patients with malignant bone disease.
Coleman, RE
Cancer. 2002;(10):2521-33
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advanced tumors often metastasize to bone, resulting in a variety of skeletal complications. Bisphosphonates are potent inhibitors of osteoclast-mediated bone resorption that reduce the incidence and delay the onset of skeletal complications and reduce the need for radiation and surgery. Biochemical markers of bone resorption have been identified that can augment the imaging techniques used to diagnose bone metastases and assess response to bisphosphonate therapy. METHODS In the current study, the available literature regarding bone resorption markers is reviewed and the clinical relevance of these data with respect to the treatment of bone metastases discussed. RESULTS Urinary calcium and hydroxyproline have been widely used to assess bone metabolism, but do not appear to be well correlated with clinical outcome in patients with bone metastases. Several unique breakdown products of Type I collagen (including pyridinium crosslinks, pyridinoline, and deoxypyridinoline) and peptide-bound crosslinks (N-telopeptide and C-telopeptide) are more specific and sensitive markers of bone resorption. N-telopeptide and C-telopeptide have been identified as the most sensitive biochemical markers currently available for detecting bone metastases and for assessing response to therapy or disease progression. CONCLUSIONS To the author's knowledge markers of bone resorption have not yet been recommended for routine clinical use. However, further research is needed to define their potential role in the diagnosis of bone metastases, the assessment of disease progression and response to bisphosphonate therapy, and predict the rate of bone loss and the potential for fracture. Suppression of bone resorption markers in response to bisphosphonate therapy appears to correlate with clinical outcome in patients with both osteolytic and blastic bone lesions; therefore, the goal of bisphosphonate therapy should be to suppress markers of bone resorption.